On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, at 13:39, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * jys [11-02-19 16:03]:
>>
> > Each module has a default ordering number, when a module is moved it gets a
> > new number between the numbers of its new neighbors. You can see these in
> > the XMP file as lines like
> >
> >
+1
Sent from my Asus mobile
On 2 Nov 2019 20:40, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* jys [11-02-19 16:03]:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, at 08:40, Christian wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I'm happy that the pixlpipe is no longer fixed.
>
> I'm happy that the unfixed pipe is mostly not broken... big thanks to
* jys [11-02-19 16:03]:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, at 08:40, Christian wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I'm happy that the pixlpipe is no longer fixed.
>
> I'm happy that the unfixed pipe is mostly not broken... big thanks to all the
> devs who banged their heads against all the many little problems (because
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, at 08:40, Christian wrote:
> Anyway, I'm happy that the pixlpipe is no longer fixed.
I'm happy that the unfixed pipe is mostly not broken... big thanks to all the
devs who banged their heads against all the many little problems (because that
shouldn't be thankless work!).
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, at 01:49, Christian wrote:
>
> With the crop coming first, the gradient on the picture is depending
> on the cropping!
>
> For me, the gradient filter belongs to the biginning of
> the pipe like it is the case for hardware filters,
That does seem a little bit weird, I'm
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, at 17:53, Heiko Bauke wrote:
> Pixel pipe ordering is similar to working with several layers and
> blending nodes in Gimp or Photoshop. Here the order of the layers
> matters as well and every serious user is aware of this.
Good analogy. Maybe a concrete example from
Hi,
Am 02.11.19 um 01:36 schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
* Pascal Obry [11-01-19 16:30]:
Le vendredi 01 novembre 2019 à 14:56 -0400, Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
fwiw, I believe the pp order should remain static and *only* the visual
list should be changable.
Amusing! You are probably saying that
* Pascal Obry [11-01-19 16:30]:
> Le vendredi 01 novembre 2019 à 14:56 -0400, Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
> > fwiw, I believe the pp order should remain static and *only* the visual
> > list should be changable.
>
> Amusing! You are probably saying that just because you don't know why
> the pp
Le vendredi 01 novembre 2019 à 14:56 -0400, Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
> fwiw, I believe the pp order should remain static and *only* the visual
> list should be changable.
Amusing! You are probably saying that just because you don't know why
the pp can be reordered.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny
Patrick Shanahan schrieb am 01.11.19 um 19:56:
fwiw, I believe the pp order should remain static and*only* the visual
list should be changable. BUT, if it is determined that pp order may be
altered, it should ONLY alterable within parameters where the order makes
sense.
That's what I
Agreed
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 3:15 PM jys wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, at 10:33, Julian Rickards wrote:
> > My wishes and comments are GUI-only and related only to the Favourites
> tab.
> >
> > There is another conversation tied into this one about re-ordering the
> > modules in the PP
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, at 10:33, Julian Rickards wrote:
> My wishes and comments are GUI-only and related only to the Favourites tab.
>
> There is another conversation tied into this one about re-ordering the
> modules in the PP list (the Active tab I suspect because it lists the
> modules
* Julian Rickards [11-01-19 13:36]:
> My wishes and comments are GUI-only and related only to the Favourites tab.
>
> There is another conversation tied into this one about re-ordering the
> modules in the PP list (the Active tab I suspect because it lists the
> modules used, and their PP
* Bernhard [11-01-19 13:17]:
> Until now I did not feel the need to change pp since the explanation given
> seemed valid to me and I was happy with the results.
> When I occasionally saw discussion about GUI improvement and module order I
> always thought this is GUI only - which indeed would be
My wishes and comments are GUI-only and related only to the Favourites tab.
There is another conversation tied into this one about re-ordering the
modules in the PP list (the Active tab I suspect because it lists the
modules used, and their PP order).
I suppose that the two conversations should
Until now I did not feel the need to change pp since the explanation
given seemed valid to me and I was happy with the results.
When I occasionally saw discussion about GUI improvement and module
order I always thought this is GUI only - which indeed would be a big
improvement for me.
Now
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, at 06:18, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> also once changed there doesn't appear any option ot restore the original
> order to the pixelpipe. ???
This was discussed, and I *think* it's still planned to add such a feature.
Adding that, and possibly only allowing re-ordering in
In my opinion, re-ordering the modules in the favourites shouldn't be a
problem with the pp order. In the same way that you may have written down,
on paper, the modules you want to use, in the order you want to use them,
re-ordering favourites in this way shouldn't be any different. However, I
had
I think that I am relieved maybe ... hopefully I did not disturb
the pp now I am confused ... I simply wanted to put the favorites
in my logical processing order.
David
On 01.11.19 14:18, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Pascal Obry [11-01-19 08:01]:
David,
Shurely changing the
People are confused even with history (left panel) and iop list (right
panel) being in different order, and you are proposing to introduce
third ordering of modules. I'm strongly against complicating things
like that. Favorites tab doesn't look any different from any other tab
on the right panel,
* Pascal Obry [11-01-19 08:01]:
> David,
>
> > Shurely changing the order of the modules located in the
> > 'favorites' tab does not change the individual modules position in
> > the pixel-pipeline? that would be unthinkable!
>
> Of course it does! Re-ordering the iop is not for fun,
I agree with David, re-ordering the modules in the Favourites tab should
*not* affect the pixel-pipe order but I wonder if David and Pascal are
thinking differently. As I understand it, Aurlien was re-ordering the
modules in the "Pixel-pipe" tab, which of course affected the pp order.
However,
Shurely changing the order of the modules located in the
'favorites' tab does not change the individual modules position in the
pixel-pipeline? that would be unthinkable!
David
On 01.11.19 11:23, Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Friday, 1 November 2019 08:19:46 CET David Vincent-Jones
On Friday, 1 November 2019 08:19:46 CET David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> Something interesting .. I moved the rgb-filmic module to a new
> location and the image was significantly changed! Am I also changing the
> pipeline?
See
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, at 00:19, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> Something interesting .. I moved the rgb-filmic module to a new
> location and the image was significantly changed! Am I also changing
> the pipeline?
Yes. Don't move things unless you have a reason based on processing order.
Something interesting .. I moved the rgb-filmic module to a new
location and the image was significantly changed! Am I also changing the
pipeline?
David
On 31.10.19 22:09, jys wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 13:33, KOVÁCS István wrote:
Hi,
I've seen Aurélien Pierre's video about filmic
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 13:33, KOVÁCS István wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen Aurélien Pierre's video about filmic and tone EQ; there, he
> used the mouse to reorder modules on the active modules tab. I can
> only use the 'multiple instances' menu's move up/down options; for me,
> click+drag just
Its a new feature for DT 3.0.
Cheers
KOVÁCS István schrieb am Do., 31. Okt. 2019,
21:33:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen Aurélien Pierre's video about filmic and tone EQ; there, he
> used the mouse to reorder modules on the active modules tab. I can
> only use the 'multiple instances' menu's move up/down
Hi,
I've seen Aurélien Pierre's video about filmic and tone EQ; there, he
used the mouse to reorder modules on the active modules tab. I can
only use the 'multiple instances' menu's move up/down options; for me,
click+drag just opens/closes the module (so the click takes effect,
the drag is
29 matches
Mail list logo
