--- Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 16:33, Harold Hunt wrote:
For future reference, the xlauncher-style program is on my list of
things to
do. I want it done in straight C or C++ interfacing the GDI manually.
I
don't want dependencies on cumbersome
--- Rasjid Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:08 am, Ralf Habacker wrote:
This is a great idea. I was thinking of using a language/toolkit
that I
could compile on my Linux box, as it it my main development machine.
Delphi isn't too bad, as it (sort of) works under
- Original Message -
From: Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rasjid Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cygwin-xfree Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been playing with wxWindows with C++.
Why not just code to the Win32 API? It's not that hard, not for a trivial
launcher.
wxWindows is a
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 16:33, Harold Hunt wrote:
For future reference, the xlauncher-style program is on my list of things to
do. I want it done in straight C or C++ interfacing the GDI manually. I
don't want dependencies on cumbersome libraries, and I don't want any
non-free compiler
- Original Message -
From: Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 16:33, Harold Hunt wrote:
For future reference, the xlauncher-style
: Re: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 7:08 am, Tim Thomson wrote:
snip
I would prefer that xlauncher, or a variant be installable via
setup.exe,
so it can be used by anyone. If it means porting/rewriting,
I'll give it a
shot :) (There isn't all
Tim,
How does this work, do I just make a package, and then email cygwin-apps?
Is this valid for this sort of program, where it isn't even compiled using
cygwin?
I haven't had any comments on this program yet because, while it is a neat
exercise and will be useful for other work, it will not
Harold Hunt wrote:
I haven't had any comments on this program yet because, while it is a neat
exercise and will be useful for other work, it will not be distributed with
Cygwin/XFree86 until it is written in a language that can be compiled with a
free software compiler, preferrably gcc or
Harold Hunt wrote:
That's fine about Java... but that last I knew this xlauncher was a Delphi
app. What have you got to say about that :)
WTF? I don't follow the xfree list all that closely, but didn't this
thread start out as Success with Java prog in XFree? I just assumed
that
Chuck,
WTF? I don't follow the xfree list all that closely, but didn't this
thread start out as Success with Java prog in XFree? I just assumed
that 'xlauncher' WAS that Java prog. Sorry for the confusion.
You know... sometimes I'm just not paying any attention at all. What has
happened
Harold Hunt wrote:
WTF? I don't follow the xfree list all that closely, but didn't this
thread start out as Success with Java prog in XFree? I just assumed
that 'xlauncher' WAS that Java prog. Sorry for the confusion.
You know... sometimes I'm just not paying any attention at all. What
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:56:44AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
I haven't had any comments on this program yet because, while it is a neat
exercise and will be useful for other work, it will not be distributed with
Cygwin/XFree86 until it is written in a language that can be compiled with a
12 matches
Mail list logo
