back from skiiing - with lots of catching up to do...
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:54:06PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I guess I'll have to become one quickly, for my votes to count...
How about coreutils?
Or has someone already
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:54:06PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I guess I'll have to become one quickly, for my votes to count...
How about coreutils?
Or has someone already volunteered for that?
I think Gareth half did. You can have
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:54:06PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I guess I'll have to become one quickly, for my votes to count...
How about coreutils?
Or has someone already volunteered for that?
cgf
Naw, I think I'd rather start with
I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
package exists in this table with no votes. I think that after two
months of no votes the package should fall off the list.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:38:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@ LPRng
date : 21 Jan 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
package exists in this table with no votes. I think that after two
months of no votes the package should fall off the list.
I respectfully disagree, especially now that we have someone who is
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
package exists in this table with no votes. I think that after two
months of no votes the package should fall off the list.
I
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
package exists in this table with no votes. I think that after two
months of no votes the package should
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:43:05PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would make sense for there to be a limitation on how long a
package exists in this table with no votes. I
I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
Regards Trevor
@ proj
date : 08 Mar 2003
version: 4.4.6-1
status : not reviewed
notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00176.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00162.html
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
Unfortunately, AFAIK, you are not a package maintainer. The package
maintainer club is who gets to vote.
cgf
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
Unfortunately, AFAIK, you are not a package maintainer. The package
maintainer club is who gets to vote.
cgf
Oops,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:26:23PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
Unfortunately, AFAIK, you are not a package maintainer.
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:26:23PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:54:06PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I guess I'll have to become one quickly, for my votes to count...
How about coreutils?
Or has someone already volunteered for that?
cgf
: [UPDATE] Pending package status (11 Jul 2003)
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:46:59AM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote:
I would like to give proj and libgeotiff my vote if that's ok.
Unfortunately, AFAIK, you are not a package maintainer. The package
maintainer club is who gets to vote.
cgf
15 matches
Mail list logo