Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-21 Thread Charles Wilson
Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 8:33 AM if you select the source for more than one of [bob|bobx|boby], then it is downloaded only once (good) but is unpacked three times. This isn't a

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-20 Thread Charles Wilson
Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:59 PM Also, setup must do the following (even without new 'views' and whatnot) Setup should already do that, why not make a test setup.ini and see what

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:52:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:24:48AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: Chris, Shall we add this to the cygwin distro or are we still waiting for some postinstall shell script work? These will forever be known as Harold's Famous Last

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-19 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 6:56 AM In a related question that has to do with my laziness, I need a way to tarball a CVS tree without including the CVS directories. I'm sure this can be done with a simple

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-19 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 8:48 AM I didn't quite gather from the earlier discussions whether we can have a source package seperate from any binary packages. i.e., could we have XFree86-full-src

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-19 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:59 PM Also, setup must do the following (even without new 'views' and whatnot) Setup should already do that, why not make a test setup.ini and see what happens :]. It's all data

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:59:29PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: P.S. Chris, where'd upset go? the current version used to be in htdocs, but it's gone now. AND, the old version which lived in cinstall/temp, is still there -- and you said you were going to remove it.

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-18 Thread Harold Hunt
Chris, Shall we add this to the cygwin distro or are we still waiting for some postinstall shell script work? These will forever be known as Harold's Famous Last Words: Sure Chris, why not? Go ahead and add the packages to the distro. Be aware, I just updated XFree86-xserv to

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-17 Thread Harold Hunt
Looks like you figured out upset. Sorry about not responding. Actually, I did the same thing that Ian did and reverted to the upset from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src in the directory: winsup/cinstall/temp That version of upset reports the version number as the whole file name before the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:02:51AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: Looks like you figured out upset. Sorry about not responding. Actually, I did the same thing that Ian did and reverted to the upset from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src in the directory: winsup/cinstall/temp I'd forgotten about that

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:18:19AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: The syntax for upset should just be upset dir where `dir' is the directory containing the distribution. setup.ini will go to stdout. upset -u setup.ini dir will update an existing setup.ini. I beg to differ. Try setting it up

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available for comments and testing

2002-04-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:37:08AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: Try setting it up like sourceware then. The directory defaults to 'release'. Just do 'upset -u setup.ini' in a directory containing a the 'release' directory. I just moved contrib to release and the new upset works like a dream!