-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 6 11:20, Lapo Luchini wrote:
I guess an email to DJB could clarify it a bit...
It's essential to do this. A source code with no copyright or
licensing information at all is highly lawless ground. Dunno about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Dessent wrote:
Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the
imagination.
It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the
package, maybe it qualifies as Public Domani, but I guess an email to
DJB could
On Oct 6 11:20, Lapo Luchini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Dessent wrote:
Still, I doubt it qualifies as OSI-approved by any stretch of the
imagination.
It doesn't even have a copyright notice in the source nor in the
package, maybe it qualifies as Public
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Dessent wrote:
Did we already have a DJB licensensing-discuss thread? I wouldn't
exactly call djbware free software, but I'm also not familiar with the
requirements of Cygwin packages. Would it even be allowed?
Mhh.. I don't remember...
Lapo Luchini wrote:
Mhh.. I don't remember...
Yes, actually we had (and I did also do some reply.. 0_0)
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/threads.html#01639
...but that was on QMail, which has Information for distributors at
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html, while no similiar page
