RFC: DateTime::TemporalValue

2003-10-22 Thread Dan Kubb
Hi, I recently worked on a project where I had to keep track of data that changed over time. I needed to keep a history of the changes, as well as allow values to be specified for future time periods. For example, a value could be set, and it would go into effect starting now. A second value

Re: Chinese Calendar Question (fwd)

2003-10-22 Thread Daisuke Maki
Absolutely. I've suggested DateTime::Util for helpers before. Astro::* makes sense for 'generic' astronomical calculations. DateTime specific stuff should inhabit another namespace. Okay, that makes more sense to me. How about: DateTime::Util::Calc DateTime::Util::Astro::Sun

[RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

2003-10-22 Thread Rick Measham
I just installed Bundle::DateTime on my Darwin machine ... I hadn't looked through the docs beforehand :) Can I suggest two other bundles that I'm willing to maintain (they shouldn't need much alteration anyway. Not like the full bundle!) Bundle::DateTime::Minimal is the minimum needed to

Re: RFC: DateTime::TemporalValue

2003-10-22 Thread Flavio S. Glock
Dan Kubb wrote: I recently worked on a project where I had to keep track of data that changed over time. I needed to keep a history of the changes, as well as allow values to be specified for future time periods. DateTime::TemporalValue 082: #Class::Multimethods could really clean this

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

2003-10-22 Thread Eugene van der Pijll
Rick Measham schreef: I just installed Bundle::DateTime on my Darwin machine ... I hadn't looked through the docs beforehand :) Can I suggest two other bundles that I'm willing to maintain (they shouldn't need much alteration anyway. Not like the full bundle!) Bundle::DateTime::Minimal

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

2003-10-22 Thread Eugene van der Pijll
Dave Rolsky schreef: On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Eugene van der Pijll wrote: DT prereq's: Class::Factory::Util 1.3 - prereq's of DateTime Params::Validate 0.52 Test::More 0 Time::Local 1.04 Class::Singleton 1.03 - prereq of DT::TimeZone DateTime::Locale 0.03 -

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

2003-10-22 Thread rickmeasham
Dave Rolsky schreef: DateTime, it will tell you that you need these prereqs anyway. Eugene van der Pijll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The first few versions of Bundle::DateTime left out those prereqs. As a result, the bundle was difficult to install for the first time: A good

Re: [RFC] DateTime::Bundle::Minimal and DateTime::Bundle::Basic

2003-10-22 Thread Iain Truskett
Also, regarding DTF::HTTP suitability, it has a requirement of HTTP::Date which is part of LWP. This probably counts against it for bundling (though most people using bundles probably have LWP already). cheers, -- Iain. http://eh.org/~koschei/

[RFC] Astro related modules

2003-10-22 Thread Daisuke Maki
I've now re-organized the astronomical calculation portions of the chinese calendar modules into the following. This should be nicer to the namespace. Please let me know if they look ok: http://www.wafu.ne.jp/~daisuke/DateTime-Util-Calc-0.01.tar.gz