Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 16:17:13, cyg Simple wrote: 5 sec * 2300 packages = 11,500 sec 11,500 sec is 3.19 hours > Which in a build like FFmpeg or similar, is statistically 0. > 1 package once in a while doesn't matter. > So perhaps you have some data to show a non-trivial amount of time saved >

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/21/2017 3:26 PM, Steven Penny wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 13:29:43, cyg Simple wrote: >> Changing the default does improve the speed of configure because >> configure no longer needs to execute GCC to figure out where the build >> files are.  Yes the time saved is small but time is

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 13:29:43, cyg Simple wrote: Changing the default does improve the speed of configure because configure no longer needs to execute GCC to figure out where the build files are. Yes the time saved is small but time is expensive so any saving is a big deal, especially with such

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/20/2017 6:47 PM, Steven Penny wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:53:28, cyg Simple wrote: >> I appreciate what Yaakov does but I bet these are not built in native >> Cygwin mode so a host must be supplied.  In native mode the default is >> typically used and currently it doesn't match the

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:53:28, cyg Simple wrote: I appreciate what Yaakov does but I bet these are not built in native Cygwin mode so a host must be supplied. In native mode the default is typically used and currently it doesn't match the expected host environment. Really this discussion boils

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-20 14:53, cyg Simple wrote: > I appreciate what Yaakov does but I bet these are not built in native > Cygwin mode so a host must be supplied. In native mode the default is > typically used and currently it doesn't match the expected host environment. You lose the bet. Every single

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/20/2017 1:41 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 20/10/2017 17:44, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/20/2017 11:24 AM, > >> Why is it different?  Give a reason not just >> some lame excuse. > > This is extremely rude, in my opinion. > Thanks for your opinion. I reworded most of my original text in

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/20/2017 2:44 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2017-10-20 11:41, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> On 20/10/2017 17:44, cyg Simple wrote: >>> On 10/20/2017 11:24 AM, >>> Why is it different? Give a reason not just some lame excuse. >> This is extremely rude, in my opinion. > > He's not asking the

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/20/2017 2:34 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/20/2017 11:11 AM, cyg Simple wrote: > > I may regret joining this thread, but here goes. > But thanks for doing so anyway. >>> Your assumption is that the default and chosen triplets must/should be >>> one and the same. >> >> No, I assume no

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-20 11:41, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 20/10/2017 17:44, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/20/2017 11:24 AM, >> Why is it different? Give a reason not just some lame excuse. > This is extremely rude, in my opinion. He's not asking the question he needs answered and is getting exasperated. >

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/20/2017 11:11 AM, cyg Simple wrote: I may regret joining this thread, but here goes. >> Your assumption is that the default and chosen triplets must/should be >> one and the same. > > No, I assume no such thing. > >> They are not, they need not be, and we are far from >> being alone in

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 20/10/2017 17:44, cyg Simple wrote: On 10/20/2017 11:24 AM, Why is it different? Give a reason not just some lame excuse. This is extremely rude, in my opinion. Yaakov has been extremely patient with you but you are always disregarding our point of view, that only shows us that you

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/20/2017 12:11 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/20/2017 11:54 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-20 10:44, cyg Simple wrote: >>> On 10/20/2017 11:24 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2017-10-20 08:28, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/19/2017 4:33 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> 2) the

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/20/2017 11:54 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-20 10:44, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/20/2017 11:24 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> On 2017-10-20 08:28, cyg Simple wrote: On 10/19/2017 4:33 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > 2) the output of config.guess is a default and does NOT

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-20 10:44, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/20/2017 11:24 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-20 08:28, cyg Simple wrote: >>> On 10/19/2017 4:33 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: 2) the output of config.guess is a default and does NOT reflect, or need to match, our chosen triplet.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/20/2017 11:24 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-20 08:28, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/19/2017 4:33 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> 2) the output of config.guess is a default and does NOT reflect, or need >>> to match, our chosen triplet. There is nothing to fix in config.guess. >> >>

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-20 08:28, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/19/2017 4:33 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> 2) the output of config.guess is a default and does NOT reflect, or need >> to match, our chosen triplet. There is nothing to fix in config.guess. > > Fine, it doesn't have to match, why don't you want it

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 4:33 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > 2) the output of config.guess is a default and does NOT reflect, or need > to match, our chosen triplet. There is nothing to fix in config.guess. Fine, it doesn't have to match, why don't you want it to? Don't give me the historical reasons idea.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 19:11, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 18:49, Steven Penny wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:00:12, cyg Simple wrote: >>> So says you!  The vendor portion has been agreed to be -pc- and it isn't >>> -unknown-, a patch then should be created for config.guess to match the >>>

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 18:49, Steven Penny wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:00:12, cyg Simple wrote: >> So says you!  The vendor portion has been agreed to be -pc- and it isn't >> -unknown-, a patch then should be created for config.guess to match the >> agreed upon vendor.  The config.guess script supplies

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:00:12, cyg Simple wrote: So says you! The vendor portion has been agreed to be -pc- and it isn't -unknown-, a patch then should be created for config.guess to match the agreed upon vendor. The config.guess script supplies the default to configure for the build and host.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 18:21, Brian Inglis wrote: > I think the OP's problem is he knows no way to override the default and use > only > the standard ./configure && make build approach. Which works just fine btw, so there's no need to override it. > The OP could take a build config.cache and save it in

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 15:14, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 16:00, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/19/2017 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> On 2017-10-19 15:02, cyg Simple wrote: On 10/19/2017 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2017-10-19 12:59, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-19

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 04:18 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/19/2017 10:18 AM, Ken Brown wrote: >> On 10/19/2017 9:19 AM, cyg Simple wrote: >>> On 10/18/2017 6:58 PM, JonY wrote: I agree with Yaakov, why does it need to change? >>> >>> See my response to Yaakov.  If you supply explicit host and

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 16:00, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/19/2017 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-19 15:02, cyg Simple wrote: >>> On 10/19/2017 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2017-10-19 12:59, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: >> x86_64-pc-cygwin is

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 15:02, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/19/2017 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> On 2017-10-19 12:59, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: > x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 15:26, cyg Simple wrote: > My assumption is because of config.guess' default. It isn't incorrect, > it is a valid assumption. You cannot have both, it is one or the other. Your assumption that the default provided by config.guess must match the one we have chosen is incorrect.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 15:02, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/19/2017 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >> On 2017-10-19 12:59, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issues. >>> >>> As I have said several times, this

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

> On Oct 19, 2017, at 3:21 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > > On 10/19/2017 4:02 PM, Vince Rice wrote: >>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 2:08 PM, cyg Simple wrote: >>> >>> On 10/19/2017 2:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: When you *really* need to use --build

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 15:21, cyg Simple wrote: > I'm not providing the name of the package because I don't need help > configuring it and I don't want the discussion to become how to do that. This is *exactly* what this discussion *should* have been about from the beginning, because that would have been

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 4:21 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 14:08, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/19/2017 2:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> >>> When you *really* need to use --build and/or --host, then you need to >>> use x86_64-pc-cygwin, as that is our chosen name. >> >> Then config.guess

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 4:02 PM, Vince Rice wrote: >> On Oct 19, 2017, at 2:08 PM, cyg Simple wrote: >> >> On 10/19/2017 2:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> >>> When you *really* need to use --build and/or --host, then you need to >>> use x86_64-pc-cygwin, as that is our chosen name.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 14:08, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/19/2017 2:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> >> When you *really* need to use --build and/or --host, then you need to >> use x86_64-pc-cygwin, as that is our chosen name. > > Then config.guess needs to change to match the chosen name!! No, it

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2017-10-19 12:59, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: >>> x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issues. >> >> As I have said several times, this assertion is incorrect. You need to >> use

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

> On Oct 19, 2017, at 2:08 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > > On 10/19/2017 2:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> >> When you *really* need to use --build and/or --host, then you need to >> use x86_64-pc-cygwin, as that is our chosen name. > > Then config.guess needs to change to

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 12:59, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: >> x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issues. > > As I have said several times, this assertion is incorrect. You need to > use the triplet which matches the toolchain with which

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 2:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > When you *really* need to use --build and/or --host, then you need to > use x86_64-pc-cygwin, as that is our chosen name. Then config.guess needs to change to match the chosen name!! Why confuse everyone? Make up your mind and choose one. I

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 2:59 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: >> x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issues. > > As I have said several times, this assertion is incorrect. You need to > use the triplet which matches the toolchain with

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: > x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issues. As I have said several times, this assertion is incorrect. You need to use the triplet which matches the toolchain with which you are building. For example, Fedora and RHEL all

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 11:44, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/19/2017 11:04 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> We've been building packages for 64-bit Cygwin for years now without a >> problem. Maybe you could just tell what you're trying to do and the >> problem you're seeing so that we can assist you, instead of

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 2:37 PM, Steven Penny wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:47:29, cyg Simple wrote: >> > may we know which package ? >> > > If it refuses triplet has a strange way to use Autoconf/Automake >> > and changing the compiler seems the wrong way to solve the issue >> >> No, it doesn't matter. 

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:47:29, cyg Simple wrote: > may we know which package ? > > If it refuses triplet has a strange way to use Autoconf/Automake > and changing the compiler seems the wrong way to solve the issue No, it doesn't matter. Delivering x86_64-pc-cygwin anything is wrong since the

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 12:41 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 19/10/2017 18:21, cyg Simple wrote: > ./configure --host=x86_64-unknown-cygwin --build=x86_64-unknown-cygwin >>> >>> >>> the correct way is >>>   ./configure >>> >> >> Normally yes, but ... >> >>> don't add what you don't need.. >> >> I

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 11:04 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 08:25, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/18/2017 7:26 PM, Steven Penny wrote: >>> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote: For a regex pattern you should include both. I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 19/10/2017 18:21, cyg Simple wrote: ./configure --host=x86_64-unknown-cygwin --build=x86_64-unknown-cygwin the correct way is  ./configure Normally yes, but ... don't add what you don't need.. I was trying to help a package refusing the config.guess triplet so I needed it.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 10:41 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 19/10/2017 15:17, cyg Simple wrote: >> >> > So the corrective action is to distribute GCC and friends as x86_64-unknown-cygwin-*.exe instead of x86_64-pc-cygwin-*.exe. >>> >>> Incorrect.  GCC is also fine as is. >>> >> >> No it is

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 10:18 AM, Ken Brown wrote: > On 10/19/2017 9:19 AM, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/18/2017 6:58 PM, JonY wrote: >>> I agree with Yaakov, why does it need to change? >>> >> >> See my response to Yaakov.  If you supply explicit host and build to >> configure it does not work. > > So don't

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-19 08:25, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/18/2017 7:26 PM, Steven Penny wrote: >> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>> For a regex pattern you should include both. >>> I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my packages. >>> >>> E.G. on octave >>> >>>

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 19/10/2017 15:25, cyg Simple wrote: On 10/18/2017 7:26 PM, Steven Penny wrote: On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote: For a regex pattern you should include both. I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my packages. E.G. on octave

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 19/10/2017 15:17, cyg Simple wrote: So the corrective action is to distribute GCC and friends as x86_64-unknown-cygwin-*.exe instead of x86_64-pc-cygwin-*.exe. Incorrect. GCC is also fine as is. No it is not! The below example should work out of the box and it doesn't.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/19/2017 9:19 AM, cyg Simple wrote: On 10/18/2017 6:58 PM, JonY wrote: I agree with Yaakov, why does it need to change? See my response to Yaakov. If you supply explicit host and build to configure it does not work. So don't do that. Specifying host is for cross-compilation.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/18/2017 7:26 PM, Steven Penny wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> For a regex pattern you should include both. >> I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my packages. >> >> E.G. on octave >> >> /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/i686-pc-cygwin >>

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/18/2017 6:58 PM, JonY wrote: > On 10/18/2017 10:41 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-18 14:10, cyg Simple wrote: >>> On 10/18/2017 1:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2017-10-18 09:05, cyg Simple wrote: > Does anyone care if a patch to config.guess changes the i*:CYGWIN*:*

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/18/2017 6:41 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-18 14:10, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/18/2017 1:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> On 2017-10-18 09:05, cyg Simple wrote: Does anyone care if a patch to config.guess changes the i*:CYGWIN*:* filter to echo

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-18 18:26, Steven Penny wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> For a regex pattern you should include both. >> I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my packages. >> >> E.G. on octave >> >> /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/i686-pc-cygwin >>

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:45:11, Marco Atzeri wrote: For a regex pattern you should include both. I do not bore which one is built and distributed on my packages. E.G. on octave /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/i686-pc-cygwin /usr/lib/octave/site/oct/x86_64-unknown-cygwin This is certainly not right. I

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/18/2017 10:41 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-18 14:10, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/18/2017 1:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>> On 2017-10-18 09:05, cyg Simple wrote: Does anyone care if a patch to config.guess changes the i*:CYGWIN*:* filter to echo

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-18 14:10, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/18/2017 1:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-18 09:05, cyg Simple wrote: >>> Does anyone care if a patch to config.guess changes the i*:CYGWIN*:* >>> filter to echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-cygwin? >> >> That would be incorrect.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-18 13:10, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/18/2017 1:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-10-18 09:05, cyg Simple wrote: >>> Does anyone care if a patch to config.guess changes the i*:CYGWIN*:* >>> filter to echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-cygwin? >> >> That would be incorrect.

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/18/2017 1:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-18 09:05, cyg Simple wrote: >> Does anyone care if a patch to config.guess changes the i*:CYGWIN*:* >> filter to echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-cygwin? > > That would be incorrect. config.guess is fine as it is. > So the corrective

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-18 09:05, cyg Simple wrote: > Does anyone care if a patch to config.guess changes the i*:CYGWIN*:* > filter to echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-cygwin? That would be incorrect. config.guess is fine as it is. -- Yaakov signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/17/2017 3:16 PM, cyg Simple wrote: > The config.guess file[1] is confused. > > 840i*:CYGWIN*:*) > 841 echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-cygwin > 842 exit ;; > - > 870amd64:CYGWIN*:*:* | x86_64:CYGWIN*:*:*) > 871 echo x86_64-unknown-cygwin > 872 exit ;; > > The GCC executable is

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-18 00:45, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 18/10/2017 05:29, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/17/2017 7:49 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: >> I'm only concerned with Cygwin at the moment.  As I understand it the we >> should distribute x86[_64]-unknown-cygwin-*.exe

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 18/10/2017 05:29, cyg Simple wrote: On 10/17/2017 7:49 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: I'm only concerned with Cygwin at the moment. As I understand it the we should distribute x86[_64]-unknown-cygwin-*.exe and not as x86[_64]-pc-cygwin-*.exe We also need

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-17 21:29, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/17/2017 7:49 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >> On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: >>> The config.guess file[1] is confused. >>> >>> 840i*:CYGWIN*:*) >>> 841 echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-cygwin >>> 842 exit ;; >>> - >>> 870amd64:CYGWIN*:*:* |

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/17/2017 7:49 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: >> The config.guess file[1] is confused. >> >> 840i*:CYGWIN*:*) >> 841 echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-cygwin >> 842 exit ;; >> - >> 870amd64:CYGWIN*:*:* | x86_64:CYGWIN*:*:*) >> 871 echo

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/17/2017 7:39 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2017-10-17 15:31, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/17/2017 3:45 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: The config.guess file[1] is confused. 840i*:CYGWIN*:*) 841echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-cygwin

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: > The config.guess file[1] is confused. > > 840i*:CYGWIN*:*) > 841 echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-cygwin > 842 exit ;; > - > 870amd64:CYGWIN*:*:* | x86_64:CYGWIN*:*:*) > 871 echo x86_64-unknown-cygwin > 872 exit ;; > > The GCC executable is

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-17 15:31, cyg Simple wrote: > On 10/17/2017 3:45 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >> On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: >>> The config.guess file[1] is confused. >>> 840i*:CYGWIN*:*) >>> 841 echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-cygwin >>> 842 exit ;; >>> - >>> 870amd64:CYGWIN*:*:* |

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 10/17/2017 3:45 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: >> The config.guess file[1] is confused. >> >> 840i*:CYGWIN*:*) >> 841 echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-cygwin >> 842 exit ;; >> - >> 870amd64:CYGWIN*:*:* | x86_64:CYGWIN*:*:*) >> 871 echo

Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown-

On 2017-10-17 13:16, cyg Simple wrote: > The config.guess file[1] is confused. > > 840i*:CYGWIN*:*) > 841 echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-pc-cygwin > 842 exit ;; > - > 870amd64:CYGWIN*:*:* | x86_64:CYGWIN*:*:*) > 871 echo x86_64-unknown-cygwin > 872 exit ;; > > The GCC executable is