looks a nice setup. I suspect putting in a bright 6500K LED bulb would help
and as suggested additional blue filtration might be good as well.
Advantage of LED is cool temperature so less problems with heat bending
negatives in the holder.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 15:07, jys wrote:
>
>
> On Wed,
I have to agree that improving the brush in DT to function more like LRs is
worth doing. I have abandoned use of the brush in DT because it is
nowhere near as functional as LRs. That being said, I find using the path
tool to draw around an region leaves the LR brush for dead. What I really
like
> why don't you file an feature request so you know the dt dev's see your
> request,
>
> https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/issues/new?assignees==
> mplate=feature_request.md=
>
> instead of "hoping" one will see your desires on the mail list.
Thanks Patrick,
I am sorry, I didn't know
* Martin Šoltis [08-13-20 17:42]:
> Thanks Burce.
>
> Yes as you've said IT IS POSSIBLE. But you have to use multiple tools and
> even
> then it is not as easy as with brush tool in LR.
> Yes I know there are many people who hates comparison with LR but if there is
> some good and effective
Thanks Burce.
Yes as you've said IT IS POSSIBLE. But you have to use multiple tools and even
then it is not as easy as with brush tool in LR.
Yes I know there are many people who hates comparison with LR but if there is
some good and effective tool I don't think is wrong to learn from this.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 22:43, wrote:
>
> In darktable 3.0.2 I had the “auto-apply of the base curve” switched off
> (empty tick box) in the preferences.
> Now in 3.2.1 it does always apply the base curve whether ticked on or not.
In 3.2.1, there are two settings that are related to the base
Hello,
I am still learning darktable (new since July) and upgraded from 3.0.2 to
3.2.1 on Windows 10. In darktable 3.0.2 I had the "auto-apply of the base
curve" switched off (empty tick box) in the preferences. Now in 3.2.1 it
does always apply the base curve whether ticked on or not. I guess
> Avoiding clipping is the most important thing, but also having some
> data to work with is important, too. :-)
>
If you don't clip channels you capture data good enough for work.
Having older sensor might be a problem, since they tend to produce more
noise in darker areas but I would just
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020, at 23:34, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote:
> I believe white balance is nothing to worry about.
The role of the white balance module is explained here:
https://discuss.pixls.us/t/inverting-photos-of-color-negatives-with-darktable/9140/44
How much that step actually
Hi,
you want to take an image of the emulsion layer (which contains the
photographic information). You do want to have as little as possible
in between that layer and your lens, not even the film carrier.
Mirroring can be done in software easily, lost information can't be regained.
Uwe
I believe white balance is nothing to worry about. Anyway you adjust
channels individually in negadoctor module without any reference to the
bulb type. The only thing you should worry about is to get no clipping
in individual channels of your "scan".
Timur.
On Thu, 2020-08-13 at 08:27 +0200,
Jys,
Thanks for the tips, they absolutely me sense. I used a 2700k led until now,
but will definitely give a try to a cooler e17 bulb.
M
> On 2020. Aug 13., at AM 7:08, jys wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020, at 08:24, Miklós Müller wrote:
>> As for the scanning resolution, I have to
Timur,
Why is that happening? Where can i read about that more? Also, thanks for the
tip on that other forum at https://discuss.pixls.us/tags/play_raw.
M
>> On 2020. Aug 13., at AM 6:37, Timur Irikovich Davletshin
>> wrote:
> Well, in this case you may be losing in resolution. But it is up
13 matches
Mail list logo
