Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_0.2_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_0.2_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_0.2.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_0.2.dsc
flash-kernel_0.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_0.2.tar.gz
flash-kernel_0.2_arm.deb
to
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.55
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:26:51AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
However, it isn't quite perfect, because the progress bar endpoints for
the task scripts are all wrong. In order to fix this, tasksel would need
to
flash-kernel_0.3_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
flash-kernel_0.3.dsc
flash-kernel_0.3.tar.gz
flash-kernel_0.3_arm.deb
flash-kernel-installer_0.3_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I paste here the last instance of the draft proposal by the debian kernel team
[1]. Well, mostly me and Frederik, with direct input from Manoj, and reflecting
assorted comments from others, Steve and Anthony being the most prominent ones.
Please review this, especially with regard to
Accepted:
flash-kernel-installer_0.3_arm.udeb
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_0.3_arm.udeb
flash-kernel_0.3.dsc
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_0.3.dsc
flash-kernel_0.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_0.3.tar.gz
flash-kernel_0.3_arm.deb
to
Subject: discover1: funny output; can't open file
Package: discover1
Version: 1.7.18
Severity: normal
When the /etc/init.d/discover script calls /sbin/discover error
messages are returned complaining about not being able to open files
with control sequences as names. The same result is produced
I ran into this problem on three installations now. The fix I used
was to switch to a virtual console during installation and run
chroot /target
mount -t proc proc /proc
DEBIAN_HAS_FRONTEND=1 /var/lib/dpkg/info/mdadm.postinst configure
(press ENTER at each prompt)
umount /proc
exit
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD - etch3 netinst
Image version: 2006-09-12 debian.org
Date: 2006-10-06
Machine: IBM NetVista 8305-42G
Processor: Pentium 4
Memory: 1 GB
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Windows reports the drive as connected to my 2ary
IDE channel, PCI bus 0 dev 31
also sprach Jim Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.06.1124 +0200]:
I ran into this problem on three installations now. The fix I used
was to switch to a virtual console during installation and run
chroot /target
mount -t proc proc /proc
DEBIAN_HAS_FRONTEND=1
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061006 10:00]:
I paste here the last instance of the draft proposal by the debian kernel team
[1]. Well, mostly me and Frederik, with direct input from Manoj, and
reflecting
assorted comments from others, Steve and Anthony being the most prominent
ones.
Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:51:42PM -0500, Mathew Binkley wrote:
Hello. I attemped to install Debian Etch on a IBM JS20 using an iso
from 09/22/2006. The install works correctly until it tries (and fails)
to detect the PATA hard drive. None of the modules listed will work
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
one more test install turned out this:
while Loading additional components from CD in expert mode
you get a list with optional installer modules listed. Above it
there is this text ...
All components of the installer needed to
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:34:30AM -0500, Mathew Binkley wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:51:42PM -0500, Mathew Binkley wrote:
Hello. I attemped to install Debian Etch on a IBM JS20 using an iso
from 09/22/2006. The install works correctly until it tries (and fails)
On Friday 06 October 2006 17:49, Sven Luther wrote:
Frans, can you comment ? I saw you commited this fix, but maybe you
didn't upload it yet ? Or maybe there is another issue ?
I did not commit anything yet. Colin promised to look into the issue this
weekend based on the mail I sent him.
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 06:06:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I've been meaning to provide more information (like logs from package
installation) on this and a specific, reproducible test case, but have
not found the time to do so.
I'll try to do this and will send you the info when I do.
The three brand name drugs available to improve sex lives are now available in
generic form at a significantly
lower price.
Pick up the one that is best for you at:
http://bfk.com.nfkzdbjzmhkg0yohglbtgdwb4gbtt.grolsh.cc
room sponge
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: Debian Etch Testing dated October 3, 2006
Date: October 6, 2006
Machine: IBM JS20 blade
Processor: PPC 970FX, 2.2 GHz
Memory: 1.5 GB
Partitions: hard drive not detected
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
00:00.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro
Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:05:23PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
BTW, no-hardware should be always present, the four cases should be
1)no-hardware only
2)no-hardware + disable-module=linux_input
3)no-hardware + disable-module=chipset specific
martin f krafft wrote:
Actually, I am not sure whether it has been fixed, since your fix
is simply to mount /proc, while my solution has nothing to do with
/proc, at least not directly.
Would it be possible for you to reproduce this problem and make the
output of
DEBIAN_HAS_FRONTEND=1 sh
Package: partman-md
Hi,
This bug probably doesn't belong to this package, but it's the most
relevant I could find. Please reassign as needed.
I've done an netinst installation on an amd64 with the etch beta 3
(20060806) version.
After a failed installation, I'm trying to do the same thing
On Friday 06 October 2006 14:42, Alexis Lee1 wrote:
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801DB (ICH4) IDE Controller
(rev 01)
Comments/Problems:
I started with install. It asks me for my language, country and
keyboard layout then pauses while it tries to detect the CD-ROM. Then I
get
What we are referring to of course is the wonderful blue pill for erection
difficulties everyone is talking about. We
not only carry it, but we do at 1.56 cents each.
Take a peek at:
http://tjzmhkgiy6hy3bbwdwbmgbbt.grolsh.cc
Enjoy!
Sincerely,
Dick Rolando
Customer Service Team
fold
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:05:23PM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
BTW, no-hardware should be always present, the four cases should be
1)no-hardware only
2)no-hardware + disable-module=linux_input
3)no-hardware + disable-module=chipset specific module, e.g.
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:55:06 -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Frans Pop wrote:
Are we talking about the same thing here?
I thought the consensus was that selinux should be added as a
separate standard (enabled by default) task to tasksel for Etch and
not the packages promoted to
tasksel_2.56_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.56.dsc
tasksel_2.56.tar.gz
tasksel_2.56_all.deb
tasksel-data_2.56_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 391479 partman-md
Bug#391479: partman-md: Devices always show up as use for lvm.
Warning: Unknown package 'pratman-md'
Bug reassigned from package `pratman-md' to `partman-md'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: grub-installer
Hi,
I've done an netinst installation on an amd64 with the etch beta 3
(20060806) version.
I've setup my /boot as a raid 1 device, so that in case of failure, I
could still boot from my other disks. Looking for a solution, on how I
could set up grub so it could boot
Package: partman-md
Hi,
I've done an netinst installation on an amd64 with the etch beta 3
(20060806) version.
It seems that deleting md devices doesn't work. If I select delete md
device, it's still showing up as md device. You can't configure it or
anything, doesn't have a size and things
also sprach Jim Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.10.06.2022 +0200]:
I did a new install (on i386 this time, previously I've been on
amd64), with the disk split into a root and RAID1 partition to ensure
mdadm would be installed. It failed during base install, at which
point I ran:
Your help is
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Netinstall CD image
Image version: 6 Oct 2006 daily image x86 version from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 6 Oct 2006 15.28
Machine: IBM Thinkpad 380Z
Processor: Pentium
martin f krafft wrote:
http://jim.sh/~jim/tmp/target.tar.gz
I don't know how DEBIAN_HAS_FRONTEND=1 would help things.
Neither do I, but it does :) Here's how to demonstrate it using
target.tar.gz on another system:
su
cd /tmp
tar xzf target.tar.gz
chroot target
then you can see
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.56_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.56_all.deb
tasksel_2.56.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.56.dsc
tasksel_2.56.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.56.tar.gz
tasksel_2.56_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.56_all.deb
Override entries
Your message dated Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:08:53 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#390803: fixed in tasksel 2.56
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:08:53 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388549: fixed in tasksel 2.56
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:08:53 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#388497: fixed in tasksel 2.56
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello,
I'm on a slow (though flat-rate) dial-up link.
From what I can find, to read the installer manual, I can either
download the pdf or txt format or view the html on line.
I would like to download the entire html to read offline.
Is this possible?
Thanks,
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Saturday 07 October 2006 02:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on a slow (though flat-rate) dial-up link.
From what I can find, to read the installer manual, I can either
download the pdf or txt format or view the html on line.
I would like to download the entire html to read offline.
Is
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 02:15:10AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 07 October 2006 02:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to download the entire html to read offline.
You can install the debian package that contains the installation guide.
This contains all three formats and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
tags 283214 + sarge
Bug#283214: RC2: grub failed but lilo ok on HP Proliant DL 380
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
39 matches
Mail list logo
