Just to complete the list:
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html
Gerrit P. Haase wrote on Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1:53 AM:
Hello Lapo,
Well I guess I will at least try harder porting djbdns, then, I
really miss a local DNS resolver on my laptop 0=)
1. caching DNS server
Hello Brian,
(As for a local resolver, I use the win32 BIND9.)
Works well? I don't like BIND very much, but I could use it as a
fall-back in case I can't get dnscache to work...
It works well, even has a nifty installer that installs it as a
service. The command line binaries (host, dig,
Hallo Charles,
+1 vote from me for libgeotiff (makes 3 IIRC, please upload).
+1 vote for proj.
Would you ming to included also GEOS in this set of packages?
If so, +1 vote for geos.
Where did THIS come from? I ITP'ed these over a year ago; surely
there's a statute of limitations
Hello,
Just read at the gnome website about the cross-desktop MIME-type
system.
As with GNOME 2.6, you must define the XDG_DATA_DIRS environment
variable to the path at which your MIME database is installed, for
instance prefix/share.
Now I thought that things like this need to be handled, and
Hello,
I have read what I can find, but am getting stuck with sshd. I am using
Openssh 3.9p1-2. My service starts fine, and I am running it with -d -d
-d -e parameters (set in registry), I used -v -v -v on the ssh command line.
My key files are owned by SYSTEM:none, and are read-write for
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hello,
Just read at the gnome website about the cross-desktop MIME-type
system.
As with GNOME 2.6, you must define the XDG_DATA_DIRS environment
variable to the path at which your MIME database is installed, for
instance prefix/share.
Now I thought that things like this need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Dessent wrote:
Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the
imagination.
It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the
package, maybe it qualifies as Public Domani, but I guess an email to
DJB could
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:15:47PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Igor, can we get two gold stars for Jason? One for his years of
Postgres support, and another one for just being a long time
contributor to Cygwin.
[snip]
Done.
Thanks!
On Oct 6 11:20, Lapo Luchini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Dessent wrote:
Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the
imagination.
It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the
package, maybe it qualifies as Public
On Oct 6 18:37, koan wrote:
Hello,
I have read what I can find, but am getting stuck with sshd. I am using
Wrong mailing list. Try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[EMAIL
Hello,
I'm running cygwin setup in quiet mode and i want to do it with all
users options. i thought it was set by default as it is when you run the
setup in standard mode but when i install cygwin as regular user under
windows xp or 2000 the mount entry in the registry are set into
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Already ported: BIND. Why don't you use bind?
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/
Because most of us don't like bind that much, I assume.
There is the Lightweiht Resolver Daemon lwresd included with the
bind-9 sources.
2. authoritative-only DNS server
Powerdns:
On Oct 6 12:48, Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Already ported: BIND. Why don't you use bind?
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/
Because most of us don't like bind that much, I assume.
I guess using bind is some sort of a habit. The same goes for sendmail.
You think
Am in the process of adding functionality.
I have a shiny new feature working locally:
Context Menu item checks /etc/passwd for the preferred shell of the current
user, and starts that as a login shell using the specified term.
At the moment it has some quite horrible quoting going on, and I'm
bertrand marquis wrote:
Hello,
I'm running cygwin setup in quiet mode and i want to do it with all
users options. i thought it was set by default as it is when you run the
setup in standard mode but when i install cygwin as regular user under
windows xp or 2000 the mount entry in the registry
Hello Yaakov,
As with GNOME 2.6, you must define the XDG_DATA_DIRS environment
variable to the path at which your MIME database is installed, for
instance prefix/share.
Now I thought that things like this need to be handled, and probably
the best would be to do such initial settings in the
At 12:55 PM 10/6/2004 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 6 12:48, Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Already ported: BIND. Why don't you use bind?
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/
Because most of us don't like bind that much, I assume.
I guess using bind is some sort
Dave schrieb:
Comments appreciated.
yes, this is perfect for handling -s optionally in chere:
default shell from /etc/passwd
chere [options...] [-s shell] -t terminal
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
Dave wrote on Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1:29 PM :
Am in the process of adding functionality.
I have a shiny new feature working locally:
Context Menu item checks /etc/passwd for the preferred shell of the
current user, and starts that as a login shell using the specified
term.
At the
ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation
The distribution can be uploaded from:
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1-src.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/setup.hint
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:40:32PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
ccdoc 08.41 is ready for experimentation
The distribution can be uploaded from:
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1-src.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-08.41-1.tar.bz2
A number of problems with 2.0.2-14 have been fixed, and I've also
upgraded X and linked against the new X libraries.
I'd like to remove 2.0.2-14 and have this new release replace it.
Any ideas how to handle the setup hints? The new tetex-x11 hint file
requires: x11-org-base (instead of
New port for review.
sdesc: C library that implements an embeddable SQL database engine.
ldesc: C library that implements an embeddable SQL database
engine. Programs that link with the SQLite library can have SQL
database access without running a separate RDBMS process. The
distribution comes
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Any ideas how to handle the setup hints? The new tetex-x11 hint file
requires: x11-org-base (instead of XFree86-base), but that would be a
problem for 2.0.2-13.
Well, you could require both (the new XFree86-base is a dummy package,
which won't do
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote:
New port for review.
sdesc: C library that implements an embeddable SQL database engine.
ldesc: C library that implements an embeddable SQL database
engine. Programs that link with the SQLite library can have SQL
database access without
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
Well, you could require both (the new XFree86-base is a dummy package,
Ok, that sounds like an acceptable option. I've fixed the xorg name
and added XFree86-base.
P.S. Does it really require xorg-x11-base, or xorg-x11-bin-dlls?
I just mimicked ghostscript-x11.
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be tested at all.
This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already in
the public domain.
The reason I submitted it to this group for approval was because I was
bit
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be tested at all.
This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already in
the public domain.
The reason I submitted it to this group for approval was because I was
bit
Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps schrieb:
New port for review.
Ah, Jaari is back in business! Great. And a complete new building
engine... and the same libtool problems as most of us...
+1 for sqlite
./sqlite-3.0.7-1.sh conf builds into sqlite-3.0.7/.build/.build which
seems to be odd.
really
Reini Urban wrote:
Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps schrieb:
New port for review.
Ah, Jaari is back in business! Great. And a complete new building
engine... and the same libtool problems as most of us...
+1 for sqlite
+1 vote from me too.
./sqlite-3.0.7-1.sh conf builds into
Reini Urban schrieb:
Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps schrieb:
Ah, Jaari is back in business! Great. And a complete new building
engine... and the same libtool problems as most of us...
+1 for sqlite
./sqlite-3.0.7-1.sh conf builds into sqlite-3.0.7/.build/.build which
seems to be odd.
really
Joe Linoff wrote:
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be tested at all.
This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already in
the public domain.
The reason I submitted it to this group for approval was because
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL building
instructions are from the CYGWIN FAQ, just wrongly applied.
Builds out of the
Should I re-submit this with the ITP designation?
Reini Urban wrote:
Joe Linoff schrieb:
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be tested at all.
This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already
in the public
Gerrit P. Haase writes:
Hallo Charles,
+1 vote from me for libgeotiff (makes 3 IIRC, please upload).
+1 vote for proj.
Would you ming to included also GEOS in this set of packages?
If so, +1 vote for geos.
Where did THIS come from? I ITP'ed these over a year ago;
Reini Urban wrote:
Ah, and if you upload it please remove mhash-devel, since mhash-0.9.1-1
includes the devel stuff also. I already wrote it, but double is better.
Or leave it as [prev]. As you want. (I don't think so)
No, removed it and changed the setup.hint you included to reflect that
the
Joe Linoff schrieb:
Should I re-submit this with the ITP designation?
If you get 3 positive reviews IMHO not.
Reini Urban wrote:
Reini Urban schrieb:
You need a subject like: [ITP] ccdoc 08.41
Why this funny version number?
It should be called ccdoc-0.8.41 imho.
Or if MAJOR is 8 leave the 0 away = ccdoc-8.41
This is irritating.
Thanks for the insight.
I would strongly prefer ccdoc-0.8.41 but the cygwin
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be tested at all.
Any reason for sending this multiple times?
What everyone seems to be missing is this:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:01:16AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Reini Urban wrote:
Ah, and if you upload it please remove mhash-devel, since mhash-0.9.1-1
includes the devel stuff also. I already wrote it, but double is better.
Or leave it as [prev]. As you want. (I
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00270.html
I'm thoroughly confused. You are the package maintainer but you, and
everyone else are treating this like a new experience.
Just me. Sorry, my fault.
I thought I know all the packages by hard.
--
Reini
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be tested at all.
Any reason for sending this multiple times?
What everyone seems to be missing is
Hi:
Please upload the following to replace ccdoc-0.8.39-1:
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2-src.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/setup.hint
There are no cygwin related changes.
Thanks,
Joe
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:33:50PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be tested at all.
Any reason for
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
Well, you could require both (the new XFree86-base is a dummy package,
Ok, that sounds like an acceptable option. I've fixed the xorg name
and added XFree86-base.
P.S. Does it really require xorg-x11-base, or
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
Well, you could require both (the new XFree86-base is a dummy package,
Ok, that sounds like an acceptable option. I've fixed the xorg name
and added XFree86-base.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:33:50PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't
think that the program needs to be
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an oversight, because their DLL building
instructions are from the
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:04:48PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Reini Urban wrote:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 08:44:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
I want to take over and maintain the cygwin version of mhash-0.9.1
It was probably just an
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:51:33PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote:
You are correct. I will be more vigilant in the future. Thanks for
pointing this out.
NP. Thanks for volunteering to maintain a package and put up with this
grief.
cgf
50 matches
Mail list logo
