-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 6 11:20, Lapo Luchini wrote:
I guess an email to DJB could clarify it a bit...
It's essential to do this. A source code with no copyright or
licensing information at all is highly lawless ground. Dunno about
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Isn't the usual solution for this to provide an empty mhash-devel package
as [curr]? That way people will get mhash-devel uninstalled from their
systems, rather than having mhash and mhash-devel share files (which will
be removed if mhash-devel *is* uninstalled manually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Dessent wrote:
Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the
imagination.
It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the
package, maybe it qualifies as Public Domani, but I guess an email to
DJB could
On Oct 6 11:20, Lapo Luchini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Dessent wrote:
Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the
imagination.
It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the
package, maybe it qualifies as Public
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL building
instructions are from the CYGWIN FAQ, just wrongly applied.
Builds out of the
Reini Urban wrote:
Ah, and if you upload it please remove mhash-devel, since mhash-0.9.1-1
includes the devel stuff also. I already wrote it, but double is better.
Or leave it as [prev]. As you want. (I don't think so)
No, removed it and changed the setup.hint you included to reflect that
the
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:01:16AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Reini Urban wrote:
Ah, and if you upload it please remove mhash-devel, since mhash-0.9.1-1
includes the devel stuff also. I already wrote it, but double is better.
Or leave it as [prev]. As you want. (I
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL building
instructions are from the
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:04:48PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 02:07:29PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 01:46:41PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
it seems there was the -mno-cygwin flag used for the mhmash library
build and it isn't a Cygwin version at all:
$ cygcheck
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL building
instructions are from the CYGWIN FAQ, just wrongly applied.
Builds out of the box after removing the mingw stuff.
I want to package it as single version (no
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL building
instructions are from the CYGWIN FAQ, just wrongly applied.
Builds out of the box after removing the mingw
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL building
instructions are from the CYGWIN FAQ, just wrongly
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:37:05PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:37:05PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reini Urban wrote:
claim, claim... please don't pull.
Agh, you beat me on time ;-)
Well I guess I will at least try harder porting djbdns, then, I really
miss a local DNS resolver on my laptop 0=)
(and what should they have in common? well..
Lapo Luchini wrote:
Well I guess I will at least try harder porting djbdns, then, I really
miss a local DNS resolver on my laptop 0=)
(and what should they have in common? well.. djbdns is by DJB, which
is a crypto expert himself... ok, ok, almost nothing in common)
Did we already have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Dessent wrote:
Did we already have a DJB licensensing-discuss thread? I wouldn't
exactly call djbware free software, but I'm also not familiar with the
requirements of Cygwin packages. Would it even be allowed?
Mhh.. I don't remember...
Lapo Luchini wrote:
Mhh.. I don't remember...
Yes, actually we had (and I did also do some reply.. 0_0)
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/threads.html#01639
...but that was on QMail, which has Information for distributors at
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html, while no similiar page
19 matches
Mail list logo
