Re: [rfc] DateTime::Cache 0.01

2003-07-06 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
> If someone knows of something on CPAN for this, please tell me. There is > Class::Decorator, and maybe that plus a little syntactic sugar might be in > order, so we can do: Or we could make our own with Hook::LexWrap/Class::Hook. I don't think any of these will work well with Memoize as it's

Re: DT::E::NameDay in CVS

2003-07-06 Thread Ben Bennett
Oops, my bad. I will mail the request. -ben On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 07:24:42PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: > Why is the directory called DateTime-Event-NameDay-0.02? Ben, can you ask > SF to change this, please? > > > -dave > > /*=== > House Absolute Consulting > w

DT::E::NameDay in CVS

2003-07-06 Thread Dave Rolsky
Why is the directory called DateTime-Event-NameDay-0.02? Ben, can you ask SF to change this, please? -dave /*=== House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com ===*/

Re: [rfc] DateTime::Cache 0.01

2003-07-06 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > Available immediately from: > > http://kolea.ifa.hawaii.edu/~jhoblitt/pm/DateTime-Cache-0.01.tar.gz > > I'm not sure if this should be DateTime::Util::Cache instead. I prefer > the Util::* namespace but I wanted to keep the name as short as > possible.

[rfc] DateTime::Cache 0.01

2003-07-06 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
Available immediately from: http://kolea.ifa.hawaii.edu/~jhoblitt/pm/DateTime-Cache-0.01.tar.gz I'm not sure if this should be DateTime::Util::Cache instead. I prefer the Util::* namespace but I wanted to keep the name as short as possible. As soon as a namespace is agreed upon I'll move this

Re: DateTime::Format::ISO8601 namepsace

2003-07-06 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
> Ok, I can try to port over my framework when your code is checked in, > although it relies on being able to pass in a base date and be able to > select the return classes so I am not sure how easy it is to do. I've been using now because I'm not creating parser objects. It simple enough to make

DT:Fiscal::Year

2003-07-06 Thread Jesse Shy
After thinging about this for a few minutes, I remembered why there is no quarter_of_fiscal_year, or period_of_fiscal_year. This is because depending on your particular calendar, something like day 90 could either be the end of the first quarter or third period where you have 12 periods that coresp

Re: DateTime-Fiscal-Year 0.01

2003-07-06 Thread Jesse Shy
That makes sense. Let me make sure I have this correct: Change day_of and week_of methods to check if there are arguments, if not, return those current values or throw and error if not yet defined. Add a quarter_of method with the same API. On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Thu, 3 Ju

DT::Locale in CVS

2003-07-06 Thread Dave Rolsky
I recently checked in the DT::Locale code to SF CVS. Just now, I also checked in the changes necessary to make DateTime.pm use it. It seems to work quite well, from my limited testing. There's a couple more things I want to do before a release: - Decide how to handle default format length. Ric

Re: DateTime::Format::ISO8601 namepsace

2003-07-06 Thread Ben Bennett
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 06:56:32PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > I want to preserve the revision history of my tree so the move to SF won't be until > next week. Ok. > What really needs to be done is a lot more tests. I'm considering a framework for > building tests. Ok, I can try to port ov