Josh Berkus wrote:
Hmmm. If you're storing stuff as MIME, you could actually put it in a TEXT
field in PostgreSQL. Mind you, that just makes replication easier, it
doesn't help otherwise -- both are stored using TOAST regardless.
That won't work afaik. Using TEXT would mean forcing the
Perhaps there's something I don't understand, but I thought that
messages (including attachments) were all represented using text, i.e.,
UTF7. Is that not the case? (If this is a n00b question feel free to
refer me to an RFC, those things don't scare me).
- Naz.
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Josh
Naz Gassiep wrote:
Perhaps there's something I don't understand, but I thought that
messages (including attachments) were all represented using text, i.e.,
UTF7. Is that not the case? (If this is a n00b question feel free to
refer me to an RFC, those things don't scare me).
If everyone
From my experience if you want to hear about:
1) How unstable is 2.3.3? I'd like to try out some of the new
features.
I'm only using it on testing and seams OK, with some problem I think with
IDLE.
2) If I run queries against the mail in the backend database, and
update or
delete
Josh Berkus wrote:
DBMail folks,
I'm setting up DB mail for my personal server (this account). I've a
number of questions; forgive me that I don't know much at all about
adminning mailservers. I know a lot about databases, though.
1) How unstable is 2.3.3? I'd like to try out some of
Paul,
Don't use it for anything other than testing. There are still some
pretty fundamental issues to iron out.
Thanks for the warning. 2.2 it is. Now, if only Ubuntu would update
the $%@ packages ...
2) If I run queries against the mail in the backend database, and update or
delete
On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Paul,
Don't use it for anything other than testing. There are still some
pretty fundamental issues to iron out.
Thanks for the warning. 2.2 it is. Now, if only Ubuntu would
update the $%@ packages ...
2) If I run queries against the
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Paul,
Don't use it for anything other than testing. There are still some
pretty fundamental issues to iron out.
Thanks for the warning. 2.2 it is. Now, if only Ubuntu would update
the $%@ packages ...
2) If I run
Hi Josh :)
Greetings from pg-hackers :)
- Naz.
Josh Berkus wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Paul,
Don't use it for anything other than testing. There are still some
pretty fundamental issues to iron out.
Thanks for the warning. 2.2 it is.
I've been running it on Ubuntu for a couple of years. I've got 2.2
running on Ubuntu Server 6.10 LTS and it compiles from source perfectly.
Curtis
Josh Berkus wrote:
Paul,
Don't use it for anything other than testing. There are still some
pretty fundamental issues to iron out.
Thanks
Josh Berkus wrote:
Keen! Hopefully I'll be able to do a write up on replicated e-mail with
dbmail ...
On postgresql perhaps?
Where do attachments go?
Depends. In 2.2 everything is chopped up into 500k blocks and stuffed in
blobs that are simply concatened on retrieval. So attachments are
Paul,
Keen! Hopefully I'll be able to do a write up on replicated e-mail
with dbmail ...
On postgresql perhaps?
What, like I'd use something else? ;-)
In 2.3+ attachments are indeed stored as atomic blobs in the mimeparts
table. The rfc822 header part of the complete message, and the
Josh Berkus wrote:
Paul,
Keen! Hopefully I'll be able to do a write up on replicated e-mail
with dbmail ...
On postgresql perhaps?
What, like I'd use something else? ;-)
THing is people talk a lot about pros and cons of running dbmail on a
mysql-replication setup. But I havent heard
DBMail folks,
I'm setting up DB mail for my personal server (this account). I've a
number of questions; forgive me that I don't know much at all about
adminning mailservers. I know a lot about databases, though.
1) How unstable is 2.3.3? I'd like to try out some of the new features.
2) If
to put myDNS administration and
proftpd all togheter in the same application, so any pre existing tool
will not work for me.
Jorge
- Original Message - From: Tommi Lätti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DBMail mailinglist dbmail@dbmail.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail
what I'm working on a multi-user (meaning support staff) managment system.
Its a complete management system written in PHP. If you're looking for
something that you can deploy easily and quickly, you should look at
dbmail administrator. Its not the greates interface in the world, but it
works.
On 1/28/06, Curtis Maurand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The user_idnr is an auto-increment number. The database assigns that
integer automatically. Then you use that number to create the rest of
what you need. I had a perl script at one point to do this which would
give you the queries that
Me too.
-Brad
On Jan 29, 2006, at 4:31 AM, zamri wrote:
On 1/28/06, Curtis Maurand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The user_idnr is an auto-increment number. The database assigns that
integer automatically. Then you use that number to create the rest of
what you need. I had a perl script at
Hi,
I have a few question on the IMAP implementation.
1) What is the memory footprint of the DBMail IMAP.
2) What is the maximum number of simultaneous connections that the DBMail
IMAP server can handle.
3) How many threads does the DBMail imap server create? Does it have a
fixed pool of
gopalakrishnan kamalanathan wrote:
Hi,
I have a few question on the IMAP implementation.
1) What is the memory footprint of the DBMail IMAP.
Mmm, my main inhouse mailserver (5 heavy users with many very large mailboxes)
running dbmail2-mysql-ldap (trunk-snapshot):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
Hello everyone,
I recently installed DBMail 1.2.7 on a test system with MySQL 4 Exim 4
and think DBMail is very good! I hope to deploy it on a production
system soon, and while the DBMail list archive was useful in providing
some answers to my questions, it also created new questions! :)
I've been running dbmail 2.x rc/cvs (Postfix 2 MTA) as my sole mail
repository for some months now. I have a few gigs of mail stored, but
only a handful of users. I had a few delivery chain issues about a month
ago that required me to go into the database and fix some mail, but I
haven't lost
Ok,
after a further dig into the setup, i am happy that the mail is handling
the virtualdomains correctly, if i send an email to tim, it goes into the
logs as dbmail-tim, this sahould then go via the .qmail in the dbmail home
dir and pass it to dbmail-smtp, but i am fairly sure that this is not
after a further dig into the setup, i am happy that the mail is handling
the virtualdomains correctly, if i send an email to tim, it goes into the
logs as dbmail-tim, this sahould then go via the .qmail in the dbmail home
dir and pass it to dbmail-smtp, but i am fairly sure that this is not
snip
Have you followed the qmail install info? (see below) if you've placed the
'domain:user' reference within /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains qmail
should
forward all email from that domain to the specificied user. In your case the
dbmail user.
also don't forget to tell qmail to accept
25 matches
Mail list logo
