Re: ps help, version patch

2002-05-28 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good formatting, wrong date == extremely minor problem. Applied. Thanks. cgf After getting some sleep, I also noticed this line in my usage function: With options, %s outputs the long format by default\n, prog_name, prog_name); which

Re: ps help, version patch

2002-05-28 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 07:28:04AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: --- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good formatting, wrong date == extremely minor problem. Applied. Thanks. cgf After getting some sleep, I also noticed this line in my usage function:

Re: New stat stuff (was [PATCH] improve performance of stat() operations (e.g. ls -lR ))

2002-05-28 Thread Conrad Scott
Chris, I've just picked up the latest changes from CVS and I'm having a problem with run.exe from a .BAT file (i.e., from my current cygwin.bat mechanism). After a bit of tracing, I've found that it comes down to NtQueryObject in handle_to_fn() in dtable.cc. NtQueryObject succeeds but the

Re: New stat stuff (was [PATCH] improve performance of stat() operations (e.g. ls -lR ))

2002-05-28 Thread Conrad Scott
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 11:00:28PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: I've just picked up the latest changes from CVS and I'm having a problem with run.exe from a .BAT file (i.e., from my current cygwin.bat mechanism). What's run.exe? cgf Sorry: it's

Re: New stat stuff (was [PATCH] improve performance of stat() operations (e.g. ls -lR ))

2002-05-28 Thread Matt
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Don Bowman wrote: So I've performed a mini-benchmark of Chris' changes. I did a ls -lR /dev/null of the cygwin source tree on my notebook. It might be a good test to do ls -lR /test.txt between the different configurations and diff the output to make sure nothing was

Re: New stat stuff (was [PATCH] improve performance of stat() ope rations (e.g. ls -lR ))

2002-05-28 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:58:52PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote: So I've performed a mini-benchmark of Chris' changes. I did a ls -lR /dev/null of the cygwin source tree on my notebook. Baseline (current setup.exe install): 1m14.9s 'statquery' patch I sent earlier: 4.081s Current CVS tree: 3.718s

Re: New stat stuff (was [PATCH] improve performance of stat() ope rations (e.g. ls -lR ))

2002-05-28 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:25:37PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:58:52PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote: So I've performed a mini-benchmark of Chris' changes. I did a ls -lR /dev/null of the cygwin source tree on my notebook. Baseline (current setup.exe install): 1m14.9s

Re: New stat stuff (was [PATCH] improve performance of stat() ope rations (e.g. ls -lR ))

2002-05-28 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:27:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:25:37PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:58:52PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote: So I've performed a mini-benchmark of Chris' changes. I did a ls -lR /dev/null of the cygwin source

Re: New stat stuff (was [PATCH] improve performance of stat() operations (e.g. ls -lR ))

2002-05-28 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 11:47:45PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 11:00:28PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: I've just picked up the latest changes from CVS and I'm having a problem with run.exe from a .BAT file (i.e., from my current