New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks:
I converted the darcs-2 repository from hashed-format to darcs-2-
format, and got this weirdness:
This patch apparently includes both mv Autoconf.lhs Autoconf.lhs.in
and add file Autoconf.lhs.in.
Regards,
Zooko
changelog
patch author
or value judgment, but I
disagree with it. It was more true before the recent renewed
interest in hacking on darcs-2.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
by comparing
the ones listed on the buildbot page that describes the step with the
result of 'env' in the local shell.
Maybe it changes the default shell?
According to the buildbot page linked above the process being
executed has argv: ['bash', '-c', 'make test'].
Regards,
Zooko
This sounds like a great analysis. It would be consistent with why the
change to the steve_and_monica script help...I think it was the first
script executed that piped data so that darcs expected on STDIN.
Hm... But buildslave closing the make process's stdin shouldn't
effect the darcs
P.S. I opened a ticket on the buildbot trac:
http://buildbot.net/trac/ticket/198
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Reid reported on IRC:
(I ran darcs get http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk tahoe)
... there is no status ...
A minute later he said Oh, now there is status..
However, I believe that the current UI principle for darcs
, then it hangs indefinitely.
There's something else curious about it -- twice during my
experimentation I interrupted a test to the bash prompt back, but the
test left several processes running in the background: bash, and yes,
but not darcs or perl.
Regards,
Zooko
So the way to reconfigure your terminal is:
stty erase C-v[BACKSPACE]
Where C-v means hold down the control key and hit the v key and
[BACKSPACE] means hit the backspace key.
__
Darcs bug tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue727
upgrading to the
current stable release, let us open a ticket at http://buildbot.net .
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
are running the latest
stable buildbot code on the OSX Tiger buildslave?
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
from that buildmaster.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
is continuously receding...
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
Heron it would be good if it were released earlier rather than later,
so let's see what we need to do to release it ASAP.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
?
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Okay, now I'm on a working network, but:
---
$ time darcs pull -a --verbose --debug-verbose http://allmydata.org/
source/tahoe/trunk
Beginning identifying repository .
Done identifying repository .
Beginning identifying repository http
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I ran this command on Windows, using the darcs.exe from 2008-02-06:
time darcs get --hashed --verbose --debug-verbose [EMAIL PROTECTED]:$REPO
The remote host repo was in hashed format. This was the result:
ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] darcs transfer-mode
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
time darcs-1.0.9 get http://darcs.net/repos/unstable
real20m55.913s
time darcs-2pre get --hashed http://darcs.net/repos/unstable-hashed
real39m5.057s
again:
time darcs-2pre get --hashed http://darcs.net/repos/unstable-hashed
real
straceithg/tar.strace.log.txt
15448 straceit/tar.strace.log.txt
2034044 total
So darcs made 1.9 million system calls to do darcs record while hg
made 60,000 system calls to do hg commit.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel
On Feb 7, 2008, at 1:11 PM, David Roundy wrote:
Thanks for the test case, Zooko, and for pointing out this regression!
Could you rerun your timings when you have pulled this change:
I pulled your latest patches and ran it again and it took around 20
seconds.
Way to go! That is within
tar xjvf ciphercycles-20070205.tar.bz2
0m2.3s
time hg init
0m0.1s
time hg addremove
0m1.4s
time hg commit -m'init import of ciphercycles-20070205'
0m2.3s
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org
time darcs-2pre get --verbose --debug-verbose --hashed http://
darcs.haskell.org/ghc
took 253m32.6s
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
-20070205'
15m44.0s
Oh, I just realized that I was compiling ghc in another window, but
this record took 15 minutes just like the darcs-1-format record did,
so I guess running a ghc compile in another window didn't interfere
with the benchmark too much!
Regards,
Zooko
On Feb 6, 2008
I used KQ's patch and it fixed the problem for me. Thanks, KQ!
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I created a 1 billion byte file (the machine has a mere 500 million
bytes of physical RAM), darcs added that file, and then darcs
recorded and I got
darcs failed: out of memory
This was with darcs-2.
Regards,
Zooko
--
messages: 2980
.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
would be willing to help with darcs-1.0.10, at least in my
traditional role of making a zipfile with it plus putty executables
for Windows and Cygwin...
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think what is happening is that Mac OS 10.4 comes with a libcurl
that is too old:
configure says:
checking for libcurl... 7.13.1
checking for curl_global_init in -lcurl... yes
and then make says:
[ghc] src/hscurl.o
src/hscurl.c: In function
*want* them.)
Is that right? That would be a good way to optimize the generation
of different timestamps -- skip it entirely. ;-)
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks:
The --repodir option is documented as --repodir=DIRECTORY specify
the repository directory in which to run. But the way it behaves is
more like the directory in which to run, if that directory is a
repository, else recursively search
I added --debug-verbose and sure enough it is calling scp for, it
looks like, every single patch.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
On Jan 25, 2008, at 5:13 PM, zooko wrote:
Hm. This file is 390 KB. I'll just give you the head -20 and
attach the compressed version. There is no occurrence of the
string sftp in it.
That last sentence is wrong.
ssh -O an_invalid_command ; # Null Null Null
scp -q [EMAIL PROTECTED
to be.
I think this would definitely be harder than
learning haskell. Which isn't to say it's not a reasonable problem to
tackle, but rather that your lack of Haskell knowledge isn't an
excuse!
Heh heh. To me, implementing network protocols is easy, and learning
Haskell is hard.
Regards,
Zooko
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here is a bash script which, on my Mac OS X machine, with darcs-2
(recent vintage), yields the following output:
darcs: failed to read patch:
Tue Jan 8 11:47:49 MST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tagged allmydata-tahoe-0.7.0
user error (Couldn't fetch
when you have the privilege of doing ssh to the
server, because it has strictly better access options.
So yes, advising my users to use http on get is a good work-around, too.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http
for the
implementation difficulty (of which I know little), any other option
would provide a better trade-off.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
following-up to my own post:
On Jan 24, 2008, at 1:15 PM, zooko wrote:
So, let me see if I understand the issues here.
...
2. It would be nice, but isn't currently used, if one could rely
on the property that for a given patch id, nobody can come up with
another patch that has the same
(although not safe against a quantum computer).
SHA-1 is the worst of both worlds -- slow and unsafe.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is an old bug with darcs that it sometimes leaves an empty
directory named something like darcs-ssh.
darcs 2 has modified this into a new and more troublesome form --
darcs get sometimes leaves an empty directory named myprojecdarcs-
ssh
/archives/2005/08/new_cryptanalyt.html
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
it ~/.darcs/cache, and I guess it doesn't know what I mean by
~), so you can probably consider the 1/2/3 rows as just showing the
noise in the system rather than actually using the cache. :-)
I'll try to explain to darcs-on-windows where to do caching, later.
Regards,
Zooko
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try this with darcs-2:
rm afile
darcs record
darcs mv anotherfile afile
It will say that it can't proceed since afile already exists (at
least on Windows), even though afile actually doesn't exist.
--
messages: 2698
nosy: beschmi, droundy
on the part of some malicious actor that darcs
tries to prevent, such that the collision-resistance (such as it is)
of SHA-1 is necessary to prevent it?
Regards,
Zooko
[1] http://cryptopp.com/benchmarks.html
[2] http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/zfs_end_to_end_data
.
(If you need a secure hash function, Tiger is probably stronger than,
and is 150% as fast as, SHA-1.)
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks:
The current unstable (darcs-2-pre) fails its self-tests for me. The
last part of the output is:
Test Summary Report
---
pull.pl (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 14 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks:
I tried the executables from
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~rgm/darcs/
but they don't do anything on my Windows XP system, not even pop up a
crash dialog. ./darcs.exe --version, for example, returns silently
to the prompt.
Regards,
Zooko
of
patches, using hashed format is much faster than using darcs-2 format!
The repo in question is publically available (and chock full of very
cool source code that you are welcome to use):
http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk
Regards,
Zooko
this.
Try valgrind.
Just install valgrind and use valgrind darcs instead of darcs.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
On Jan 18, 2008, at 3:25 PM, John Meacham wrote:
Yes. I was thinking of zip. sorry. how does 'bzip2' compare actually?
In my experience, 7z provides tighter compression and similar speed
so I've stopped looking at bz2. But here you go:
81592 trunk-nocompress-individual-patches
48980
If I may suggest, I think that the version number 1.0.10 makes more
sense than 1.1.0, because the difference between 1.0.10 and 1.0.9
is much like the difference between 1.0.9 and 1.0.8. This is the
10th incremental improvement since darcs 1.0.0.
Regards,
Zooko
/_darcs
_darcs replaced by _darcs.tar and then gzipped:
18784 trunk-gz-all-at-once/_darcs.tar.gz
_darcs replaced by _darcs.tar and then 7zipped:
10644 trunk-7z-all-at-once/_darcs.tar.7z
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
, as I'm so used to tar. :-)
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
messages if there are three or more -v's, and so I
hope that when that patch becomes available in a darcs release that
it will help my co-worker.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo
I've got the tarball, but I'm not clear how to use it to reproduce
the bug.
I don't see any problems there (e.g. no unrecorded changes), but I
only
looked with the latest darcs-unstable and the darcs 1.0.9rc1 that
is in
etch, so it may be that the bug appeared and disappeared between
On Jan 12, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Tommy Pettersson wrote:
On the other hand, darcs2 has the new GADT testing and better
unit testing, so darcs2 might already be even more safe with the
old repo format than darcs1, even without real world testing. By
looking at the reported bugs it has mostly been
to make it reproducible so
that we can debug it.
First of all, I made cp -a's of the three repos (on three different
machines) where it happened.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman
Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Okay, here's what I know so far:
My coworker Rob wrote a patch on his Mac machine, using darcs 1.0.8
from MacPorts. This is the patch (visible on our trac+darcs): [1].
He pushed this patch to our dev.allmydata.com machine, which is Linux
Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
My brother Nejucomo just got a similar error -- pull silently
succeeded and then left unrecorded changes -- on Ubuntu 7.04 with
darcs 1.0.9rc2. He had a much older version of our repository, and
he pulled to become up to date with our current
Thanks for looking at this, David.
I'm busy on the imminent v0.7.0 release of our secure, decentralized
filesystem, http://allmydata.org , so after this message I probably
won't look at this more until next week.
On Jan 3, 2008, at 3:09 PM, David Roundy wrote:
* Can you confirm that you
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear People of Darcs:
Thank you, as always, for your work on this valuable tool!
Please observe the following transcript:
--- begin included transcript
HACO wonwin-mcbrootles-computer:~/playground/allmydata/tahoe/trunk-
hack$ darcs replace
On Jan 1, 2008, at 4:58 PM, Zooko wrote:
HACO wonwin-mcbrootles-computer:~/playground/allmydata/tahoe/trunk-
hack$ darcs replace --token-
chars=[ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz_-] \\-
\\-root\\-uri \\-\\-dir\\-uri docs/configuration.txt
darcs failed: Bad token spec
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks:
This is a minor disaster for me, as the central, canonical, append-
only repository of my company and my open source project, http://
allmydata.org , is corrupted in a way that will probably interfere
with our operations. So I
.
Unfortunately, the machine where things work okay is not the central
development machine for the project. ;-/
Each darcs executable was compiled on that machine itself.
Could there be a bug in Haskell that would cause this sort of behavior?
Regards,
Zooko
?
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
that set,
even though the two repositories exchange other patches not in that set.
This is often requested by users on the darcs mailing list, I've
noticed.
If darcs supported that kind of workflow easily, would such support
also apply to management of permission bits?
Regards,
Zooko
Dear darcs-devel folks:
Oh by the way, let me say: HOORAY!. I suspected that darcs 2 was
never going to actually happen, and now I see that it *is* going to
happen! Way to go! This breathes new life into the darcs project!
Regards,
Zooko
However, darcs shouldn't be unsetting your x bit. I'm pretty
certain that
is a bug! :(
I spoke loosely. It doesn't actually unset the bit on an actual
file, but when I do darcs get it creates a new physical file
without the +x bit. I perceive this as unsetting the bit on the
logical
on this front, as well as on the
symlink front, was waiting for darcs-2 patch theory to be sorted out.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
, whenever a new patch is pushed into the
central darcs repository for allmydata.org:
http://allmydata.org/buildbot/waterfall
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
Folks:
Please read Brian Warner's comments in this e-mail thread:
http://allmydata.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2007-November/000227.html
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs
unrecording or amending patches that have been distributed.
+1
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the following transcript, I expect the darcs diff at the end to
show that the line added by patch b2 was WHAA, not WHOO.
I just ran afoul of this issue in practice, and it took me a little
while to realize that darcs was sending me on a wild
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks:
If I do a darcs put to a local directory on win32, a process named
ntvdm.exe starts hammering the CPU and keeps going for many minutes.
If I do a pull, the process appears, but then it disappears again
shortly.
ntvdm.exe is apparently
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
https://zooko.com/zookobin-copy.tar.bz2
If you untar that repo and run darcs check, it will say the repo is
inconsistent, but darcs repair doesn't fix it.
Regards,
Zooko
--
messages: 2122
nosy: beschmi, droundy, kowey, tommy, zooko
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is interesting. On two different Windows computers of my own,
plus Arno's Windows computer, several different repos have turned out
to be inconsistent once we upgraded to darcs v1.0.9.
Is there any known issue that would cause this? I
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear darcs hackers:
There follows an edited version of a conversation I had with Arno on
IRC. He went to bed before I could get him to try to reproduce the
problem.
---
arnowa: did i mention already that i hate darcs?
arnowa: i mean darcs
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I created a new directory on a remote server named hanford, and ran
darcs init therein. (hanford has darcs 1.0.8.)
Then I ran darcs push -a from a different computer to try to push
stuff into that repo on hanford. The different computer
Today I had a strange idea: why not using sqlite (an embedded
database) for data storage?
I think this is quite reasonable.
That's what monotone has been doing for years. If it didn't work
well, they'd have stopped doing it by now.
http://monotone.ca
Regards,
Zooko
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As per this e-mail message:
http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/2007-July/005927.html
If darcs is in the process of doing something (in this case fetching
metadata from a remote repository), it doesn't do a good enough job
of informing
there, and he doesn't know whether it is making progress or
is hung.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... then I tried darcs put instead of darcs push, and I got this
(note that I am putting to a directory that doesn't exist -- 1.0.9p):
---
wonwin-mcbrootles-computer:~/playground/darcs$ time darcs put
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:src/darcs/1.0.9p 21
Folks:
I just installed GNU/OpenSolaris [1] (pretty cool, eh?), and
installed GHC 6.6.1, and built darcs 1.0.9. Attached are from
configure, make, and make test.
The tests didn't quite get full marks, I think, but darcs seems to work.
Regards,
Zooko
Attached are the logs I mentioned, and here is the footnote:
[1] http://gnusolaris.org
zooko.configure.log.rz
Description: Binary data
zooko.make_test.log.rz
Description: Binary data
zooko.make.log.rz
Description: Binary data
On Jul 6, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote
On Jun 14, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
My co-worker who complains a lot abot darcs frequently mentions how
irritating it is that he tells darcs Go pull thusly now!, and
darcs replies by silently hanging. He doesn't know if darcs is
making progress and will eventually
or
cmd.exe) then the operating system prevents anyone from rm'ing or
mv'ing that directory. If you darcs pull a patch which attempts to
do so, then funny things will result.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is on Mac OS X:
I did time darcs pull -a -v -v -v.
...
[remove unused imports (thanks, pyflakes)
Zooko O'Whielacronx [EMAIL PROTECTED]**20070521201943]
[remove some unused names (thanks, pyflakes)
zooko**20070601200636]
[change RandomSet
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was pushing some patches to a local repo when I realized I didn't want to
push them and hit C-c. This left a repository with all the patches listed, but
with unrecorded changes, and such that darcs check and darcs repair
reported nothing wrong. I
issues. (I use darcs on Mac, Linux, and w32 pretty much every day.)
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Consider the following two calls (cut-and-pasted from my terminal).
How can the presence of that final l make the pattern invalid?
darcs v1.0.8.
Regards,
Zooko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/trees/trunk$ darcs diff -u --match name \dbutil: convert
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am working with a linux source tree pulled through git. I couldn't figure
out the user interface of git to simply add and record one file, so I gave up
and decided to use darcs instead:
KERN yumyum:/usr/src/linux$ darcs init
KERN yumyum:/usr/src
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
here is a cut and paste from bash:
Regards,
Zooko
HACK yumyum:~/work$ time darcs get -v -v -v [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:trees/trunk-new-coders
Directory '/mnt/sdb1/zooko/work/trunk-new-coders' already exists, creating
repository as '/mnt/sdb1/zooko/work
this:
---
Welcome to the darcs darcs repository!
This is the stable release branch.
**
---
When I build the result, it identifies its version as 1.0.8 (stable branch).
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http
that maybe darcs rm could simply print out an error
message saying Just rm it. and do nothing else.
In any case, he finds the difference between darcs mv and darcs
remove to be inexplicably inconsistent.
Added a note to issue127.
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue127
Regards,
Zooko
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like to be able to use x and p with the behavior that they
offer in darcs pull in darcs record.
Regards,
Zooko
(Thanks to RobK for the suggestion.)
--
messages: 836
nosy: droundy, robk, tommy, zooko
status: unread
title: I wish
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
---
Repository.lhs:1:0:
Warning: `seekRepo' is imported more than once:
imported from DarcsRepo at Repository.lhs:43:0-25
imported from DarcsRepo at Repository.lhs:42:19-26
Repository.lhs:1:0:
Warning
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm using darcs to manage, among other things, another darcs repository. The
recent security feature (in 1.0.6 a.k.a. 1.0.7pre1) has caused a problem
because it notices that one of the patches is modifying
./trunk/_darcs/prefs/defaults and aborts
such as Eclipse and OpenSSH.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
with many Free
Software Eclipse plugins.
Regards,
Zooko
___
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm trying to obliterate a patch, and darcs exits with No patches selected!.
This is because there is a tag which depends on that patch.
The bug is that it doesn't offer me to obliterate the tag. Secondarily, the
error message doesn't convey
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
