Hello,
I have started this discussion, so let me finish it as well.
When I used darktable for the first few times I was surprised that there is
no global UnDo on a user action. In the lightable part none at all. In the
darkroom it doesn't reflect user action, but probably some kind of code
Thanks Rob
I tried making from the source but, though technically minded, I'm not good
enough to get it to work. But ...
The PPA for Zesty came live overnight. This has made my week.
Thank to all the developers and testers.
I really enjoy the software.
Cheers
Alex
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, 10:08 AM
This "Document Name" is not present when exporting to file, only when
exporting directly to Flickr.
And it's not possible to run exiftool in this case.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:48 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 17:03:31 -0700
> Sergii Dymchenko
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 17:03:31 -0700
Sergii Dymchenko wrote:
>I noticed that when exporting to Flickr EXIF info of the exported
>JPEG has full path to the source file as "Document Name".
>
>I'd prefer not to expose this info, and there can be some (minor)
>security
I've been a victim of my own inattentiveness and wiped all edits on
images in the library. It sucked but it was my fault. It would have
been nice to have either a write protect feature on edited images
(my preference) or an undo. In my case, the undo was backups.
On
Hi,
I noticed that when exporting to Flickr EXIF info of the exported JPEG has
full path to the source file as "Document Name".
I'd prefer not to expose this info, and there can be some (minor) security
considerations (username on the local system can be revealed, for example).
Is there an
Hi,
When I define a draw & parametric mask with combine inclusive the entire
image is always selected.
The expected behavior is the drawn mask to be added to the selection made
on the parametric mask, as when the combine exclusive the drawn mask is
subtracted.
As far as I can tell it works the
Am Freitag, 14. April 2017, 19:48:35 CEST schrieb Dr. Georg Troska:
> Hello Tobias,
>
> I tried around a bit. Thank you very much for your hints.
>
>
> In principle the presets (Voreinstellung in german) do what I want. But
> are there meant to be used for such a case?
>
> What happens if I
Am Samstag, 15. April 2017, 22:15:19 CEST schrieb Sergii Dymchenko:
> I want a traceable back and stable (stay the same if I re-export the same
> images lately or in different order) file names.
The problem with the image id is that it's not that stable. Once you remove an
image from darktable
That doesn't solve the issue when you make wrong step in working in
lightable. You like to make modifications, but you also like to make step
back if you make wrong one.
I wonder how all the commands are processed.If there is no undo, it may be
because there is not a single queue through which
Why don't you use fixed name from the start, maybe similar what David
suggested (I used the same) and add suffix for your export. If original
would be something like 2017-12-23_12345.jpg your export could be
2017-12-23_12345_client1.jpg
I know what would you, but across different cameras it is
Just wondering if an
"image write disable" that prevents any changes to the image
(some what akin to the color buttons) might by a
solution/option. It's not an undo but would protect image
edits and could also prevent situations of accidental
How do I move presets into the LUT module?
David
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Le samedi 15 avril 2017 à 23:33 +0200, Richard Vanek a écrit :
> Colin,
>
> that is rather unfortunate that there is no Undo. Do you know if
> there is reason for it?
Not enough time to work on this feature.
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best way to travel is by means of
14 matches
Mail list logo