* Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-28 21:01:07 -0500]:
[snip]
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need to
inform me
that they don't work? And that advances the discussion
how, exactly?
I did not just tell you that they are broken.
I also gave you a test
On Apr 29 10:19, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-28 21:01:07 -0500]:
Dude, you are just *asking* for one heck of a zinger!
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/netdict?zinger
Sorry, I am not sure I understand what you mean.
(PS it may be because English is not
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:01:07PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
[snip]
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need to inform me
that they don't work? And that advances the discussion how, exactly?
I did not just tell you that they are broken. I also gave you a test
case for
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:19:56AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-28 21:01:07 -0500]:
[snip]
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need to
inform me
that they don't work? And that advances the discussion
how, exactly?
I did
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:01:07PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
[snip]
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need
to inform me
that they don't work? And that advances the discussion
how, exactly?
I did not just tell you that they are broken. I also gave
you a test
* Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2005-04-28 21:01:07 -0500]:
[snip]
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need to
inform me
that they don't work? And that advances the discussion
how, exactly?
I did not just tell you that they are broken.
I also gave
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:19:56AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2005-04-28 21:01:07 -0500]:
[snip]
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need to
inform me
that they don't work? And that advances the discussion
how, exactly?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 07:39:04PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:01:07PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
[snip]
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need
to inform me
that they don't work? And that advances the discussion
how, exactly?
I did
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:19:45PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Dude, seriously, get over me.
Here's how email works. You send email. Someone either responds or
doesn't respond. For a while I didn't respond but you kept sending.
I'm responding now. I'm trying to do so in the fashion that
* Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 22:29:34 -0400]:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 07:39:37PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 18:20:31 -0400]:
the problem is that mkstemp() does not regard FIFOs (as created by
mkfifo() or mknod()) as
[snip]
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need to
inform me
that they don't work? And that advances the discussion
how, exactly?
I did not just tell you that they are broken.
I also gave you a test case for FIFOs.
I think such a test case is useful for development and
Hi,
it appears that mkstemp() returns a temp FD pointing to the same file:
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
== /tmp/clisp-x-io-000592
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
== /tmp/clisp-x-io-000592
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
== /tmp/clisp-x-io-000592
is this a known bug?
thanks!
--
Sam
I'm surprised your example doesn't segfault. My Linux man page
says explicitly that the template should not be a string constant
but must be a character array, i.e. use
char t1[] = /tmp/clisp-x-io-XX;
char t2[] = /tmp/clisp-x-io-XX;
char t3[] = /tmp/clisp-x-io-XX;
* Tony Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 12:41:20 -0500]:
I'm surprised your example doesn't segfault. My Linux man page says
explicitly that the template should not be a string constant but must
be a character array, i.e. use
char t1[] = /tmp/clisp-x-io-XX;
char t2[] =
Sam Steingold:
* Tony Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm surprised your example doesn't segfault. My Linux man page says
explicitly that the template should not be a string
constant but must
be a character array, i.e. use
char t1[] = /tmp/clisp-x-io-XX;
char t2[] =
* Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 13:24:29 -0400]:
it appears that mkstemp() returns a temp FD pointing to the same file:
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
== /tmp/clisp-x-io-000592
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
== /tmp/clisp-x-io-000592
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:06:09PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 13:24:29 -0400]:
it appears that mkstemp() returns a temp FD pointing to the same file:
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
== /tmp/clisp-x-io-000592
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 07:39:37PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 18:20:31 -0400]:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:06:09PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 13:24:29 -0400]:
it appears that mkstemp() returns a
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:06:09PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-27 13:24:29 -0400]:
it appears that mkstemp() returns a temp FD pointing to the same file:
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
== /tmp/clisp-x-io-000592
mkstemp (/tmp/clisp-x-io-XX);
fifos just barely work under cygwin. I wouldn't recommend
using them.
Yes, it appears that they are heavily broken.
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need to
inform me that they don't work? And that advances the
discussion how, exactly?
cgf
And your
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:26:32PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
fifos just barely work under cygwin. I wouldn't recommend
using them.
Yes, it appears that they are heavily broken.
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need to
inform me that they don't work? And that
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:26:32PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
fifos just barely work under cygwin. I wouldn't recommend using them.
Yes, it appears that they are heavily broken.
So when I say fifos just barely work you felt the need to inform me
that they don't work? And that advances
22 matches
Mail list logo
