Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Luca Favatella
On 04/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote: Luca Favatella dixit: I'm attaching * a screenshot of the problem I get in the (monolithic) image built using makefs Please attach screenshots in ASCII. I mostly read my eMails either via ssh or on an 80486DLC laptop from 1993 with not

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Luca Favatella dixit: * a screenshot of the problem I get in the (monolithic) image built using makefs Ok, I see now (forwarded to workplace): I think you really should RTFM. There are quite some options: -f free-files Ensure that a minimum of free-files free files (inodes)

Re: debian installer daily developmental build from 4.8.2009

2009-08-05 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Dieter Faulbaum (dieter.faulb...@bessy.de): Dear installer developer, the debian installer (daily build from 4.8.2009) has a kernel version 2.6.30-1-486, which supports the ext4 filesystem and the installer gives me the possibility to select this filesystem version. But the kernel,

Processed: Re: Bug#540023: cdrom: netinst installation might freeze with out-of-date keyring

2009-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 540023 wishlist Bug #540023 [cdrom] cdrom: netinst installation might freeze with out-of-date keyring Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'grave' reassign 540023 debian-installer Bug #540023 [cdrom] cdrom: netinst installation might freeze

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Luca Favatella
On 05/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser t.gla...@tarent.de wrote: Luca Favatella dixit: * a screenshot of the problem I get in the (monolithic) image built using makefs Ok, I see now (forwarded to workplace): [...] cf. http://www.mirbsd.org/htman/i386/man8/makefs.htm I’d say your best bet is to

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Thorsten Glaser a écrit : On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Luca Favatella wrote: It looks like there are no regressions in the produced monolithic and netboot images. Cool! Should I proceed to upload makefs as-is to Debian? Is there someone here willing to sponsor? Otherwise, Mika Prokop from

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Luca Favatella
On 04/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote: Luca Favatella dixit: [...] Why do you copy ${TREE}/* to a temporary $$fs/ first, anyway? You can run it directly on ${TREE} I'd say: define mkfs.ufs1 sh -c 'makefs -t ffs -s ${IMGSZ} -o minfree=0,version=1 $$0 ${TREE}' endef Again,

Bug#540031:

2009-08-05 Thread Drew Kropp
Package: installation-reports Boot method: net install with ~180mb cd image Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/5.0.2/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-502-powerpc-netinst.iso Date: ~11pm central time august 4th, again roughly 2 hours later Machine: powerbook g4 a1095 Processor: Memory:

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Luca Favatella wrote: It looks like there are no regressions in the produced monolithic and netboot images. Cool! Should I proceed to upload makefs as-is to Debian? Is there someone here willing to sponsor? Otherwise, Mika Prokop from grml.org has volunteered to do it if I

Bug#540031:

2009-08-05 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Drew Kropp wrote: Comments/Problems: Twice the install froze on retrieving file 753 of 753 25% Please send the /var/log/syslog from the installation after the freeze (assuming you can still switch to a debug console on VT2 or VT3). Make sure you gzip the syslog

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Luca Favatella dixit: Tested. Please see Great ☺ http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i/branches/d-i/kfreebsd/installer/build/Makefile?r1=59940r2=59943pathrev=59943 You forgot “diff_format=u” otherwise I see nothing… Why didn’t you set minfree to 0 from the default of 5% as it doesn’t make any

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Aurelien Jarno dixit: I will have a look at the package and upload it if everything is fine. Thanks. I am a bit concerned by the name though. I understand it comes from the NetBSD® world, actually. It handles 4.2FFS, UFS2 and ISO 9660 (plus SUSP, RRIP, El Torito). Support for ext2fs is

Bug#540031:

2009-08-05 Thread Drew Kropp
I downloaded the iso again and the routine finished. Looks like I should have tried a little harder first! thanks On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Drew Kropp wrote: Comments/Problems: Twice the install froze on retrieving file 753

Bug#540031: marked as done ()

2009-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:59:34 +0200 with message-id 200908051259.34813.elen...@planet.nl and subject line Re: Bug#540031: has caused the Debian Bug report #540031, regarding to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Luca Favatella
On 05/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote: Luca Favatella dixit: [...] Why didn’t you set minfree to 0 from the default of 5% as it doesn’t make any sense in initrd? Done. http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i?view=revrevision=59946 Can you please explain me better the difference

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Luca Favatella dixit: Can you please explain me better the difference between -f and minfree (the man page is not clear). I read: Sure. -f ensures, for makefs(8), that the filesystem has enough free inodes, whereas minfree is a tunefs(8) parametre you might know from ext2fs, which measures the

Re: test of makefs in kfreebsd d-i

2009-08-05 Thread Luca Favatella
On 05/08/2009, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote: Luca Favatella dixit: Can you please explain me better the difference between -f and minfree (the man page is not clear). I read: Sure. -f ensures, for makefs(8), that the filesystem has enough free inodes, whereas minfree is a tunefs(8)

linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2009-08-05 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14.dsc linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14.tar.gz to pool/main/l/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6/linux-modules-di-s390-2.6_1.14.tar.gz loop-aes-modules-2.6.30-1-s390x-di_1.14_s390.udeb to

FW: Wireless Install

2009-08-05 Thread Philip.Joslin
Found it. Thanks. From: Philip Joslin - C10554 Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:14 PM To: 'debian-boot@lists.debian.org' Subject: Wireless Install Is there anywhere that I can objtain succint (and detailed) step-by-step instructions on how to get my Intel

Re: Spam cleaning for August 2004

2009-08-05 Thread Don Wright
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:59:43 +0200, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: On Wednesday 17 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: Back in August 2004, a huge storm happened with someone's autoresponder spamming the list with hundreds of messages, apparently looping. I found these in the list

Bug#539228: partman freezes with encrypted partitions

2009-08-05 Thread da jedall
I have rapidly tried the same install with the same usbkey on another laptop(not the same model) The first part of partitionning (choosing uncrypted and encrypted partitions) seems to work... ( i can't go further without loosing my data) I am a noob of the syslog,but from what i have seen ,it