On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, [iso-8859-1] André Esteves wrote:
A problem in democracy, is that when you tamper with things, and got with it,
it will probably be ve dificult to prove you did it.
Think: It's evolution!!! There is a wit war between any forces in a democracy
to get away with it.
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Dave Howe wrote:
Jim Choate wrote:
Which is a blind path since those files -must- be unencrypted and if
they do mount the disk they have to have access to the key to
unencrypt the fs hence you're in the same boat as with Winblows.
At least in theory a lilo boot
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Sunder wrote:
In real life this will not work as most Windoze hard disk encryption
schemes can't encrypt the OS disk - and this is where the temp/cache stuff
goes.
These can have more than enough info to reveal what's on your crypto disk
(ie. shortcuts to url's you've
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, [iso-8859-1] André Esteves wrote:
A problem in democracy, is that when you tamper with things, and got with it,
it will probably be ve dificult to prove you did it.
Think: It's evolution!!! There is a wit war between any forces in a democracy
to get away with it.
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Dave Howe wrote:
Jim Choate wrote:
Yes, it can mount the partition. That isn't the problem. The problem
is that for lilo to do this it has to have access to the key in
plaintext. That makes the entire exercise moot.
not if you have to type it every time.
Then I'd say
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/SciTech/reuters20030206_694.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/02/030207070412.htm
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/a/2003/02/07/MN3492.DTL
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/SciTech/reuters20030206_671.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20030206S0003
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:34:37 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Fwd: if you're happy and you know it bomb iraq
Original Message
Subject: FW: if you're happy and you know it bomb iraq
From: christopher johnson
Date: Wed, February 5, 2003 7:18 am
To:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
Me? I grew up here in NYC in the 70s, where/when Punk began (please, no one
out in the sticks there try to tell me about the Brits inventing Punk, and
Yeah, right...not.
MC5 (1969, Detroit), Iggy Pop (1973, Detroit)...Kick out the jams brothers
and
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tim May wrote:
This is a terribly important point, and failure to understand this
point is the source of more disagreements than I can count.
What if everyone thought that way? (Fallacy, as my actions will NOT
affect the choices of others, a situation most evident in
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:
Well, yes, but the thread is primarily about the destructive effects of
subsidy. Sort of fantasizing what it would be in a libertarian dream world, I
guess.
--
Harmon Seaver
CyberShamanix
http://www.cybershamanix.com
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 30 Jan 2003 at 11:31, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I'm not arguing pro strong state. I'm merely saying that the
tax funded ivory tower RD is complementary in scope to
privately funded research. If 95% of it is wasted (and
lacking libertarian
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Howie Goodell wrote:
Tim May wrote:
For example, the space program. The Moon Flag Planting cost about
100,000 slave-lives (about $125 thousand milliion in today's dollars) to
finance. It distorted the market for things like single stage to orbit,
which might have
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Michael Cardenas wrote:
A far mroe exciting idea to me is how handhelds like palms, ipaqs,
etc, could beused to transfer digital anonymous cash. They seem like
perfect delivery vehicles.
Say, secret agent X meets congressman Y in a dark alley somewhere to
give him a
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Eric Cordian wrote:
Ovshinsky, the amorphous semiconductor guy, developed a relatively
efficient photovoltaic film that could be manufactured by continuous
extrusion by a simple machine.
For some reason, that never hit the big time either.
He had several problems in
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 30 Jan 2003 at 11:31, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I'm not arguing pro strong state. I'm merely saying that the
tax funded ivory tower RD is complementary in scope to
privately funded research. If 95% of it is wasted (and
lacking libertarian
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tim May wrote:
This is a terribly important point, and failure to understand this
point is the source of more disagreements than I can count.
What if everyone thought that way? (Fallacy, as my actions will NOT
affect the choices of others, a situation most evident in
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Howie Goodell wrote:
Tim May wrote:
For example, the space program. The Moon Flag Planting cost about
100,000 slave-lives (about $125 thousand milliion in today's dollars) to
finance. It distorted the market for things like single stage to orbit,
which might have
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Get some scurf from expensive D.C. restaurants. PCRAmplify it up if you
And be sure to open it -only- at the crime scene. If the investigator
could grab a sample of the same mix of DNA at some other location that the
suspect visits then they'd
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Michael Cardenas wrote:
A far mroe exciting idea to me is how handhelds like palms, ipaqs,
etc, could beused to transfer digital anonymous cash. They seem like
perfect delivery vehicles.
Say, secret agent X meets congressman Y in a dark alley somewhere to
give him a
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Eric Cordian wrote:
Ovshinsky, the amorphous semiconductor guy, developed a relatively
efficient photovoltaic film that could be manufactured by continuous
extrusion by a simple machine.
For some reason, that never hit the big time either.
He had several problems in
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
Yo! Anyone out there in codeville know if the following is possible?
Yes, but there are caveats.
What I mean is,
Let's say some disgruntled and generic crypto-kook (let's call him,
say,...'Tyler Durden') has been signing his (tiring) cyber-missives
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Get some scurf from expensive D.C. restaurants. PCRAmplify it up if you
And be sure to open it -only- at the crime scene. If the investigator
could grab a sample of the same mix of DNA at some other location that the
suspect visits then they'd
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030106/030106-6.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9 from
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2cid=569ncid=738e=1u=/nm/20030114/tc_nm/tech_transmeta_dc
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200301/14/eng20030114_110120.shtml
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Bill Stewart wrote:
Any time you post to a list of a bunch of people you don't know,
you might be posting to a list of a bunch of people you don't like.
Reading the archives sometimes helps.
A (hopefully) helpful hint for
From: Jim Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Constitutional analysis of the right to bear arms
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 20:07:32 -0500 (CDT)
A Review of The Constitution and The Use of Force:
--
[Here is where the federal government is given the job
http://observer.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,873008,00.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell,
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:20:12 -0500 (EST)
Subject: washingtonpost.com || Bush To Name Tech Security Leaders
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34171-2003Jan9.html?referer=email
snip
One senior intelligence officer said Clapper faces a
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
For all I know, I've been posting on a list haunted by a bunch of
crypto-white supremists (crypto, as in secret, hidden). And if that's the
case, then I want to know. Figured I'd ask for clarification on this issue.
(And from some of May's comments in
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
Replying to Blah Jim Choate wrote...
It's called relativity because it assumes no absolute frame against
which speeds must be referenced.
Wrong.
OK, Senior Choate,
Pot, Kettle, Black. You should consider asking Tim for membership in the
CACL
From: Jim Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Constitutional analysis of the right to bear arms
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 20:07:32 -0500 (CDT)
A Review of The Constitution and The Use of Force:
--
[Here is where the federal government is given the job
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAV51JRRAD.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9 from
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
From: Jim Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
Not from the photons perspective, from a photons perspective there is
-no- time.
A photon has no perspective.
Yes it does. It is a particle and it interacts with the rest
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Anonymous wrote:
As a (fellow) trained physicst, do you actually believe that
quantum-encrypted signals are truly secure as a byproduct of basic
physical law, or do even YOU believe that QM is merely a useful
calculational tool,
No 'label' is ever the thing it labels. QM
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Tim May wrote:
-- Newcomb's Paradox (discussed in Pearl, Joyce, Nozick, etc.)
This is no paradox, it is a silly question with an obvious answer that a
lot of smart people have wasted a lot of time over.
You mug the alien and take both boxes. Hence if the alien could
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
Blah wrote quite an excellent post. In fact, I've met few physics PhDs
which would have been able to respond so well. So needless to say, my
curiosity is peaked concerning who Blah is in the real world. (Tim May,
Thanks. It's nice to run into
Axiomatic Set Theory
P. Suppes
ISBN 0-486-61630-4 (Dover)
$12 US
ToC Excerpt...
1. Introduction
1.1 Set Theory and the Foundation of Mathematics
1.2 Logic and Notation
1.3 Axiom Schema of Abstraction and Russell's Paradox
1.4 More Paradoxes
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Anonymous wrote:
As a (fellow) trained physicst, do you actually believe that
quantum-encrypted signals are truly secure as a byproduct of basic
physical law, or do even YOU believe that QM is merely a useful
calculational tool,
No 'label' is ever the thing it labels. QM
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Tim May wrote:
People,
Please don't quote a long article and then bottom-post a few comments.
Or top-post a few comments. In fact, the best idea is to only quote
enough to remind other readers what you are commenting on.
It's not a matter of bandwidth, it's a matter of
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
Blah wrote quite an excellent post. In fact, I've met few physics PhDs
which would have been able to respond so well. So needless to say, my
curiosity is peaked concerning who Blah is in the real world. (Tim May,
Thanks. It's nice to run into
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Tim May wrote:
-- Newcomb's Paradox (discussed in Pearl, Joyce, Nozick, etc.)
This is no paradox, it is a silly question with an obvious answer that a
lot of smart people have wasted a lot of time over.
You mug the alien and take both boxes. Hence if the alien could
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Anonymous wrote:
Sam Ritchie sneered:
Hmmm, is someone a wittle upset over a certain recent textual reprimand? No
need for petty schoolyard insults, May. What happened to the new year's
resolution you made?
~S
Am I just imagining it, or is there a definite
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Ken Hirsch wrote:
In general you have to consider the whole system, including derivation
rules, not just the axioms, although you can certain start with a set of
axioms like:
{ x=1, x=2}
or, come to think of it,
{ 1=2 }
You'd first have to define what '=' means, that
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Todd Boyle wrote:
And anyway, you don't come into a community that is
working based on certain shared assumptions, and start
questioning the assumptions.
Actually that is -exactly- what one should do.
No man is the communities nigger.
Or as Decarte once said:
If you
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1106-979623.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9 from
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
there will be no inconsistency in a formal axiomatic
systems
Can't prove a negative, even in a formal system.
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Todd Boyle wrote:
And anyway, you don't come into a community that is
working based on certain shared assumptions, and start
questioning the assumptions.
Actually that is -exactly- what one should do.
No man is the communities nigger.
Or as Decarte once said:
If you
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Ken Hirsch wrote:
In general you have to consider the whole system, including derivation
rules, not just the axioms, although you can certain start with a set of
axioms like:
{ x=1, x=2}
or, come to think of it,
{ 1=2 }
You'd first have to define what '=' means, that
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Anonymous wrote:
Sam Ritchie sneered:
Hmmm, is someone a wittle upset over a certain recent textual reprimand? No
need for petty schoolyard insults, May. What happened to the new year's
resolution you made?
~S
Am I just imagining it, or is there a definite
Time:Jan. 14, 2003
Second Tuesday of each month
7:00 - 9:00 pm (or later)
Location:Central Market HEB Cafe
38th and N. Lamar
Weather permitting we meet in the un-covered tables.
http://physicsweb.org/article/world/15/12/2
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9 from
http://www.oreilly.com/news/seti_0201.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9 from
Time:Jan. 14, 2003
Second Tuesday of each month
7:00 - 9:00 pm (or later)
Location:Central Market HEB Cafe
38th and N. Lamar
Weather permitting we meet in the un-covered tables.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 04:07:23 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [eff-austin] Government Technology Conference in Austin, TX
From :
Government Technology Conference [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : Free Keynotes, Free Tech Expo
Date :
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 22:53:32 -0600
Subject: Risks: Rising Vigilantism
From Risks Digest 22.47, [ http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/22.47.html ]
--
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 08:38:53 -0500
http://focus.aps.org/story/v10/st29
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9 from Outer
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/28723.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/01/05/1433211.shtml?tid=97
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell,
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
'instantaneously' from -whose- perspective?
From anyone's perspective.
Not from the photons perspective, from a photons perspective there is -no-
time. It is clear from Relativity that as -anything- approaches the speed
of light it's mass grows larger
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
There has been much speculation around Fermi's famous
question: Where are they? Why haven't we seen any
traces of intelligent extraterrestrial life?. One way
in which this question has been answered (Brin 1983)
is that we have not seen any traces of
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
how do you know that apples and oranges are not same
or are same?
Its the way you look at it.
No, ever see Apple and Oranges cross-breed? -THEY- look at it that way
too. So there -is- something there to the cladistic viewpoint.
--
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:42:45 -0600
Subject: Rhizome: thing.net evicted from Internet
From Rhizome Digest 01.03.03:
An unfortunately predictable follow up to the emails I posted earlier
about the critical/parody works posted by the likes of the Yes Men
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 13:16:29 -0600
Subject: Rhizome: Konrad Becker Review
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
8.
Date: 12.29.02
From: McKenzie Wark ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: konrad becker review
Konrad Becker,
N-Person Game Theory: Concepts and Applications
Anatol Rapoport
ISBN 0-486-41455-8 (Dover)
$13 US
[SSZ: If you get this, also get his 2-Person Game Theory as well.]
Excerpt from Introduction - Some Mathematical Tools, pp. 11
Game theory is properly a branch of mathematics. As such it is
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 11:21:35 -0600
Subject: RISKS: How to disappear in America
From Risks Digest 22.46, [ http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/22.46.html ]
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 03:28:41 GMT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rev. Fredric L. Rice)
Subject: Re:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Mike Rosing wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
So does the fermi paradox mean that there are no extra
terrestrials.Can't we throw away this paradox like
every other paradox?
It's easier to assume we don't know what we're looking for. That's not a
paradox
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/03/01/03/030103hndecss.xml?s=IDGNS
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, blah wrote:
'instantaneously' from -whose- perspective?
From anyone's perspective.
Not from the photons perspective, from a photons perspective there is -no-
time. It is clear from Relativity that as -anything- approaches the speed
of light it's mass grows larger
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
how do you know that apples and oranges are not same
or are same?
Its the way you look at it.
No, ever see Apple and Oranges cross-breed? -THEY- look at it that way
too. So there -is- something there to the cladistic viewpoint.
--
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
And no, Relativity and QM have -not- been joined into a -single cohesive theory-.
You have to qualify this.
No, I don't.
General relativity has not been unified with quantum mechanics in any
way that is universally
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
There has been much speculation around Fermi's famous
question: Where are they? Why haven't we seen any
traces of intelligent extraterrestrial life?. One way
in which this question has been answered (Brin 1983)
is that we have not seen any traces of
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Mike Rosing wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
So does the fermi paradox mean that there are no extra
terrestrials.Can't we throw away this paradox like
every other paradox?
It's easier to assume we don't know what we're looking for. That's not a
paradox
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
The Liar Paradox is an argument that arrives at a
contradiction by reasoning about a Liar Sentence. The
most familiar Liar Sentence is the following
self-referential sentence:
As it says-they are self referecial statements.What do
we learn from the
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
As you already see-what you say is correct for your
definition of proof and axiom.
Here is the fundamental error in your thinking, you are trying to argue
apples and oranges. As my comments alude to, what you are doing is trying
to argue geometry using two
http://www.msnbc.com/news/854409.asp?0si=-
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9 from
http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20030103-95731792.htm
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:37:30 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Physics News Update 619
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
Number 619 January 3, 2003 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein,
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
And no, Relativity and QM have -not- been joined into a -single cohesive theory-.
You have to qualify this.
No, I don't.
General relativity has not been unified with quantum mechanics in any
way that is universally
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
An axiom is an improvable statement which is accepted
as true.
An axiom is a statement which is -assumed to be universaly required-.
That is -not- equivalent to 'true' (eg A point has only position is not
'true' but a -definition- which is neither true or
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
The Liar Paradox is an argument that arrives at a
contradiction by reasoning about a Liar Sentence. The
most familiar Liar Sentence is the following
self-referential sentence:
As it says-they are self referecial statements.What do
we learn from the
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, A.Melon wrote:
If you still want to say there's some kind of hole in quantum theory, then are you
saying that if
we fix this hole, QM will bve able to predict experimental outcomes to, say 20
decimals rather than
10? (QM is by far the most sucesful physical theory ever
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
Is there a way to RELIABLY find the mail was opened?
I have a related question. I have a little server sitting in a wall
closet. Does anyone have an easy solution (preferably low tech) for
figuring out
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the latest news on Adelman's cryptological
soup? Once his DNA crypto was touted as a
substantial breakthrough for crypto, though since
overshadowed by quantum crypto smoke-blowing.
DNA computes
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Matthew X wrote:
Chompsky makes the point that the state underwrites the so called free market.
As we are all libertarians,(cept shoate) here we should be doing our utmost
to expose,ridicule,attack and destroy the state,nest pas?
You're right, I don't want to get rid of
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
As you already see-what you say is correct for your
definition of proof and axiom.
Here is the fundamental error in your thinking, you are trying to argue
apples and oranges. As my comments alude to, what you are doing is trying
to argue geometry using two
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
I have a related question. I have a little server sitting in a wall
closet. Does anyone have an easy solution (preferably low tech) for
figuring out that the closet door has been opened?
A switch that shutdowns the server, and a passphrase on
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
An axiom is an improvable statement which is accepted
as true.
An axiom is a statement which is -assumed to be universaly required-.
That is -not- equivalent to 'true' (eg A point has only position is not
'true' but a -definition- which is neither true or
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Matthew X wrote:
http://cash.ucsc.edu/
Came to from seeing this...
A field known as 'experimental economics' has extended game theory into
two specific 'minigames': the 'Ultimatum Game' and the 'Public Goods
Game,' he writes. Research using these games as probes
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, A.Melon wrote:
If you still want to say there's some kind of hole in quantum theory, then are you
saying that if
we fix this hole, QM will bve able to predict experimental outcomes to, say 20
decimals rather than
10? (QM is by far the most sucesful physical theory ever
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
Is there a way to RELIABLY find the mail was opened?
I have a related question. I have a little server sitting in a wall
closet. Does anyone have an easy solution (preferably low tech) for
figuring out
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Matthew X wrote:
Chompsky makes the point that the state underwrites the so called free market.
As we are all libertarians,(cept shoate) here we should be doing our utmost
to expose,ridicule,attack and destroy the state,nest pas?
You're right, I don't want to get rid of
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
I have a related question. I have a little server sitting in a wall
closet. Does anyone have an easy solution (preferably low tech) for
figuring out that the closet door has been opened?
A switch that shutdowns the server, and a passphrase on
http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/legalissues/story/0,10801,77205,00.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAJ9C58HAD.html
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
Criswell, Plan 9 from
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-01/dc-ed123002.php
--
We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
are going to spend the rest of our lives.
101 - 200 of 2170 matches
Mail list logo
