On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:25:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, there! :)
I finally packaged Midnight Commander for inclusion in the cygwin
distrubution. I delayed this for some time, because there is a bug
in cygwin, triggered when using MC with subshell support - I wanted
to
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:25:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, there! :)
I finally packaged Midnight Commander for inclusion in the cygwin
distrubution. I delayed this for some time, because there is a bug
in cygwin, triggered when using MC with subshell
1) The appropriate list for this discussion is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ehm.. of course it is.
2) I've checked in a quick option --no-replaceonreboot that does this, for
you to build upon. It needs building upon because failing to replace those
files *will* require a roll-back of the rest of the
I've generated the native and X11 packages for Ghostscript 7.05. The
layout for the three packages (base, native and X11) should probably
be reviewed (Chris F. and Chuck W., when you get the chance.)
I've also generated a new setup.hint file, which probably also needs
to be reviewed before
Someday, I'm sure that I'll understand why people insist on redirecting
cygwin-apps discussions to cygwin.
Anyway, I'm redirecting this back to the correct mailing list.
cgf
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:31:30AM -0700, Dario Alcocer wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 06:08:46AM +0100, John Morrison
-
setup files:
#1)
ghostscript
requires: cygwin libpng2 zlib ghostscript-base
version: 7.05-1
You don't specify the version in setup.hint. You either
a) don't include any version info at all; upset will figure it out
b) specify using curr: prev:
Charles Wilson wrote:
Now, all of the RPM-nuts are jumping up and down screaming RPM! RPM!
right now -- and the Debian faction is yelling dpkg! dpkg!. BEFORE
voicing that, please go back and READ the 27,374 threads where this
has been suggested in the past. Here's a summary:
--
- Original Message -
From: David A. Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jan
Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: ITP: Guile 1.5.6
Charles Wilson wrote:
Now,
I think some more precise info could be helpful.
Right now just starting setup.exe and pressing two times view, to view
default install selection leads to:
packagename current = new
kde-x-1.3 1.3-1.3 = 1.3
kdebase-2 2-2-2-2.2.2-b1 = 2.2.2-b1
kdegames-2 2-2-2-2.2.1-a2 = 2.2.1-a2
kdelibs-2
- Original Message -
From: Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:16 AM
Subject: Re: setup.exe and replacing of in-use files
Oh, and BTW: the patch was about 2 minutes work :}. Doing transactional
installs will be somewhat more :}.
I
David A. Cobb wrote:
I'm just a plain-nut! Would it be worthwhile, in your opinion, to look
at GNUpdate? At least, it doesn't carry any corporate baggage.
But we LIKE corporate baggage! And cygwin is part of a secret
government scheme to...well, another time, perhaps. And don't
Hi Chris [and other mknetrel hackers],
Today, I had a look at mknetrel 1). I think it's great, and it indeed
looks a bit like the cygwin-cross tools 2).
A very short overview.
mknetrel:
* creation of cygwin packages only, by cross building on linux.
* set of functions for each stage
Chris,
Can you please modify upset (or tell me where to find the current CVS so I
can offer a patch) to generate per-version requirements lists in setup.ini?
I'm not sure how best to specify such things in setup.hint :[.
This is compatible with the current released setup.exe, and enables
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:01:46PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Can you please modify upset (or tell me where to find the current CVS so I
can offer a patch) to generate per-version requirements lists in setup.ini?
I'm not sure how best to specify such things in setup.hint :[.
I've posted the
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:05:54AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi Chris [and other mknetrel hackers],
Today, I had a look at mknetrel 1). I think it's great, and it indeed
looks a bit like the cygwin-cross tools 2).
A very short overview.
mknetrel:
* creation of cygwin packages only,
Thanks Chris.
The following patch should move the requires: line out to be per-version,
but it doesn't address the upset internal representation to allow true
per-version requires. I'll have a longer study of this issue next weekend.
Cheers,
Rob
===
Index: upset
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 01:07:57PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Someday, I'm sure that I'll understand why people insist on redirecting
cygwin-apps discussions to cygwin.
Oops, I realized I had typed in the wrong address in the To:,
of course right after I sent the darn e-mail off :-(
17 matches
Mail list logo
