On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:47:00AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 07:58:01AM +, jim bell wrote:
> > What a relief!!!Thank heavens for leaks!!!
> > Jim Bell
..
> http://thesaker.is/trump-elected-as-president-risks-and-opportunities/
.. "So it has
On Jan 15, 2017, at 2:27 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
>> Trump did not say he grabs women's pussies whether they let him or
>> not. He said that women let him grab their pussies.
>>
>> And, since he is a handsome six foot three charismatic billionaire,
>> rich, powerful, and
On 11/9/2016 10:30 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
Jihadists cannot do these bad things, but
Trump can because he's a proud North American citizen. So, your
President can attack women and being intolerant with all the people.
Trump did not say he grabs women's pussies whether they let him or not.
You self righteous moron.
Do you think I'm interested in going into my personal drug history with you? I
have taken massive oral doses, on more than one occasion. Again: It is NOT
nearly the revelatory experience you seem to think.
Go swill some booze and fuck off jack =)
--
John
On Nov
> John Newman:
> Most pot heads I know
Instead of thinking for yourself, you subscribe to a predetermined pattern
of behavior, citing "what pothead's think" as a foundation for your truth
Eat it
In a sensory deprevation tank
> it's like me telling you "drink 2l of vodka"
It is not, why keep
On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 18:45:32 -0800
Razer wrote:
>
>
> On 11/27/2016 06:42 PM, juan wrote:
> > Druggies dying in the streets? That's the kind of bullshit that
> > propagandists dream up.
> . ^
>
> Detached from reality.
Your propaganda
On 11/27/2016 06:42 PM, juan wrote:
> Druggies dying in the streets? That's the kind of bullshit that propagandists
> dream up.
. ^
Detached from reality.
Rr
Nice of you to evade the point cunt. The point is, fucktard,
Libertarians would decriminalize shit like Herowhine and crackcaine but
sure the fuck wouldn't pay for treatment to keep the druggie from dying
in the streets or the regulation to keep it pure enough they aren't
simply poisoned by
On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:05:43 -0800
Razer wrote:
>
>
> On 11/25/2016 10:45 PM, John Newman wrote:
> > Drugs prohibition is fucking heinous.
> > I don't think it matters what the substance is. Locking an addict
> > up does not cure them =)
> >
> > It's all a bad fucking joke
> John Newman:
> Alcohol is a drug
Chemically, yes but not legally or socially, or you'd be in jail and out
of a job, fam
> you snipped out bullshit about "eat a half gram and find out"
Cuz you didnut try it, or address it
.5g flower is 100mg THC
I said 500mg THC
Eat it
> freak out like a
On Nov 26, 2016, at 7:56 PM, xorcist at sigaint.org wrote:
>> John Newman:
>> It is working?
>
> If you think alcohol is less than or equal to "drugs" in
> harmfulness, but maybe you are intentionally misreading
>
Alcohol is a drug. Surely you realize this. More
On 11/25/2016 10:45 PM, John Newman wrote:
> Drugs prohibition is fucking heinous.
> I don't think it matters what the substance is. Locking an addict up
> does not cure them =)
>
> It's all a bad fucking joke - a "war" to perpetuate a vested interest
> in keeping prison populations high (and
Drugs prohibition is fucking heinous.
I don't think it matters what the substance is. Locking an addict up does not
cure them =)
It's all a bad fucking joke - a "war" to perpetuate a vested interest in
keeping prison populations high (and profitable), to systematically fuck a
certain cross
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:07:39 -0800
Razer wrote:
>
>
> On 11/25/2016 08:39 PM, juan wrote:
> >
> > quick note on evil chemical compounds
> >
> > methamphetamine is a semi synthetic derivative of ephedrine,
> > ephedra having a long history in chinese culture
> >
>
quick note on evil chemical compounds
methamphetamine is a semi synthetic derivative of ephedrine,
ephedra having a long history in chinese culture
morphine is a fully natural green product manufactured by
mother nature - semi synthetic heroin is a minor
John Newman wrote:
> Heavy abuse of alcohol is just as destructive
> as heavy use of any other drug.
Alcohol is good, because it is legal. If it were bad it
wouldn't be legal.
Drugs on the other hand are destroying the future of our
Christian children. 2
On 11/25/2016 05:59 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:48:15PM -0800, Razer wrote:
>>
>> On 11/25/2016 05:28 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Morgan Freeman with some timeless wisdom:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoNNYLkQIsE
>>>
>>>
>> This isn't the one where he
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:48:15PM -0800, Razer wrote:
>
>
> On 11/25/2016 05:28 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Morgan Freeman with some timeless wisdom:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoNNYLkQIsE
> >
> >
>
> This isn't the one where he says very clearly, and distinctly "Tittie
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:49:06PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> On 11/25/2016 03:10 PM, John Newman wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 25, 2016, at 2:21 PM, xorcist at sigaint.org
> > wrote:
> >
> John Newman:
> Heavy abuse of alcohol is just as destructive
> as heavy use of
On 11/25/2016 03:10 PM, John Newman wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2016, at 2:21 PM, xorcist at sigaint.org
> wrote:
>
John Newman:
Heavy abuse of alcohol is just as destructive
as heavy use of any other drug.
>>> John Newman:
>>> On any severe alcoholic, or any
> Razer:
> There IS a lethal dose however for hash and other extracts
Wrong! (I'm on my Donald Trump shit [1])
> people produce for profit using all sorts of good shit like butane and
ether.
And CO2, which you breath in all day
Ever use soap?
Grab some dry ice and stop being such a grinch
>
There is no Lethal Dose of Marijuana. Even in food. You'd vomit it all
up before you ever ate enough. There IS a lethal dose however for hash,
pot crack, 'shatter', oils, and other extracts people produce for profit
using all sorts of good shit like butane and ether.
So I guess the moral is
LD50 = lethal dose for 50% of population
On November 24, 2016 5:02:58 PM CST, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:55:14PM -0500, John Newman wrote:
>> On November 23, 2016 7:30:13 AM EST, "xorcist at sigaint.org"
> wrote:
>> >> John Newman:
On 11/24/2016 02:55 PM, John Newman wrote:
>
> On November 23, 2016 7:30:13 AM EST, "xorcist at sigaint.org"
> wrote:
>>> John Newman:
>>> Heavy abuse of alcohol is just as destructive
>>> as heavy use of any other drug.
>> On who? Prove it
> On any severe alcoholic, or
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:55:14PM -0500, John Newman wrote:
> On November 23, 2016 7:30:13 AM EST, "xorcist at sigaint.org"
> wrote:
> >> John Newman:
> >> pot is definitely more benign than ecstacy
> >Take 500mg edible dose and say that shit
>
> Take ld50 of water and
> Shawn K. Quinn:
> Honestly, if you're going to vote exclusively for candidates with no
> realistic chance of being elected... you may as well just not vote.
But your stupid argument says these two options have the same effect =D
> In Texas, if you voted for Stein, Johnson, McMullin, or Mickey
> government mandating what said "crackhead" can put into his own body
Though I forgot to include 'use' law, it's clear I meant
a fully legal environment without any such drug laws.
> incarceration costs
You misread again, legal *drug* environment above has no such jail.
OP implied drug
On 11/19/2016 08:32 AM, John Newman wrote:
> LOL. Amusing.. umm.. anecdote about Owsley :)
>
> MDMA was first synthesized by Merck I think early 20th century.
> Alexander Shulgin definitely tried it in the 70s. He has a whole book
> that came out a while later about all the dope he cooked up
6 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is DEAD!!!
MDMA is 'designer methamphetamine
MDMA is 'designer methamphetamine
Do you how fucked up you look Tweaker?
Tweaker!Tweaker! Tweaker!
But I'm a Raver!
Tweaker!Tweaker! Tweaker!
But I'm a HIPSTER!
Tweaker!Tweaker! Tweaker!
Fuck you pharmapoisons. I took the best L on the planet back in the 60s,
and even THEN 99 percent of
> On Nov 19, 2016, at 6:00 AM, John Newman wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 19, 2016, at 2:10 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:14 PM, John Newman wrote:
>>> wouldn't a bigtime drug supplier be interested in making political
>>>
> On Nov 19, 2016, at 2:10 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:14 PM, John Newman wrote:
>> wouldn't a bigtime drug supplier be interested in making political donations
>> to politicians who declare themselves unalterably opposed to drug
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:14 PM, John Newman wrote:
> wouldn't a bigtime drug supplier be interested in making political donations
> to politicians who declare themselves unalterably opposed to drug
> legalization?
It would be by far the most logical use of a relatively small
From: John Newman
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:17:12PM +, jim bell wrote:
>> Yes, that is a very interesting current example of such a thing. ??My
>> question is, are the right people being killed?Is it anybody associated with
>> drugs that is dying, or is it just
On 11/17/2016 10:09 AM, juan wrote:
> What question is that?
The Question restated for your benefit:
Are you interested in this convo regarding what to do in the interim
between the time the police go away and the time the MAJORITY of people
take personal responsibility towards others
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:12:42 -0800
Razer wrote:
>
>
> On 11/16/2016 11:35 PM, juan wrote:
>
> > Yes, that is a big problem because people who've been
> > indoctrinated since early childhood have no incentives to
> > learn that what they've been taught is wrong.
>
>
On 11/17/2016 09:17 AM, jim bell wrote:
>
>
> From: Mirimir
>
> On 11/16/2016 08:11 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Razer wrote:
If police
vanished off the street this second what do you think might happen,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:17:12PM +, jim bell wrote:
>
>
> From: Mirimir
>
> On 11/16/2016 08:11 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Razer wrote:
> >>> If police
> >>> vanished off the street this second what do you think
On 11/16/2016 08:11 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Razer wrote:
>> If police
>> vanished off the street this second what do you think might happen,
>> realistically?
>
> There'd be a whole lotta thugs rising up, and becoming dead thugs
> just as fast.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:05:44 +1100
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> >
> > > of to people who might then vote for his nobodys.
> > > If you want a vote you have to put it in everyday practical terms.
> > > No offense to the Juans's out there, just saying.
> >
> > No problem.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 01:48:46AM -0300, Juan wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:28:21 -0500
> grarpamp wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Razer wrote:
> > > [?]
> >
> > Well, those are the practical everyday questions people
> > like Juan
On 11/16/2016 07:59 PM, juan wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:48:56 -0800
> Razer wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/16/2016 07:11 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Razer wrote:
If police
vanished off the street this second what do you
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 3:53 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:26:23PM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2016 11:14 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
On 11/16/2016 11:19 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
It doesn't do what you think it does. It
Laughing at all the people here debating, loving, and dying for
certain parties, platforms, and ideologies whichever they may be.
Ha Ha Ha! It's all a fucking setup by those ppi.
Only candidates worth a shit are indies of their own mind who
say fuck off / ignore to everyone else running as such a
On 11/16/2016 07:11 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Razer wrote:
>> If police
>> vanished off the street this second what do you think might happen,
>> realistically?
> There'd be a whole lotta thugs rising up, and becoming dead thugs
> just as fast.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Razer wrote:
> If police
> vanished off the street this second what do you think might happen,
> realistically?
There'd be a whole lotta thugs rising up, and becoming dead thugs
just as fast. More efficient than today's model of dethugging?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:26:23PM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 11:14 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> > On 11/16/2016 11:19 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> >
> > > It doesn't do what you think it does. It does nothing to break the
> > > system. In Texas, if you voted for Stein, Johnson,
On 11/16/2016 10:14 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 10:46 AM, Razer wrote:
>> I'll repeat something I KNOW I said on this list somewhere along the
>> line:
>>
>> I don't give a fuck about your "Blue" faction of the one party state
>> with an ideology of American exceptionalism, and
On 11/16/2016 09:14 AM, Steve Kinney wrote I'm going to crib:
> Show a Progressive Liberal a button labeled "Kill a random foreign
> family to help assure your own children's future financial security,"
> and not one of them would push it. But label that button "Obama and
> Clinton's Foreign
On 11/16/2016 11:14 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 11:19 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>
> > It doesn't do what you think it does. It does nothing to break the
> > system. In Texas, if you voted for Stein, Johnson, McMullin, or
> > Mickey Mouse... you effectively voted for Trump and made it
On 11/16/2016 10:46 AM, Razer wrote:
> I'll repeat something I KNOW I said on this list somewhere along the line:
>
> I don't give a fuck about your "Blue" faction of the one party state
> with an ideology of American exceptionalism, and global war as it's
> economic basis.
Honestly, if you're
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:19:46 -0600
"Shawn K. Quinn" wrote:
> In Texas, if you voted for Stein, Johnson, McMullin, or Mickey
> Mouse... you effectively voted for Trump
> and made it that much more difficult to turn Texas blue.
> I'd like to know why there are so
From: Shawn K. Quinn
>> That's EXACTLY what I want.
>It doesn't do what you think it does. It does nothing to break the
>system. In Texas, if you voted for Stein, Johnson, McMullin, or Mickey
>Mouse... you effectively voted for Trump and made it that much more
>difficult
On 11/16/2016 10:12 AM, Razer wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/16/2016 02:53 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>> On 11/12/2016 02:41 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
>>> Quinn tried to explain you how the (North!) American elections work.
>>> It's pretty illogical, unfair and doesn't make any sense to the rest
>>> of the
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:53 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>
>> On 11/12/2016 02:41 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
>> Quinn tried to explain you how the (North!) American elections work.
>> It's pretty illogical, unfair and doesn't make any sense to the rest
>> of the world, but
On 11/15/2016 10:24 AM, juan wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:20:22 -0500
> grarpamp wrote:
>
>> Your nobody is not Juan's nobody.
> "Nobody will solve your problems, vote for Nobody" - That's the common
> sense and anarchist approach. Rayzer's isn't.
>
Umn... "Common
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:20:22 -0500
grarpamp wrote:
> Your nobody is not Juan's nobody.
"Nobody will solve your problems, vote for Nobody" - That's the common
sense and anarchist approach. Rayzer's isn't.
On 11/14/2016 11:20 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Your nobody is not Juan's nobody.
Mine is solution-focused nobody.
I also don't believe you can simply eliminate governments, or armies, or
police agencies just... like... that. Anyone who says such things is
either an idiot, a or a feudal warlord with
Your nobody is not Juan's nobody.
On 11/13/2016 10:12 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:16 PM, juan wrote:
>> I think the point is that "nobody" got the most votes so
>> "nobody" should be president
> That's fine too. But without people out there explaining exactly
> how
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:12:04AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:16 PM, juan wrote:
> > I think the point is that "nobody" got the most votes so
> > "nobody" should be president
>
> That's fine too. But without people out there
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:16 PM, juan wrote:
> I think the point is that "nobody" got the most votes so
> "nobody" should be president
That's fine too. But without people out there explaining exactly
how that will work in peoples daily lives, how to
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:02 PM, John Newman wrote:
> wonder what Joe Dumbshit will think when those factory jobs DON'T come
> back
Same thing he will when they don't come back under Clinton or Bernie
or any other current major figure either. Raping, sellout and efficiency
Original Message On Nov 12, 2016, 12:51 PM, Cecilia Tanaka
wrote: On Nov 12, 2016 5:19 PM, "xorcist at sigaint.org" wrote: > > > John
Newman: > > as Juan said, fucking bad news that Trump won > > John = Juan > >
Clarifies Juan's deep knowledge of a place he don't live.
God,
On Nov 12, 2016 5:19 PM, "xorcist at sigaint.org"
wrote:
>
> > John Newman:
> > as Juan said, fucking bad news that Trump won
>
> John = Juan
>
> Clarifies Juan's deep knowledge of a place he don't live.
God, Xorcist! Juan and John are different guys and this insinuation is
On Nov 12, 2016, at 3:18 PM, xorcist at sigaint.org wrote:
>> John Newman:
>> as Juan said, fucking bad news that Trump won
>
> John = Juan
>
> Clarifies Juan's deep knowledge of a place he don't live.
>
It doesn't take deep knowledge to recognize the blindingly
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 4:58 PM, juan <juan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Jim wrote:
>
>> Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is DEAD!!!
>
>
>So, good news, the wicked witch lost. Bad news, trump won
The history of American politics is a wretched piece of sur
> Jim Bell:
> This is called "Duverger's Law".
Fuck Duverger's arse research. He is just as dishonest as .
With their logic, the 46% that didn't vote voted for Clinton because she
lost.
Retarded.
--
@abditum
> Shawn K. Quinn:
> Let me explain to you how presidential voting works (in every state but
Maine and Nebraska, anyway)
Don't care about rules.
YOU could've written in anybody yins wanted, stupid.
> voting for Gary Johnson was the same as voting for Trump
A vote for one is not a vote for
Jim wrote:
>Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is DEAD!!!
So, good news, the wicked witch lost. Bad news, trump won.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 07:20:33PM -0500, John Newman wrote:
>
> > On Nov 10, 2016, at 6:51 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:16:33PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:30:30 -0500
> >> grarpamp wrote:
> >>
>
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 6:51 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:16:33PM -0300, Juan wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:30:30 -0500
>> grarpamp wrote:
>>
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Razer wrote:
So
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Razer wrote:
> So the final numbers for Election Day are:
>
> 231,556,622 eligible voters
>
> 46.9% didn't vote
> 25.6% voted Clinton
> 25.5% voted Trump
>
> NOBODY got the most votes!
I'm ok with that... means there's plenty of room
for
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:28 AM, John Newman wrote:
> Fuck the USA =)
She's a pretty hawt bish, nice robes, cute hat, bit of a bookworm,
tough as nails, got that indepndant freedom thing going on for a
while now... yeah, I'd do her.
This "Law" assumes there are two distinct parties with two different
ideologies. There aren't, There are two right wing (traditionalist for a
start) factions of a one party (American exceptionalist ideology) state.
Besides:
231,556,622 eligible voters
46.9% didn't vote
25.6% voted Clinton
25.5%
On 11/09/2016 12:42 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> County level maps always very interesting... democrats
> really only exist in big cities, and a few regional areas
> respondant to dems social causes such as black south.
> Massive 20-60% percent differences, flipping right at city limits.
>
>
It will be very interesting! ;)
http://www.businessinsider.com/shervin-pishevar-wants-california-to-become-own-nation-if-trump-wins-2016-11?op=1
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/09/shervin-pishevar-wants-to-help-california-secede-from-the-us.html
From: Shawn K. Quinn
2. As a result of #1, a vote for any candidate who finishes below second
place is effectively the same as voting for the eventual winner. Put
another way, it robs the second place candidate of the votes needed to
win.
This is called "Duverger's
Well, you are not my favorite person in the whole world, but let people
think you acted like a jerk would be pretty unfair, not correct at all.
Nobody deserves being considered bad when is not guilty.
Nah, "garbage fire" is too much. Just usual garbage and, after some time,
garbage can be used
County level maps always very interesting... democrats
really only exist in big cities, and a few regional areas
respondant to dems social causes such as black south.
Massive 20-60% percent differences, flipping right at city limits.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president
Sorry, Boyce, but probably there are people on CP list who do _not_ know
you and your writting patterns. My intention was just avoiding
misunderstandings.
- c.
On Nov 9, 2016 5:18 PM, "Griffin Boyce" wrote:
> If someone's stupid enough to believe I'd post that, then
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 17:32 +, Griffin Boyce wrote:
> Why be such intellectual coward? You could've writtens in anybody you
> wanted.
Let me explain to you how presidential voting works (in every state but
Maine and Nebraska, anyway):
1. The candidate with the most votes takes all the
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:28 AM, jim bell wrote:
> most of the news media were pushing on the scales for Hillary.
They still are. And generally trying to steer shit with their
sideways questions and comments. But hey, it's a free press,
always happens. At least people can
Boyce,
I know you don't like me, but someone is using your name, pretending to be
you on CypherPunks list.
Sorry for being late, but this message was tagged as spam and just read it
now.
Take care.
- c.
On Nov 9, 2016 2:32 PM, "Griffin Boyce" wrote:
> > Shawn K.
Do you want to know why I think North American activists and hackers will
probably have serious problems? :(
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-vows-to-strengthen-cybersecurity-capabilities
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/cyber-security
From: Razer <ray...@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: Ding Dong the Wicked Witch is DEAD!!!
On 11/09/2016 11:13 AM, jim bell wrote:
>"Chaos" is not identical to "change". Nevertheless, "Chaos" is a state in
which there is very low resistance to
"Chaos" is not identical to "change". Nevertheless, "Chaos" is a state in
which there is very low resistance to change. Jim Bell
From: Razer
+10
Addenda: Americans are confused. They mistake chaos for change.
On 11/09/2016 09:28 AM, Steve Kinney
+10
Addenda: Americans are confused. They mistake chaos for change.
On 11/09/2016 09:28 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/2016 02:58 AM, jim bell wrote:
> > What a relief!!! Thank heavens for leaks!!!
>
> Meh. I prefer Trump by a /small/ margin; better chaos and gridlock in
> DC than a
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 12:30:16 +
Cannon wrote:
>
> The problem with globalism is that such a goal generally leads to
> centralization of power with trans-national government structure.
But that's a completely false choice. Both trans-national
> Shawn K. Quinn:
> above the law
They all above the law, you cuck.
> Inciting riots
Reddit.
> I didn't really want to vote for Hillary, but it was the best choice
Why be such intellectual coward? You could've writtens in anybody you
wanted.
Don't come crying to here with your lies, you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/2016 02:58 AM, jim bell wrote:
> What a relief!!! Thank heavens for leaks!!!
Meh. I prefer Trump by a /small/ margin; better chaos and gridlock in
DC than a massive, well coordinated murder machine IMO. I'm
sentimental: I hate to see
From: Georgi Guninski On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at
07:58:01AM +, jim bell wrote:>> What a relief!!!Thank heavens for leaks!!!
>> Jim Bell
>I am not feeling for the bitch at all. But votes based on hatred (i.e.
>choose the more delicious shit) are just social
I look at the bright side:
Under that criminal scumbucket Nixon we ended up with: Clean Air/Clean
Water Act, Women's "Right to choose", The US got OUT of Vietnam, the EPA.
Know why?
Because it PUT PEOPLE IN THE STREET IN A MURDEROUS RAGE INSTEAD OF BACK
TO SLEEP LIKE ELECTING a Teflon Warmonger
http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/news/flashback-watch-the-simpsons-predict-president-trump-in-2000-20160317
Trump will break your country. Hope Lisa Simpson can save it in an
alternative reality, in a paralel world. :P
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 07:58:01AM +, jim bell wrote:
> What a relief!!!Thank heavens for leaks!!!
> Jim Bell
I am not feeling for the bitch at all. But votes based on hatred (i.e.
choose the more delicious shit) are just social engineering trick, from
which the organizers profit.
On Nov 9, 2016 8:59 AM, "Cannon" wrote:
>
> On 11/09/2016 09:27 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> > (All politicians are monsters, with different degrees of internal and
external corruption, not only her and him, not only in USA.)
>
> While yes true that most politicians suck.
> | The attempts at building an interconnected globalised world are
> | beginning to fail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
| The attempts at building an interconnected globalised world are
| beginning to fail.
The problem with globalism is that such a goal generally leads to
On 11/09/2016 05:11 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2016 8:29 AM, "John Newman" wrote:
>>
>> Fuck the USA =)
>
> John, please, more compassion. "Fu¢k the USA" is too much, dear. :(
>
> Unhappily, they are already fu¢ked. The rest of the world too. It's the
> end of
On Nov 9, 2016 8:29 AM, "John Newman" wrote:
>
> Fuck the USA =)
John, please, more compassion. "Fu¢k the USA" is too much, dear. :(
Unhappily, they are already fu¢ked. The rest of the world too. It's the
end of the globalization era and the world will change a lot. Not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/09/2016 09:27 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> (All politicians are monsters, with different degrees of internal and
> external corruption, not only her and him, not only in USA.)
While yes true that most politicians suck. Why all the hate for
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo