Re: [ITP] alure 1.2

2016-10-24 Thread Jon Turney
On 18/10/2016 01:06, Bastian Germann wrote: This is actually a bug (different variable names in FindFLAC.cmake and CMakeLists.txt) that was fixed implicitly upstream with http://repo.or.cz/alure.git/commit/6934c17f9ace7fc19ea94623dab0a4b37d11a879 I added a patch for v1.2 and also included

Re: [ITP] alure 1.2

2016-10-17 Thread Bastian Germann
This is actually a bug (different variable names in FindFLAC.cmake and CMakeLists.txt) that was fixed implicitly upstream with http://repo.or.cz/alure.git/commit/6934c17f9ace7fc19ea94623dab0a4b37d11a879 I added a patch for v1.2 and also included support for fluidsynth. Now all dependencies that

Re: [ITP] alure 1.2

2016-10-17 Thread Bastian Germann
2016-10-17 21:38 GMT+02:00 Ken Brown : > That happens because DYNLOAD is not defined. If you build with DYNLOAD > defined, it links fine. There is one glitch that has to be fixed when you > do that. The build detects windows.h and then doesn't include dlfcn.h. > [See main.h,

Re: [ITP] alure 1.2

2016-10-17 Thread Ken Brown
On 10/17/2016 9:41 AM, Bastian Germann wrote: Am 16.10.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Marco Atzeri: Any reason to not add FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) dependency ? Yes, there is a reason: The symbols used from FLAC/stream_decoder.h cannot be linked: [ 70%] Linking CXX shared library

Re: [ITP] alure 1.2

2016-10-17 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 16.10.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Marco Atzeri: > However I suggest to not build the static library > and to install only the shared one, as this is the default > on cygwin. Ok. > Any reason to not add FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) > dependency ? Yes, there is a reason: The symbols used from

Re: [ITP] alure 1.2

2016-10-16 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 13/10/2016 19:05, Bastian Germann wrote: Hi, it's almost 4 weeks since I submitted the package. Is there something wrong with my email to not be answered? I think, I followed the Contributor's Guide pretty close. just busy with other life, as most of the other maintainers for what I see on

Re: [ITP] alure 1.2

2016-10-15 Thread David Stacey
On 13/10/16 18:05, Bastian Germann wrote: it's almost 4 weeks since I submitted the package. Is there something wrong with my email to not be answered? I think, I followed the Contributor's Guide pretty close. Is someone willing to review the package? It's probably only polite for /someone/

Re: [ITP] alure 1.2

2016-10-13 Thread Bastian Germann
Hi, it's almost 4 weeks since I submitted the package. Is there something wrong with my email to not be answered? I think, I followed the Contributor's Guide pretty close. Is someone willing to review the package? Regards, Bastian 2016-09-17 12:28 GMT+02:00 Bastian Germann: > I have packaged

[ITP] alure 1.2

2016-09-17 Thread Bastian Germann
Hi, I have packaged alure and would like to become a maintainer for it. alure is available at http://kcat.strangesoft.net/alure.html and MIT/X11 licensed. The major GNU/Linux distributions include it in their repositories, e.g. Debian: https://packages.debian.org/source/jessie/alure In the