[Per Olofsson]
Isn't policy-rc.d a cleaner solution? AFAIK nothing in policy requires
a package to use start-stop-daemon, but it does say that maintainer
scripts [1]should use invoke-rc.d.
Perhaps. But at the moment, start-stop-daemon has the largest chance
of working.
Maybe
both
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:34:51AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report.
I'm sorry, but I can't try it again ATM.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL
Hi Steve,
thanks for your quick reply. Things are looking better now, but are not
completely perfect yet.
culprit: partitioning of the second disk should never modify previous
settings for sda
Auto-partitioning means that you're allowing the system to choose a
fixed partition layout
On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, at 04:27 PM, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 03:40:30PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Please, somebody, give it a try and let me know I'm not going
crazy. It doesn't take very long to get to the point where this
bug manifests itself, and you don't ever get to
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I guess we could do both, and remove the dummy start-stop-daemon when
everything is using invoke-rc.d.
Seems like a good idea. I'll make pcmcia-cs use invoke-rc.d then.
--
Pelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
nobootloader_0.0.17_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nobootloader_0.0.17.dsc
nobootloader_0.0.17.tar.gz
nobootloader_0.0.17_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 12:05:40AM +0300, eddyp wrote:
Sorry, I sent an outdated file. Apparently I had the newer version on my
desktop. (now working on laptop)
Could you please checkin this file?
done. Thank you.
But the package including the old version seems already to be uploaded.
Accepted:
nobootloader_0.0.17.dsc
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.17.dsc
nobootloader_0.0.17.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.17.tar.gz
nobootloader_0.0.17_all.udeb
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.17_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:51:41PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.07.26.2352 +0200]:
OK. 5 people confirmed their interest in a d-i devcamp.
Please add me to the list of interested parties.
Me too, altough it may be that i may not be
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:36:24AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:19, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:27:24AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:10:18PM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
Note 0:
The new 2.6-only businesscard image is groovy. It's certainly
smaller and sleeker. But there are still situations where a 2.6
kernel won't work, and 2.4 is still needed. (see Bug#261463:
Missing
* Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-28 19:39]:
In bug #212646 you can see the reason why I want this to be done.
I have checked on debian-qa and people there seems to agree with
me that setserial is no longer needed to be a part of base. It
should be just another package that you can
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Debian-installer-version: pxeboot.tar from 26th of july 2004
uname -a: Linux portable 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Sat May 1 18:04:05 EST
2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 27 and 28 july 2004
Method: I used the pxeboot to start the installer and got packages
through a
Package: debian-installer
Version: 1.0rc-1 Sarge netinst
When installing on a soft raid array, mkinitrd needs a valid raidtab.
The package to install is mdadm (but the error message says it needs
raidtools2 (bug reported to initrd-tools ). Installing raidtools2 does
not create the raidtab.
So
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:03:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:10:18PM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
Note 0:
The new 2.6-only businesscard image is groovy. It's certainly
smaller and sleeker. But there are still situations where a 2.6
kernel won't
[Martin Michlmayr]
I'd also like to see #247906: Please don't install boot loaders
addressed (at least on mips/mipsel, I cannot speak for the other
arches with 100% confidence).
As far as I can see, the following archs still install the boot loader
in debootstrap v0.2.40:
alpha: aboot
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_0.67.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.7-powerpc-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.7-powerpc-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.6.7-power3-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.7-power3-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.6.7-power4-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.7-power4-di_0.67_powerpc.udeb
[I'm not on debian-boot; please respect the Reply-To]
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 13:44:48 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
What really has to happen for this is an upload of debootstrap which
doesn't install it. I'd very like to see such an upload. I'd also like
to see #247906: Please don't
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
[I'm not on debian-boot; please respect the Reply-To]
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 13:44:48 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
What really has to happen for this is an upload of debootstrap which
doesn't install it. I'd very like to see such an upload. I'd also like
to see
Package: debian-installer
Version: 2004-07-27
When I use linux26 to start installation then the netadapter can't
detected. But , if I use linux to start installation, it can detected
Broadcom eXetrem BCM5704 .
I am using Debian-sarge-i386.iso (2004-07-27) to install sarge (kernel
2.6) into HP
I did, a couple of days ago. As you say, debian-cd on gluck needs a cvs
update of tools/boot/sarge/boot-powerpc. manty?
Sorry, my fault, I thought I had updated that already, but I hadn't, I have
just updated it right now, so today's build should be ok.
Regards..
--
Manty/BestiaTester -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 262043 partman
Bug#262043: cdimage.debian.org: I am using the daily sarge iso images to create a
local mirror. Instalation fails attempting to partition a disk
Bug reassigned from package `cdimage.debian.org' to `partman'.
retitle 262043
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040727/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux lovesong 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004 07 28 at about 3P.M. EDT
Method:
Used SBM to boot
I repeated the installation with a recent daily build,
it failed in the same way, so the bug is not just an
obsolete beta-4 bug. See bug#262070 for a more recent installation
report.
-- hendrik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Dear Colleague,
Have you heard of FEMLAB before? It's a finite element modeling
software package with a smooth interface to MATLAB.
Get a first glance of FEMLAB and demo models by getting a free
Tour CD 2004 at http://www.comsol.com/tourcd.
FEMLAB is used in research, product development
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
base-installer 0.093
uname -a:
Now: Linux saphir 2.6.7-1-k7 #1 Thu Jul 8 06:45:35 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
(installed using kernel-image-2.4.26-1-386)
Date:
???
Method: How did you install? What did you boot off?
Mark Brown wrote:
I've found some more instances of this problem. I managed to catch a
diff of the config files before and after the upgrade, though I didn't
remember to rerun the upgrade or cache the entire database:
Now I understand. This is because debootstrap installs packages using
the
I've submitted what I hope will be the final debian-installer build to the
autobuilders, but it seems that recent dependency breakage in newt will
cause some of the builds to fail. I hope I can ask the autobuilders to
retry, but this will likely delay things for a few days.
At this point it's
base-installer_1.01_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.01.dsc
base-installer_1.01.tar.gz
base-installer_1.01_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
Current debian-installer as downloaded from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/
has a typo in the german translation. It should read Grundsystem
instead of Grunsystem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-07-29 from
http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/images-m68k/daily/atari/
uname -a: impossible to run it
Date: 2004-07-29 21:38:12
Method: using Atari boot floppy
Machine: Atari Falcon030 with AfterBurner040 (MC68040), NOVA Mach64
Accepted:
base-installer_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.01.dsc
base-installer_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.01.tar.gz
base-installer_1.01_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.01_powerpc.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
Does this machine usually run linux? If so, what version of the kernel?
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm going to give this one more try. Please reply via email as i won't
be subscribed to this list for long. I thought i had documented this
problem clearly and in the right place - if i haven't *please let me
know so i can find the _right_ place*.
Hi folks,
My Debian installation
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 03:33:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm writing you because you're listed in our records as someone who can
help test the Debian sarge installer on m68k (MVME162).
We're close to the finalising the next release of the installer, and I hope
you can help us by testing
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:21:32 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#241011: success, but failed to find CD drives
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Sorry, the machine that I installed on and submitted that report from, currently has
its harddrive full with 40GB of movies and music. It is running Fedora Core 2. I do
plan on switching to Debian once Sarge goes stable.
Anyway, after I submitted that report, another release candidate of the
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:17:42 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240367: various problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 262106 + pending
Bug#262106: debian-installer: typo in german translation
Tags were: l10n
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 240959 -1
Bug#240959: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] failed to find CD after boot
Bug 240959 cloned as bug 262140.
reassign -1 cdrom-detect
Bug#262140: [i386] [beta3] [netinst] failed to find CD after boot
Bug reassigned from package
tags 262106 + pending
thanks
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:15:39PM +0200, Sebastian Stark wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
Current debian-installer as downloaded from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/
has a typo in the german
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:47:34 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240959: failed to find CD after boot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:36:38 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240963: failed to find CD after boot; successful network install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 03:11:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I've submitted what I hope will be the final debian-installer build to the
autobuilders, but it seems that recent dependency breakage in newt will
cause some of the builds to fail. I hope I can ask the autobuilders to
retry, but this
Today's upload of debootstrap implemented the change described at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff. to remove
all bootloaders from the base system.
Unfortunately, d-i itself is not ready for such a change, as most of the
bootloaders in question don't yet have
Package: elilo-installer
Version: 0.0.5
Severity: important
As discussed at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff.,
debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader
packages; this should be handled by the installer. Please update
elilo-installer to call
Package: silo-installer
Version: 0.0.6
Severity: important
As discussed at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff.,
debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader
packages; this should be handled by the installer. Please update
silo-installer to call
Package: vmelilo-installer
Version: 1.3
Severity: important
As discussed at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff.,
debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader
packages; this should be handled by the installer. Please update
vmelilo-installer to call
Package: palo-installer
Version: 0.0.4
Severity: important
As discussed at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff.,
debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader
packages; this should be handled by the installer. Please update
palo-installer to call
Package: arcboot-installer
Version: 0.011
Severity: important
As discussed at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff.,
debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader
packages; this should be handled by the installer. Since
arcboot-installer is the only
d-i's failing again on mips (Indy r4k) with 32 MB. Netbooting from a
current svn build dies just after the base system components are
downloaded, and the 20040729 sarge_d-i CD images start failing during
network configuration as the VM begins to kill processes.
The relevant message on vt4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 261535 Running 'grub-install --no-floppy (hd0)' failed
Bug#261535: grub fails: does not have any corresponding BIOS drive
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Nicholas Breen wrote:
d-i's failing again on mips (Indy r4k) with 32 MB. Netbooting from a
current svn build dies just after the base system components are
downloaded, and the 20040729 sarge_d-i CD images start failing during
network configuration as the VM begins to kill processes.
I just
lowmem_1.00_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lowmem_1.00.dsc
lowmem_1.00.tar.gz
lowmem_1.00_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_1.00_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I misspelt the name of my install proxy. The only message I got was that
the mirror was invalid.
On switching to tty2 I was able to enter the command from tty4 and so
discovered my error.
stderr should be captured (and maybe tailed), and when an error
Accepted:
lowmem_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.00.dsc
lowmem_1.00.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.00.tar.gz
lowmem_1.00_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.00_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_1.00_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_1.00_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
lowmemcheck_1.00_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Package: installation-reports
powerpc businesscard 20040729 OldWorld PowerMac
INSTALL REPORT
Synopsis:
Partition hard drives fails on powerpc OldWorld PowerMac on
20040729 businesscard install.
Debian-installer-version: Fill in date and from where you got the
image
sid_d-i
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I'm doing a network install via modem.
I've discovered d-i downloading, amongst others, jfs and lvm udebs.
I won't be using either, so this is simply wasted time.
I suggest that downloading and installing optional udebs be deferred
until it's clear
My effort at answering questions by inserting them into the environment
failed.
However, I've discovered env2debconf.
With this small change:
sed floppy/sbin/env2debconf~ floppy/sbin/env2debconf \
-e 's/set -e/set -ex/' \
-e '/for/ s=\set\=set;cat /etc/env 2/dev/null='
I can put a
Package: installation-reports
powerpc 20040724 businesscard
OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso
Comments/Problems:
The powerpc 2.6 kernel on the 20040724 businesscard CD is missing
drivers (modules or
Latest discover1 update (1.6.4) seems to have solved
my problem. It installed fine this time.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
The 2.6 kernel from Jul 2 (I think from Sid) doesn't detect my IDE
drive. According to the log, the IDE modules are missing.
2.4 of the same date does detect it.
I don't have logs to offer, and I'm about to look for newer vmlinuz and
initrd.gz.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
65 matches
Mail list logo
