---end--->8---
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Alberto
>
>
> ___
> List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
> IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
> SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-C
ation approach with
> single values attributes.
>
> Best regards,
> Alex
>
> ___
> List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
> IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
> SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
> Searc
___
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive:
http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
--
David Ihnen
Voice contact (562) 743
-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive:
http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
--
David Ihnen
Voice contact (562) 743-1807
___
List: http
is an abbreviation
for the name of the table the note is related to, and the 'TableId' is the
record within that table.
So, it is in fact a multi-column join between the note table and several
other tables, each with their own 'TableName'.
Steve
On 1/10/2011 1:07 PM, David Ihnen wrote
approach?
On 1/10/2011 1:34 PM, David Ihnen wrote:
You're not thinking specifically enough. The column which has the ID in
it is being used to store disparate types of information - a transaction
note identifier is a DIFFERENT type than a customer service event
identifier
- but they're
Agreed, You are a better expresser than I, apologies for clutzing ther
ideas. And I do like my julienned fries.
David
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Rob Kinyon rob.kin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 13:54, David Ihnen davidih...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. That was what i
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Leandro Hermida soft...@leandrohermida.com
wrote:
Hi t0m,
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.netwrote:
On 11 Jul 2010, at 14:48, Leandro Hermida wrote:
I had a look at KiokuDB, its a very nice project and suitable for
certain
Perchane did you try something like this:
$rs = $schema-resultset('IncOpcode')-search(
{ desc = { -like = [ map { '%'.$_.'%' } @TERMS ] }
} );
David
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Dennis Daupert ddaup...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to '-and' a varying number of variables in a
where
Dan Horne wrote:
On 7/07/2009, at 12:43 PM, David Ihnen wrote:
Dan Horne wrote:
Say I have a table called customer which links to a parent table
called status. I wonder if there is a shortcut so that I don't need
to figure out the parent id in advance if I know the unique name.
my
Oye, at least when you're coding you don't make silly ommissions... like
not doing create_related.
my ($self, $status_obj, $phase_obj) = @_;
$self-txn_do( sub { $self-create_related('process', { status =
$status_obj, phase = $phase_obj }) } );
}
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
David Ihnen wrote:
Ivan Fomichev wrote:
Hello, great module. Instead of arguing if it is a useful patch or not
and if it should be applied or there are weird workarounds easily
available, just make your own DBIx::Class component and release it on
CPAN. Who need
Rob Kinyon wrote:
Now, if someone can provide a solid use-case, then I'll be onboard.
But, adding features for the sake of adding features is how you end up
with a crappy API.
Rob
Lets see if I can argue the use case. I tripped over this limitation
and I *think* it was when I was doing this
Rob Kinyon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:13, Peter Rabbitsonrabbit+d...@rabbit.us wrote:
A classical use-case is right side condition on a left-join. There is
no way to emulate those appropriately with WHERE - the condition has to
reside in the join spec itself: i.e. you need to get ALL
Ivan Fomichev wrote:
Hello, great module. Instead of arguing if it is a useful patch or not
and if it should be applied or there are weird workarounds easily
available, just make your own DBIx::Class component and release it on
CPAN. Who need will load this component. Good luck. Ivan.
Can
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 01:49:05PM -0700, David Ihnen wrote:
Sometimes I think i'm missing something obvious.
In my application, for instance, a holiday can be assigned to a group.
A group has many donors
A donor might have many scheduled days
A scheduled day
Sometimes I think i'm missing something obvious.
In my application, for instance, a holiday can be assigned to a group.
A group has many donors
A donor might have many scheduled days
A scheduled day is associated with a particular schedule
In this spot in my application, the operation is
Is this appropriate behavior or a bug?
Consider this code here. It is part of our application's database test
script. Its purpose is to hit every rel defined in the database so that
we can get an early warning on any class configuration mismatching the
state of the database.
# get all the
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
David Ihnen wrote:
fREW Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Peter Rabbitson
rabbit+d...@rabbit.us mailto:rabbit%2bd...@rabbit.us wrote:
Greetings,
The next release of DBIC will have a number of exciting improvements,
among them proper
fREW Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Peter Rabbitson
rabbit+d...@rabbit.us mailto:rabbit%2bd...@rabbit.us wrote:
Greetings,
The next release of DBIC will have a number of exciting improvements,
among them proper -count -update and -delete of any resultset,
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Greetings,
The next release of DBIC will have a number of exciting improvements,
among them proper -count -update and -delete of any resultset,
regardless of it's complexity (join, group_by, paging, etc.)
While all of these improvements are logical extensions of the
Louis Erickson wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Chris Cole wrote:
snip
Why does it work fine when I have Autocommit 'on', but get the following
error with Autocommit 'off':
I'm surprised no one else has replied.
I must have missed the message.
This bit me too when I first
started
Chris Cole wrote:
Ultimately, the SQL code I want to replicate is:
SELECT miRNA_id, sum(abundance) as sum
FROM mirbase_hairpin_match, seq_data
WHERE query_id = id
AND query_id LIKE 'mmuD%'
GROUP BY miRNA_id
I've tried breaking it down to a simpler SQL for testing:
SELECT query_id, miRNA_id,
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
David Ihnen wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:59:48AM -0700, David Ihnen wrote:
Which is why:
-create_related('ivr_holiday', { holiday = date, description =
$description });
is called. but does not create
Peter Corlett wrote:
On 19 Apr 2009, at 11:14, Matt S Trout wrote:
[...]
And the patch didn't come with tests, so I assumed he didn't *want*
it to
be applied ...
It was more a prompt for somebody with better inside knowledge of
DBIx::Class to take the idea and run with it or suggest a
BUT - if we *do* put the hash entry in for the relationship tying column
(donor_id in this case) - but leave its value undefined - the error does
not occur.
What do you make of that?
David Ihnen
Matt S Trout wrote:
After possibly the longest and most irritating development cycle in DBIC's
ivan wrote:
I wish to realise SQL in DBIx syntax:
select * from table1 left join ( select * from table2 where date =
'mydate' ) as F ON ( table1.id = F.table1_id );
Is it possible ?
package DB::Schema::table1;
__PACKAGE__-load_components(qw/core/);
__PACKAGE__-table('table1');
Rob Kinyon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:07, David Ihnen dav...@norchemlab.com wrote:
Nothing is actually a plugin that impliments the 'Nothing' design pattern -
that is - instead of returning null when referencing a row in an empty
resultset (particularly -single and -first
So in the wake of fREW showing a modification of the classes to allow
the modification of the delete, I utilized a corrollary concept...
restricting a result set automatically/transparently, as you would in
case of that delete - not normally showing the deleted rows. In my
case, my alerts
I wrote a blog post on the specifics of my method.
http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com/archives/274. The only things that
are missing are a) configurability and b) a way to find deleted rows.
The first is just a matter of me reading the source code of more
Components, the second seems
Looks like an encoding problem, fREW. You might notice its not a dot
*between* - its a dot *after* each letter. The data is being sent in as
something like 16 bit unicode, and is being serialized out without
taking that into account.
I wish I knew the solution, but I hope that provides a
Heiko Gruner wrote:
Hello,
i tried to hardcode values into a table relationship like below.
But i just received just errors like
undef error - Invalid rel cond val
That sucks, eh Heiko? Yes, what I was saying below is I know what you
mean and this is how I want it to work, but it does not
.
I hope we can figure out how to do complex join relations, that would be
awesome.
Helpfully,
David Ihnen
Programmer
Norchem Laboratories
http://www.norchemlab.com/
___
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC
33 matches
Mail list logo
