Re: DBI::Test's DESIGN.md

2013-07-02 Thread Jens Rehsack
Am 01.07.2013 um 23:55 schrieb Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com: On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi all, I decided it's best to discuss it in public than in a github repository. We can easier answer / quote / split discussions than in a push/pull battle. #

Re: DBI::Test's DESIGN.md

2013-07-02 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 09:44:06 +0200, Jens Rehsack rehs...@gmail.com wrote: For the moment, I wouldn't spend to much brain on those cases, as they do not affect any existing and targeted driver. Primary goal for the first shot are: * DBI (and bundled drivers) * SQL::Statement (with DBI::Mock

Re: DBI::Test's DESIGN.md

2013-07-01 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi all, I decided it's best to discuss it in public than in a github repository. We can easier answer / quote / split discussions than in a push/pull battle. # DESIGN Currently this is a list of open issues and discussion

Re: DBI::Test's DESIGN.md

2013-07-01 Thread Martin J. Evans
Apologies for top posting and I'll give this post the attention it deserves later (by all means track me down Jens if I forget) but one thing struck me immediately and that was sections in DBD pod like DBD::ODBC's deviations from the DBI specification at

Re: DBI::Test's DESIGN.md

2013-07-01 Thread Jens Rehsack
Am 02.07.2013 um 00:56 schrieb Martin J. Evans boh...@ntlworld.com: Apologies for top posting and I'll give this post the attention it deserves later (by all means track me down Jens if I forget) but one thing struck me immediately and that was sections in DBD pod like DBD::ODBC's