Pascal Obry schrieb am 19.08.20 um 21:25:
Le mercredi 19 août 2020 à 14:09 -0400, Michael a écrit :
that is the question!
Is there any benefit to compiling the program on my own?
Having latest features.
Having latest bugs and possibly corrupt your db and broke all your
edits :)
So if
On mercredi 19 août 2020 23:00:17 CEST Guillermo Rozas wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 19.08.2020, 14:40 -0400 schrieb Michael:
> > > I thought compiling led to faster?
> >
> > This might be the case or not. Depending on your CPU. When you
> > compile for your machine, the compiler can set all
In 3.0.x using the keyboard typing 1 when the file is selected will give
it one star, typing 0 will leave it with no stars
With the mouse clicking on the first star will apply a 1 star rating,
but if it already has a one star rating clicking on the first star will
remove its rating, for me,
* Mark Heieis [08-19-20 19:03]:
> Hi,
>
> I import images with zero rating and then apply ratings accordingly.
> Previous to 3.0.2, I could zero rate an image by toggling star-1
> (assuming only star 1 is toggled on) if the rating is no longer desired.
>
> I must be missing something, how do I
Hi,
I import images with zero rating and then apply ratings accordingly.
Previous to 3.0.2, I could zero rate an image by toggling star-1
(assuming only star 1 is toggled on) if the rating is no longer desired.
I must be missing something, how do I zero rate an image from the UI, as
I seem to be
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 19.08.2020, 14:40 -0400 schrieb Michael:
> > I thought compiling led to faster?
>
> This might be the case or not. Depending on your CPU. When you
> compile for your machine, the compiler can set all optimization
> options according to your system. A package maintiner however
I can confirm that hitting "1" twice doesn't seem to work, regardless of if
the corresponding option is enabled or not (Linux, 3.2.1). I never used it,
so I don't know if it was working before. Maybe it is worth filing a bug.
However, hitting "0" removes the rating.
Regards,
Guillermo
On Wed, Aug
Is it not possible anymore to press the "0" key to zero-rate an image?
--
August Schwerdfeger
aug...@schwerdfeger.name
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:21 PM Bruce Williams wrote:
> Try hitting the number one key twice.
> First press will rate the image a 1.
> Second press will clear that and mark it
-- Forwarded message -
> From: Mark Heieis
> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020, 05:23
> Subject: [darktable-user] How to zero star rate an image?
> To: darktable forum
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I import images with zero rating and then apply ratings accordingly.
> Previous to 3.0.2, I could zero
Am Mittwoch, den 19.08.2020, 14:40 -0400 schrieb Michael:
> I thought compiling led to faster?
This might be the case or not. Depending on your CPU. When you
compile for your machine, the compiler can set all optimization
options according to your system. A package maintiner however
has to
Try hitting the number one key twice.
First press will rate the image a 1.
Second press will clear that and mark it as unrated.
Cheers,
Bruce Williams.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Mark Heieis
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020, 05:23
Subject: [darktable-user] How to zero star rate an
I have no programming experience aside from:
10 print "Hello World'
20 goto line 10
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:40 PM Michael wrote:
>
> I thought compiling led to faster?
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:19 PM Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >
> > * Michael [08-19-20 14:12]:
> > > that is the question!
I thought compiling led to faster?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:19 PM Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> * Michael [08-19-20 14:12]:
> > that is the question!
> > Is there any benefit to compiling the program on my own?
>
> quicker access to latest/greatest, usually packagers are somewhat slower.
>
>
Whats more, if you can read the code a little, you may be able to write it
a little too! You may be able to fprintf stderr some things you are curious
about, as I was when I was first experimenting with scanning color
negatives. Ok I have some programming background so YMMV.
m
On Wed, Aug 19,
* Michael [08-19-20 14:12]:
> that is the question!
> Is there any benefit to compiling the program on my own?
quicker access to latest/greatest, usually packagers are somewhat slower.
experience
pride
more beer
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri
that is the question!
Is there any benefit to compiling the program on my own?
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
That is the question!
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 16:58, Marc Cabuy wrote:
> Since I use a scene-referred workflow, that’s it.
If reconstruction is not on (threshold is set high, as is the default
setting), filmic is pretty fast, it's just a kind of tone curve (for a
16 MPixel image, about 140 ms on my ancient box).
I've
Kofa, Since I use a scene-referred workflow, that’s it. No problem, I’ll live with that until … … Christmas .Thank you !Marc. Van: KOVÁCS IstvánVerzonden: woensdag 19 augustus 2020 16:13Aan: darktable-user@lists.darktable.orgOnderwerp: Re: [darktable-user] v.3.2.1 is wonderful, maybe somewhat
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 15:32, Marc Cabuy wrote:
> that slower response on zoomed out images in the darkroom GUI does not seem
> to be associated with lack of GPU
> processing (as I wrongly suspected). I only see my GPU less loaded for a
> longer period when zooming out,
> when compared to
Terry, that slower response on zoomed out images in the darkroom GUI does not seem to be associated with lack of GPU processing (as I wrongly suspected). I only see my GPU less loaded for a longer period when zooming out, when compared to exporting. Exporting gives higher load but during a
Hi Pascal and Co. You have done a great job with DT. I have access to LR
and PS and all Adobe programs because I my job but I just love DT and the
masks that allow local adjustments. I confess I would love to see Dt and
Rawtherapee join forces and become Dark Therapee, but I guess that will not
Hi Jason,
> Overall impressions: a worthy improvement (thanks, developers!). I am
> going to adjust to a new workflow with darktable 3.2, but it is not a
> big adjustment. I think overall darktable has come very far since the
> early days, and it is hard to believe such a program is free
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
