On 2017-05-24 20:07, Doug Henderson wrote:
> , On 24 May 2017 at 18:16, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> I would appreciate it if anyone has any experience with, or can point me
>> to, any python3 code in any Cygwin package which works Windows proxy
>> authentication?
> I had a glance at the source. I
, On 24 May 2017 at 18:16, Brian Inglis wrote:
> I would appreciate it if anyone has any experience with, or can point me
> to, any python3 code in any Cygwin package which works Windows proxy
> authentication?
I had a glance at the source. I recall adapting it to load SQL tables
with units
On 2017-05-24 12:13, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Brian Inglis writes:
>> Updating the currencies only when setup is run seems to me to be
>> insufficient if users want to use current currency conversions.
>
> Well yes. But that means that each user should be able to update, not
> just the
Brian Inglis writes:
> Updating the currencies only when setup is run seems to me to be
> insufficient if users want to use current currency conversions.
Well yes. But that means that each user should be able to update, not
just the administrator.
> Would the best approach be to punt on running
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] writes:
> I would prefer that by default updates happen automatically and those
> who do not want automatic updates do something to stop them from
> happening.
That there should be updates was never debated, only the machanism of
doing so is discussed here.
>
On 2017-05-24 10:26, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
> Brian Inglis sent the following at Tuesday, May 23, 2017 10:37 PM
>> On 2017-05-23 17:55, Doug Henderson wrote:
>>> On 23 May 2017 at 15:49, Brian Inglis wrote:
Updating the currencies only when setup is run seems to me to be
Brian Inglis sent the following at Tuesday, May 23, 2017 10:37 PM
>
>On 2017-05-23 17:55, Doug Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 23 May 2017 at 15:49, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>
>>> Updating the currencies only when setup is run seems to me to be
>>> insufficient if users want to use current currency
On 2017-05-23 17:55, Doug Henderson wrote:
> On 23 May 2017 at 15:49, Brian Inglis wrote:
>
>> Updating the currencies only when setup is run seems to me to be
>> insufficient if users want to use current currency conversions.
>
> Currencies needs to be split to a different package from
On 23 May 2017 at 15:49, Brian Inglis wrote:
> Updating the currencies only when setup is run seems to me to be
> insufficient if users want to use current currency conversions.
Currencies needs to be split to a different package from non-currency
units. Non-currency units is very static,
On 2017-05-23 11:28, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Brian Inglis writes:
>> The easiest approaches to this would be:
>> - rename or delete postinstall script which might upset cygcheck or
>> setup remove
>> - null /usr/share/units/currency.units, as it is required and produces
>> an error message if not
Brian Inglis writes:
> The easiest approaches to this would be:
> - rename or delete postinstall script which might upset cygcheck or
> setup remove
> - null /usr/share/units/currency.units, as it is required and produces
> an error message if not available, but if it is empty, everything works.
On the cygwin list, Achim Gratz asked:
> Can you please make that configurable by some file in /var/lib/units
> that will prevent the perpetual postinstall script from even forking
> if the user decides that this should not be updated?
Configuration of units is currently supported only in
Last time I simply removed the `test' marker. This time I'll ask.
John, are you sure that it should become a `test' version?
Please see setup.html. It explicitly requires this for new packages.
Rob
Ok, I bit. Step 5:
5. Create setup.hint file following the documentation on this web page.
For new packages the first upload MUST be tagged as experimental. Once
the package has no major bug reports from the users, then a current
package may be introduced
Rob
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:53:30PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Ok, I bit. Step 5:
5. Create setup.hint file following the documentation on this web page.
For new packages the first upload MUST be tagged as experimental. Once
the package has no major bug reports from the users, then a
I found a problem with the bash_completion as stands...
I have a path ~/Applications/Apache Group/ with no other directory in
Applications starting with 'A'. When I cd ~/Applications/A[tab] it doesn't
autocomplete.
When I look through the shell script I can see...
snippit
# Turn on extended
===
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
I found a problem with the bash_completion as stands...
...
Sorry to have caused so
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:02:07AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
I found a problem with the bash_completion as stands...
I have a path ~/Applications/Apache Group/ with no other directory in
Applications starting with 'A'. When I cd ~/Applications/A[tab] it doesn't
autocomplete.
That's
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 11:22 am
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:02:07AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
I found a problem
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:40:35PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Hi,
I've packaged up the latest version of units.
I've just uploaded it to sourceware.
You might consider to send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in a few hours. Please keep the format as you will find it in
the cygwin-announce
December 2001 11:29 am
To: Morrison, John
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Units
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:40:35PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Hi,
I've packaged up the latest version of units.
I've just uploaded it to sourceware.
You might consider to send a message to [EMAIL
===
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Robert Collins' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Morrison,
John [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:50 PM
Subject: RE: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Question: does
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:53:30PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Ok, I bit. Step 5:
5. Create setup.hint file following the documentation on this web page.
For new packages the first upload MUST be tagged as experimental. Once
the package has no major bug
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:39:13AM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Thanks. Will do.
btw, since you prob a *lot* more about bash than I do (since you're the
maintainer for cygwin ;) have you any idea's why that's scripts messing cd's
auto completion up?
Prepared for disappointment?
Ok, then,
Oh well - never mind :) I CC'd the original author, hopefully either he (or
somebody on this list...? :) can fix it *GRIN*.
J.
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 12:45 pm
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Units
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:09:17PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:38:39AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Not amused,
Corinna
Nor, am I amused. If it must be tagged I'd rather see the tag NEW
instead, unless the maintainer believes that
Charles Wilson wrote:
John, why don't you create a bashutils package, to serve as a
collection of (moderately) useful bash scripts and settings. For now,
it could contain only bashcompletion, but later you could add -- oh,
bashprompt, or something...
I'm sure every daily bash user has
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2001 7:26 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Units
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:09:17PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:38:39AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Corinna Vinschen
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see how that applies to the first release of a new package.
I'd call it pretty basic risk management. If the package doesn't cause
any havoc, then put it in current really quickly. I'm just nervous with
the concept
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:27:33PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see how that applies to the first release of a new package.
I'd call it pretty basic risk management. If the package doesn't cause
any havoc, then put
===
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Btw, I think Earnie's idea of having a *New!* category is actually a
good one. I have been meaning to implement something like that for
the
web package lister, in fact.
Yes. I intend to do that for setup once we
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 04:25:49PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Btw, I think Earnie's idea of having a *New!* category is actually a
good one. I have been meaning to implement something like that for the
web package
===
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about
New within the last _x_ days ?
Then it's up to the user.
Rob
Thanks.
btw - did you have a look at the bash completion script I posted about the
other day?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 10:27 am
To: Gary R. Van Sickle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Units
Sounds like
OK,
The setup.hint and bz2 packages can be found at:
http://www.straylight.eu.org/~carl/bash_completion/
Here's the hint file...
sdesc: A script of Bash completion rules.
ldesc: A relatively new feature in bash is programmable completion,
which has been available since the beta version of
Cc: Morrison, John; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Earnie Boyd wrote:
I think that `category: Utils' is too generic. I'd prefer Misc but
that's reserved. How about `category: Shell Utils'?
In the current grammar, `category: Shell Utils
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats not what the help file says...
Note that category names may be multi-word, e.g., ASCII Games but,
currently all categories are only a single word.
I know that.
category: Shell Utils
is two categories.
category: Shell Utils
is one category. (Earnie's
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:16:58PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is fun.
A couple of questions for you wrt setup.hint...
category: the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:04:22AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats not what the help file says...
Note that category names may be multi-word, e.g., ASCII Games but,
currently all categories are only a single word.
I know that.
category: Shell Utils
is two
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:58:55PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Gah! I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to
Earnie instead. Sorry about that...
Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see,
http://cygwin.com/setup.html doesn't mention any Shell Utils
, 2001 4:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
snip
I'm not sure how you got that impression. This includes the cygwin package
itself would be applied to If your package is dependent on a file. So,
if
your package is not dependent on anything in the cygwin package
The same could be said for many people where the sender is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001
completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:21:17PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
I have to admit that I thought it was quite confusing too. Perhaps if it
said, This rule also applies to Cygwin itself because Cygwin is also a
package?
Now, *that's* confusing.
So the cygwin package should say
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:58:55PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Gah! I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to
Earnie instead. Sorry about that...
Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see,
http://cygwin.com/setup.html
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:25:36PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Is there no way that the list program can rewrite the reply-to line? That
would Make Things Easier(TM), IMHO of course :)
How about if I just block any email that mentions Reply-To? That
would make things a lot easier for me.
cgf
: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:25:36PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Is there no way that the list program can rewrite the reply-to line? That
would
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:31:40PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
That's what the webpage implies. If that's not what it means, then surely
you have to agree that the page is confusing.
I guess now I understand at least one specific confusion.
Robert already clarified the intent of the section. Go
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there anything similar to this in Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, etc.?
Well, /etc/profile, hosts, passwd, group and other core config files are
owned by the 'setup' package in Red Hat Linux. Then there's the
initscripts package for the rc.d directory. And most of the
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 4:17 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:04:22AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:13:35AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there anything similar to this in Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, etc.?
Well, /etc/profile, hosts, passwd, group and other core config files are
owned by the 'setup' package in Red Hat Linux. Then there's the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:28:28PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 4:17 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
I hate to be a wet blanket about
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:26:00PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:28:28PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Fair enough - I found it today and found it useful. I thought one of the
purposes of this list was to question whether an app would be a nice
addition.
It
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'd like to pour fuel into the fire of `usefulness' of a package.
I'd like to contribute the NetBSD fortune package to Cygwin and
therefore I'd even like to propose to add a Games section *gasp*.
setup.hint:
---
sdesc: Print a random, hopefully
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:46:58PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'd like to pour fuel into the fire of `usefulness' of a package.
I'd like to contribute the NetBSD fortune package to Cygwin and
therefore I'd even like to propose to add a Games section *gasp*.
setup.hint:
===
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm. Maybe I just convinced myself that they belong as a separate
package.
How about this:
John, why don't you create a bashutils package, to serve as a
collection of (moderately) useful bash scripts and settings.
- Original Message -
From: Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions?
Cool. You've my vote.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Ebrey, Carl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One thing I would like to say though is that I've been quite annoyed
by the
attitudes that come over on this mailing list. The last time I
checked
Cygwin was an open project, available for anyone to contribute and
offer
help.
work done :)
J.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Collins
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 9:37 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: fortune-1.8-1 [was Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)]
- Original Message
Sure. Will do either tomorrow or Friday.
J.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 5:54 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Christopher Faylor wrote
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:36:52AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm. Maybe I just convinced myself that they belong as a separate
package.
How about this:
John, why don't you create a bashutils package, to serve as a
I've email'd the author - he's blessed the port. I've also asked him to
keep me in touch with new versions.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 17 December 2001 11:31 am
To: Morrison, John
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Units
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:29 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Units
erm, I should probably add that the actual setup.hint file /does/ have @
units as the first line. Just for clarity, and all her friends :)
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, John
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:43:34PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2001-12-17 at 22:38, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Oops. Having actually read the new setup.html I see that the @ line is now
optional. Okay, so now I feel stupid and I shall see to it that I get a
severe beating in order to ensure
63 matches
Mail list logo
