[I've had no time to look at this in detail and that will have to wait a
bit more.]
Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps writes:
>>> would it actually make a difference whether the zp_ is a script of
>>> italic-man or of man-db? I've also added a cygport file to the
>>> repository so you can try the
Am 25.06.2023 um 15:36 schrieb Jon Turney:
On 21/06/2023 22:45, Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Am 16.02.2023 um 20:17 schrieb Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps:
Am 16.02.2023 um 19:59 schrieb Jon Turney:
On 21/01/2023 17:04, Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps wrote:
italic-man installs two
On 21/06/2023 22:45, Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Am 16.02.2023 um 20:17 schrieb Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps:
Am 16.02.2023 um 19:59 schrieb Jon Turney:
On 21/01/2023 17:04, Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps wrote:
italic-man installs two scripts and hooks them into the workflow of
the
Am 16.02.2023 um 20:17 schrieb Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps:
Am 16.02.2023 um 19:59 schrieb Jon Turney:
On 21/01/2023 17:04, Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps wrote:
italic-man installs two scripts and hooks them into the workflow of
the 'man' command so that the italic attribute of manual pages
Am 16.02.2023 um 19:59 schrieb Jon Turney:
On 21/01/2023 17:04, Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps wrote:
italic-man installs two scripts and hooks them into the workflow of
the 'man' command so that the italic attribute of manual pages is
actually displayed as italics in terminals that support
On 21/01/2023 17:04, Thomas Wolff via Cygwin-apps wrote:
italic-man installs two scripts and hooks them into the workflow of the
'man' command so that the italic attribute of manual pages is actually
displayed as italics in terminals that support it.
cygport file attached
Thanks very much
Thomas Wolff writes:
>> How are updates to man-db, /etc/man_db.conf etc. handled?
> I checked the man-db postinstall script, and it does not overwrite
> man_db.conf if it exists already, so the modification will persist.
No postinstall script should ever modify files in /etc if they have been
Am 11.08.2019 um 00:29 schrieb Brian Inglis:
On 2019-08-10 03:07, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 09.08.2019 um 22:51 schrieb Brian Inglis:
On 2019-08-09 13:31, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 09.08.2019 um 20:56 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Jon Turney writes:
This gets a GTG from me.
I believe that according to
On 2019-08-10 03:07, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 09.08.2019 um 22:51 schrieb Brian Inglis:
>> On 2019-08-09 13:31, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>>> Am 09.08.2019 um 20:56 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Jon Turney writes:
> This gets a GTG from me.
> I believe that according to our stated procedures
Am 10.08.2019 um 11:07 schrieb Thomas Wolff:
Am 09.08.2019 um 22:51 schrieb Brian Inglis:
On 2019-08-09 13:31, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 09.08.2019 um 20:56 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Jon Turney writes:
This gets a GTG from me.
I believe that according to our stated procedures additional
approvals
Am 09.08.2019 um 22:51 schrieb Brian Inglis:
On 2019-08-09 13:31, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 09.08.2019 um 20:56 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Jon Turney writes:
This gets a GTG from me.
I believe that according to our stated procedures additional approvals
are required, because this package is unique to
On 2019-08-09 13:31, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 09.08.2019 um 20:56 schrieb Achim Gratz:
>> Jon Turney writes:
>>> This gets a GTG from me.
>>> I believe that according to our stated procedures additional approvals
>>> are required, because this package is unique to cygwin.
>> I'm not sure I
Am 09.08.2019 um 20:56 schrieb Achim Gratz:
Jon Turney writes:
This gets a GTG from me.
I believe that according to our stated procedures additional approvals
are required, because this package is unique to cygwin.
I'm not sure I remember correctly from when the discussion went on the
first
Jon Turney writes:
> This gets a GTG from me.
>
> I believe that according to our stated procedures additional approvals
> are required, because this package is unique to cygwin.
I'm not sure I remember correctly from when the discussion went on the
first time, but wasn't there some mumbling
On 8/9/2019 8:59 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 28/07/2019 07:01, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>> I'm again proposing a package to enable italic display of manual pages (as
>> originally intended).
>> I changed the deployment strategy, following comments in my previous attempt
>>
On 28/07/2019 07:01, Thomas Wolff wrote:
I'm again proposing a package to enable italic display of manual pages
(as originally intended).
I changed the deployment strategy, following comments in my previous
attempt
(https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2017-04/msg00116.html).
A cygport file is
16 matches
Mail list logo
