On Wed, 26 May 2004 18:36:14 +0200
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op di 25-05-2004, om 18:50 schreef Martin Michlmayr:
* Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-11 13:32]:
Op wo 11-02-2004, om 00:29 schreef Bastiaan Van Eeckhoudt:
I made this remark before, but no harm in
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 00:22 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
It's quite counterintuitive; I have no intention of loading network
hardware drivers during the install.
If PCMCIA is such a large set, perhaps a separate pcmcia-drivers floppy
image is required? If that existed, and was listed, I would
Your message dated Wed, 26 May 2004 21:20:28 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line PCMCIA resource ranges now configurable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 26 May 2004 21:20:28 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line PCMCIA resource ranges now configurable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
Using:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/powerpc/20040525/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
to install sarge on a dual G5 with 'install-(safe-)power4' initially
works fine, but then hangs during the stage entitled 'Detecting
network hardware'
will talk to you later take care
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I tried:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/20040524/sarge-i3
86-netinst.iso
and it appears to have the same problem. As soon as the IDE driver
stuff is loaded I get the following error:
There was a problem reading data from the CDROM. Please make sure it
is in the
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:29:23PM +0200, Michal wrote:
Using:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/powerpc/20040525/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
to install sarge on a dual G5 with 'install-(safe-)power4' initially
works fine, but then hangs during the stage entitled 'Detecting
Great. Can you try new images from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and report if there
are any regressions or new problem?
I don't see any floppy images there. I did try to install using the
sarge-i386-netinst.iso file from today, and it worked very well. Very
cool! :)
Hello Martin,
I'll download an image tomorrow and will do some installs to check if the
issues are resolved.
The report should be ready by friday morning.
Kind regards
Thorsten Schaefer
- Original Message -
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thorsten Schaefer [EMAIL
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 04:08:15PM -0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
clone 233257 -1
reassign -1 linux-kernel-di-alpha
retitle -1 dont provide reiserfs modules
thanks
* Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-26 18:15]:
For root, you mean?
In generally the consensus seems that Reiser
Your message dated Wed, 26 May 2004 16:32:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#251050: fixed in ddetect 0.99
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
ddetect_0.99_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.99.dsc
ddetect_0.99.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.99_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.99_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.99_all.udeb
archdetect_0.99_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hw-detect-full_0.99_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Accepted:
archdetect_0.99_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.99_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.99.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.99.dsc
ddetect_0.99.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.99.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.99_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.99_all.udeb
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:37:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
ViewCVS uses anonymous SVN access and that has been disabled because of
locking problems a couple of weeks ago.
It would be nice, if somebody with write access on the host
could create a four line HTML page with this information
Package: discover1
Version: 1.5-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hi, please add norwegian translation for program and po-debconf.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 0.50
With build 20040526 (i386 netinst CD), when I choose language nl_NL, I
suddenly get 'Belgisch (be-latin1)' as the default keymap.
This is very, very wrong: no-one has a Belgian keyboard in the Netherlands!
20040522 had 'Dutch' as default; I wonder how this got
Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2004 00:16:58 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
--- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is SCSI limited to 15 partitions? I thought SATA is usually done
witth libata, and hence SCSI emulation. What are the alternatives?
According to Linux ALLOCATED DEVICES mainteained by John Cagle now:
Hello-
when I first booted to the debian disk it recognized
the drive as a fat 32 disk and an ntfs. I
repartitioned it as a linux drive now the system won't
recognize it at all. I tried with another drive and
the same thing happened. I tried for a couple of days
to make it see it again as a
Final state at the end of the string freeze
28 complete languages 100%
Bulgarian, Catalan, Czech, Danish, German, Greek, Spanish, Basque
Finnish, French, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean,
Lithuanian,Norwegian Bokmal, Dutch, Norwegian Nynorsk, Polish
Frans Pop wrote:
With build 20040526 (i386 netinst CD), when I choose language nl_NL, I
suddenly get 'Belgisch (be-latin1)' as the default keymap.
This is very, very wrong: no-one has a Belgian keyboard in the Netherlands!
20040522 had 'Dutch' as default; I wonder how this got changed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 251113 pending
Bug#251113:
=?iso-8859-1?q?discover1=3A_=5BINTL=3Anb=5D_Norwegian_bokm=E5l_translatio?=
=?iso-8859-1?q?ns?=
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
* Paul Verwayen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-26 23:38]:
There's still no detection of the Promise 20378 SATA.
Not with the 2.4.26, and not with the 2.6 kernel.
So, what's missing, is the loading of the sata_promise
module.
Thanks for checking. Can you please send me the output of the
Martin,
Today I used de Debian Installer of 20040526.
There's still no detection of the Promise 20378 SATA.
Not with the 2.4.26, and not with the 2.6 kernel.
I've got Debian running now by installing first to
an IDE(PATA) disk, and then install the 2.4.26-2 kernel
and loading the sata_promise
tags 251113 pending
thanks
Quoting Håvard Korsvoll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: discover1
Version: 1.5-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hi, please add norwegian translation for program and po-debconf.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: INSTALL REPORT
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 20:56:10 +0200
To: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-26 20:56]:
Everything is working fine now. I installed this with trail and
error (learing by doing). I first worked mostly with Windows :-(
Some questions i do not understand 100%. Sorry, not yet enough linux
experience :-)
Mount partitions:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040524/ and 20040526/ with
business card and netinst iso's
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Sat Apr 24 01:43:10 EDT 2004 Sparc64 unknown
Date: Tues, May 25 and Wed, May 26
Method: OpenPROM command boot
Hello Debian-installer team,
During the baseconfig part of the install, locales are set up,
while root has C locale by default (but the user account has
correct locales).
This has some consequences:
1) Debian menu is translated, since update-menus was ran under
proper locales! This is very nice
partman-ext2r0_0.03_mipsel+arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext2r0_0.03.dsc
partman-ext2r0_0.03.tar.gz
partman-ext2r0_0.03_mipsel.udeb
partman-ext2r0_0.03_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
partman-ext2r0_0.03.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_0.03.dsc
partman-ext2r0_0.03.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_0.03.tar.gz
partman-ext2r0_0.03_arm.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_0.03_arm.udeb
partman-ext2r0_0.03_mipsel.udeb
Hi Jens,
Well, having it automatically called on the subarches that need it.
You should be able to put it in the postinst_hook in
kernel-img.conf(5). If not, file a bug report, please.
Ok, we could get rid of quik-installer or yaboot-installer with that, but
bootloaders have their features
Hello,
I am just wondering, how to mirror/rsync the leftover packages for
jigdo images... (i.e. gluck.debian.org?)
regards,
--
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim -- vLSM.org -- http://rms46.vLSM.org/ --
Fetch my GNUPG public key at http://rms46.vlsm.org/pgp/pub.txt ---
signature.asc
Description:
Bill Allombert wrote:
This has some consequences:
1) Debian menu is translated, since update-menus was ran under
proper locales! This is very nice ! Thanks to everybody involved!
Is this _really_ a good thing?
2) The debconf database might contain some non-7bit value
(especially since some
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/20040526/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
uname -a: ? (would not boot)
Date: May 26, 2004 - 21:30
Method: downloaded and burned SPARC daily build CD 20040526
(I had the same problem with 20040525 daily build as well
I found that USB works fine on that machine if I specify noapic on the
kernel command line. Perhaps if there's room, you might mention this
one on the boot screens, or just in the installation manual.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
IT
1
40IT,80%
2
email,
3
CEO
CIO, IT
430
(25732)
,
(34595)
(19447)
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-27 00:03]:
Yes, there's no check yet for free space at the front of the partition.
If someone who knows partman well can spare some high-bandwidth
face-time here at debconf, I'd like to be able to hack something out for
How about simply requiring a
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 09:35:56AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Since I'm pretty new to Alpha hardware, I didn't know
that I needed to leave several blocks at the beginning of the disk for
aboot, I just sort of assumed that the blocks would be reserved, as they
are on x86. This caused
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 251066 resolvconf
Bug#251066: Sarge Beta 4 DHCP issues
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `resolvconf'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Wed, 26 May 2004 22:34:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed with 0.66+
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
This email is automatically generated. Normally sent out once. If you have any
question or bug-report, then please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
leider erreichen Sie mich im Zeitraum von 17.05. bis 04.06.2004 nicht im Büro. In
dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 06:30:34PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 07:51:12PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=follow-up of BugReport #250324/
When will the new ddetect available in netboot image for Sparc64?
At
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040524
uname -a: Sorry I am not neer my computer actually
Date: 25 may 2004
Method: Network install, boot from sarge-i386-businesscard , from
ftp.fr.debian.org, no proxy
Machine: Personnal build: MB asustek
Processor: PIV 2,4
Memory: 512
Hi
I have downloaded from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/ the
last 2 build (0524-25) and dont have basque to choose in laguagechooser :(
Any know why ? Or is better to open a bug ?
thanks
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
The daily build of d-i netboot from may 26th
does show both eth0 eth1 NICs.
That is good.
(more information when debian-installers is finished)
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 26 May 2004 11:29:02 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#250493: no need for a continue for base install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 12:29:57PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 09:36:52AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
At boot there is a message like hardware detect, I assume it is in
/etc/init.d/
But here neither detection of the second NIC.
The exact message at boot:
Package: debian-installer
Version: daily build 2004-05-26
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
People who do an install from network
are asked twice from where the get packages.
Please reduce this to one question
and one confirm (just hit enter)
So only once
Choose protocol:
ftp
http
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i
Hello D.I.S.T.,
My first 'boot net' with beta4 on Sparc64 went fine.
Todays 'boot net' with 2005-05-26 from p.d.o./~jbailey failed,
the reserved RAMdisk was to small.
I had to type
boot net linux ramdisk_size=8192
Does it make
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:47:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 10:22:25PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
No. The initrd should only contain the modules needed for bringing up
the root filesystem, and maybe using the console. It is mkinitrd's
duty to figure out what's
Hello,
I have been helping a friend install a debian sarge system with the new beta 4
installer and have come across a strange problem. The system installed
perfectly. The first time it rebooted, it just kept rebooting. I instructed
him to manually partition the system with a small boot
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040524 - daily build from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/20040524/
uname -a: system not successfully installed
Date: 25.05.2004
Method: CD install from netinst image as above
Machine: SunBlade100
Processor:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily i386 20040525
uname -a:
Linux kourou 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 26. may 2004 ~11h
Method: netboot.iso, not proxied via serial cable.
Machine: AMD 800 with Via mainboard
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040525/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux roller.fmi.uni-sofia.bg 2.6.5-1-386 #2 Fri Apr 30
20:13:30 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux (the second install)
Date: 2004-05-26
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 251008 debian-cd
Bug#251008: recent netboot on sparc64 requires larger ramdisk
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-manual' to `debian-cd'.
End of message,
Geert Stappers wrote:
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i
Hello D.I.S.T.,
My first 'boot net' with beta4 on Sparc64 went fine.
Todays 'boot net' with 2005-05-26 from p.d.o./~jbailey failed,
the reserved RAMdisk was to small.
I had to type
boot net linux
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 12:06:45PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:47:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 10:22:25PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
No. The initrd should only contain the modules needed for bringing up
the root filesystem, and
^pi^ wrote:
I have downloaded from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/ the
last 2 build (0524-25) and dont have basque to choose in laguagechooser :(
Any know why ? Or is better to open a bug ?
They don't have the updated languagechooser on them. Try the sid_d-i
Jean-François Rouanet wrote:
This computer has no floppy drive attached; the installer try to load the floppy
module and issue a FATAL ERROR and the install of the base system crash. If I
connect a floppy drive, the install works perfectly.
Please tell us the actual error message and define
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
In an install from businesscard CD, the CD is not used after the udebs
are loaded from it, and could be used for installing another machine in
parallell. But it's mounted, and locked. It would be neat if somehow d-i
knew the CD would not be
Can anyone help me out here?
The cdrom images on m68k are failing to build with the following.
| LOCPATH=./tmp/cdrom/tree/usr/lib/locale LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 reduce-font
/usr/src/unifont.bdf ./tmp/cdrom/all.utf ./tmp/cdrom/unifont.bdf
| setlocale: C.UTF-8
| FYI: MB_CUR_MAX/MB_LEN_MAX: 6/16
| error
Hello,
the daily builds are broken insofar as the floppy disk image contains a
vmlinux file again (thanks!) but no boot loader (miboot). The hfs filesystem
is empty except for the kernel file, and the Mac shows an icon of a
crossed-out disk (signalling no boot loader found) when booting.
Is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 251020 xserver-xfree86
Bug#251020: xfree86 doesn't recognize horizvert rates + cat /proc/bus/usb/devices
hangs, and so discover does
Bug reassigned from package
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Can anyone help me out here?
The cdrom images on m68k are failing to build with the following.
| LOCPATH=./tmp/cdrom/tree/usr/lib/locale LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 reduce-font
/usr/src/unifont.bdf ./tmp/cdrom/all.utf ./tmp/cdrom/unifont.bdf
| setlocale: C.UTF-8
| FYI:
hi my name is lou , I bought this copy of
linux debian I'm having some problems . I CAN'T GET IT TO PASS
to do anhting else please help , I'm new to this program, but always wanted to
try it because of all the good things I've herd about linux
debian...
thanks lou..
Email:::
[EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 251008 debian-installer-manual
Bug#251008: recent netboot on sparc64 requires larger ramdisk
Bug reassigned from package `debian-cd' to `debian-installer-manual'.
End of
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I don't see it on i386, so it may be in a udeb that is only in the
initrd on m68k.
It seems to be eject-udeb. I'd file a bug, but I'm not sure what to say.
Hmm, vmelilo-installer is missing a output file, but I don't know if
it's the culprit.
Could someone
Dear Sven,
Why not use discover in mkinitrd instead?
Well, that is what i proposed, didn't i ?
No, you propose to use discover in the initrd.
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je pézqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 08:42:54AM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=reporting a minor bug/
I had to type
boot net linux ramdisk_size=8192
Does it make sense to add it to the manual of d-i ?
No.
I don't understand why you're having this problem,
From looking at the information on this bug, I'm thinking the easiest
way to fix this would be to add code to check the fs type on the
partitions we've been asked to install onto. If the fs is not
ext2/ext3/reiser/etc., then we should complain and (optionally) ask
the user Are you REALLY sure you
Dear Sven,
Well, having it automatically called on the subarches that need it.
You should be able to put it in the postinst_hook in
kernel-img.conf(5). If not, file a bug report, please.
Yeah, sure, but i think there is a misunderstanding. the duty of
discover is exactly to find the modules
A colleague tried this and failed, so I better ask first.
Environment:
- some relatively new Dell Latitude D800 notebook (i386)
- Windows XP occupies 100% of the internal disk (/dev/hda)
(and is recognised by the current installer)
- external USB 160GB Maxtor harddisk (/dev/sda) 100% for
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 04:46:29PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
Dear Sven,
Why not use discover in mkinitrd instead?
Well, that is what i proposed, didn't i ?
No, you propose to use discover in the initrd.
Ah, ok, i did miss this misinterpretation.
There still is a problem for
An Exception Has Occurred
Python Traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /org/svn.debian.org/viewcvs/lib/viewcvs.py, line 2585, in main
request.run_viewcvs()
File /org/svn.debian.org/viewcvs/lib/viewcvs.py, line 263, in run_viewcvs
self.rootpath, rev)
File
Package: debian-installer
I downloaded the business card ISO of the beta 4 installer. I was
having trouble installer unstable. I chose several mirrors (not all)
and could not install. I had to install testing and then dist-upgrade.
Not a problem but annoying. I then began another install
Package: discover1, ddetect
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
On a system installed with d-i and using the 2.6 kernel, that has only
scsi hard drives, and an ide CD, the CD drive does not work when debian
is booted (to base-config). Problem seems to be that ide-generic is not
loaded by either discover,
I'm scheduling a meeting for debian-installer developers at DebConf4,
tomorrow, Thursday, from 10 am to 11 am, in the mini-auditorium. Anyone
who's interested in working on d-i is also invited. The purpose of the
meeting will be to make plans for what we'll work on at DebConf4 and
arrange testing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 230705 [d-i-powerpc] d-i beta2 on powerbook G4 ppc
Bug#230705: installation-reports: d-i beta2 on powerbook G4 ppc
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 236128 -1
Bug#236128:
Bug 236128 cloned as bug 251055.
reassign -1 partman
Bug#251055:
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
retitle -1 When warning about unrecognized partition table, mention new hard drives
and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 243233 -1
Bug#243233: installation report (d-i 20040408)
Bug 243233 cloned as bug 251054.
reassign -1 partman
Bug#251054: installation report (d-i 20040408)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
severity -1 minor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 232827 LVM on root doesn't work
Bug#232827: Installing kernel image failed
Changed Bug title.
reassign 232827 lvmcfg
Bug#232827: LVM on root doesn't work
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lvmcfg'.
thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 236859 -1
Bug#236859: Package: installation-reports
Bug 236859 cloned as bug 251056.
retitle -1 when re-trying dhcp, it should try for more than 10 secs
Bug#251056: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug title.
severity -1 wishlist
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 14:21:42 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line FWD: INSTALL REPORT (medium priority)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 25 May 2004 14:20:15 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line FWD: INSTALL REPORT (beta 2, stock standard)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
* rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-12 22:40]:
I downloaded the new daily snapshot, ran it, got some strange messages,
such as it kept asking me if I wanted to activate PCMCIA becasue it it
thought I had it. The exact message was; This computer seems to have
PCMCIA interface, Please choose
Can you download a new image from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and see how well
that works for your beta tester?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Alexander Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-07 22:22]:
Sorry for the long delay, I tried to find the newbie I forced to do the
install ;)
I showed the beta4, where you changed the translations, and asked him if
this is better. And he thinks, he would have found the swap-option
sooner, so
* Brent Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-26 19:46]:
Could not see the Western Digital 80Gb 800JB Serial ATA 7200rpm 8MB drive.
Would not allow me to partition it.
Since the last beta of debian-installer was released, a large number
of changes related to SATA have been made. In particular, we
* Frank Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-23 13:47]:
Somewhat detects existence of SATA disk, claims it needs ide-scsi
module which doesn't exist, then goes to partion page with a blank
default menu entry, hitting enter just returns to same page.
Since the last beta of debian-installer was
* David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-08 17:29]:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 06:42:19PM +0100, Gerald Pichler wrote:
The biggest problem of all: My graficcard was not detected. I have
a ATI XPert 2000, Mandrake knows this card since I use Mandrake,
the XFree86 driver for an ATI Rage 128 TV
* Jack Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-07 21:07]:
tar: unrecognized file type
debootstrap.log contained only a copy of
tar: unrecognized file type
and then:
ln: /target/usr/bin/awk: file exists
umount: /target/dev/pts: invalid argument
umount: /target/dev/shm: invalid argument
* Bill Nugent [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-06 09:23]:
During the installation the partitioning of the disk(s) is more
complicated and/or difficult that it should be. There are several
different methods on the netinst disk and most of them are a pain to
use and get in the way. Both times I
* Karl Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-19 14:00]:
I am not able to recreate what went wrong at this time - I will be doing
a similar install in the next weeks and will take careful notes. Please
close this bug for now.
Do you have some time to do another test of the image at
clone 236128 -1
reassign -1 partman
retitle -1 When warning about unrecognized partition table, mention new hard drives
and that it's normal there
severity -1 wishlist
thanks
* Anders Petersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-04 12:00]:
The installer queries with a list of modules before probing
Can you try new images from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and say whether any
of this issue is still there?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* DESBUREAUX Sylvain FTRD/RTA/LAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 09:49]:
À 69% of the installation of the base system I have :
The debootstrap program exited with an error (return value 127)
Errors were encountered while processing :
Libgnutls7
Exim4-daemon-light
Mailx
At
Exim4
* Erik Holstensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-01 23:54]:
Configure network HW: I Have no Diskdrive in computer so it reported it as
failed to install but I dont know if its a bug or just as it should be.
Load installer modules: Dont remember if it where here or in Install base
system: . When
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
