On Dec 11, 2007 11:49 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
Janjaap Bos wrote:
The changes I made are all in the patch. Let me know when you have
suggestions, and whether you're able to build it. Perhaps Yaakov is
willing to check it with his findings.
Thank you VERY much. I will try to look
On 10/28/05, Alan Hourihane wrote:
This test version was built from the mainline X.Org trunk code and not
the CYGWIN branch.
I'll be working on getting whatever changes exist on that branch over
into the mainline trunk code next.
If the patches are still in CYGWIN then that's the problem.
On 10/28/05, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 19:56 -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
I've taken the opportunity to evaluate the new package. Prior
versions of Cygwin/Xorg provided the dlls and development files for
the libDPS interface. For some reason, they were omitted
On 10/28/05, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
On 10/28/05, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 19:56 -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
I've taken the opportunity to evaluate the new package. Prior
versions of Cygwin/Xorg provided the dlls and development files for
the libDPS interface
On 10/27/05, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Yep, uploading myself to sourceware now.
They'll be in-place in the next hour.
Alan,
I've taken the opportunity to evaluate the new package. Prior
versions of Cygwin/Xorg provided the dlls and development files for
the libDPS interface. For some reason,
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
It looks like we no longer need ttmkfdir in order to expose the fonts
installed with Windows to X11. The mkfontscale utility that is included
with out distribution was inspired by ttmkfdir and essentially replaces it:
That's not what it says, at least it makes no claim
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Noted. I am not sure that I can do anything about that. Doesn't seem
like it would be worth looking into at the moment. I would gladly
accept a tip or patch from anyone.
I don't know how, but I think this is my fault. I modified the install
script to bzip the
Ron Stanonik wrote:
Recall, after upgrading xfree from 4.2 to 4.3, then libXft and libfontconfig
found no fonts.
My mistake apparently. I had to run fc-cache (which scans for fonts and
builds fonts.cache-1 files). I assumed fonts.cache-1 were just for performance,
not strictly required. I was
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Damien,
You can just do this:
touch /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/host.def
Our host.def doesn't really have anything in it, so this should work
just fine. I will try to release another fix to XFree86-progs tomorrow
if an empty host.def takes care of your problem.
Harold,
David A. Case wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
No. Older X apps will need to be recompiled for 4.3.0. This is a
change that needed to happen. In the meantime, you can keep the old
DLLs in the same directory and it will allow older X apps to run side by
side with new X
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Nicholas,
Can you explain to me what fontconfig and freetype2 are, specifically?
Freetype2, quoting the homepage [1]:
FreeType 2 is a software font engine that is designed to be small,
efficient, highly customizable and portable while capable of
producing
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Can anyone think of any changes to the font packages between 4.2.0 and
4.3.0 that would require me to repackage and distribute 4.3.0 font sets?
If not, I would really like to just leave the current 4.2.0 fonts in
place since it will save most people from downloading
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Andrew,
You aren't a -multiwindow guy yet?
I don't know about him, but some of us do prefer to have a full window
manager to operate in. However, I'm sure there are many who like to
have a rootless X, and thus multiwin suits them fine. It would be sorta
nice, though,
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Nicholas,
I really don't know what to do here. Perhaps some others know what to
do and whether or not this is a good idea.
Would it be easier to update to 4.3.0? Have we already made Xt a shared
lib in 4.3.0?
On a side note, has anyone been seeing signs of when
Hi Harold,
It's been awhile... Anyhow, I've been working on a few packages which
use libtool, and thus the reason behind my request. It turns out, using
the new libtool, that one has to go to extreme lengths just to get libXt
to link in, since the new libtool balks at linking true static
--- Mlarcvaernas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that a Rootless mode for the Xserver right now
is one of the most important and crucial features
needed. For the Xserver to be used in a way that is
convenient for many users, the option to have X
applications displayed on the main Windows
--- Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secondly, Cygwin's shared
import libraries end in dll.a not .a [which is the suffix
reserved for static import libraries]. I really think we ought
to
differentiate on this. What if I wanted to distribute a shared
and
static version of my
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:32:27 +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
How about a seperate package call X11-compat for this? Just
seems
like a waste of space for people who don't care.
Good
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
final outcome:
--
/usr/X11R6/bin/cygXfoo.0.0.dll
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXfoo.0.0.dll.a
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXfoo.0.dll.a
/usr/X11R6
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 11:24:43PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
Nice job!
For the libXft-1.dll we'll need a hack somewhere to make that
libXft.dll for backwards compatibility.
in cygwin.cf is
--- Stuart Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One method is to provide a 'mirror driver' to intercept the all
calls
from GDI to the display driver (this should be the method used by
Netmeeting).
But that requires a device driver doesn't it? (i.e. code that runs
in
kernel mode).
--- Stuart Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As what we are wanting to do here isn't strictly a cygwin/Xfree86
thing could I suggest we start a new sourceforge project and
mailing list
for this?
A new SF project yes, but this is very much a Cygwin/XFree related
issue. It's easier to keep up
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't use GDI in the name. I ask this because I don't want
there
to be confusion between the Cygwin/XFree86 NativeGDI engine and any
foogdi project.
Consider instead something like the following:
XShell
XExplorer
Something more
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any such development would need to occur in a branch that could
eventually be merged back in if it proves stable, useful, well
modularized, and actively maintained. If not, I'll just forget
that
anyone ever talked about doing it in the first
Hi Alan,
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:25:11 -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
Nicholas,
I wasn't even aware of XFree86 4.2.1 until you mentioned it.
I am not sure if I will build a release of it or not... seems
like a lot of
trouble for just a
--- Harold L Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yikes.
Didn't your mothers ever tell you guys that you are crazy?
C'mon Harold, doesn't the idea seem even a bit compelling?
Cheers,
Nicholas
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stuart Adamson wrote:
Every Windows draw command is translated into calls to a GDI
driver. this
driver is either the driver of the graphics card or a
printer. The people
from wine already have written a driver which exports a GDI
interface and
maps
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith D. Tyler wrote:
More over, if you have GDI-fake-X-GDI-real, that would be quite
ugly
for the speed.
Wouldn't running Windows emulation under POSIX emulation under
Windows
be, at best, just as bad?
Yes. That's why I'm saying:
- if you want
--- Guy Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:13:50 -0500, Michael Harnois
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oooh. This is stranger than I thought. Some of those programs do
get built
correctly, despite the log messages. For instance in config/util,
makestrs,
revpath, and rman
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I don't use xkb extension and after each logon to AIX system run
xmodmap .xmodmap.cz
on my remote machine, where .xmodmap.cz is my keyboard definition
file.This
needs to by run just once, not for each terminal.
Pavel
--- Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Bertrand Muquet wrote:
Hello
I've got a problem running xdvi with Xfree 86
When Xdvi shall display .eps files, it does not work
and I get the fwg msg:
gs: unknown device:X11
This message is coming from
--- Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
So all he has to
do, if it is possible, is to tell Xdvi to use that binary
instead. I
have no idea how to do that, though.
man xdvi
-interpreter filename
(.interpreter
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. I'm still trying to build xrn.
$ xmkmf
mv -f Makefile Makefile.bak
imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config
In file included from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/Imake.tmpl:1845,
from Imakefile.c:9:
/tmp/IIf.576279:312: unterminated
--- Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Manjunatha Shetty Kondalli wrote:
Could you please tell me the solution for following problem?
Xlib: connection to mywinhost:0.0 refused by server
Xlib: Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key
Error: Can't open display:
--- Brian Genisio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Stuart Adamson wrote:
I thought it would be neat if there were a way to run a Java
app
in Windows, and display on an X server.
A quick web search on Java, X11 points me to
--- John Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ooh, if you need anyone to help test! I will! I've
been wanting somebody to do this since I started cygwin
and Java development!
Well I'll see what I can do. Last time I was working on it, I was
battling bad arrays and structs which couldn't be
--- Hans Werner Strube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some months ago I built xfig with an easily self-compiled static
libXaw3d.a.
Now after installing XFree86-Xaw3d-1.5-1, I rebuilt xfig. This
failed
with a plenty of errors indicating multiple entry-point definitions
(from Xaw3d and Xt) and
--- Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you wan't more ?
The expression is:
What more do you want?
Cheers,
Nicholas
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
--- Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Ralf Habacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you wan't more ?
The expression is:
What more do you want?
Cheers,
Nicholas
Arrrggg! I forgot about the Reply-To munging! Sorry, this wasn't
intended for the list
This is more appropriate for the Cygwin/XFree list.
--- Keith Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The script /etc/profile.d/00xfree.csh includes the following line:
eval echo ${PATH} | grep -q ${X11PATH}
This is executed before $PATH has been set, resulting in an error
message:
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:14:50AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
Any comments ?
Are there any licensing issues with qt? Is the open source license
compliant
with cygwin's?
http://cygwin.com/licensing.html
Ghostscript's license [The
--- Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 10:41:41AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:14:50AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
Any comments ?
Are there any licensing issues with qt? Is the open source
license compliant
with cygwin's?
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:00:59AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
in the QPL. What bugs me is the word Unix. Cygwin is not
Unix
but it's... well, some sort of plug in to Windows, isn't it? I
hate to say that.
Again, I must point out
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 07:51:08AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:14:50AM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
Any comments ?
Are there any licensing issues with qt
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 10:57:36AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, AFAIK, YANAL and IANAL, so I don't know how you can make
Can we please cut out the acronyms
--- Staf Verhaegen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everything De Icaza and Ximian does is open source except one peace
of code
that is used to connect to an expensive propriety email server.
Without this
connector thing evolution email client is fully usable and open
source as is
ximian gnome,
Jehan,
As a rule of thumb, packages should *never* modify the /etc/profile
script (even if you do back it up). This is a big no-no, as most
*nix people would tell you. If you insist on getting into a
discussion on why this is, then so be it. Instead, create 2 scripts
(a csh and a sh) and drop
Harold et al.,
After a brief discussion this morning, Ralf has given me permission
to package QT-2.3.1 and release it to the Cygwin community. I would
like to have it under the XFree86 dir, since it is a fully native X
library. This release has been throughly tested by us over on the
--- Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, remember also that the X11 version is licensed under the GPL,
so it is
fine. They do make some other versions that are not yet licensed
under the
GPL. The native Windows version used to be non-GPL, but I think I
remember
seeing something in
--- Jim George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I say finally but of course the fun is just beginning for me:)
I now have sylpheed (the X Mail Client) running under cygwin-X and
it's very good, there are some items that could be beefed
up/improved upon (and I shall offer whatever help I'm able to)
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralf,
Since KDE on Cygwin might eventually depend on this Qt package, why
don't you guys decide together what the best location would be?
I really have no idea where to put it, so I'm all for just putting
it
somewhere and cleaning up the
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is going on here Mr. Jack Larsen? We have had four posts of
this
meesage to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Were you intending to post
this to
cygwin-apps or somewhere else?
Have you put this in release/ or release/XFree86? If it isn't in
--- Stuart Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Granted, the XWin man page is out of date now and could do with an
update
...
Patches are, as usual, Gratefully Accepted.
Cheers,
Nicholas
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live
Harold,
Thanks for the sarcasm, but it was hardly warranted. I was simply
restating the facts for those who were not involved. Also, it seems
that you missed one of the points of that discussion, which was that
all things of XFree nature should be discussed on the XFree list,
regardless of
--- Dennis Foreman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't replies to a list automatically go to the list? My replies
seem to
be going to the personal mail of posters. I believe there is a setting
in
many list servers that prevents the replies from going to the poster.
regards,
D. J. Foreman
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
Hold on a minute here.
I am seeing three newsgroup cross-posts in the header for this message.
Can someone else verify that this is indeed being cross-posted?
Yup, he's cross-posting alright:
Newsgroups:
--- Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
Hold on a minute here.
I am seeing three newsgroup cross-posts in the header for this
message.
Can someone else verify that this is indeed being cross-posted?
Yup, he's cross
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Foreman wrote:
At one point in history, (before WW II) the head of the US Patent
Office
said he wanted to close the office because everything that needed to
be
invented had already been invented and there was nothing left the
world
--- Thomas Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you're writing a script that very likely will contain a password in
cleartext? How secure is that?
Keep it on a floppy-disk, and keep that in plastic case in your pocket.
It works for me. Then it will be just as secure as your wallet. Now
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2002 1:36 AM
Harold,
Who's to say that ReactOS won't have a registry?
1
--- Joe W. Guy, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me if/how to install GNOME on cygwin? I have XFree86
running on cygwin, but the only window manager that I have is TWM.
Please
advise.
No GNOME for you, sorry. But you are welcome to install KDE! Check out:
--- Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 16:33, Harold Hunt wrote:
For future reference, the xlauncher-style program is on my list of
things to
do. I want it done in straight C or C++ interfacing the GDI manually.
I
don't want dependencies on cumbersome
Hi,
Instead of bitching, all people have to do is click once on the default
option and it will switch to install. This installs everything except
the test packages. If only people would try to figure it out a little
before complaining. Although, I suppose eventually we'll have to get
setup to
--- Rasjid Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:08 am, Ralf Habacker wrote:
This is a great idea. I was thinking of using a language/toolkit
that I
could compile on my Linux box, as it it my main development machine.
Delphi isn't too bad, as it (sort of) works under
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to check if the batch file already existed or not. Attached is
the corrected script.
Jehan
#!/bin/sh
BATCH_FILE=/usr/X11R6/bin/startxwin.bat
if [ ! -f ${BATCH_FILE} ]; then
# First part of the
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to attach the X.ico file. It's not the best in the world but
I guess it will do (it's the same I sent you with the systray patch a
while ago). It is to be installed in /usr/X11R6/bin (or you have to
modify the script)
Jehan
might've missed
something...like discussion of the mkshortcut tool in cygutils...)
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot to attach the X.ico file. It's not the best in the world
but
I guess it will do (it's the same I sent you with the systray patch a
while
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you search the archives, others have already made icons ready for
you
use :).
Well, I had this one for quite a while already.
I wonder why not just can all the dos stuff by having
--- Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 10:24 AM
I mind. Setup should become -more- data driven not less.
Excuse me? All I was suggesting is to reword the final
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
--- Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you search the archives, others have already made icons ready for
you
use :).
Well, I had this one for quite a while
--- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being interested in porting freeciv with gtk+ support... and gtk+
package being not available... I'm investigating it =)
Harold states he has not enough time for it (
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-06/msg00302.html ).
But has he a
--- Harold L Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas,
He has something. Frankly, I think we should let harold release these
packages. He's got a firm understanding of the underlying mechanics
of
how X works. Plus if you commit to maintainership of 1.X, then it is
assumed that you
--- Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
Alexander,
Unfortunately, we still have to #undef i686. I just tried removing
the
``#undef i686'' and the results are below. The problem is that the
value for
the i686 define is still being
--- Harold L Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas,
I'll post this later tonight. Prepare a release announcement to send to
both
the regular list and cygwin-xfree-announce. I'll let you know when it
is
posted so you can send the announcements in. Use messages in the
archive for
Xaw3d is the 3D version of the MIT Athena widget set for X11.
RELEASE NOTES:
I have used patches to the SuSE Linux version of this
library to fix security and UI bugs. Also, some patches
have been added by me to address Cygwin building and to
bring this library into the 21st Century.
--- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following message is copied from message wrongly sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now Nicholas Wourms has ported libXaw3D so maybe I should do a 1.12.0-2
to use it... or maybe two separate binary packages are better?
One for libXaw (that is default
For any xwin developer:
This is not explained in the FAQ or the Contributors guide. Can some
explain to me, if it is even possible, exactly how one generates both a
shared [.dll and .dll.a] and unshared [.a] library via the imake system?
How are the foo-def.cpp files generated? If possible,
Greetings All,
I have compiled and packaged the 3D Athena Widgets for Cygwin/XFree86 as
promised in my previous message. It should be completely functional and
ready for use. If they are satisfactory, please upload them to the
mirrors. Attached is the README file from the package. I used
--- Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, cross compiling is toroughly broken right now. It will take awhile
to
get it working properly. I'd appreciate it if anyone that is cross
compiling the current XFree86 cvs would send in their host.def, any
modification they made to cygwin.cf,
--- Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, Nicholas -- don't squish Rhialto that quickly. He's probably one
of our new users who knows nothing about the cygwin project except what
he read on slashdot this morning.
Sorry,
I am still cranky about the refusal to include objc in
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 02:24:13PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:57:55PM -0400, Christopher Faylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:17:13PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
Then I have tried pointing my font
--- Greg Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have cc'ed this to Nicholas since I'd like to know what version
of X he was running...
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:45:58AM -0400, Christopher Faylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I'd never used the 'xset fp=' command before.
--- Greg Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 05:01:52AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris + Greg,
Check your e-mail, I just e-mailed both you and greg an xfs.exe with
debugging symbols. As for what version I'm running, it is the vanilla
version
--- Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
I had a quick look and it looks to me like the only option via
setup.exe
if I want to make xfs is to download the full source for X. Is the
source
a special tree for cygwin or could I copy over the source I already
have
from
--- Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas,
You might want to set your cvs sticky tag to the xf-4_2-branch for the
checkout if you run into problems with HEAD. If you do go this route,
be
sure to unset the sticky tag in the /xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xwin
directory. This way
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 05:01:52AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Check your e-mail, I just e-mailed both you and greg an xfs.exe with
debugging symbols. As for what version I'm running, it is the vanilla
version that comes via setup.exe, a.k.a
Harold,
We had this discussion in the past, and yes I *have* read the cygwin-xfree
contributor's guide and followed your directions WORD-FOR-WORD, except for
removing the NO_TCP_H and defining font building.
I checked out the Xfree tree with the 4.2.0 sticky tag. I then updated
the xwin
--- Greg Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:12:58PM -0400, Christopher Faylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:54:38PM +1000, Greg Lane wrote:
The rules say to post here, although would there be any point
asking
on the main cygwin list to get a
--- Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas,
We had this discussion in the past, and yes I *have* read the
cygwin-xfree
contributor's guide and followed your directions WORD-FOR-WORD, except
for
removing the NO_TCP_H and defining font building.
You could not possibly have
Harold,
On ~ line 66158 of my build log, you'll notice this:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../../exports/lib ../../../exports/bin/bdftopcf -t
tech14.bdf | gzip tech14.pcf.gz
/bin/sh: ../../../exports/bin/bdftopcf: No such file or directory
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../../exports/lib
--- Harold L Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicholas,
Anyhow, I think we are missing the whole point of this thread, what
were
*YOUR* findings.
I forgot to draw attention to what I found, but I did post your build
snippet
with warnings and my build snippet that didn't have warnings
Nope,
It is shipped with I.E. 2.0. Only in win95oemsr2 a.k.a. Win95b did I.E.
3.0 start shipping.
Cheers,
Nicholas
--- Sylvain Petreolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have *Windows 95*,
you must have Internet Explorer 3.0 or greater
installed to use
Cygwin/XFree86, as this installs
Harold,
As you well may know, the /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config/host.def is needed for
running the xmkmf command. The issue is that this file is being installed
by both the lesstif and XFree86-prog packages. The problem is, when you
uninstall lesstif, the XFree86-prog version host.def is not
2) xwinclip.c - Add a UnicodeSupport function to check if we have
Unicode support or not. Currently this is done by just checking if we
are on an NT-based platform or not. (Harold Hunt)
Harold,
I found this on MSDN, and wonder if it might be of use for Unicode support
on 95/98/ME for
--- Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I think x2x is what you are after. Looks like the xservers need to
support the XTEST extension. Does the cygwin-xfree server support this?
Not sure where you'd find it, there is a description here:
- I did
some
additional poking around and found this, which describes making x2x more
secure:
http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/klee/misc/x2x.html
From: Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED], cygwin-xfree Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 06:25:49AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
I can confirm this with the the latest snapshot of cygwin on WindowsME.
I'll run an strace later and see what the problem is.
Was this ever posted? I never saw it, if so
--- Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris was referring to the fact that, in addition to placing the test
release stand-alone files (e.g., XWin-Test58.exe.bz2) on my msu.edu site
and
distributing them via the sources.redhat.com network, I have also been
placing a modified
People,
For the love of God, bzip2 is there for a reason, please use it. Some of
us have high mail volume and low mailbox quotas.
Thanks,
Nicholas
--- Harold L Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philippe,
Did you hide the mouse cursor when you took the screenshots? There's
not a
mouse
Harold,
Sorry to rehash an old discussion, but I just discovered this thread when
you mentioned it. I followed it through to conclusion, but it stopped as
quickly as it started. Whatever happened to this discussion? Any chance
of a new logo being adopted? I personally dislike the current
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
