Processed: tagging 219868

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 tags 219868 - pending Bug#219868: choose-mirror: Go Back does not work properly Tags were: pending d-i Tags removed: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#231222: debian-installer: assumes color ansi serial console

Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Tags: sarge sid d-i debian-installer does not prompt for terminal type when installing from a serial console, and apparently assumes an 80x24 color ansi termianl. While only the size is incorrect in the cases I have tested, (it looks a bit stupid to

Bug#218774: main-menu retreiver selection still broken (Re: install report: sid on i386, pure SCSI)

On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:34:21PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Funny, I'd run into this same problem 94 days ago, and I filed a bug then, but forgot about it. This is bug #218774 (main-menu). I'm tempted to fix this bug by putting load-cdrom and load-floppy[1] on the CDROM, dropping

floppy-retriever_0.18_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: floppy-retriever_0.18.dsc to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.18.dsc floppy-retriever_0.18.tar.gz to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.18.tar.gz floppy-retriever_0.18_all.udeb to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.18_all.udeb

Bug#219868: pnding again

I took a look at this bug, and the backup code was wacked. I have removed all that complexity from the state machine, and removed many bugs with it. I'll commit the new version tomorrow. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#215207: marked as done (choosemirror: [INTL] Country names should be marked for translation)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 03:10:21 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

[no subject]

j'ai installer une Gforce 4 MX 440, tout va bien mais je n'arrive pas à avoir une transmition en couleur sur ma télé. merci par avance

Bug#222843: marked as done (do not ask distribution on cdrom install)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 03:33:29 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixd has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

irv-Canadian Generics is the place meds

Hey, come on - Why not check out P_H_E_N_T_E_R_M_I_N_E Physician Consultation: $0.00 Free discreet shipping http://ipjyn.justeased.com/gp/default.asp?id=RM if not interested: http://czgsj.justeased.com/er/er.asp?Folder=gp bronchial blackwell omnibus haunch rerouted cannister ravish ax

Bug#222718: bug reproduced after first (incomplete) installation

Package: partconf Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #222718 After a failed installation with an older iso image, I tried the image at: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/ (the 20040204 businesscard image) and I had the same bug. I opted for a autopartitioning scheme

Bug#231239: Report : beta2 on HP d330uT w/ 17in TFT monitors

Package: installation-reports We installed 3 d330uT based machines at Solutions Linux 2004 ; of the 3 machines, 2 had a dualhead Quadro 4 graphic card. Debian-installer-version: Beta2 uname -a: handbuilt 2.6.2-rc1 kernel Date: 2003-02-02 Method: netinst Machine: HP d330uT unit with 17in TFT

Re: install report: sid on i386, pure SCSI, part 2

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:31:49AM +0100, Herbert Kaminski wrote: Booting Knoppix and having a look at the hard disk does not reveal anything suspicious (to me), maybe with one exception: when I mount the /boot/initrd.img-xxx from the hard disk, it contains a file 'loadmodules' with, among

Re: goals for next release

On Wednesday 28 January 2004 02:54, Kenshi Muto wrote: At 27 Jan 04 21:18:30 GMT, Joey Hess wrote: - better i18n in the second stage I don't know what the status is. Perhaps Kenshi Muto knows? Probably mandatory for next release. I believe Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Greek

Attachment Rejected hi

The attachment you sent was rejected. Please send as a zip file. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: goals for next release

Hi, At 5 Feb 04 11:07:55 GMT, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: I believe Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Greek will be displayed correctly. Unfortunately Greek is not displayed correctly. The following is a screenshot from the initial welcome message after first boot.

Re: goals for next release

Well, debian-installer takes the kernel from the archive, and this is willed, since it is bad that the install works, and then suddenly after the reboot, the new kernel doesn't work anymore. So, it is back to either wait 2.4.25, which can be soon or maybe also not, or convince Herbert to add

Mini debian laptop

Hi there! I'd like to know if these files bf2.4-3.0.23-mini.iso compact-3.0.23-mini.iso idepci-3.0.23-mini.iso vanilla-3.0.23-mini.iso are to be burned separetly onto a cdrw each one of the files. I mean.. Are these 4 files bootable? How do I use them?? Thank you very much in advance!! m0psus

Re: goals for next release

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:51:10PM -, Dermot Bradley wrote: Well, debian-installer takes the kernel from the archive, and this is willed, since it is bad that the install works, and then suddenly after the reboot, the new kernel doesn't work anymore. So, it is back to either wait

Re: debian-installer help wanted

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:43:29PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: 6. lintian/linda checks for udebs I just submitted bug #231292 for linda which implements some udeb checks mentioned in the mini-policy. Another patch (bug #230986) allows the checking

New debian-installer build system

Hello All, The improved version of the installer's build system is ready now (but not yet committed to CVS). It allows better control over the image generation process, including subarchitecture support and image names. The naming scheme follows dest/SUBARCH/MEDIUM/FLAVOUR/files or for single

mirror/distribution rename

I'm renaming mirror/distribution to mirror/suite, since the suite is the value it really holds, and calling it distribution was making the code too confusing. I also have some changes pending commit to make the installer smarter about default suites. Instead of defaulting to testing in

Processed: Bug categorized: Bug#231239: Report : beta2 on HP d330uT w/ 17in TFT monitors

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 231239 -1 Bug#231239: Report : beta2 on HP d330uT w/ 17in TFT monitors Bug 231239 cloned as bug 231298. reassign -1 ethdetect Bug#231298: Report : beta2 on HP d330uT w/ 17in TFT monitors Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to

Re: goals for next release

Sven Luther wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:51:10PM -, Dermot Bradley wrote: Well, debian-installer takes the kernel from the archive, and this is willed, since it is bad that the install works, and then suddenly after the reboot, the new kernel doesn't work anymore. So, it

Re: New debian-installer build system

Thiemo Seufer wrote: If you want to test it for your architecture, apply the patch from http://www.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de/homes/ths/debian-installer/build-diff against the build directory. Then you can either run dpkg-buildpackage for the full build or use raw make. I'd suggest a make

Bug#220127: marked as done (please improve dutch translation)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:03:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FWD: Re: bug #220127 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Re: main-menu retreiver selection still broken (Re: install report: sid on i386, pure SCSI)

Here is what's going on. cdrom-detect fails to configure as it cannot find the drive. The user selects anna from the main menu. Anna depends on retriever, a virtual package provided by floppy-retriever, and cdrom-retriever. main-menu needs to configure at least one of these to continue, and it

Re: goals for next release

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:51:10PM -, Dermot Bradley wrote: Well, debian-installer takes the kernel from the archive, and this is willed, since it is bad that the install works, and then suddenly after

Re: goals for next release

Sven Luther wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:51:10PM -, Dermot Bradley wrote: Well, debian-installer takes the kernel from the archive, and this is willed, since it is bad that the install works, and

Re:

! 07/02/04 8 MASHRABIA 4* 267 HB SINDBAD BEACH 4* 292 HB , ! 549 .. 06.02.04 18.02.04 : , / , / , , , ( ) : 1000 ~ 30$ 14/02/04 8 EDERA 2* 299 BB + 45 euro / - - , , , , ,( , , - ) 19/02 - 23/02/04 KRISTALL 3* 299 + 50 euro BB /,

Re: goals for next release

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:20:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Sven Luther wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 01:51:10PM -, Dermot Bradley wrote: Well, debian-installer takes the kernel from the archive, and

Bug#231318: Failed installation on old Pentium system

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: beta 2, downloaded from http.us.debian.org 2004-05-02 uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.2-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 unknown Date: 2004-05-02 18:10 Method: Booted from floppies, then network install from a local mirror Machine: Dell

Processing of base-config_2.09_i386.changes

base-config_2.09_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-config_2.09.dsc base-config_2.09.tar.gz base-config_2.09_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Processing of cdrom-retriever_0.14_i386.changes

cdrom-retriever_0.14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdrom-retriever_0.14.dsc cdrom-retriever_0.14.tar.gz cdrom-retriever_0.14_all.udeb load-cdrom_0.14_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#231328: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20040204 businesscard from gluck uname -a: can't get far enough for that... Date: Thu Feb 5 22:25:39 SAST 2004 Method: businesscard iso. Machine: Custom Processor: AMD XP 1700+ Memory: 768 MB DDR Root Device: IDE /dev/hda Root Size/partition

Processing of net-retriever_0.25_i386.changes

net-retriever_0.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: net-retriever_0.25.dsc net-retriever_0.25.tar.gz net-retriever_0.25_all.udeb download-installer_0.25_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Processing of choose-mirror_0.029_i386.changes

choose-mirror_0.029_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: choose-mirror_0.029.dsc choose-mirror_0.029.tar.gz choose-mirror_0.029_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

net-retriever_0.25_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: download-installer_0.25_all.udeb to pool/main/n/net-retriever/download-installer_0.25_all.udeb net-retriever_0.25.dsc to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.25.dsc net-retriever_0.25.tar.gz to pool/main/n/net-retriever/net-retriever_0.25.tar.gz net-retriever_0.25_all.udeb

main-menu_0.056_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: main-menu_0.056.dsc to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.056.dsc main-menu_0.056.tar.gz to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.056.tar.gz main-menu_0.056_i386.udeb to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.056_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to

choose-mirror_0.029_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: choose-mirror_0.029.dsc to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.029.dsc choose-mirror_0.029.tar.gz to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.029.tar.gz choose-mirror_0.029_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.029_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cdrom-retriever_0.14_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdrom-retriever_0.14.dsc to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.14.dsc cdrom-retriever_0.14.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.14.tar.gz cdrom-retriever_0.14_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-retriever/cdrom-retriever_0.14_all.udeb

base-config_2.09_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-config_2.09.dsc to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.09.dsc base-config_2.09.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.09.tar.gz base-config_2.09_all.deb to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.09_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 220477 225865

Processing of ddetect_0.66_i386.changes

ddetect_0.66_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ddetect_0.66.dsc ddetect_0.66.tar.gz hw-detect_0.66_all.udeb ethdetect_0.66_all.udeb hw-detect-full_0.66_all.udeb archdetect_0.66_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To

Processing of nobootloader_0.0.3_i386.changes

nobootloader_0.0.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: nobootloader_0.0.3.dsc nobootloader_0.0.3.tar.gz nobootloader_0.0.3_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Processing of baseconfig-udeb_0.026_i386.changes

baseconfig-udeb_0.026_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: baseconfig-udeb_0.026.dsc baseconfig-udeb_0.026.tar.gz baseconfig-udeb_0.026_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Installer builds for non x86 archs. - Was Re: Daily builds may go away

On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 07:15:00PM -0500, Ray Knight wrote: OK, there is a link to an m68k Mac image at this site. But, there doesn't appear to be an installer for NuBus PPC Macs, no link to installer images for SGI Indy or Sparc. Is anyone working on supporting the NuBus PPC Macs? How about

Processing of netcfg_0.44_i386.changes

netcfg_0.44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netcfg_0.44.dsc netcfg_0.44.tar.gz netcfg_0.44_i386.udeb netcfg-dhcp_0.44_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.44_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#225865: marked as done (base-config: WRAPPER_OPTION is needed)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:32:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#225865: fixed in base-config 2.09 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#219868: marked as done (choose-mirror: Go Back does not work properly)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:32:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#219868: fixed in choose-mirror 0.029 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#220477: marked as done (base-config: timezone list messed up)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:32:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#220477: fixed in base-config 2.09 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#225870: marked as done (validlocale can not handle language_territory.codeset style locale)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:32:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#225870: fixed in base-config 2.09 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#226200: marked as done (base-config: Completely unreadable messages)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:32:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#226200: fixed in base-config 2.09 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#226344: marked as done (choose time zone region default based on language)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:32:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#226344: fixed in base-config 2.09 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

baseconfig-udeb_0.026_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: baseconfig-udeb_0.026.dsc to pool/main/b/baseconfig-udeb/baseconfig-udeb_0.026.dsc baseconfig-udeb_0.026.tar.gz to pool/main/b/baseconfig-udeb/baseconfig-udeb_0.026.tar.gz baseconfig-udeb_0.026_all.udeb to pool/main/b/baseconfig-udeb/baseconfig-udeb_0.026_all.udeb Announcing to

ddetect_0.66_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: archdetect_0.66_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.66_i386.udeb ddetect_0.66.dsc to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.66.dsc ddetect_0.66.tar.gz to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.66.tar.gz ethdetect_0.66_all.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.66_all.udeb

nobootloader_0.0.3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: nobootloader_0.0.3.dsc to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.3.dsc nobootloader_0.0.3.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.3.tar.gz nobootloader_0.0.3_all.udeb to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.3_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you

Processing of lilo-installer_0.30_i386.changes

lilo-installer_0.30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lilo-installer_0.30.dsc lilo-installer_0.30.tar.gz lilo-installer_0.30_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processing of grub-installer_0.32_i386.changes

grub-installer_0.32_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: grub-installer_0.32.dsc grub-installer_0.32.tar.gz grub-installer_0.32_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

netcfg_0.44_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: netcfg-dhcp_0.44_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.44_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.44_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.44_i386.udeb netcfg_0.44.dsc to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.44.dsc netcfg_0.44.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.44.tar.gz

lilo-installer_0.30_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lilo-installer_0.30.dsc to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.30.dsc lilo-installer_0.30.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.30.tar.gz lilo-installer_0.30_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/lilo-installer/lilo-installer_0.30_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL

Fixed in NMU of grub-installer 0.32

tag 230502 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:41:54 -0500 Source: grub-installer Binary: grub-installer Architecture:

grub-installer_0.32_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: grub-installer_0.32.dsc to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.32.dsc grub-installer_0.32.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.32.tar.gz grub-installer_0.32_i386.udeb to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.32_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL

Bug#223086: marked as done (baseconfig-udeb: should create the .udeb in binary-indep)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:47:03 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#223086: fixed in baseconfig-udeb 0.026 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Fixed in NMU of grub-installer 0.32

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 230502 + fixed Bug#230502: debian-installer wiped out my MBR Tags were: d-i Bug#231113: install report on an amd k6/2 350mhz Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processing of iso-scan_0.13_i386.changes

iso-scan_0.13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: iso-scan_0.13.dsc iso-scan_0.13.tar.gz iso-scan_0.13_all.udeb load-iso_0.13_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processing of cdrom-detect_0.45_i386.changes

cdrom-detect_0.45_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdrom-detect_0.45.dsc cdrom-detect_0.45.tar.gz cdrom-detect_0.45_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#229313: marked as done (Should use backup capability)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:02:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#229313: fixed in lilo-installer 0.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#183362: marked as done (lilo-installer: 'cancel' button do not cancel)

Your message dated Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:02:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#183362: fixed in lilo-installer 0.30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bootstrap packages list

Hi folks Currently the only source of the bootstrap packages list is debootstrap. We are currently building a more robust replacement and need a proper packages list. I attach the current list. It don't list required packages and dependencies which will be installed automaticaly. Package

Processing of autopartkit_0.77_i386.changes

autopartkit_0.77_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: autopartkit_0.77.dsc autopartkit_0.77.tar.gz autopartkit_0.77_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Processing of lvmcfg_0.15_i386.changes

lvmcfg_0.15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lvmcfg_0.15.dsc lvmcfg_0.15.tar.gz lvmcfg_0.15_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Processing of prebaseconfig_0.51_i386.changes

prebaseconfig_0.51_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: prebaseconfig_0.51.dsc prebaseconfig_0.51.tar.gz prebaseconfig_0.51_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

lvmcfg_0.15_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lvmcfg_0.15.dsc to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.15.dsc lvmcfg_0.15.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.15.tar.gz lvmcfg_0.15_all.udeb to pool/main/l/lvmcfg/lvmcfg_0.15_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

cdrom-detect_0.45_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdrom-detect_0.45.dsc to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.45.dsc cdrom-detect_0.45.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.45.tar.gz cdrom-detect_0.45_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.45_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for

autopartkit_0.77_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: autopartkit_0.77.dsc to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.77.dsc autopartkit_0.77.tar.gz to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.77.tar.gz autopartkit_0.77_i386.udeb to pool/main/a/autopartkit/autopartkit_0.77_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your

iso-scan_0.13_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: iso-scan_0.13.dsc to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.13.dsc iso-scan_0.13.tar.gz to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.13.tar.gz iso-scan_0.13_all.udeb to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.13_all.udeb load-iso_0.13_all.udeb to pool/main/i/iso-scan/load-iso_0.13_all.udeb Announcing to

prebaseconfig_0.51_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: prebaseconfig_0.51.dsc to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.51.dsc prebaseconfig_0.51.tar.gz to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.51.tar.gz prebaseconfig_0.51_all.udeb to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.51_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank

Bug#230502: marked as done (debian-installer wiped out my MBR)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:39:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of grub-installer 0.32 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#231113: marked as done (install report on an amd k6/2 350mhz)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:39:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of grub-installer 0.32 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processing of rootskel_0.61_i386.changes

rootskel_0.61_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rootskel_0.61.dsc rootskel_0.61.tar.gz rootskel_0.61_i386.udeb rootskel-bootfloppy_0.61_i386.udeb rootskel-locale_0.61_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

rootskel_0.61_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: rootskel-bootfloppy_0.61_i386.udeb to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.61_i386.udeb rootskel-locale_0.61_i386.udeb to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.61_i386.udeb rootskel_0.61.dsc to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.61.dsc rootskel_0.61.tar.gz to

Processing of base-installer_0.051_i386.changes

base-installer_0.051_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-installer_0.051.dsc base-installer_0.051.tar.gz base-installer_0.051_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

base-installer_0.051_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: base-installer_0.051.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.051.dsc base-installer_0.051.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.051.tar.gz base-installer_0.051_i386.udeb to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.051_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL

kbd-chooser_0.40_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kbd-chooser_0.40.dsc to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.40.dsc kbd-chooser_0.40.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.40.tar.gz kbd-chooser_0.40_i386.udeb to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.40_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your

Processing of debian-installer-utils_0.44_i386.changes

debian-installer-utils_0.44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-utils_0.44.dsc debian-installer-utils_0.44.tar.gz di-utils-reboot_0.44_all.udeb di-utils-exit-installer_0.44_all.udeb di-utils-terminfo_0.44_all.udeb

Processed: Fixed in NMU of base-installer 0.051

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 228399 + fixed Bug#228399: base-installer: [PATCH] kernel package name for sparc are wrong Tags were: pending patch d-i Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

FWD: debian-installer help w/ sparc

- Forwarded message from Vague Rant [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Vague Rant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:52:06 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debian-installer help w/ sparc Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] while nobody here at freegeek is really sparc-savvy, we've got a few

Re: Installer builds for non x86 archs. - Was Re: Daily builds may go away

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:42:22PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 07:15:00PM -0500, Ray Knight wrote: OK, there is a link to an m68k Mac image at this site. But, there doesn't appear to be an installer for NuBus PPC Macs, no link to installer images for SGI Indy or

Bug#220127: bug #220127

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I completely missed the discussion in debian-l10n-dutch and I couldn't find it in the archive(s). But wouldn't the next translation better suit the original context? Alternatieve downloadlocatie (of downloadlocaties) The full sentence could then be:

Re: Installer builds for non x86 archs. - Was Re: Daily builds may go away

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:42:22PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: Once exim4* are in unstable, I will publish my images. exim4 has been in unstable for ages. exim4 was built and uploaded on sparc and arm Jan 21, but has not been

Processing of floppy-retriever_0.19_i386.changes

floppy-retriever_0.19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: floppy-retriever_0.19.dsc floppy-retriever_0.19.tar.gz floppy-retriever_0.19_all.udeb load-floppy_0.19_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Processing of cdrom-detect_0.46_i386.changes

cdrom-detect_0.46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdrom-detect_0.46.dsc cdrom-detect_0.46.tar.gz cdrom-detect_0.46_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

cdrom-detect_0.46_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdrom-detect_0.46.dsc to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.46.dsc cdrom-detect_0.46.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.46.tar.gz cdrom-detect_0.46_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.46_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for

floppy-retriever_0.19_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: floppy-retriever_0.19.dsc to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.19.dsc floppy-retriever_0.19.tar.gz to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.19.tar.gz floppy-retriever_0.19_all.udeb to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.19_all.udeb

Re: FWD: debian-installer help w/ sparc

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 06:46:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: while nobody here at freegeek is really sparc-savvy, we've got a few sparc machines floating around that we'd be happy to try out debian-installer on. especially if someone knows OpenBoot- we've had trouble figuring out exactly how

Re: FWD: debian-installer help w/ sparc

Jeff Bailey wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 06:46:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: while nobody here at freegeek is really sparc-savvy, we've got a few sparc machines floating around that we'd be happy to try out debian-installer on. especially if someone knows OpenBoot- we've had trouble

Bug#222051: marked as done (ejects a random CD drive, not necessarily the one with the d-i CD)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:42:24 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#220476: marked as done (kbd-chooser: make keyboard layout choosable on default priority)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:48:53 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#220124: marked as done (kbd-chooser: do not make keyboard selection dependent on language)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:48:53 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#219528: marked as done (Random root tmpfs filesystem size.)

Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:47:02 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#231361: Problem in boot loader installation with beta2 network installer

-a: Linux debian 2.4.22-1-i386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i386 unknown (this is the installer's kernel) Date: 20040205 19:29 CST Method: Network installation. Booted from mentioned floppy images which were written fo floppy disks. Rest of packages downloaded from a mirror. Tried both mexican

  1   2   >