On Wed, 16 May 2018, Zach van Rijn wrote:
So conclusively, the file on the website should be left intact.
The best conclusions are the ones that end up with us doing nothing! =B)
I don't know how complicated this feature is to implement for other
TLS backends than openssl (and its siblings b
On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 00:51 +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2018, Zach van Rijn wrote:
>
> > ...
>
> I think that as long as nobody reports a problem with them
> being left as-is we can just let them be. Unless someone feels
> an urge to dig in and figure out what the "right" way f
On Wed, 16 May 2018, Zach van Rijn wrote:
two entries (lines 1171 and 2638 respectively) have comments that are in
UTF-8, which I noticed today, pasted below for reference:
...
Should these be converted [via 'mk-ca-bundle'], ignored [leave the file
as-is] or some other option?
I think that