Thank you very much.
I will take by myself. I don't think that I am running out of memory
because my computer can solve larger problem previously.
Or somewhere I get the memory leakage.
Best
Pham Ngoc Kien
Vào Th 5, 2 thg 5, 2019 vào lúc 19:40 đã viết:
> Hi,
>
> Is it UMFPACK that returns the
On 5/3/19 3:34 PM, Hamed Babaei wrote:
>
> I believe it will be less time-consuming if I simply avoid using the
> SymmetricTensor class and use the Tensor class instead and insert the
> symmetric elements manually.
For sure. And for once I'm not even going to argue that this might be a nice
On 5/3/19 4:14 PM, Doug wrote:
> Ok, so my initial understanding of deal.II was accurate. It all makes sense
> now. Although FE_DGP is spanning {1,x,y} in reference space, it is not
> spanning those bases in physical space. Instead, it is spanning some
> combination of {1,x,y,xy} with 3 degrees of
Hello again,
I am now looking into adding vector-valued equations to my current
framework. The goal will be to do some hp-adaptive Navier-Stokes flow
simulation using Discontinuous Galerkin. I have read "Handling vector
valued problems", went through most of the vector-valued examples, and saw
Prof. Bangerth,
Ok, so my initial understanding of deal.II was accurate. It all makes sense
now. Although FE_DGP is spanning {1,x,y} in reference space, it is not spanning
those bases in physical space. Instead, it is spanning some combination of
{1,x,y,xy} with 3 degrees of freedom, that only
Dear Wolfgang,
I believe it will be less time-consuming if I simply avoid using the
SymmetricTensor class and use the Tensor class instead and insert the
symmetric elements manually.
Thanks anyway for your incredible support!
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For
On 5/3/19 2:07 PM, Hamed Babaei wrote:
>
> $ *SymmetricTensor<6, dim> C; *
>
>
> The error is:
>
> /home/hbabaei/deal.ii-candi/deal.II-v9.0.1/include/deal.II/base/symmetric_tensor.h:563:29:
>
> error: incomplete type
> ‘dealii::internal::SymmetricTensorAccessors::StorageType<6, 3, double>’
Dear Bruno,
Thank you very much for your hint. I added the extra include but it did not
help and I am still getting the same error!
I am wondering what other things I may want to try?
Thanks
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
Dear Bruno,
Thank you very much for your hint. I added the extra include but it did not
help and I am still getting the same error!
I am wondering what other things I may want to try?
Thanks
On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 3:24:04 PM UTC-5, bruno@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Try to add #include
Hi,
Try to add #include We cannot
do explicit instantiation for every thing so if you have something that is
less common you need the extra include.
Best
Bruno
On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 4:07:56 PM UTC-4, Hamed Babaei wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am planning to use a symmetric tensor rank-6 for
Hello,
I am planning to use a symmetric tensor rank-6 for third-order elastic
constants in a nonlinear elasticity code. The tensor is supposed to be
symmetric within each three pair indices as well as all possible orders of
pair permutations.
Namely, C_ijklmn = C_jiklmn = C_ijlkmn = C_ijklnm
On 5/2/19 7:26 PM, Doug wrote:
>
> Based on this, I assume that FEValues, which takes a FiniteElement and a
> Mapping, uses them to evaluate the Jacobian field instead of using a bilinear
> mapping as the documentation of Mapping suggests. So FE_DGP would only be
> able
> to parametrize the
12 matches
Mail list logo
