Okay, I've uploaded and announced the new gettext packages:
gettext-0.10.40-1
libintl1-0.10.40-1
libintl-0.10.38-3
I also updated the setup.hint files on the server for the following
packages:
wget mutt nano vim sharutils
The maintainers of those packages should make a note
I have uploaded my update to nano 1.0.7 to
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/nano/
This version compiles completely OOTB without even the LIBS=-lintl in front
of make or configure...
It also installs the locale files into the correct directory now
Spell checker should now work less buggy
Hi ... I am going out on a limb here and assume that this feature hasnt been
suggested before. (ummm yeah I know I should of checked the message lists -
I am prepared to shoot myself if I am wrong :P)
Having just read Corinna's announcement that regex was going to be removed.
I was thinking that
Ok, I'll be the religious one. If a package is removed from setup.ini
then setup should leave previously installed versions alone. If a
package needs to be removed due to serious conflicts with Cygwin then a
null package can be created to remove the conflicting files. Then at a
later
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 6:03 AM
As for the # of executables in the /bin directory, isn't
there a limit to the number of files and/or directory entries
in any one directory on win32?
As has already
Gareth Pearce wrote:
note - i know little to nothing about db and havent looked at the
packages
Hmmm depending on release order seems rather dubious to me...
Would it not be better to have the symlink installed by postinstall script
that checks if there is an existing symlink and only
I haven't missed a message wrt the ABI compatibility merge have I?
We're still waiting for that, right?
If you have, so have I. (and I been paying more attention then usual). But
then again I am not subscribed to gcc-patches. hmm nope - nothing there yet.
Gareth
- Original Message -
From: Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: gcc-3.2 C++ ABI and packaging c++ libraries [was Re: [ITP]:
Berkeley DB v3.1]
Gareth Pearce wrote:
B)If possible, I'd like to know what
- Original Message -
From: Danny Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gareth Pearce [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: migrating cygwin-mingw-gcc branch
The merge has happened.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-07/msg01277.html
umm
I actually managed to upgrade my cygwin instalation and still have time to
give this method 2 stuff ago.
So, introducing nano-1.1.10-1 - the first 'unstable branch' release for
cygwin.
It may be unstable branch, but I have been using it for a while on debian,
and the only bug I have experienced
Argh - sorry bad gareth sent copys to authors as well as list.
Gareth - adds to your spam by appologising :P.
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:05:42AM +, Gareth Pearce wrote:
Hi,
Here is one more package, astyle.
http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/astyle
-package.tar.gz
http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/doxyge
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:14:46PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
Just a pro-vote - for both - not that i have had a chance to check them
for quality...
Corinna says:
Why not?
ummm because I am a busy boy? :P - barely get a few minutes spare at
all these days, let alone next to my
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:25:34AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I forgot to mention this earlier, but I also like the idea of the
necessary files being in one tar, like this:
http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/5153/cygwin-package/tmake-
1.8-1-package.tgz
Instead
Good! :) I've downloaded the latest package earlier today and gave it a
try. It seems to behave well - as far as I can tell and I am not a doxygen
user. I've tried some of the tests (not all) from
/usr/doc/doxygen-version/exmaples/
and they seemed to produce the html docs. However one of the
changing subject title since this is a different topic really.
(Also switch to cygwin-apps since its about setup)
Actually, I haven't installed Cygwin for the first time on a machine, in a
long while. Does it popup a dialog to telling the user to modify the PATH
to include C:\cygwin\bin? If
I added a patch to follow some recommendations from Gerrit.
1) have the library name be cygxerces-c2_1_0.dll rather than
libxerces-c2_1_0.dll (following conventions used by other libraries in
cygwin).
2) the symlinks created in the build structure during make more
accurately represent the
Anyone wishing to review these packages can point setup.exe to
http://abackus.imagineis.com.
I'll definitely review these when i get home ... hopefully they will solve
my xerces-c related problems.
Gareth - still doesnt understand why hes got xerces-c related problems in
the first place.
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Gareth Pearce wrote:
Anyone wishing to review these packages can point setup.exe to
http://abackus.imagineis.com.
I'll definitely review these when i get home ... hopefully they will
solve
my xerces-c related problems.
Ping. Have you had a chance to review
Sorry about that guys... I don't like making excuses, so I'll just blame
it
on the hallucinogenic drugs :) I'll have a -1 version back there soon and
I'll remove the -2 version. It'll contain the fix for the problem with the
wrong dll (my tar.incl file still had the libxerces instead of
Woops - sorry all...
still a bit brain dead after finishing my thesis...
same with other message eek!
Gareth
- Original Message -
From: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gareth Pearce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:27 AM
Subject: Fwd: Re
3. xerces-c
[...]
reviews: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg9.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00048.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00047.html
votes : 3 (Gerrit, Gareth and Robert)
AFAICS, this
, xerces-c-doc 2.1.0-1
available for review/upload
1) changed dll naming (cygxerces-c21.dll) and packaging based on the
suggestions and guidance of Charles Wilson
2) patched stricmp/strnicmp bug found by Gareth Pearce
Apache bug #14612 GCCDefs clashes with cygwin's string.h for stricmp
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Gareth Pearce wrote:
Okay i think it looks ready to go ... one non-show stopper point... when
running the shell script for generating the packages that comes with the
src
package - the created src package contains all the object files ...
missing
a make clean step i
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Daniel Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [ITP] par 1.52
Runtime requirements:
cygwin-1.3.19 or newer
So this won't work with older dlls?
I was under the
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 05:39:07PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
Your source package does not conform to 'Method Two', though you
seem to be convinced that it is.
Sorry this is totally new to me, I'm going with Method One. I was a
bit confused but have read the
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:21 AM
Subject: Re: nano editor : v.1.2.0 released
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 11:57:38AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Gareth Pearce wrote:
A lil slow
1 vote for aspell-dict *nudge nudge*
Gareth - who does intend one day to stop this sequence of busy weeks so he
can do stuff again.
erm - not to rain on this ... but is it a good idea if the patent has only
expired in america?
Gareth
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Unisys patent
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:38:28AM
8. Aspell
date : 07 Apr 2003
version: 0.50.3-1
status : not reviewed
notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html
votes : 4 (Christopher, Elfyn, Gerrit and Igor)
url:
16. Aspell-en
date : 19 Jun 2003
version: 0.51.0-1
status : not (yet) reviewed
notes : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00161.html
votes : 0 (aspell prerequisite)
url: http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
(correction)
libaspell is under
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
too many different 'personal website' directory layout formats for me...
and I only have 3.
Gareth
(correction)
libaspell is under
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
too many different 'personal website' directory layout formats for me...
and I only have 3.
Gareth
(correction)
libaspell is under
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
too many different 'personal website' directory layout formats for me...
and I only have 3.
Gareth
(correction)
libaspell is under
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/aspell/libaspell/libaspell15-0.50.3-1.tar.bz2
too many different 'personal website' directory layout formats for me...
and I only have 3.
Gareth
@ Aspell
date : 07 Apr 2003
version: 0.50.3-1
status : not reviewed
notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html
back from skiiing - with lots of catching up to do...
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 09:54:06PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
I guess I'll have to become one quickly, for my votes to count...
How about coreutils?
Or has someone already
Trying to find out everything thats been happening ... my hotmail clogged up
and a whole stack of email didnt get delivered - somewhat of a mess. It
even deleted some of my older emails - annoying. - in future i'll not keep
any old emails around in hotmail :)
I'd rather let Gareth take a look
nano i'll update to 1.2.2 when 1.5.* goes live
aspell is ready and waiting for 1.5 - or was last time i remember...
Gareth
- Original Message -
From: Elfyn McBratney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: Test packages, or lack thereof
Hi,
nano 1.2.2-1 is ready for distribution
in this release
- FHS conformance
- linked against newer ncurses (screen corruption things may have gone away
as a result)
- built with cygwin 1.5.3
- miscilaneous bug patches in nano itself
files:
http://users.on.net/gpearce/setup.hint
I didn't even try to compile them, yet, but being mathematical packages
I fear not they may not compile.
So I'm beginning to ask the list if there is interest in those two
number theory / big integer libraries.
http://www.swox.com/gmp/
http://www.shoup.net/ntl/
(I think I'll compile NTL
Doh - i forgot gcc 3.3.1 is 'test' - but indeed - if theres Anyone who wants
to develop with libaspell before gcc test version goes real - i think they
can use the test ... no?
I dont really think that aspell needs to be marked as test because of this.
Gareth
You haven't marked them as test
AFAIC, we're ready.
I'll repeat the URLs for the dictionaries:
04be855c088559b4682b5495510234fe *aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/aspell-en-0.51.0-1-src.tar.bz2
33fad88cd4d517596ebab42d368ba750 *aspell-en-0.51.0-1.tar.bz2
aspell Gareth Pearce*
aspell-dev Gareth Pearce*
aspell-doc Gareth Pearce*
aspell-en Gareth Pearce*
Aspell-en is actually RLC
Secondly - I have sent an announce post for aspell (which also covers
aspell-en), but it seems to have
I suspect that a few packages are also unmaintained. Is the astyle
maintainer still around, for instance?
FWIW if the astyle maintainer didn't pipe up I was going to offer to
maintain it in their absence. However a quick investigation shows that
upstream astyle has had no development in over
Robert wrote:
Sure. I'm interested.
I already downloaded the package from CVS.
Okay - I'll not bother looking any further into things myself for now.
Gareth wrote:
Hmm despite the apparent lack of upstream development on this one - m4
is
pretty rock solid (compared to astyle at
Take it.
I only wanted to play with it to get it working for me any way.
I'll find something else to contribute.
Robert
I don't have an express desire to maintain m4 - I only said I would consider
doing it, cause I like to try and be helpful and fill gaps which I can
manage. M4 looked
doxygen Ryunosuke Satoh
I just want to point out, that the astyle maintainer also has the
ownership of doxygen. The doxygen version does not work correctly on text
mounts and Ryunosuke confirmed me this lastly (after some private email
conversation 1 year ago), but he
Gareth Pearce wrote on Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:05 PM:
Also - I'm willing to (try to)update (and maintain there after) -
doxygen Preferably with graphviz to go with it. This is assuming that
the position is open. I've built 1.3.4 - and run it over a 90thousand
line project - using
If Debian has put it under non-free it does not meet Debian's poliy for
main.
It's problamy not compatible with GPL or the OpenSource Definition
For reference:
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/license/index.html
Daniel Reed wrote:
ITP: graphviz
HOLD-UPS: Not enough votes (need 2 more). No package, nothing to
review!
I use it to create GPG trust relationsships graphs.. I guess it wuold be
handy to have on (standard) Cygwin.
Aye.
Additional hold-ups for this one should include - no
This doesn't really seem appropriate to me. Devel maybe?
Gareth
Hallo,
Somoehow setup.exe installed the gcc source package gcc-core for me,
however I only wanted to install the binaries and it was also not
listed in the Up-To-Date section after I tried to uninstall the source
again. What I did now was to explicit install gcc-core (the source
This is the list of maintainers and packages as of Saturday, November 1,
2003.
This list is generated using information from a variety of sources,
including
the live repository, the package coordinator's records, and software-
tracking
sites such as freshmeat.net. Packages that appear to
I understand this may not be a very high priority as many people are
probably using Broadband now, but I know I would appreciate it, and I
imagine many others would too. I know this wouldn't really be much of an
issue except that I've noticed in my downloads that I average between 1.7
and
If a vote for gd is a vote towards gnuplot, you have my vote.
I would like to contribute and maintain the gd package:
* http://www.boutell.com/gd/ (Homepage)
* http://www.boutell.com/gd/http/ (Download location)
My goal is to contribute the gnuplot package
*
Hmm... just noticed that you have libgd2 and libgd2-devel... I was under
the impression that you should stick the DLL version in the libgd
package name, which you did, but I thought that the DLL version number
was *not* included in the -devel package name.
It seems to me that the devel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
Sent: Wednesday, 3 December 2003 10:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ITP] ImageMagick
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:27:48AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
I would like to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 1:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ITP] ImageMagick
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:07:59PM +1100, Gareth Pearce wrote:
-Original
3. Package openjade and opensp. These don't build with gcc3 yet, so that
might
take a while. This would allow users to build cygwin-doc with tools
available
from the Cygwin net release (with the possible exception of the info
manual).
If I remember correctly, I've gotten jade on a gcc3
ago. Gareth Pearce once
wanted to take over and sent also an ITP for the related graphviz, but
I've not heard anything from him about these packages for some months,
too. So ...
of course I don't
have time and/or 1.3 is not a stable branch are perfectly good
reasons ^_^)
Regards
Hi
I would like to contribute and maintain the aspell-pl package:
* http://aspell.net/ (Homepage)
* http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/ (Download location)
! Download size 9 MB
Ciao
Volker
Official aspell dictionaries definitely get my
On 2004-01-30T14:12+0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
) wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/aspell-
de/setup.hint
) wget http://cygwin.dev.wapme.net/packages/vzell/cygwin/release/aspell-
de/aspell-de-0.50.2-1-src.tar.bz2
) wget
Jari Aalto wrote:
| Time to relax, so get gnuschess + xboard and start playing:
I vote pro gnuchess and xboard.
I vote pro gnuchess and xboard as well.
Gareth Pearce
_
E-mail just got a whole lot better. New ninemsn Premium
a timeout drop the listing of having
someone who submitted the idea.
I still do intend to package graphviz just waiting for an appropriate amount
of time to spend on it.
Gareth Pearce
PS yes, I changed emails.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Yaakov Selkowitz
Sent: Monday, 26 July 2004 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Heads-up: aspell-dev marked test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
-setup.hint
http://www.users.on.net/~gpearce/libsasl2-2.1.19-1.tar.bz2
Regards,
Gareth Pearce
Security Developer
Panareef Pty. Ltd. (www.panareef.com)
}/doc under /usr/share/doc/cyrus-sasl-2.1.19 and maybe the
uppercase files from {srcdir}/saslauthd under
/usr/share/doc/cyrus-sasl-2.1.19/saslauthd ?
Sounds like a good idea.
I will endeavour to have an updated package ready tomorrow.
Regards,
Gareth Pearce
Security Developer
Panareef Pty. Ltd
in conformance with RFC .
http://www.users.on.net/~gpearce/libsasl2-setup.hint
http://www.users.on.net/~gpearce/libsasl2-2.1.19-1.tar.bz2
Ready for upload?
Regards,
Gareth Pearce
Security Developer
Panareef Pty. Ltd. (www.panareef.com)
the copying of files
in a wildcard/specified fashion occurred in a way which the resultant
directory structure matched the source and the other where the resultant
directory structure was flattened. The current patch works for wildcards
aiming into a single target directory.
Regards,
Gareth Pearce
Nano
(Several unstable versions I could consider moving too but wont unless
interest is expressed, also some new stable versions, I guess I should
update.)
Aspell binaries and docs and dev and libaspell but not dictionaries.
(There is a new version of this which I will upgrade too if any
Lapo Luchini wrote:
Lapo Luchini wrote:
Hi Gareth,
just a quick question: do you plan to support the current nano-2.0.x
branch in your Cygwin package relases?
Gareth replied privately to me that's ok with him if I adopt the package.
Should anyone take a look at the packaging?
)
This desperately needs to be ITA'd. I have a version in Ports if anyone
who actually uses this wants to pick it up:
http://cygwin-ports.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cygwin-ports/ports/trunk/www/apache2/
cyrus-sasl/libsasl2 ORPHANED (Gareth Pearce)
cyrus-sasl/libsasl2
73 matches
Mail list logo
