Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 06:22:21 +0200
From: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps
> On 30.07.2020 21:38, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> >
> > By the way, when should I promote libiconv-1.16-2 from test to current?
>
> when you are confident about it. ;-)
>
&
On 30.07.2020 21:38, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
By the way, when should I promote libiconv-1.16-2 from test to current?
when you are confident about it. ;-)
But, I don't know how to promote.
Should I rebuild and release as libiconv-1.16-3 ?
No. Just remove the "
t; CI results here:
> >
> > https://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/jobs.cgi
> > https://ci.appveyor.com/project/cygwin/scallywag/history
> >
>
> Very wonderful!
> Thank you.
By the way, when should I promote libiconv-1.16-2 from test to current?
But, I don't know how to promote.
Should I rebuild and release as libiconv-1.16-3 ?
Regards,
Lem
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 12:45:35 +0200
From: Achim Gratz
> Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
> > I've prepared it at a branch w_build-requires in the repository
> > https://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/libiconv.git .
> >
> > But not merged yet to master branch.
>
> You should push
Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
> I've prepared it at a branch w_build-requires in the repository
> https://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/libiconv.git .
>
> But not merged yet to master branch.
You should push experiments to the playground branch, which you can
force-push and delete
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 10:29:15 +0200
From: Achim Gratz
> When you next build the libiconv package, please add BUILD_REQUIRES so
> the CI can try to build it. Currently it's missing at least gperf from
> the CI build environment.
All right, Achim.
I've prepared it at a branch w_build
When you next build the libiconv package, please add BUILD_REQUIRES so
the CI can try to build it. Currently it's missing at least gperf from
the CI build environment.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Factory and User Sound S
On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 19:45 +0200, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On 11.07.2020 04:03, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I suggest an update to libiconv 1.16, since the current Cygwin
> > packages of libiconv 1.14 are old (updated 5 y
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 19:45:59 +0200
From: Marco Atzeri
> On 11.07.2020 04:03, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I suggest an update to libiconv 1.16, since the current Cygwin
> > packages of libiconv 1.14 are old (updated 5 years ago).
>
On 11.07.2020 04:03, Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Hi!
I suggest an update to libiconv 1.16, since the current Cygwin
packages of libiconv 1.14 are old (updated 5 years ago).
Cygport files are forked
to https://github.com/cygwin-lem/libiconv-cygport/tree/w_1.16
from http
Hi!
I suggest an update to libiconv 1.16, since the current Cygwin
packages of libiconv 1.14 are old (updated 5 years ago).
Cygport files are forked
to https://github.com/cygwin-lem/libiconv-cygport/tree/w_1.16
from http://cygwin.com/git/cygwin-packages/libiconv .
New test package files
These two package-sets should be updated together.
* compiled against cygwin-1.5.1 kernel
* documentation moved to /usr/share/*
libiconv-1.9.1-2
libiconv2-1.9.1-2
libcharset1-1.9.1-2
gettext-0.12.1-2
gettext-devel-0.12.1-2
libintl2-0.12.1-2
libgettextpo0-0.12.1-2 (*)
(*) new library package
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:48:11AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
These two package-sets should be updated together.
libiconv-1.9.1-1
libiconv2-1.9.1-1
libcharset1-1.9.1-1
gettext-0.12.1-1
gettext-devel-0.12.1-1
libintl2-0.12.1-1
libgettextpo0-0.12.1-1 (*)
The gettext manpages were installed
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:48:11AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
These two package-sets should be updated together.
libiconv-1.9.1-1
libiconv2-1.9.1-1
libcharset1-1.9.1-1
gettext-0.12.1-1
gettext-devel-0.12.1-1
libintl2-0.12.1-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These two package-sets should be updated together.
libiconv-1.9.1-1
libiconv2-1.9.1-1
libcharset1-1.9.1-1
gettext-0.12.1-1
gettext-devel-0.12.1-1
libintl2-0.12.1-1
libgettextpo0-0.12.1-1 (*)
The gettext manpages were installed into usr/share/man/*
Actually, now
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:48:11AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
These two package-sets should be updated together.
libiconv-1.9.1-1
libiconv2-1.9.1-1
libcharset1-1.9.1-1
gettext-0.12.1-1
gettext-devel-0.12.1-1
libintl2-0.12.1-1
libgettextpo0-0.12.1-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
I had the same thought. I don't have any problems with the gradual
adoption
of /usr/share/man, as long as the man command works with it, of course.
I wish we'd used /usr/share/man from the start, in fact. Oh well.
While we're at it, It
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:48:11AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
These two package-sets should be updated together.
libiconv-1.9.1-1
libiconv2-1.9.1-1
libcharset1-1.9.1-1
gettext-0.12.1-1
gettext-devel-0.12.1-1
libintl2-0.12.1-1
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:57:56PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
localedir = bindtextdomain (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR);
...
puts (localedir);
Am I right here? I had not much to do with libintl so far so please
excuse my questions.
No, I think that actually
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:42:04PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Real fix: figure out why sharutils thinks it needs access to that
variable, and use the public API to do the same thing. If possible.
shar just uses the value to print it to stdout if the option
Charles,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:32:55AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
These two package-sets should be updated together.
libiconv-1.9.1-1
libiconv2-1.9.1-1
libcharset1-1.9.1-1
gettext-0.12.1-1
gettext-devel-0.12.1-1
libintl2-0.12.1-1
libgettextpo0-0.12.1-1 (*)
trying to build
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
trying to build sharutils for 1.5.0, I've just came across a problem:
gcc -o shar shar.o encode.o ../lib/libshar.a ../lib/libshar.a -lintl -lintl
shar.o(.text+0x5523): In function `main':
/home/corinna/src/sharutils-4.2.1/src/shar.c:1970:
undefined
These two package-sets should be updated together.
libiconv-1.9.1-1
libiconv2-1.9.1-1
libcharset1-1.9.1-1
gettext-0.12.1-1
gettext-devel-0.12.1-1
libintl2-0.12.1-1
libgettextpo0-0.12.1-1 (*)
(*) new library package -- gettext-devel now depends on it. Because we
do not have versioned requires
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 18:32, Charles Wilson wrote:
Because we
do not have versioned requires AFAIK
We do. Not extensively tested, but see the setup homepage for the
syntax.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On 14 Jul 2003 18:37:21 +1000, Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 18:32, Charles Wilson wrote:
Because we
do not have versioned requires AFAIK
We do. Not extensively tested, but see the setup homepage for the
syntax.
Should I use it, in this case -- or is
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 18:47, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 14 Jul 2003 18:37:21 +1000, Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 18:32, Charles Wilson wrote:
Because we
do not have versioned requires AFAIK
We do. Not extensively tested, but see the setup homepage
/usr/lib/libiconv.la is given in /usr/lib/libintl.la(dependency_libs).
Therefore, to link with it, the libiconv package must be installed.
Max.
[Cleaning out my mailbox]
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:50:16AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Now you can link gcc against libiconv ;-).
FWIW, I hope I have done this. I added the libraries in the hopes that
the gcc configury would find it. How do we determine if it worked?
cgf
Christopher Faylor wrote:
[Cleaning out my mailbox]
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:50:16AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Now you can link gcc against libiconv ;-).
FWIW, I hope I have done this. I added the libraries in the hopes that
the gcc configury would find it. How do we determine
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 06:43:55PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
[Cleaning out my mailbox]
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:50:16AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Now you can link gcc against libiconv ;-).
FWIW, I hope I have done this. I added the libraries in the hopes
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I just realized that it was pretty easy to check. I just have to look at
the build logs. Nope. No -liconv. After all that trouble to install
it, gcc only randomly detected it in certain directories.
I haven't looked at the gcc-3.1.1 source tree, but I know
I think you need to configure with
--enable-nls \
--without-included-gettext \
For gcc-3.2 I get
$ cygcheck cc1.exe
Found: .\cc1.exe
.\cc1.exe
C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll
C:\WINNT\System32\KERNEL32.dll
C:\WINNT\System32\NTDLL.DLL
C:\cygwin\bin\cygintl-2.dll
It's worth a try, but wasn't there a lot of work done recently in the
top-level configury of gcc? You are probably benefitting from that; it
remains to be seen whether it'll work in 3.1.1.
--Chuck
Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
I think you need to configure with
--enable-nls \
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:37:18PM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
I think you need to configure with
--enable-nls \
--without-included-gettext \
Yup. I do.
Maybe it's a cross-build thing.
cgf
For gcc-3.2 I get
$ cygcheck cc1.exe
Found: .\cc1.exe
.\cc1.exe
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:41:17PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
It's worth a try, but wasn't there a lot of work done recently in the
top-level configury of gcc? You are probably benefitting from that; it
remains to be seen whether it'll work in 3.1.1.
I think most of the work was just
This all gets my vote, particularly libiconv. And as a bonus, it gives me yet
another excuse to delay release of mutt-1.4-1 ;-) (it uses libiconv).
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer. Patriot.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles
ditto for ImageMagick (it uses it too, and I could use an excuse).
-Original Message-
From: Gary R. Van Sickle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 June 2002 10:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: libiconv
This all gets my vote, particularly libiconv. And as a bonus
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:49:57AM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
ditto for ImageMagick (it uses it too, and I could use an excuse).
I don't think there is any doubt that this will be useful. I'd say go
for it, Chuck.
Okay, it's uploaded.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:49:57AM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
ditto for ImageMagick (it uses it too, and I could use an excuse).
I don't think there is any doubt that this will be useful. I'd say go
for it, Chuck.
Okay, it's
39 matches
Mail list logo
