Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 05:14:55PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > See my other remark about the removal of the command line option. > > It is not removed. You can any option specify either by command line, or > by GENCONTROL_OPTS. Fine. > > So my last concern (which I also expressed in my

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Andreas Tille writes: >> Note that in the moment, the GENCONTROL_OPTS need to be defined *after* >> the blends-dev/Makefile inclusion, since the latter set it to be empty >> (I'll change that in a moment, however). > > Noted from changelog... > > See my other remark about the

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Hi Ole, On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:51:39PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > > > I've read this - but how did you actually *used* this setting. > > What are you doing on your side to trigger the UDD option? > > I just added it to my Makefile and it works. Complete astro/Makefile: > > ``` >

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille writes: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:35:39AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: >> Andreas Tille writes: >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: >> > H, >> > but no --udd option for the

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Hi Ole, On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:35:39AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > Andreas Tille writes: > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > H, > > but no --udd option for the /usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control > > call. How are you triggering

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Andreas Tille writes: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > H, > but no --udd option for the /usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control > call. How are you triggering the UDD option at your side? Inside of blend-gen-control, see

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:22:35PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > If there are no other urgent things, I would like to upload the new > version (to experimental? or directly to unstable?). Remember, it will > go through NEW (new binary python3-blends) and so take some time. H, diff --git

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Hi Ole, On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 04:56:25PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > I extended the queries to allow multiple (and even versionized) provides. Cool. > Andreas Tille writes: > > > > Yes. The package filo is missing and bedtools provides it. That's a > > hint to fix the

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Hi Andreas, I extended the queries to allow multiple (and even versionized) provides. Andreas Tille writes: >> > It has another really great feature. It has the following warning >> > output: >> > >> > WARNING:__main__:"filo" has been replaced with "bedtools" >> >> Where

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:02:38PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > > It has another really great feature. It has the following warning > > output: > > > > WARNING:__main__:"filo" has been replaced with "bedtools" > > Where does it get this from? Is this issued when "filo" is a "Provides"? See

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Hi Ole, On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:02:38PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > Andreas Tille writes: > > I mean we need different metapackages for say amd64, arm64, i386, etc. > > I agree that this is no solution for MultiArch but from my point of > > view that's rather a corner

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille writes: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:02:39PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: >> We had a short discussion in >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2018/03/msg00059.html >> >> and your answer. Do you mean something more? > > I mean we need

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:02:39PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > From your experience: do you think there are chances to get an > additional table with normalized dependencies? Just ask for commit permissions. I have created several tables and wrote the according importer. As long as you do

Re: Non-normalised field Provides in UDD table

Andreas Tille writes: >> Huh! That is ugly! Who made this??? > > Probably the person who had the intention to add control file > information verbosely to a database table. I had discussed things like > this years ago (debian...@lists.debian.org with [UDD] in subject is the >