On Oct 14, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:23:57AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Note however that the daily image will still be based on sid, like
other
daily images, but will install testing instead.
I believe other daily images are based on testing.
Please close this bug. It's no longer possible to do tests due to the hardware
being decommissioned.
Thanks!
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Dec 5, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
I intent to remove the cramfs support from the kernel and the
cramfsprogs package. Current kernels supports squashfs, which is a far
more advanced replacement.
It is currently in use by the debian-installer for mips and the
powerpc
Debian on PowerPC seems to be in trouble...
1) The daily d-i CDImage for PowerPC hasn't been updated since Dec 12th.
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/
2) Even if it were updated, it still would not be possible to install
Debian Sid on
On Dec 16, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
2) Even if it were updated, it still would not be possible to install
Debian Sid on PowerPC due to the lack of a linux-image package more
up-
to-date than 2.6.30. This problem has existed for several weeks.
Why does that hinder installation?
On Dec 16, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Again, there is *nothing* wrong with the installer here. We welcome
reports
of issues with installations of testing, but issues with sid are
seldom
caused by problems in the installer.
If you say so, I have to agree that there is *nothing*
On Dec 17, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 17 December 2009, Rick Thomas wrote:
I have listed several problems that exist in Sid and Squeeze, some of
which prevent successful installation (even though there is nothing
wrong with the installer).
The problems in Sid
On Dec 17, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
(And please do not over-inflate the severity of bug reports: a desktop
environment not being installable does not make the installation
system
unusable.)
It may not be grave for the installer (indeed, you've already
established at great
On Dec 17, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 17 December 2009, Rick Thomas wrote:
It may not be grave for the installer (indeed, you've already
established at great length that it's not an installer problem at
all)
but that doesn't make it any the less grave for whatever
Package: installation-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/
Daily build #1 for powerpc, using installer build from sid
This bug (562575) is still present in today's netinst CD.
The businesscard installer boots and prints the ususal flock of kernel startup
messages.
then it says:
Starting system log daemon
Segmentation fault
and then it loops saying
INFO: kbd-mode: setting console mode to Unicode
, anyone?
On Jan 1, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
Here's a datapoint...
Today I did the same for the PowerPC version of the netboot/mini.iso
(13 MB) and used it to install squeeze on my testing PowerMac G4.
Worked a treat.
And what's really cool is that the businesscard and netinst CD's
On Jan 1, 2010, at 8:44 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On 2010-01-01 at 13:51:59 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
Here's a datapoint...
Today I did the same for the PowerPC version of the netboot/mini.iso
(13 MB) and used it to install squeeze on my testing PowerMac G4.
Worked a treat.
And what's
Interestingly enough, this problem does not seem to be present in the
i386 daily installer CDs.
Just another datapoint...
Rick
On Dec 28, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
This bug (562575) is still present in today's netinst CD.
The businesscard installer boots and prints the ususal
This is the same as bug #562575
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
unimportant that resources cannot be spared to
even *look* at a problem that renders the installer unusable on that
hardware?
Rick
On Dec 28, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
This bug (562575) is still present in today's netinst CD.
The businesscard installer boots and prints
On Jan 15, 2010, at 5:00 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 16:23 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
This bug is still present in the Thu Jan 14 16:08:46 UTC 2010
businesscard CD downloaded from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/
So
On Jan 17, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Julian Hernandez Gomez wrote:
The only powerpc computer that I have (PS3) is the one that I'm
trying to install :(
maybe Rick had other machines previously installed and he could run
the cdebconf powerpc version.
--
Julian.
I do have such machines, and
On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 13:17 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Jan 17, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Julian Hernandez Gomez wrote:
The only powerpc computer that I have (PS3) is the one that I'm
trying to install :(
I think someone reported that there were
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'd recommend grabbing cdebconf from the d-i svn repo and building a
few
test versions at various points between 0.145 and 0.146. Just
running
cdebconf-get from the built source tree may prove informative.
Ian.
Once again, I have the
On Jan 16, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Mathew Binkley wrote:
As I said earlier, there shouldn't be an arbitrary line between the
installer and the packages. People aren't installing Etch the
installer or Etch the packages, they're installing Etch the
release. Test both parts simultaneously, as a
On Jan 28, 2007, at 9:42 PM, Phill Thorpe wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 03:09 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 29 January 2007 02:41, Phill Thorpe wrote:
I dont think that you read it correctly.
This install did not detect my nic at first, it only detected my nic
when I booted with:
install
On Jan 31, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 19:27, Robert Millan wrote:
It just mirrors the same boot options offered by the official
installer
(except rescue which doesn't make much sense in this context).
No, with official images auto is not really offered
On Feb 7, 2007, at 2:47 PM, Geert Stappers wrote:
Op 06-02-2007 om 11:50 schreef hugo vanwoerkom:
11:40:09 (8.04 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 2746856. Retrying.
snip/
Do other people have this trouble?
For what it's worth: It is the first report.
I've had it in the past. Not
On Feb 12, 2007, at 7:22 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 15:30 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
Maybe I should try the whole thing again and write down the details.
Can you give me a URL for the linux ieee1394 mailing list?
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
Package: installation
Severity: important
After installation on a powerpc system (PowerMac BlueWhite G3) when aptitude
is run in interactive (curses) mode, told
to do update and finish any pending operations (g) command, it turns out that
the hfsutils and sudo packages are
marked for
On Feb 14, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 15 February 2007 01:10, Joey Hess wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
After installation on a powerpc system (PowerMac BlueWhite G3) when
aptitude is run in interactive (curses) mode, told to do update and
finish any pending operations (g
On Feb 27, 2007, at 6:23 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Gordon Farquharson wrote:
I tried a build of the installer from trunk (revision 45431) and
nearly fell of my chair:
Known problem at the top of DebianInstaller/Today in the wiki.
I don't see any reference at all on the wiki to Gordon
So the problem is that (aside from the possibility that OS9 is not
being recognized) if the other OS is OS9, the default for hardware
clock should be local time, but if the other OS is OS-X, the
default for the hardware clock should be UTC. Is that a correct
assessment?
I solve it by
On Mar 5, 2007, at 5:40 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Something wrong with rsync? I think zsync can also be used.
zsync works great. It doesn't work with DVD images -- something
about files larger than 2GB (31 bit byte offsets).
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi Alex!
Welcome to an elite minority of those of us who have got this to work!
Below are a couple of hints from my own experience in doing this.
Rick
On Mar 7, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Alex Teclo wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: BootX
Image version: Debian etch powerpc weekly
On Mar 15, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 15 March 2007 17:44, Colin Watson wrote:
Personally I also feel that all possible solutions effectively make
/etc/fstab unreadable and unmaintainable.
The approach we took in Ubuntu was to put comments above each UUID
entry in
On Mar 25, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Geert Stappers wrote:
Back to 'netinst'
This image is one that does disappoint people often.
What could be done to prevent that?
I see two possibilities:
(A) Eliminate it entirely
(B) Treat it as an expanded businesscard image.
Discussion:
(A) I'm serious.
Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is
not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these
On Apr 14, 2007, at 6:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:21:56PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it?
W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The
following signatures couldn't be verified because
It would be really great if whatever solution results from this
discussion were also applicable to other architectures than x86. My
personal interest is in PowerPC (especially OldWorld PowerMacs) and
I'm willing to help as much as I can with the testing process (I'm
not a developer)
Sven,
You didn't ask for my opinion, but here it is anyway...
As a user, I think splitting netinst/businesscard into separate 2.4
and 2.6 isos is a wonderful idea. The fewer unneeded Megabytes I
have to download and burn before I can get started installing the
better! I usually know whether
I don't know if this is relevant, but some IDE controllers only
recognize the first 128 GB(binary) = 137*10^9 bytes.
Is it possible that your controller has two modes? Windows uses one
mode that recognizes the whole disk, and Linux uses the other
(compatibility?) mode that only recognizes the
on
the list knows?) That would be worth a try.
I know it's possible to use disks larger than 137 GB with Linux --
I'm doing it!
Rick
On Monday, July 19, 2004, at 08:33 PM, Sara Falamaki wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:15:36PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
I don't know if this is relevant, but some IDE
On Monday, July 26, 2004, at 09:25 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 02:00:46AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
The powerpc 2.6 kernel version of the d-i is missing drivers (modules
or built-in) for Mac floppy disks and SCSI CD-ROM drives.
I've added the floppy modules.
Thanks!
Installing
On Monday, July 26, 2004, at 04:53 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 02:17:46PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Monday, July 26, 2004, at 09:25 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 02:00:46AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
Installing on a PowerMac/6500 with a TEAC SCSI CD-RW drive
Is this problem only on OldWorld PowerMac's? Or am I just the only
person in the world who wants to configure his network interface
without DHCP? If this is happening on i386, it would be a show
stopper!
Please, somebody, give it a try and let me know I'm not going
crazy. It doesn't take
On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, at 04:27 PM, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 03:40:30PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Please, somebody, give it a try and let me know I'm not going
crazy. It doesn't take very long to get to the point where this
bug manifests itself, and you don't ever get
Package: installation-reports
powerpc businesscard 20040729 OldWorld PowerMac
INSTALL REPORT
Synopsis:
Partition hard drives fails on powerpc OldWorld PowerMac on
20040729 businesscard install.
Debian-installer-version: Fill in date and from where you got the
image
Package: installation-reports
powerpc 20040724 businesscard
OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso
Comments/Problems:
The powerpc 2.6 kernel on the 20040724 businesscard CD is missing
drivers (modules or
On Friday, July 30, 2004, at 05:34 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Package: installation-reports
powerpc 20040724 businesscard
OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc
Thanks for the reminder.
You can close this bug report. The ask for floppy driver module
twice (and not fined it at all bug is still present, but I've
mentioned it in other bug reports that reference more current CD
images, so there's no need for this one.
Enjoy!
Rick
On Friday, July 30,
On Thursday, July 29, 2004, at 05:42 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, at 04:27 PM, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 03:40:30PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Please, somebody, give it a try and let me know I'm not going
crazy. It doesn't take very long to get to the point
Thanks for the prompt reply!
On Sunday, August 1, 2004, at 01:55 PM, Joshua Kwan wrote:
If you do not CC [EMAIL PROTECTED], nobody except me will see
this.
I did that.
Would somebody please try this out on an i386? (DNSserver
address != Gateway address) And let me know if it breaks non-DHCP
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:52:20AM +1000, James Mills wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[Please keep further questions on the mailing list, if you would.]
Shit. Does this list not have an explicit Reply-To header to the mailing
Joey Hess wrote:
At this point the only delay is waiting for the autobuilders, which are
overloaded from all the other uploads surrounding the sarge release, to
catch up and build the d-i images. In the past 24 hours, we've gotten
builds for hppa, ia64, s390, and sparc, plus a manual build
OOOps... I accidentally hit send when I meant to hit save... Here's the complete
message as I intended it to be!
Rick
Joey Hess wrote:
At this point the only delay is waiting for the autobuilders, which are
overloaded from all the other uploads surrounding the sarge release, to
catch up
Joey Hess wrote:
The test
checklist in installer/doc/checklist is still missing many entries and
the more complete it is the better I'd feel about calling this release
rc1 instead of beta5.
If you'll send me a pointer (URL?) to the test checklist, I'll try to make sure that
it gets as done
Rikard Borg wrote:
Hi
Rick Thomas Wrote:
Any one of these three bugs will render debian-installer unusable for
anyone with anything but a plain vanilla hardware or networking
environment who doesn't have help from a competant System
Administrator, or have such skills personally
Package: installation-reports
powerpc businesscard RC1 NewWorld PowerMac
INSTALL REPORT
Synopsis:
Partition hard drives fails to see FireWire disk on powerpc
NewWorld (G4) PowerMac on RC1 businesscard install.
You folks are probably tired of seeing OldWorld PowerPC bug reports
from me,
On Monday, August 9, 2004, at 03:55 PM, Rick_Thomas wrote:
OK, as I said, output of lspci and lspci -n will be sent tonight,
when I
can get my hands on the machine in question.
Here is the output of lspci ; lspci -n
Hope it helps!
BTW, I manually did modprobe ohci1394 ; modprobe sbp2 just before
On Tuesday, August 10, 2004, at 04:04 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, so we do it by hand. I wonder though what newworld pmac box he
has that
doesn't work, apple usually reused the same componnent in various
boxes, and
thus it should usually work.
Well, it's a PowerMac G4 733 MHz. The case is grey.
Install MacOS-9. Then use the BootX boot-loader. (or 8.5 or 8.6,
if 9 won't run on the S-900. I've never seen one of those, so I
don't know what will run on it and what wont. I'm told that BootX
even works with MacOS 7.5, if your machine can run it and you have
a floppy drive to install it
Package: installation-reports
I retrieved the floppy images at
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc-small/floppy/
so I could try out a floppy-boot install from them.
I got never even got off the ground...
1) The boot.img' floppy seems to have nothing on it but the
On Wednesday, August 11, 2004, at 05:45 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:25:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
# We'd like to use miboot, but it isn't in the archive yet ...
#miboot -c ./tmp/powerpc-small_floppy_boot/miboot.conf
# ... so instead we do some grungy HFS hacking.
I wonder
On Wednesday, August 11, 2004, at 05:25 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:57:22AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Package: installation-reports
I retrieved the floppy images at
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc-
small/floppy/
so I could try out a floppy
Evilpig wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:35:27 +0100, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not in the lspci output because it's not a PCI card.
I thought I'd fixed this one, so I'd like the reporter to show me the
output of the following two commands, which you should be able to
On Friday, August 13, 2004, at 09:53 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Can you please retry the miboot boot floppies tomorrow ? I fixed the
daily-builds to rebuild the actual miboot floppies.
Now, the only problem remaining would be the root floppy being too
big, and
the actual 2.6 kernel based miboot
On Monday, August 16, 2004, at 03:18 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
Thanks Rick for testing it. I will build 2.6.8 miboot kernels
today, could you
possibly give it a try to see if it boots this evening or
something such ?
Sure. Expect my report at about the same time tomorrow that I
posted today's.
On Thursday, August 5, 2004, at 02:19 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
Rikard Borg wrote:
I'm one of those out there waiting with a 7200 box at home.
Rikard Borg
--
Hi Rikard,
Did the work-around I sent you help any? Have you got that 7200
box working yet?
Enjoy!
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thursday, August 19, 2004, at 05:00 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
happy floppy disk reading noises. However, the noises eventually
stopped and a red X appeared over the TuxMac. Then nothing. I
had to
manually eject the floppy from the drive.
What we need would be a way to get a log of it or
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 12:22:38AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 06:59, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Any ideas why these daily builds are broken every day?
I just tried the 2.4 floppy images. What Wouter says is correct. I'm
going to go over the
Rick_Thomas wrote:
Well... on the beige G3, I booted into Open Firmware with the
ofonlyboot floppy in the drive. The G3 comes up with console
input/output being keyboard/screen. From another Mac running MacOS-9, I
connected with MacKermit to the G3's modem port (which is normally
Sven Luther wrote:
the .coff booting is probably the
only free alternative, but i am told requesting a debian oldworld user to get
the serial console working is not acceptable.
Only unacceptable in the sense that Open Firmware is dramatically different between
machine types. Apple
On Mar 8, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
Except that after the reboot synaptic (and aptitude, as well...
I checked) immediately wanted to upgrade the kernel from
what came with the install.
That's called a security update...
Cheers,
FJP
On Mar 13, 2008, at 8:18 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2008, Andrea Lusuardi - uovobw wrote:
I installed a debian stable system on a Pentium 4 machine with 4
320GB
ide disks and the installation goes well, but when it comes to
installing
grub on the MBR i get an
On Mar 17, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Please use the website
instead since there you find the documentation, errada and everything
else that you will need there:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
The [17 Mar 2008] Debian Installer lenny beta 1 link on
On Mar 17, 2008, at 2:02 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
+dtkernel oops during installer startup on ThinPad T41/dt
You probably mean ThinkPad ?
+dd
+The problem looks to be kernel related but has not yet know to
be fixed.
This can not be parsed as an English language sentence.
On Mar 18, 2008, at 3:19 PM, ardoRic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Otavio Salvador
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+dd
+The problem looks to be kernel related but has not yet know to
be fixed.
Could you suggest a text for it?
Basically
Is there any chance of producing an Etch+0.5 test image for
PowerPC? I'd love to run it through my testing farm.
Enjoy!
Rick
On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:34 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Holger Wansing wrote:
I did a test installation with the i386 netinst image (sorry,
only
, Frans Pop wrote:
Hi Rick,
On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
Is there any chance of producing an Etch+0.5 test image for
PowerPC? I'd love to run it through my testing farm.
Technically I could, but I'm not sure that I want to.
First, it is quite a lot of work because of all
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:38 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
Would it be helpful if I did an Etch install then aptitude dist-
upgrade on as many Mac architectures as I can? I don't have any
non-
Mac PowerPC machines, so I can't try the oddball kernel versions
I can not duplicate this on any of my Power Mac machines.
It sounds like a hardware problem... Have you checked that all your
RAMs are firmly seated in their sockets?
Rick
On May 20, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Chao Cao wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Problem:
The installation CD will not
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Fill in date and from where you got the image
Lenny Beta2 for PowerPC KDE CD-1
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt
Date: Date and time of the install
June 24 19:35 EDT (US Eastern
Rick Thomas wrote:
Subject: Bug#487906: Lenny Beta2 on PowerPC - strange video mode
after reboot
snip
:00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage
128 PF/PRO AGP 4x TMDS (prog-if 00 [VGA])
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr
On Jul 9, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
1) Loading root floppy seems fragile
For some reason the root floppy often fails to load, depending on
which
udebs are included (i.e. probably depending on size of the initrd).
Only sometimes a floppy suddenly works.
This sounds a lot like a
The rdate in etch does not recognize a -n option. When was it added?
Rick
On Jul 21, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
I just remembered/realised that rdate can use ntp servers via rdate
-n.
Spiffy. No more issues finding a server then.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Aug 31, 2007, at 5:23 AM, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 03:06:57PM +0300, George Chavdarov wrote:
we try to download daily build netinst image to test new Serial
ATA RAID
support. But all there directories for amd64 and i386 are empty.
How to download these images?
i386
On Sep 8, 2007, at 7:17 AM, Jeremy Guitton wrote:
Le vendredi 07 septembre 2007 à 19:00 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio a
écrit :
Please try the following image:
http://people.debian.org/~lunar/debian-40r1+proposed-updates-
amd64-netinst.iso
It should solve the issue but as I am unable to
On Sep 17, 2007, at 12:42 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Jerry Quinn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Christian Perrier wrote:
The log doesn't show anything weird at all as far as I can see.
When exactly were there floppy probes occurring?
I was looking at lines like this and I assumed they were
On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:07 AM, Daniel Nylander wrote:
There was a new string in debian-installer today..
Please enter the device name of the partition or disk onto which LILO
should be installed, i.e: /dev/hda or /dev/sda1.
Shouldn't this be e.g instead of i.e?
Actually, for example would be
On Oct 23, 2007, at 4:37 AM, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD
Image version: lenny (installer build 20071016-02:06)
Date: 2007-10-22
Machine: Apple iBook G4
Processor: PowerPC 7447A, altivec supported
Memory: 1.2 Gigabyte
Using ntp to set the time should be a short operation. If it takes a
long time, the validity of the time that results is in question -- by
virtue of the process[*] being used.
Rick
[*] For those who care, it works roughly like this:
One or more polls are sent from the client to each of
On Nov 1, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Jim Paris wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
Using ntp to set the time should be a short operation. If it takes a
long time, the validity of the time that results is in question -- by
virtue of the process[*] being used.
Unless it's slow becuase of something like
have the option of which source of time to
trust.
Rick
On Nov 1, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
Using ntp to set the time should be a short operation. If it
takes a long
time, the validity of the time that results is in question -- by
virtue of
the process[*] being
On Nov 1, 2007, at 7:02 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
rdate, as used by the installer, uses SNTP.
A... (again) This was added fairly recently. Interesting.
The point remains. The uncertainty in the time from the server is
proportional (or worse) to the network delay.
Not with SNTP it
On Nov 16, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Anyway, i was able to produce a dfb 1.0 based miniiso for powerpc
[3]: it would be nice if someone could give it a try and report
whether it works or not
regards
Attilio
[3]
On Nov 18, 2007, at 5:23 AM, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Could you please try burning and booting the mini.iso image you
find in my ~ in macswell once again
Hi!
I burned the mini.iso at
-rw-r--r-- 1 attilio attilio 19826688 Nov 19 18:44 mini.iso
When I booted it with expert, I got the
On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Rick Thomas wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
ok, i rebulit the iso with the correct libcairo-directfb2 udeb,
you can find it in my ~: this time everything should be ok from
the iso building POV
On Dec 21, 2007, at 5:58 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
I'm afraid your questions are off-topic for the debian-boot list
(which is
the development list for debian-installer, not a list for boot
issues).
Suggest you try asking on the debian-user list instead.
This is such a frequent mistake...
On Dec 25, 2007, at 5:04 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 25 December 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
we will update 3.1 and 4.0 tomorrow and might need a bit of help
for the
press announcement. We currently don't have any extra text for
regarding
d-i in it. If you want any extra being
Where can I find installer CD/DVD iso images for the newly announced
etch 4.0r2
Same question for the yet-to-be-announced sarge 3.1r7 ?
Thanks!
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 29, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Del Merritt wrote:
Earlier tonight I filed an install of debian-4.0r2 on a Linksys
NSLU2 bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; in a nutshell, if you
don't happen to be in front of your ssh session when the 2+ hour
install gets to the Configuring popularity-contest
Also, make sure your ssh-client machine doesn't go to sleep while
waiting...
Rick
On Dec 29, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Del Merritt wrote:
Earlier tonight I filed an install of debian-4.0r2 on a Linksys
NSLU2 bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; in a nutshell, if you
don't happen to be in front of
On Jan 1, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Del Merritt wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
Op 29-12-2007 om 13:30 schreef Del Merritt:
Rick Thomas wrote:
Also, make sure your ssh-client machine doesn't go to sleep
while waiting...
Thanks. I'm trying this out at the moment. Then again, I'm also
here
201 - 300 of 621 matches
Mail list logo
