+ for (i = packages.begin (); i != packages.end (); ++i)
+{
+ packagemeta pkg = **i;
+ for_each (pkg.installed.scripts().begin(),
pkg.installed.scripts().end(),
+ RunScript(pkg.name, pkg.installed.scripts().size()));
+ ++k;
+ Progress.SetBar2 (k, numpkg);
+
On 25 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
+ for (i = packages.begin (); i != packages.end (); ++i)
+{
+ packagemeta pkg = **i;
+ for_each (pkg.installed.scripts().begin(), pkg.installed.scripts().end(),
+ RunScript(pkg.name, pkg.installed.scripts().size()));
+
Umm... Ping?.. Do I need to regenerate this against HEAD once Max checks
in the postinstall thread patch? It should apply with fuzz even then.
Igor
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
This patch extends logging support to preremove/postremove scripts.
Igor
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 02:11, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Umm... Ping?.. Do I need to regenerate this against HEAD once Max checks
in the postinstall thread patch?
Yes, and I'll review it then.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
signature.asc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason,
I concur with the above and I ask you again: Please release updated
package(s) without the broken rebase ASAP. Your packages corrupt DLLs
for Me users and are becoming to be a (rebase) support burden.
ok, I'll even update the packages, even while we still have a
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK to do so?
Max.
Umm, I'm confused. What about
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00569.html?
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
On 25 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
Max, can you please check this in?
Done.
Thanks.
Igor: One very, very, very minor point - please put *2* spaces between your
name and email address in ChangeLogs.
Thanks,
Max.
Sure. Didn't know that was
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK to do so?
Max.
Umm, I'm confused. What about
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00569.html?
Apparently I was confused when I wrote that... that email of mine makes no
sense at all.
Max.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK to add the correct double-space between NAME and EMAIL in the ChangeLog
lines DATE NAME EMAIL?
There are 24 single-spaced lines compared with 283 double-spaced lines.
Max.
FWIW, I count 125 single-spaced lines vs. 294 double-spaced lines... I
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK to add the correct double-space between NAME and EMAIL in the
ChangeLog lines DATE NAME EMAIL?
There are 24 single-spaced lines compared with 283 double-spaced lines.
Max.
FWIW, I count 125 single-spaced lines vs. 294
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK to add the correct double-space between NAME and EMAIL in the
ChangeLog lines DATE NAME EMAIL?
There are 24 single-spaced lines compared with 283 double-spaced lines.
Max.
On 26 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 02:11, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Do I need to regenerate this against HEAD once Max checks
in the postinstall thread patch?
Yes, and I'll review it then.
Rob
Ok, here you go.
Igor
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK to add the correct double-space between NAME and EMAIL in the
ChangeLog lines DATE NAME EMAIL?
There are 24 single-spaced lines compared with 283
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK to add the correct double-space between NAME and EMAIL in the
ChangeLog lines DATE NAME EMAIL?
There
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK to add the correct double-space between NAME and EMAIL in the
ChangeLog lines DATE NAME
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:16:28PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
However, I noticed something else. The dates in the ChangeLog are
supposed to reflect the commit date.
This is my personal preference, but is it clearly stated anywhere?
I don't know if it's clearly stated somewhere but this is
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:39:06PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
OK to add the correct double-space between NAME and EMAIL in the ChangeLog
lines DATE NAME EMAIL?
There are 24 single-spaced lines compared with 283 double-spaced lines.
Max.
FWIW, I
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-26 04:18:01
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog fork.cc sigproc.cc
Log message:
Joe Buehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* fork.cc (fork_parent): Don't copy signals from parent to
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:12:59PM -0800, Matt Berney wrote:
Unfortunately, yes. I had considered this option. But, it would require changes to
both the server and client-side code, that I was hoping to avoid.
I don't see another chance. Numerical errno values are nonportable.
Corinna
Passing errno values across systems isn't portable. You need to define
your own error codes and map errno to those. There is nothing else you
can do if you want to be portable.
These problems pop up in various networked file systems every once in a
while. The most recent one I saw was on AFS
Hi,
We are using pkgadd utility to install a package in Sun Solaris.
Currently we need to install in windows platform using cygwin. Any
suggestion/input on the above issue.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Naga
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:
Hello
./bin/my_print_defaults: 1: Syntax error: ( unexpected
What is cygwin doing to this binary to cause this error?
How do I fix?
Thank You
Martin
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are using pkgadd utility to install a package in Sun Solaris.
Currently we need to install in windows platform using cygwin. Any
suggestion/input on the above issue.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Naga
On Cygwin, the installer is called
How do you expect anyone to know the answer to your question with so
little information?
Have a look at http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
and come back with the information we need to figure out your problem.
rlc
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Martin Gainty wrote:
Hello
./bin/my_print_defaults: 1: Syntax
Martin Gainty wrote:
Hello
./bin/my_print_defaults: 1: Syntax error: ( unexpected
What is cygwin doing to this binary to cause this error?
How do I fix?
Last time someone got this error, they were trying to run Linux binaries
under Cygwin.
YOU CAN'T DO THIS!
Cygwin is a porting framework,
Looks like you don't have permission to do something.. if you can read the
dir, my guess is you don't have write access to the registry. Try adding
the -u flag to the mount command.
HTH
rlc
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am planning a centralisation of my cygwin
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am planning a centralisation of my cygwin environment.
Now I have three servers with each their separate cygwin installation.
I would use our Solaris server together with Samba to create a share
on which the cygwin tree would be
so...cygwin CANNOT run binaries?
uh oh!
Thanks!
Marty
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: cant run binaries in cygwin
Martin Gainty wrote:
Hello
Martin Gainty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello
./bin/my_print_defaults: 1: Syntax error: ( unexpected
What is cygwin doing to this binary to cause this error?
How do I fix?
Please give more information:
-What kind of application is my_print_defaults, s skript or a binary,
where to get it
Hi Randall,
Oh it's a problem alright. I'm just not sure the exact source and
whether this functionality is in conflict with something else that 5.3-1
was trying to fix. I looked at the email archives for discussions
surrounding terminfo and couldn't find anything current, except for
Chuck's
I have an existing unix application that makes extensive use of named pipes:
mknod pipe p
and shell scripts and 'C' programs that read and write pipes. Messages must
be read in order that they were written to pipe. As well many processes must
be able to write to a pipe and not have their
Hi,
Could somebody point me to something that will allow me to setup Bash cut
and paste to the Windows Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V set? (or something near that) I've
checked the faq but I guess the terms I'm using to search are wrong.
Thanks
Gary
--
Unsubscribe info:
Jurgen,
What options to procps are you using to get that output format? I
cannot reproduce it.
Randall Schulz
At 23:44 2003-03-24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
Thanks for the nice procps package.
However, are all values always shown as megabytes ?
When top or procps are used, the size
* Gary Ash (03-03-25 16:25 +0100)
Could somebody point me to something that will allow me to setup Bash cut
and paste to the Windows Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V set? (or something near that) I've
checked the faq but I guess the terms I'm using to search are wrong.
Probably because it's not Cygwin related:
This relates to a bug in Win NT 2000 sp3 or cygwin-
hard to say which. I can only exercise the bug in
cygwin, but I would like to exercise it from
command.exe- see below. Another user jammed cygwin in
183 iterations of the loop, after two days without a
reboot. I am not alone.
Mike,
I
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 09:12:50AM -0700, Martin Gainty wrote:
A quick heads up:
Standard Binaries wont run under cygwin-
Cygwin is a Windows application. It doesn't run linux binaries. That
is what you seem to be referring to as standard. A standard binary
for Windows would be a windows
Since 'man' pages for commands all have the same extension
('.1'), it seems to me that it should be possible to write a
batch file that calls 'bash' that 'invokes' man for the page?
This would allow you to double click a 'man 1' page, and voila, a
'cmd.exe'/'bash.exe' window would appear with
Your assumption that man pages all have the same extention is
fundamentally flawed. Might I suggest your start with 'man man'.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Lee D. Rothstein wrote:
Because of a number of problems in backup, I have written a
couple of Cygwin-specific bash scripts that I use to backup my
system. Is there a forum for sharing these kinds of things? (Of
course, they use 'bzip' and 'tar'.) BTW, I am not convinced
Where does cygwin look for hosts file ?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Martin Gainty wrote:
Where does cygwin look for hosts file ?
Thanks, Martin
Cygwin is a layer on top of Windows, and it uses the Windows machinery to
implement networking. Thus, the question is: where does Windows look for
the hosts file? And the answer to that is
* Martin Gainty (03-03-25 18:07 +0100)
Where does cygwin look for hosts file ?
Cygwin doesn't care about hosts. The applications are looking for
it in /etc and it is symlinked to the Windows default file in
%SYSTEMROOT%\system32\drivers\etc\.
Thorsten
--
Content-Type: text/explicit;
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
* Martin Gainty (03-03-25 18:07 +0100)
Where does cygwin look for hosts file ?
Cygwin doesn't care about hosts. The applications are looking for
it in /etc and it is symlinked to the Windows default file in
%SYSTEMROOT%\system32\drivers\etc\.
Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW: I am not a lawyer.
And therefore, everything you have said may be safely ignored.
Until this alleged GPL violator receives a cease and desist order
from an attorney, he has no reason to even consider modifying his
behavior. (Except to be polite,
Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW: I am not a lawyer.
And therefore, everything you have said may be safely ignored.
Until this alleged GPL violator receives a cease and desist order
from an attorney, he has no reason to even consider modifying his
behavior. (Except to be
Great!
I am doing a make of mysql and am getting the error:
libmysqld/sql_derived.cc: You are trying to create a symlink on a win32 file
system.
This file type is not supported on this platform.
How do I correctly identify file types to cygwin and
correct this error situation?
Sorry for the
A simple reading of the GPL text maks it clear that if you make use of GPL
software you must provide the same to your downstream clients. Charles
Wilson is correct.
Cease and desist letters are the initial legal step. However, all that
needs to be done to avoid any legal action is to put the
Pat,
At 09:36 2003-03-25, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW: I am not a lawyer.
And therefore, everything you have said may be safely ignored.
Et tu?
Until this alleged GPL violator receives a cease and desist order
from an attorney, he has no reason
Thanks. Unfortunately for me, I am running sp3.
Cygwin Win95/NT Configuration Diagnostics
Current System Time: Fri Mar 21 16:37:16 2003
Windows 2000 Professional Ver 5.0 Build 2195 Service
Pack 3
Can you please send me the output of
cygcheck -sr cygcheck_Elfyn_McBratney.txt
(my cygcheck is
Running ls /proc/registry/HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE takes 5 to 10 seconds
on my NT build machine. Using gdb to step through it, the culprit
is the GetSecurityInfo() call in get_nt_object_attribute().
A google search shows up the following, a bug in GetSecurityInfo() in Windows
that looks like it might
I'd love to see the scripts. I have written some of my own, but have
run into the full name and path problem. Please post.
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Lee D. Rothstein wrote:
Because of a number of problems in backup, I have written a
couple of Cygwin-specific bash
I have installed Cygwin with the default-settings on Windows XP
professional.
If I want to run Cygwin, by running the cygwin.bat file the following
error message appears:
19 [main] bash -584 sync_wth_child: child 2820(0x5DC) died before
initialization with status code 0x0
580 [main] bash -584
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:36:15PM -0500, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW: I am not a lawyer.
And therefore, everything you have said may be safely ignored.
Until this alleged GPL violator receives a cease and desist order
from an attorney, he has no
Randall R Schulz wrote:
What options to procps are you using to get that output format? I cannot
reproduce it.
It's the output of top, and yes, I see the problem too. The size
column is always around 400 (+/-) MB, however large or small the process.
The RSS size is correct - it matches the
Jason,
I have a snapshot-generating script called snap. It's attached. There
is usage output via the --help argument and a little header
commentary in the script itself.
% snap --help
# snap: Usage
# -c Run target directory's clean program, if any
# -D dirPlace snapshot file
* Martin Gainty (03-03-25 18:51 +0100)
I am doing a make of mysql and am getting the error:
libmysqld/sql_derived.cc: You are trying to create a symlink on a win32 file
system.
This file type is not supported on this platform.
What has that got to do with /etc/hosts? No application running
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:54:49PM -0500, Jim Drash wrote:
A simple reading of the GPL text maks it clear that if you make use of GPL
software you must provide the same to your downstream clients. Charles
Wilson is correct.
Cease and desist letters are the initial legal step. However, all that
Hi everyone,
I'm new to Cygwin and have recently set it up to do SSH Tunneling
for VNC. I can connect just fine to my SSH server from my home LAN and
from my work computer (A), but when I try to connect from a separate work
location (B), I get Access Denied. However, I *can* connect
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:20:29PM -0500, Robert Praetorius wrote:
I'd say that he ought to be prevailed upon to right a document on how
non-lawyers can help with GPL enforcement, but he probably has and I
just haven't found that link yet.
I suspect that http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
FWIW: I am not a lawyer.
And therefore, everything you have said may be safely ignored.
Just for reference, if someone's looking for a lawyer not to ignore,
that would probably Eben Moglen, FSF general counsel and board member
(also a professor of law and legal history, formerly a
Hello,
I can't transfer big files. In the output below, you can see that rsync only
transfer 1383275520 of a 5448046592 bytes file:
F:\shellsrsync -e ssh -avz ./backup [EMAIL PROTECTED]:backups
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
building file list ... done
wrote 114 bytes read 20 bytes 3.01
Cygwin itself is currently limited to 32 bit file access, though
I can't say whether or not this is a contributing factor to
your rsync issue.
Larry
Original Message:
-
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:25:02 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Rsync
Hello,
I can't transfer big files. In the output below, you can see that rsync
only
transfer 1383275520 of a 5448046592 bytes file:
Cygwin cannot handle files larger than ~2GB.
Is Cygwin able to handle Large Files??, Any idea?
There is work going on at the moment to migrate Cygwin's system
I've said this before and I'll say it again:
This list is not responsible for supporting or validating
information and/or utilities from sites other than cygwin.com.
If you have trouble with information/utitilties you get from
other sites, contact that site. In this case, your question
is
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Kyle Yamnitz wrote:
This list is not responsible for supporting or validating
information and/or utilities from sites other than cygwin.com.
If you have trouble with information/utitilties you get from
other sites, contact that site. In this case, your question
is
I just upgraded from 1.3.20 to 1.3.22 and noticed the the DBDoracle module
(1.13 and 1.12( Oracle.dll) fails on the new version. I tried recompiling
agianst the same libraries on both cygwins, and though the compile gives
the same output and result under both, the dll fails to load under
How do I reinstall /etc/passwd /etc/group to it's initial state? In a fit
of efficiency I deleted some entries in both files to find out (later) that
they apparently allow correct display of GID and UID for system files. Is
there any way to recover the original other than deleting Cygwin and
Arthur,
At 18:04 2003-03-25, Arthur I Schwarz wrote:
How do I reinstall /etc/passwd /etc/group to it's initial state? In a fit
of efficiency I deleted some entries in both files to find out (later) that
they apparently allow correct display of GID and UID for system files. Is
there any way to
Art,
Replies inline below:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Arthur I Schwarz wrote:
How do I reinstall /etc/passwd /etc/group to it's initial state? In a fit
of efficiency I deleted some entries in both files to find out (later) that
they apparently allow correct display of GID and UID for system
Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW: I am not a lawyer.
And therefore, everything you have said may be safely ignored.
guys, I can't believe you fell for this. *Do Not Feed The Trolls*.
See LoPresti's other contributions to civil discourse:
Well, what to say... my computer is ok again, I *just* have to read some
thousands emails and I can begin contribute again =P
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
--
Unsubscribe info:
71 matches
Mail list logo
