On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:42 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Pascal Obry wrote:
>>
>> I have tested the new denoise module a bit more deeply today. I feel
>> that there is something wrong with it.
>>
>> To me the denoise module does too much smoothing of the image a
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Pascal Obry wrote:
>
> I have tested the new denoise module a bit more deeply today. I feel
> that there is something wrong with it.
>
> To me the denoise module does too much smoothing of the image and we are
> loosing lot of details.
it's optimizing peak signal
hey
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Gary Thompson
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have commented on the blog post but in my long comment I have a question
> before submitting profiles.
>
> The camera (Canon 50D) has built in noise reduction for high ISO and long
> exposure (with different settings in th
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Roumano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem the current git master version (darktable 1.1
> +435~gcf57438)
Which version of libexiv2 do you have installed?
> My exported picture (to 8 bit jpg) doesnt' have anymore most of exif
> information : (in this exemple, i
Hi,
I have a problem the current git master version (darktable 1.1
+435~gcf57438)
My exported picture (to 8 bit jpg) doesnt' have anymore most of exif
information : (in this exemple, i only show few of them)
With the current git version :
roumano@roumano ~/bin/darktable $ exiftool ~/raw/201
2012/12/26 Pascal Obry :
>
> I have tested the new denoise module a bit more deeply today. I feel
> that there is something wrong with it.
>
> To me the denoise module does too much smoothing of the image and we are
> loosing lot of details.
that is what I experienced with my canon eos 60d
but
can
Am 26.12.2012 18:48, schrieb Pascal Obry:
> Le 26/12/2012 18:04, Ulrich Pegelow a écrit :
>
>> All is kept in a separate branch 'dither'. Please give it a try, tell me
>> your feedback and vote if you think this should move into master.
>
> Looks good but it applies to the whole image and adds so
Am 26.12.2012 21:22, schrieb Klaus Post:
> Hi!
>
> A few weeks ago dithering was added to Rawspeed, as part of the bit
> scaling process. Rawspeed delivers 16 bit images, so for images that are
> scaled from 12 to 16 bit, the "new" 4 bits now contain noise instead of
> "0" (or any other fixed valu
Hi!
A few weeks ago dithering was added to Rawspeed, as part of the bit scaling
process. Rawspeed delivers 16 bit images, so for images that are scaled
from 12 to 16 bit, the "new" 4 bits now contain noise instead of "0" (or
any other fixed value). I don't know when or if darktable has been update
Am Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2012, 21:05:24 schrub Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo:
[...]
> I also think this should be more core and be triggered by some conditions,
> not another module. Also, I think it should only affect areas overlaid with
> the GD or vignette filter. I was thinking on using the alpha
Max,
> can you give a little more insight what you did? Especially which
> camera and which profile you used. You are talking about denoised
> (profiled), right?
I have use a D800 with the profile I have contributed. The profile is
good, graph is quite nice.
Today I have tested it on pictures
El 26/12/2012 19:18, "Tobias Ellinghaus" escribió:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2012, 18:04:31 schrub Ulrich Pegelow:
> > Hi guys,
>
> Hi.
>
> [...]
>
> > For that reason I developed a general dithering module which comes late
> > in pixelpipe, just before gamma. It supports random dither and err
Am Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2012, 18:04:31 schrub Ulrich Pegelow:
> Hi guys,
Hi.
[...]
> For that reason I developed a general dithering module which comes late
> in pixelpipe, just before gamma. It supports random dither and error
> diffusion (Floyd-Steinberg). The latter with just a few output o
Should have gone to the list as well...
Original Message
Subject:Re: [darktable-devel] Denoise module
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:58:51 +0100
From: Max Killer
To: [email protected]
On Wed 26 Dec 2012 06:19:47 PM CET, Pascal Obry wrote:
I have tested the new de
Le 26/12/2012 18:04, Ulrich Pegelow a écrit :
> All is kept in a separate branch 'dither'. Please give it a try, tell me
> your feedback and vote if you think this should move into master.
Looks good but it applies to the whole image and adds some "noise".
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux
I have tested the new denoise module a bit more deeply today. I feel
that there is something wrong with it.
To me the denoise module does too much smoothing of the image and we are
loosing lot of details. I'm wondering if this is not because it applies
on the chromatic and on the luminance noises
Hi guys,
you might have observed that some of our modules can produce banding
artifacts. Main candidates are vignetting and graduated neutral density.
There are certainly other situations as well where banding might hit you.
It was easy to add a dithering option to vignetting by adding some
rando
2012/12/26 Gary Thompson :
> Hi All,
>
> I have commented on the blog post but in my long comment I have a question
> before submitting profiles.
>
> The camera (Canon 50D) has built in noise reduction for high ISO and long
> exposure (with different settings in the custom functions). Will changin
Hi All,
I have commented on the blog post but in my long comment I have a question
before submitting profiles.
The camera (Canon 50D) has built in noise reduction for high ISO and long
exposure (with different settings in the custom functions). Will changing
these effect the noise profile?
When
19 matches
Mail list logo
