Re: d-i changes around Mirror Hostname/Directory?

Hi Shane, Shane Gibson (2019-07-16): > I work on infrastructure provisioning automation (Digital Rebar > Provision). We're adding in Buster support right now. Bumped in to an > issue with d-i and our preseed we normally use. A working Stretch preseed > "mostly works" - but requires

d-i changes around Mirror Hostname/Directory?

HI all, I work on infrastructure provisioning automation (Digital Rebar Provision). We're adding in Buster support right now. Bumped in to an issue with d-i and our preseed we normally use. A working Stretch preseed "mostly works" - but requires interactive input for "mirror hostname" and

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-03): > This looks good to me, I've uploaded it to unstable, and added a note on > my d-i checklist to make sure I don't forget about it before the next > release. Except this doesn't work except for your JBOD use case… Adding [a-z]* at the end of the

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Hi all, Roger Shimizu (2017-06-03): > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > > > On Tue, 30 May 2017 21:52:06 +0900 > > Roger Shimizu wrote: > > > > -/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]| > > > > +/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9][a-z]*|

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > On Tue, 30 May 2017 21:52:06 +0900 > Roger Shimizu wrote: > > > -/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]| > > > +/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9][a-z]*| > > > > And I pushed the fix commit to branch "fix_839894": > > > >

Bug#839894: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Hi, On Tue, 30 May 2017 21:52:06 +0900 Roger Shimizu wrote: > > -/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]| > > +/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9][a-z]*| > > And I pushed the fix commit to branch "fix_839894": > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/grub-installer.git/commit/?h=fix_839894=9927e8c I've

Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Le mardi, 30 mai 2017, 12.56:29 h CEST Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit : > I've just filed unblock request #863734, which will hopefully achieve > this result. Ah great. Will keep an eye and upload as soon that's granted :-) -- OdyX

Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On Mon 2017-05-29 08:16:11 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > If I upload win32-loader now, it will embed gpgv-win32 2.1.18-8, no matter > which gnupg2 version will be part of stretch. There are three alternatives, > in > decreasing order of preference: > * get gnupg2 in testing, upload

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> That would also match partitions, might that not pose concerns? Now I think the following is better: > -/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]| >

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > That would also match partitions, might that not pose concerns? So maybe the following? > -/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]| > +/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]|/dev/[hsv]d[a-z][a-z]*| -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG:

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Cyril Brulebois, on lun. 29 mai 2017 21:16:54 +0200, wrote: > And thanks for the ping on that topic. > > Roger Shimizu (2017-05-29): > > Maybe it's too late for r0, but I'm still want to ask whether it's feasible > > to include the patch mentioned here: > >

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Hi, And thanks for the ping on that topic. Roger Shimizu (2017-05-29): > Maybe it's too late for r0, but I'm still want to ask whether it's feasible > to include the patch mentioned here: > https://bugs.debian.org/839894#30 > > henrich provided the patch and he

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

[ Only keep d-boot@ ML ] On Fri, 26 May 2017 19:04:13 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > You might have noticed final preparations for d-i Stretch RC 4 are > underways. A new debian-installer upload (or a binNMU) will need to > happen before the first stretch release (aka.

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Le samedi, 27 mai 2017, 17.17:10 h CEST Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > win32-loader should be arch:all-rebuilt (aka uploaded) with a versionned > Build-Depends on the latest debian-archive-keyring. It would therefore > also embed the latest versions of all the other binaries its standalone >

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 17:17:10 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > It also currently uses httpredir.debian.org as only mirror, so we should > decide if it makes sense to consolidate onto deb.debian.org for win32- > loader too. > Yes please. Cheers, Julien

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2017-05-27): >> It also currently uses httpredir.debian.org as only mirror, so we should >> decide if it makes sense to consolidate onto deb.debian.org for win32- >> loader too. > > Unless we're aware of limitations win32-loader might hit on

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Cyril Brulebois (2017-05-27): > Ditto for d-i-n-i, which I'll check right away. My bad, I had the jessie branch checked out, which is missing the new mirror selection magic. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2017-05-27): > win32-loader should be arch:all-rebuilt (aka uploaded) with a versionned > Build-Depends on the latest debian-archive-keyring. It would therefore > also embed the latest versions of all the other binaries its standalone > version embeds.

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Le vendredi, 26 mai 2017, 19.04:13 h CEST Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Hi, > > You might have noticed final preparations for d-i Stretch RC 4 are > underways. A new debian-installer upload (or a binNMU) will need to > happen before the first stretch release (aka. r0). If there's anything > you

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 19:04 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > You might have noticed final preparations for d-i Stretch RC 4 are > underways. A new debian-installer upload (or a binNMU) will need to > happen before the first stretch release (aka. r0). If there's anything > you want or would

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On 05/26/2017 09:30 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> I've looked at that for a bit, and found out that this is my own >> fault: one of the uploads of open-iscsi I did before the freeze >> changed the logic on how the initiatorname was generated within the >> installer, (due to feedback from Ubuntu

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Christian Seiler (2017-05-26): > Sure, perfectly fine with me. If I don't open a p-u bug after the > release of Stretch myself, feel free to ping me. > > (Btw. I also just noticed from reading the code that the additional > time is not the only side-effect: it will clutter

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On 05/26/2017 07:04 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > You might have noticed final preparations for d-i Stretch RC 4 are > underways. A new debian-installer upload (or a binNMU) will need to > happen before the first stretch release (aka. r0). If there's anything > you want or would like to include in

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Hi, Christian Seiler (2017-05-26): > While installing a Debian 9 system a couple of days ago, I noticed > that at the end of the installation it took a couple of seconds for > doing finalizing actions related to open-iscsi - even though the > system I installed didn't use

Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

Hi, You might have noticed final preparations for d-i Stretch RC 4 are underways. A new debian-installer upload (or a binNMU) will need to happen before the first stretch release (aka. r0). If there's anything you want or would like to include in r0, now is the time to mention it. Right now, the

Re: D-I changes needed for xterm transition (Re: (forw) Debian installer failed builds)

2011/11/19 Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br: - rootskel sets TERM=cons25 but only when this variable wasn't set. This probably has no effect. I did the change on rootskel but can't upload it as it fails to build due libklibc fault. No problem here, I verified that it indeed has no

Re: D-I changes needed for xterm transition (Re: (forw) Debian installer failed builds)

On 20.11.2011 15:43, Robert Millan wrote: [] - busybox sets TERM=cons25 Changed; will ask for it to be uploaded soon. I plan to upload fixed busybox today (with fixes for other kFreeBSD-related issues too). Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#646961: #646961 (was: D-I changes needed for xterm transition)

On 20.11.2011 17:31, Robert Millan wrote: Cool. Btw, there's also #646961 (with patch available). Yeah I looked at it today too, but have some.. issues with it. For which I installed kFreeBSD system in kvm again. The proposed change: - /sbin/route add default gw $i dev

Bug#646961: #646961 (was: D-I changes needed for xterm transition)

2011/11/20 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru: So maybe freebsd route can recognize and skip this gw keyword between source and destination? I can't tell beforehand. I'll discuss this with upstream. Or alternatively, maybe it is better to teach linux route to not require this gw (it gives

Re: D-I changes needed for xterm transition (Re: (forw) Debian installer failed builds)

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 09:41, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote: 2011/11/2 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: 2011/10/31 Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net: Oh, I didn't realized you only uploaded kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64. I am going to work on it soon. If you update kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386,

D-I changes needed for xterm transition (Re: (forw) Debian installer failed builds)

2011/11/2 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: 2011/10/31 Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net: Oh, I didn't realized you only uploaded kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64. I am going to work on it soon. If you update kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386, beware not to use 8.2-12 (still not uploaded), it'd break a few

d-i changes

Hi, as far as I understood those are the changes planned for d-i (Otavio, please correct me where I'm wrong): * d-i will use sid as a development platform: - d-i in unstable will use unstable as its udeb source, instead of testing which is the case today - It will be binNMUed on all

Re: d-i changes

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 16:50, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: ... * Later on d-i should be fixed not to have the Linux kernel and ABI  version hardcoded.  This is not currently considered critical  because it does not happen too often.  Some solution needs to be  found that provides d-i

Re: d-i changes

On Thu, 28, Jul, 2011 at 04:50:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern spoke thus.. - GPL compliance: If d-i starts to use Built-Using, it should be safe from a compliance point of view. I don't know what happens if you refer a package that is no longer in the pool. I presume it'd get

Re: [D-I] Changes to D-I level 1 statistics

Hi Christian, On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:09:39PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Davide, you should just check whether this affected the spellchecker or not. It looks ok to me. regards, Davide signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[D-I] Changes to D-I level 1 statistics

This change will not really change many things but it just copes with the switch to a master file, which happened...3 years ago..:-) Up to now, the statistics for D-I level 1 which you can see on http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/l10n-stats/ were based on cumulated statistics for individual packages

Re: [D-I] Changes to D-I level 1 statistics

I will check it asap (probably early next week) ciao, Davide Messaggio originale Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data: 03/08/2007 13.09 A: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ogg: [D-I] Changes to D-I quot;level 1quot; statistics This change will not really