Re: Job control bug in revision 3800d4934391b,

2010-05-28 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:40:49AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:10:39AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 07:01:25PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote: > > That's interesting. I've had three users complain about it so far. strace > is attached. Thanks, I have re

Re: Job control bug in revision 3800d4934391b,

2010-05-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:10:39AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 07:01:25PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote: > > > > That's interesting. I've had three users complain about it so far. strace > > is attached. > > Thanks, I have reproduced it here now. It looks like it only > happe

Re: Job control bug in revision 3800d4934391b,

2010-05-28 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 07:01:25PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote: > > That's interesting. I've had three users complain about it so far. strace > is attached. Thanks, I have reproduced it here now. It looks like it only happens occasionally on my system. > [pid 23950] <... read resumed> 0x7fff75f0

Re: Job control bug in revision 3800d4934391b,

2010-05-28 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:21:57PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote: > I'm not sure how to describe this bug, but it's affected one of my > scripts, and those of several of my users. Basically, we've had loops > dieing when backgrounded programs exit. This is the simplest test case > I can come up with:

Re: Job control bug in revision 3800d4934391b,

2010-05-28 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 08:43:34AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: Kris Maglione wrote: I should have mentioned that I tested it with every revision upto and including that one (especially as it looked promising). I definitely still have this problem as of 207e4c2a322fe: [JOBS] Fix wait regressio

Re: Job control bug in revision 3800d4934391b,

2010-05-28 Thread Herbert Xu
Kris Maglione wrote: > > I should have mentioned that I tested it with every revision > upto and including that one (especially as it looked promising). > > I definitely still have this problem as of > 207e4c2a322fe: [JOBS] Fix wait regression where it does not wait for all jobs > master Hm

Re: Job control bug in revision 3800d4934391b,

2010-05-28 Thread Kris Maglione
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 02:53:16PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: Kris Maglione wrote: I'm not sure how to describe this bug, but it's affected one of my scripts, and those of several of my users. Basically, we've had loops dieing when backgrounded programs exit. This is the simplest test case I can

Re: Job control bug in revision 3800d4934391b,

2010-05-27 Thread Herbert Xu
Kris Maglione wrote: > > I'm not sure how to describe this bug, but it's affected one of my > scripts, and those of several of my users. Basically, we've had loops > dieing when backgrounded programs exit. This is the simplest test case > I can come up with: > > #!/bin/dash > { >echo foo

Job control bug in revision 3800d4934391b,

2010-05-27 Thread Kris Maglione
I'm not sure how to describe this bug, but it's affected one of my scripts, and those of several of my users. Basically, we've had loops dieing when backgrounded programs exit. This is the simplest test case I can come up with: #!/bin/dash { echo foo sleep 1 echo foo