Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in it so
that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one architecture, send a
mail to that list asking for help.
Kurt
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:52:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > > The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success
> > > on architectures not tested by upstream.
> >
> > And have Format->Character in Impress crash
On June 18, 2023 11:37:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rob Landley wrote:
>On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3
>>> and
>>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about
>>> how he
>>> regretted the
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 09:06:31PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 06/22/2013 07:26 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
* sparc: no working nflog (mild concern); no stable kernels in stable
(compiling clisp for instance crashes the kernel reliably on smetana). We
need to run sparc with oldstable
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 04:19:30PM +0700, Daniel Glassey wrote:
Hi,
My package grcompiler version 4.2~pre5 is failing to build on the
amd64 buildd brahms and now barber as well.
The log is for 4.2~pre5-2 on brahms is at:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'll make GCC 4.6 the
default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at
least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc.
If you do the switch, please
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:43:57PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
For wheezy I'm planning to change the linking behaviour for DSOs (turning
on --as-needed and --no-copy-dt-needed-entries. The rationale is
summarized in
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:23:13PM +0400, James Brown wrote:
~$ dmesg | grep BIOS
[0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[0.00] BIOS-e820: - 0009f800 (usable)
That is 653312 bytes = 638 KB
[0.00] BIOS-e820: 0009f800 -
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 06:18:56PM -0500, Leslie Rhorer wrote:
I downloaded an application (mfs-tools) which I am trying to compile on
my
Debian Lenny system, but the make is failing with the following
errors:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -I../include-g -O2 -MT
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 06:29:51PM -0500, Ghost Kilah wrote:
Debian amd64 kernel packages
Download from here : http://debian.unixcod.org
linux-headers-2.6.28.7-unixcod_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.28.7-unixcod_amd64.deb
The debian kernel team provides experimental kernels at
deb
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 04:50:17PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 04:41:57PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 03:11:59PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
http.c:730: error: format '%lld' expects type 'long long int', but
argument 8 has type '__off_t'
I
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 06:25:58PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
Thanks Kurt!
Do you approve of this GNUmakefile change too?
-CCFLAGS = -O2 -pipe -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-c
+CCFLAGS = -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes $(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) -c
I see no
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 03:11:59PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
http.c:730: error: format '%lld' expects type 'long long int', but
argument 8 has type '__off_t'
I think it's actually a long int (or just long) on amd64, since it's
already 64 bit long. I think we have 1 or 2 other arches with
the
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 04:41:57PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 03:11:59PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
http.c:730: error: format '%lld' expects type 'long long int', but
argument 8 has type '__off_t'
I think it's actually a long int (or just long) on amd64, since it's
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:47:18AM -0800, Dzilberte Bekode wrote:
Hi
I have problem with broken postgresql package.
I've accidentally deleted some postgresql files and now I can't reinstal or
remove it.
Also after every instalation i get:
Setting up postgresql-client-7.4
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 02:31:07PM +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Hi all,
when I start cinelerra, I always get the following message:
---
void MWindow::init_shm(): Warning: /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax is 0x7ff,
which
is too low.
Before running Cinelerra do the following as
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:31:12PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Dear maintainers,
I discovered two little bugs, but I do not know, whom to report to, as I do
not know, to which package it belongs.
So I hope, the responsible maintainer might read it.
1. laptop-mode ist starting to
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 08:24:28AM -0500, Seb wrote:
Hi,
The description for linux-image-amd64 says:
--cut here---start-
Description: Linux image on AMD64
This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel on all
64bit single-
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:34:44PM +0200, Stefano Canepa wrote:
Dear all,
I'm working on apt-spy becouse I'd like to adopt this package. I don't
have an AMD64 and I cannot reproduce bug #424643 [1]. On i386 on sid I
have libcurl3-openssl and cannot install libcurl4-openssl. Could
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 01:44:52AM -0200, Luiz Guilherme Regis Emediato wrote:
Hi there,
I notice that the following Debian 4.0r1 amd64 DVD iso files are broken
on the mirrors, that is, they are only 400MB big and the MD5SUM checksum
does not return the correct values.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 10:20:05AM -0200, Luiz Guilherme Regis Emediato wrote:
Hi Kurt,
Length: 401,496,064 [application/octet-stream]
I get:
Length: 4,696,463,360 (4.4G) [application/octet-stream]
(Which is exactly 4 GB more)
The version from i386 etch works, the version from i386 sarge
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:18:56AM +0100, Pedro Sousa wrote:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 (using
.../archives/libc6_2.6-2_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.6-2_amd64.deb
(--unpack): trying to overwrite
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 07:03:09PM +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
protheus2:/var/cache/apt/archives# LANG=C dpkg -i libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb
(Reading database ... 234520 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6-i386 2.5-11 (using libc6-i386_2.6-1_amd64.deb) ...
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:52:02PM +0300, Danny Tiberman wrote:
Hello
When I do /sbin/ldconfig -v | grep libtk I get :
libtk8.4.so.0 --- libtk8.4.so.0
but when I run ldd executable i get:
libtk8.4.so -- not found
Where did you get that executable from? It shouldn't be using
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:31:52AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2007-05-18 Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to ask kindly for support regarding bug #424644 because
I do not own any amd64 and thus feel unable to solve this problem.
Any hints / patches?
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 10:31:13AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 05:07:52AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
The versions of the programs he used for autoreconf were:
* automake/aclocal 1.9.6
* autoconf 2.59
* config.{guess,sub} timestamp='2006-07-02'
* ltmain.sh
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:37:51AM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 11:48:44PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
Hi,
I get occasional reports from users using one of my libraries
in debian (I'm upstream too
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:09:02PM +0200, jmt wrote:
Hi,
Last update screw up my box : linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 has no sk98lin (no
network then). Which module replaces it ?
It's now done by the skge module.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
Hi,
I get occasional reports from users using one of my libraries
in debian (I'm upstream too), which has bugs on a 64 bit platform.
I'd love to fix them, but don't have access to a 64 bit system.
Is there anybody here who can
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:18:18PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
I'm mirrorring debian-amd64, including the unofficial sarge, on
debian.csail.mit.edu. For how much longer should that mirror stick
around? Does it need to exist after sarge has been moved off the main
mirror network or after the
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 09:52:50PM +0200, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi
Has anyone noticed that gcc is older in experimental for amd64 than for
other architectures. It seems to me like dependencies that go in circles.
If so, does anyone have an explanation? I wanted to compile the
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 01:18:07PM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
System; two dual-opteron, amd64 etch, 16GB ram, raid1.
Heavy computation (memory either 1750 mb or 3750 mb
per node) started with high % cpu usage and little
usage of memory. Then, the two factors inverted, the
HD led became
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:51:43AM -0600, Jaime Ochoa Malagón wrote:
Frans,
if my memory don't fail gcc 3.4 was the first gcc eable to compile for
amd64 now the reference is clearly obsolete...
This is about an amd64 kernel that can be installed from a .deb on i386.
I don't remember exactly
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:35:39PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Anyway, I don't know about the current state of amd64 kernels for i386,
so I don't have a suggestion for that text.
So we have an linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 and amd64-libs packages on
i386. The default gcc version supports building
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 06:11:09PM -, Peter Wilkes wrote:
Hello
I am having problems downloading the first ISO for the 64 bit version of
debian. The FTP listings show a file size of around 4.4 Gb but when I
download the size is only 376 Mb. I have tried on 3 different computer
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:22:06PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
BTW, couldn't this also be addressed just by adding a
-l/usr/lib/courier-authlib option to dh_shlibdeps?
That seems to work too.
Why does this only happen on amd64? I don't really want an
architecture-specific kludge in the
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:54:47PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -x maildrop_2.0.3-1_amd64.deb tmp/maildrop/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ objdump -x tmp/maildrop/usr/bin/maildrop | grep auth
NEEDED libcourierauth.so.0
RPATH /usr/lib:/usr/lib/courier-authlib
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:00:42AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007, Vitezslav Kotrla wrote:
I've noticed new i386 package in experimental, thanks a lot. Is it
possible to provide amd64 package, too?
I don't have an amd64 and the amd64 buildd is probably not able to
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 08:48:21PM -0500, Bharath Ramesh wrote:
I am trying to compile a software. When I try to do it I get error.
Which seems to be a linker error I assume. This compiles cleanly on a
machine running fedora. The error I get is as follows:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 10:35:32PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
ld -r -o goto-programs.o goto_convert.o goto_function.o goto_main.o
goto_sideeffects.o goto_program.o basic_blocks.o goto_threads.o
goto_check.o goto_function_pointers.o goto_functions.o goto_inline.o
remove_skip.o
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:52:37AM +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote:
Hi,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html
yes, I'm aware of the non-free buildd network, and both packages have
already been built on other architectures. But as you can see on
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 01:51:10PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:52:37AM +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote:
Hi,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html
yes, I'm aware of the non-free buildd network, and both packages have
already been
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:37:20PM +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote:
Hi,
is there someone willing to build and upload core++ and cgal (both
non-free due to QPL) on amd64? Unfortunately, there is still no
(unofficial) autobuilder for non-free/amd64 and amd64 is the
architecture I care most about
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:47:33AM +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
Le 12.01.2007 23:14:48, Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:32:23PM +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)
wrote:
Is there a 2.6.19 in Debian?
I don't think so yet. I beleive the decision is that etch will
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:54:25AM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
it's in experimental. Probably all the maintainers are working to try to
release etch as soon and not put more difficult thing as openoffice 2.1 in
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 02:56:45PM -0800, Andrew Sharp wrote:
I thought I would ping the list to see if anyone knows why the
openoffice.org-hyphenation-en* packages are missing from etch. They're
in i386. In fact, only a handfull of the hyphenation packages are
available on amd64.
Those
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:30:51PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
That was quick, thanks Kurt!
Now, who can we poke about updating the installer images?
I think we need to wait for sarge r5, there aren't any plans to make any
for sarge r4.
Afaik, r5 is planned for in about 2 months.
Kurt
--
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:11:33PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
I tried an install with the 3.1r3 netinst ISO, and noticed that it
appears to have reverted to the debian.org mirror list.
It looks like it is no longer using a pure64 version of base-config.
I merged the diff between base-config
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:08:21PM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
2) Downloaded
ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-amd64/20061022/images/gtk-miniiso
burned it and booted it. Starts
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
2) Downloaded
ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-amd64/20061022/images/gtk-miniiso
burned it and booted it. Starts well but hangs after a while because of
spurious interrupts related to disk
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
Hi,
I try to use the 64-bit version of OOo 2.-0.4 on my Etch AMD64 machine. If I
try to open the literature databse it gives me an error saying that the
columns cannot be found. Opening the same database from my 32-bit
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:45:07PM +0100, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 11:35 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
Hi,
I try to use the 64-bit version of OOo 2.-0.4 on my Etch AMD64 machine.
If I try to open
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:20:25AM -0600, Cedar Cox wrote:
I'm requesting that gnutls11 be updated to 1.0.16-13.2sarge1. This
update has already been uploaded to sarge-proposed-updates for the
official archs.
This will be on the archive around the time sarge r3 releases,
which should be soon.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:43:15PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Yo!
See #380079 for reference
Christian Schletig reported the postgrey package not working on AMD64.
Looking at the log message:
Jul 27 11:18:26 mail kernel: postgrey[6026] general protection
rip:2a9687fd2c
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:57:07PM +0100, Adam Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 20 July 2006 14:47, sigi wrote:
I'm using this [64-bit OpenOffice.org] package since it's released, and had
only very few
crashes. OOo only crashes while opening some MS-word files - with some
others it has no
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 11:19:38AM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
Hi,
I from time-to-time notice that amd64 doesn't have a package in
unstable/testing, while most (all) other archs do. At the moment
for example natios-plugins is compiled for most archs, but the amd64
arch reports
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 01:53:54PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
Yes. Although most packages are available for amd64, whenever I noticed
an unavailable package, I could manually build it without any changes.
Can you give me any list of packages that we should build, are
unavailable, and don't
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
Can you give me any list of packages that we should build, are
unavailable, and don't have an RC bug open that it failed to
build?
Not anymore. I remember a that a few weeks (months?) ago apt-get-ing
from testing
Hi,
The binNMU has been done and is available on the mirrors now.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-news/debian-news-2006/msg00030.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:17:07PM +0200, David Haworth wrote:
Hi,
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/
I just noticed that the weekly build of etch for amd64 is now
3 DVDs. Does this mean that the etch DVDs are now usable?
There are still things in etch that are
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 11:03:17AM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
amd64 seems to lack the canonical buildd.debian.org email alias.
Could you please see to have this enabled for you?
I'll send a mail asking this.
I've found out because I wanted to ask for the removal of the dep-wait for
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 09:26:19AM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
I wish to compile on amd64 debian etch (two dual opteron on Tyan K8WE S2895)
a
program (gamess-us, as a merely a curiosity to see how it runs in comparison
with mpqc) that is indicated:
Your computer must have a FORTRAN
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 02:24:31PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
I have no idea what you did. Can you please show us your
/etc/apt/sources.list?
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian etch main contrib
deb
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:55:48PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friends -
I can't find my way to fix my half-upgraded libc6 on amd64 sid,
caused by bug #362058. I have apt-get pointed to
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
so I now have libc6{,-dev}_2.3.6-7 and
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:08:52AM +0200, Thomas Alexander Frederiksen wrote:
Hi.
I've run into an issue of ProFTPd segfaulting whenever mod_delay kicks
in, but as it was on a critical production server, I've had no chance of
doing any serious debugging. We had to get it back up ASAP, and
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:47:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
(Please CC me, I forget if I'm subscribed.)
At what point should Mirrors.masterlist be updated to remove the
amd64.debian.net mirrors and stop listing all the main mirror network as
!amd64?
As used in the installer? I guess as long
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 11:03:47AM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi
Has anyone had the following problem when compiling C++ programs:
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
I found this on the internet which is the same problem in Ubuntu.
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 04:26:47PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
-L/usr/share/qt3/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lz -lqt-mt -lGLU -lGL -lXmu -lpthread
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a(glapi.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against
`a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object;
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 05:37:11PM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
$ ls -la /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1005478 2006-03-22 09:21 /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-03-25 17:03 /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so -
libGL.so.1.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 915718
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:00:12PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Greetings.
As an amd64 user (though admittedly not an official porter), I have
been following the new official buildd's progress with some interest,
and observed a problem with the potential to block quite a few
packages:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:14:13PM -0600, Don Montgomery wrote:
So, what is the projected timeframe for complete
integration/restoration of archive integrity?
It's going to take atleast a few weeks.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
+ Trying to add kdebase-bin...
libcupsys2 doesn't exist...
Can't add kdebase-bin ... dependency problem.
Which seems to be a generic problem in amd64 at the moment... :-(
Yes. It is probably a result from the accidental
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Dirk Schleicher wrote:
Hello,
where I can find cdrdao and growisofs?
growisofs is part of dvd+rw-tools.
cdrdao isn't in sarge, but there is a version available if you
add this to your sources.list:
deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian stinkypete main
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 04:17:48PM +0100, Dirk Schleicher wrote:
Hello,
where can I find a netinst image for the amd port?
At the same place as you can get it for other arches:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:13:22AM +0200, Arkadi Kagan wrote:
I tried the testing image.
The only noticible difference is klogd not running or misconfigured.
(after running it manually - all the same)
Could you please file an installation report about that?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:46:50PM +0200, Arkadi Kagan wrote:
image: sarge-amd64-2.6.12-netinst.iso
Could you please try the beta2 image? It's available at:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/
It should have a more recent kernel (2.6.15).
Kurt
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 06:24:00PM -0600, Russ Cook wrote:
No, I checked with dselect, searching on locale, and balocs-locales(*)
is not installed. The only locale that is installed is
liblocale-gettext-perl 1.05-1. Thanks for taking the time to reply.
So try apt-get install locales, or
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:13:36PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Just to make sure I understand: we're going multiarch? No more chrooted
32-bit environment?
No, this is biarch. It's to replace ia32-libs.
Multiarch is something totaly different.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 04:34:35AM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:13:36PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Just to make sure I understand: we're going multiarch? No more chrooted
32-bit environment?
No, this is biarch. It's
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:33:43AM +0100, Koos Vriezen wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble installing eclipse, due to a conflict between
eclipse-jdt-common (3.1.2-1) and eclipse-jdt (3.1.1-8) and depends on
eclipse-jdt-common=3.1.1-8.
Given that these packages are from 10 feb. and I couldn't
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 05:35:24PM -0500, Carl Beckhorn wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 12:50:27PM -0800, Max wrote:
With recent update of my debian-amd64/unstable I've got perl broken.
Now it reports error like
debconf: Perl may be unconfigured (Can't locate overload.pm in @INC
You
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:39:44PM +0100, rainer herrendoerfer wrote:
Hi,
During
# apt-get update
I received the
GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF
And from where are you trying to download something? Maybe this
is some package repository for something that isn't in Debian?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 05:18:13PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
strfry(string);
This bug has been fixed in glibc 2.3.5-10. There was a bug open
at: http://bugs.debian.org/343365
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:14:50PM +0200, Török Edvin wrote:
Hello,
I noticed that kde 3.5 appeared in Debian unstable. I wanted to do an
upgrade, but upgrading kdeadmin complains that it cannot find kcron
3.5.
The latest version according to the Packages file is 3.4.3-2. However
kcron
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 06:27:14PM +0100, Juanjo Garcia wrote:
This is just to report that the same exact bug is to be
found with Eterm in Debian- UltraSPARC (also 64 bit arch.)
That would probably be:
http://bugs.debian.org/157084
Which is open for 3 years and has a patch for over a year.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:33:56PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. Is there anyone (hopefully, more than one person) who's willing to
seed sarge amd64 dvd ISOs for bittorrent for a while? I've been stuck
at 39% and 24% for quite a while.
Edit: well, it looks like someone has ESP, in
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:00:34AM -0800, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
Is there a reason why the simple boot floppy approach is not offered for
the amd64 port?
Because nobody put time in it yet to get a 2.6 linux kernel to
fit on a floppy. Mostly because their are various other ways to
get it
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 03:17:16PM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
Hi folks,
I just (several hours ago) uploaded a new version of ghdl that builds on
amd64; the previous versions didn't build. Do I need to do anything to get
the amd64 buildds to build it?
According to
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 01:44:25PM +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
Hi,
Does somebody managed to build ghemical?
On the repositories, it is at version 0.90 while the lib and data
related packages are 0.91.
Thre is a reason 0.91 is not in the archive.
I downloaded the source but
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:10:41AM +0300, Basil K wrote:
Hi,
I just to try compile example from OProfile docs with strfry(char *) function.
Seg fault occured when I run result program.
I saw someone else having a problem with it like a week ago, and
expected him to file a bug report about
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 05:55:23AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Indeed, for practical buildd maintainance purposes, the distinction is
not that important -- though 'Failed' is known to not benefit of a
requeue, while 'Building:Maybe-Failed' might or might not, it's unkown,
most archs
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 06:13:10PM +0100, Lubos Vrbka wrote:
hi guys,
i am not able to update ia32-libs on sid. i get the following error:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ia32-libs_1.5_amd64.deb
(--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib32', which is also in package
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 03:19:06PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:22:49AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
The problem now seems to be that rootskel-locale still seems to
exist in testing for some reason. It's unclear to me why it
still exists. This is causing
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:39:38PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
The next problem is to actually get it into the archive. It's
getting rejected:
Rejected: debian-installer-images_20051026_amd64.tar.gz: changes file
doesn't say debian-installer-images_20051026 for Source
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 06:27:52PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I would be suprised if it generated broken .changes files. I've
attached it.
It's broken, what's the listed debian-installer_20051026_amd64.deb?
dpkg -I debian-installer_20051026_amd64.deb
new debian package
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:02:37PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
You know, amd64 is the only arch to build the monolithic target by
default. I think that this is because it used to be hard to get
businesscard CDs for amd64, but we build them now. And also there used
to be the mirror selection
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 12:22:49AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
The problem now seems to be that rootskel-locale still seems to
exist in testing for some reason. It's unclear to me why it
still exists. This is causing the monolithic target to fail to
build because it can't find the locale
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:08:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
This was resolved, only to hit the next problem with amd64: The amd64
archive signing key is not trusted by apt. So currently testing amd64
installs only work from the netinst CD, all the other install methods,
which use apt
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:05:48PM -0600, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
After starting this thread on debian-boot, I was gently pushed to
this list.
I recently tried to get Debian Installer going on a single Opteron
custom-built machine using the daily build of the netinst CD image
from
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
