> Message du 16/01/20 01:26
> De : "Michael Fritze"
> A : "User List Darktable"
> Copie à :
> Objet : Aw: Re: [darktable-user] Base curve and white balance issue with DT
> 3.0
>
>
>
> Jean-Luc,
>
> what you see is a combination of what your eyes detect and what your brain
> processes from
You could probably make darktable faster if you install a Linux distro
such as Ubuntu and the Intel Neo OpenCL driver. Intel Neo is not
available (compiled) for every distro.
From my experience darktable is slower on Windows, even with OpenCL
On 16.01.20 17:27, Christian wrote:
Am 16.01.2020
Hi,
On a 16-megapixel Nikon raw, with a 12-year-old PC (Core2 Duo, 4 GB
RAM), but with a current graphics card (NVidia 1660/6GB) and OpenCL,
'denoise (profiled)' at default settings:
299.756594 [dev_pixelpipe] took 2.312 secs (1.768 CPU) processed
`denoise (profiled)' on GPU, blended on GPU
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, at 10:42, Graham White wrote:
> So, I haven't done much investigating, but one thing that might have gone
> wrong is that the photo database has been trashed while updating to the new
> schema.
Can you elaborate on "trashed"? If there is actual db corruption which you
Am Donnerstag, den 16.01.2020, 18:42 + schrieb Graham White:
> Hi. I tried installing the ubuntuhandbook version, on my Ubuntu
> laptop
> (not on my desktop
> machine, which has all my photographs on it), with the following
> results:
> i) it asked me if I wanted to migrate the database to a
Hi. I tried installing the ubuntuhandbook version, on my Ubuntu laptop
(not on my desktop
machine, which has all my photographs on it), with the following results:
i) it asked me if I wanted to migrate the database to a different
schema, so I said yes (because I wasn't working on my main machine)
Hi,
if I am not completely wrong, this oddly named "0" version actually
installed for me via the PPA (
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/graphics:/darktable/xUbuntu_19.10
) the DT 3.0.0 !
I guess there currently is a naming issue in the build process for the
repository pages, but
When you tried to install the Darktable 3.0 .deb package from the OBS site,
how exactly did it fail?
--
August Schwerdfeger
aug...@schwerdfeger.name
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:29 AM Gonçalo Marrafa
wrote:
> I just want a way to install on 19.10 without building from source. I'm
> not asking for
You might have a look at
https://darktable.gitlab.io/doc/en/overview_chapter.html#darktable_commandline_parameters
$ darktable -d perf
This is a sample output:10,301655 [dev] took 0,321 secs (0,568 CPU) to
load the image.
10,389857 [export] creating pixelpipe took 0,072 secs (0,135 CPU)
Am 16.01.2020 um 14:45 schrieb Remco Viëtor:
No real reason to doubt his values
but...
On 16.01.20 11:09, Christian wrote:
Hi,
can you confirm that the profiled-denoise is very slow
with the default settings?
My measurement (exporting 1 image):
denoise off: 7.3 s
raw denoise: 8.5 s
denoise
On jeudi 16 janvier 2020 13:59:30 CET Anna Simon wrote:
> What kind of computer are you using?
>
> I can definitely confirm that denoise profiled non-local is slower that
> denoise profiled luma/chroma preset. So the difference you have measured
> is probably correct.
>
No real reason to doubt
I just want a way to install on 19.10 without building from source. I'm not
asking for support. I'm just following the instructions on DT's website and
there are links to binary packages for Ubuntu 19.10. Except those links
don't really have 19.10 compatible packages. That's all I'm saying...
* Gonçalo Marrafa [01-16-20 08:59]:
> The web page refers to the distro packages AND "third party" packages (
> https://www.darktable.org/install/#3rdparty). I was just saying that, since
> the install page explicitly mentions 19.10 support there should be packages
> available. If not, then don't
The web page refers to the distro packages AND "third party" packages (
https://www.darktable.org/install/#3rdparty). I was just saying that, since
the install page explicitly mentions 19.10 support there should be packages
available. If not, then don't mention it and, instead, say that you should
* Gonçalo Marrafa [01-16-20 04:53]:
> Patrick,
>
> In the web pages there is a reference to third party packages, wich
> includes support for 19.10. If no support exists for 19.10 and you have to
> build packages directly from source then, maybe, that should be mentioned
> in the pages and not
What kind of computer are you using?
I can definitely confirm that denoise profiled non-local is slower that
denoise profiled luma/chroma preset. So the difference you have measured
is probably correct.
On 16.01.20 11:09, Christian wrote:
Hi,
can you confirm that the profiled-denoise is very
Hi all,I don't have any heavy lifting GPUs, but in DT 3.0 I find denoise works
fast, Athlon something, 24Gb RAM.AndrewSent from Samsung tablet.
Original message From: Christian Date:
16/1/20 9:13 pm (GMT+10:00) To: darktable-user@lists.darktable.org Subject:
[darktable-user]
Hi,
can you confirm that the profiled-denoise is very slow
with the default settings?
My measurement (exporting 1 image):
denoise off: 7.3 s
raw denoise: 8.5 s
denoise profiled default settings: 53 s (!)
denoise profiled luma preset: 13.8 s
OpenCL is disabled.
Greetings
Chris
Patrick,
In the web pages there is a reference to third party packages, wich
includes support for 19.10. If no support exists for 19.10 and you have to
build packages directly from source then, maybe, that should be mentioned
in the pages and not stated that support exists for 19.10.
Gonçalo
On 16/01/2020 06:40, eric bruggeman wrote:
Is this something that can help? :
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuhandbook1/+archive/ubuntu/darktable
I use the one for 18.04, because I work with Linux Mint 19.3 and this is
based on Ubuntu 18.04
Hope you can use this ppa.
For Ubuntu users this ppa
20 matches
Mail list logo
