Eric, it took me all of twenty seconds to give that Echelon guy the link he
needed. Honest seekers after truth don't bother me, even if they could use
a search engine instead.
As for the spam, it sure has increased. As I deleted about six pieces
before getting to your message, I started
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Tim May wrote:
It's also a waste of time to write FAQs, I've concluded. I suspected this
before, but now I know it for sure. Those who most need to read a FAQ are
usually the least likely to do so. Those who read widely don't _need_ a
FAQ. FAQs are thus mostly useful for
At 05:11 PM 2/20/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
You're brighter than that DCF. If, say, 20 years from now
Insurance Companies get legal access to your shopping records that
Mega-Chain-Food stores have, and they find out that you've been
buying shrimp weekly, and that shrimp is proven to be a
I have as well. Never to the point of being inside the car, but to the
point of trying my key in the lock.
Yeah, given that one car off the assembly like looks pretty
much like another, and that a True CypherPunk(tm) wouldn't do
anything to his car to distinguish it from the rest of
At 7:45 AM -0800 2/14/00, Duncan Frissell wrote:
At 08:55 PM 2/12/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
Or will bother to look in the future.
What is considered legal/moral/rational today *might* change in
the future. Do you really want to take that chance?
It's a lot easier to
At 07:03 PM 2/20/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
I have as well. Never to the point of being inside the car, but to the
point of trying my key in the lock.
Yeah, given that one car off the assembly like looks pretty
much like another, and that a True CypherPunk(tm) wouldn't do
anything to his
At 4:03 PM -0800 2/20/00, Petro wrote:
I have as well. Never to the point of being inside the car, but to the
point of trying my key in the lock.
Yeah, given that one car off the assembly like looks pretty
much like another, and that a True CypherPunk(tm) wouldn't do
anything to his car
At 3:59 PM -0800 2/20/00, Petro wrote:
At 7:45 AM -0800 2/14/00, Duncan Frissell wrote:
At 08:55 PM 2/12/00 -0500, Petro wrote:
I wrote much of what you quoted and then responded to, and yet you snipped
the part that said "Tim May wrote..."
Please take some care in how you quote.
--Tim May
This thing has occasioned an untoward measure of shock, for the
fact is the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do provide for it,
see Rule 34, in appropriate circumstances--the argument should be
whether the circumstances are appropriate.
MacN
And everything the Feds do is correct? Both
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 09:30:36AM -0800, Eric Cordian wrote:
Why is toad even participating any more? Didn't it get junked after
Gilmore's editorial binge?
I'm about to "unsuscrive."
what and miss the antigravity posts?
--
1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 09:30 AM 2/20/00 -0800, Eric Cordian wrote:
Since [EMAIL PROTECTED] mysteriously died, without explanation,
there seems to be a large increase in the amount of crap, and the various
other listservs seem to be carrying random subsets of the total traffic.
I resuscrived myself via cyberpass
Greg Broiles wrote:
I resuscrived myself via cyberpass and am receiving traffic again - I
suspect perhaps someone deleted the list of subscribers.
I just resubscribed to cyberpass. It accepted me, so apparently I got
deleted during whatever service outage took place. Someone should
Anyone know if alladvantage is serious with their "get paid to surf the
net" ads?
14 matches
Mail list logo
