Please file a bug against debootstrap.
At Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:31:26 +0200,
Emil Langrock wrote:
On Sunday 26 June 2011 09:51:27 Emil Langrock wrote:
On Sunday 26 June 2011 11:06:05 you wrote:
Does it still happen? It doesn't happen for me today.
Yes, I still have that problem. But it
-printable)]
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Sounds like a bug for debootstrap, no?
Indeed!
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:15:53 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
Package: cowbuilder
Version: 0.60
Severity: grave
I guess apt is missing ...
sudo
Hmm... similar bug, one year ago.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/254042
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:53:54 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
[1 text/plain; ISO-8859-15 (quoted-printable)]
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Sounds like a bug
; but it is
build-essential.
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:53:54 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Sounds like a bug for debootstrap, no?
Indeed!
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:15:53 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
Package: cowbuilder
Version
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.12
Severity: normal
Today, debootstrap seems to die in second-stage with
W: Failure while unpacking required packages. This will be attempted up
to five times.
I do not seem to get any debugging message, so it's hard to understand what
might be
Hi,
At Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:58:35 -0300,
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp writes:
I: Unpacking zlib1g...
W: Failure while unpacking required packages. This will be attempted up to
five times.
It looks like your .deb is broken; could you check it testing
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:19:51AM -0200, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
Package: debootstrap
The /etc/hosts file isn't copied to destination by debootstrap and the
pbuilder command needs this file to
work correctly. Without /etc/hosts the pbuilder create command shows:
E:
Hi,
here's a full log of my macbook
Does your macbook has the bootcamp upgraded firmware?
Note that macbooks are initially shipped with 'bootcamp upgraded
firmware' that supports BIOS emulation.
I think ELILO doesn't work with Debian kernel right now without the
patches, so it's
Hi,
$ chroot /target apt-get install refit
$ /target/sbin/gptsync /dev/sda
$ chroot /target
$ lilo /dev/sda3
(ignoring some warnings from lilo)
After this the installation continued fine, and I have no a running Debian
system.
If we can identify a way to discover if it's truely
Hi,
After electing elilo (GRUB/LILO were presented as alternatives) installing
elilo stalled at 50%. I had accepted to install into the only presented
partition (/dev/sda1, about 200 MB FAT32 partition, partman reported 3.1 kB
free memory before.). This first partition was created my the
Hi,
# apt-get install refit (when it enters past the NEW queue)
# gptsync /dev/sda
I've temporarily put refit packages on:
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/tmp/20060702/
I chrooted into /target from the second console of d-i and
copied the deb package I got from your link.
I
Hi,
-- Forwarded Message --
...
...
Current work around is to reboot into rEFIt and run gptsync, and
then run d-i from CDROM, and then configure the bootloader.
could you please give more details about this?
# apt-get install refit (when it enters past the
Hi,
Some enterprise-level storage systems have disk-level duplication
system, as such, filesystem-label-based mount-point would not be the
end-all way of approaching the problem.
Can you describe which designs require this? I have never heard of
such a setup, and I have some doubts that
Hi,
- Are there likely to be architecture specific issues with persistent
device naming?
- Or with filesystems other than ext2/ext3?
Nothing I know about. tree /dev/disk/ should give you some ideas.
by-label links are user friendly, but may become ambiguous if users
carelessly
In trying to install my new copy of Woody ( which I received today) I
repeatedly got the message debootstrap exited with an error (return value 1)
I have tried installing on two machines, neither of very high quality, with
the same result.
I am not able to boot up the machine, so my
I plan to export over the boot-floppies/documentation and import it into
the debian-installer/documentation tree, to start the
user-documentation task.
Any objections, or better ideas?
I'd like it so that boot-floppies/documentation is marked that
this documentation is deprecated.
It's
(HELO atoron.dancer.pr.jp.netfort.gr.jp) (127.0.0.1)
by viper2.netfort.gr.jp with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 13:21:50 -
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:20:21 +0900
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Since it's a generic rule that *-bf packages should not contain
manpages, I'm of the opinion that a new rule should be added to
lintian, rather than adding overrides to all *-bf packages.
Further more, since I don't think the new debian-installer is using
those *-bf packages, but uses
But you are right, we should get 2.4 working instead of hacking devfs into
or out of d-i...
Sure, but in the mean time we have to make sure there's an installer for
m68k that actually works. Else we could just as well shut down all m68k
buildd's, as it will not be worth it anymore.
It
mklibs fails to find the PIC library for reduction since it's called
libnewt-utf8_pic.a while mklibs expects it to simply be libnewt_pic.a
We're using newt debian-installer so it'd be nice if this were fixed so
we could save some bytes on the boot media. :-)
I have a few
mklibs fails to find the PIC library for reduction since it's called
libnewt-utf8_pic.a while mklibs expects it to simply be libnewt_pic.a
We're using newt debian-installer so it'd be nice if this were fixed so
we could save some bytes on the boot media. :-)
I have a few questions:
I've
I've noticed some udebs require on libslang.so.1, while the cdebconf
slang frontend require libslang.so.1-UTF8. Should all udeb programs
and libraries link with UTF8 versions of libraries, or should we leave
it to the package maintainers?
I was kind of hoping that we would be able to
I can do a big load at the boot of this mini-system, but
due to technical constraints, i can't use a NFS exported partition (of a server) to
realize it.
What kind of technical constraints is it that you can't use a NFS exported partition?
I usually find it convenient to use NFS-root.
I think this bug should be dealt on boot-floppies side.
Shouldn't it ?
HOW? It would be easy to add this to debootstrap's call, but if the
packaging is missing in basedebs.tar, people installing from it would
fail. So debootstrap would require an update, or at least a change in
eject is missing from the woody basedebs. On powerpc, this makes changing
the CDs extremely awkward (newbies rarely dare poke a paper clip into the
CD tray). Installation from CD is impeded severely, hence the severity of
critical.
I think this bug should be dealt on boot-floppies side.
I understand that. But just like we have a bunch of architectures, we
have a bunch of netboot options. You generally don't have a lot of
choices about what your hardware supports. Telling someone whose card
doesn't support pxe to use pxe because it's better is no more sensible
than
We still need to have an eye on the space that is occupied on the
ramdisk. The udebs do not contain any unneeded modules or
documentation and in some cases they use other compile options then
their deb counterparts.
They should not be deb/udeb counterparts that are
binary-incompatible.
We are probably not going to have a floppy image from them (which
will involve having PIC packages for each library package, which is
a big burden) and if we are not going to need to fit on a floppy,
what is the point of making a udeb for ?
No, there is no way that they will fit on the
We still need to have an eye on the space that is occupied on the
ramdisk. The udebs do not contain any unneeded modules or
documentation and in some cases they use other compile options then
their deb counterparts. A good example is directfb:
They should change their sonames,
at least this
I've finally managed to build, but not test, udebs for glib, pango,
and gtk+-directfb.
I'm having doubts on whether we really need udebs for them.
I want some clarification on this point.
We are probably not going to have a floppy image from
them (which will involve having PIC packages for
reassign 171027 boot-floppies
Does it means changing Subject: for boot floppies?
Sorry, if not.
It is just a cosmetical/technical thing in the bug tracking system. Not related to the
subject.
At Thu, 28 Nov 2002 07:58:34 +0100,
Ruzsinszky Attila wrote:
architecture: sparc
Let's first have a working installer on at least a few arches before
walking down that road. However, it is a problem which I was notified
of a few days ago: d-i relies heavily on devfs and, well, 2.4 doesn't
work on m68k and it doesn't look like it will in the foreseeable
future. So, help
You seem to have already solved the problem, but
pbuilder attempts at this problem and other things by
doing a two-phase install.
debootstrap the base system,
then using APT to install the rest.
A two-stage process does not help me. I am trying to build
a small but complete
At Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:24:08 -0500,
Bao C. Ha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am playing with debootstrap to build a custom base system.
I would like to include freeswan in the list of deb packages.
Unfortunately, freeswan is in the non-US archive. I just
wonder if there is an easy way to do it
At 14 Nov 2002 00:10:32 +0100,
Martin Sj�gren wrote:
[1 text/plain (quoted-printable)]
tis 2002-11-05 klockan 03.18 skrev Junichi Uekawa:
But surely adding stuff to a data structure is a backward-incompatible
change?
It depends on the way you do it.
You can add stuff to a data
Are you talking about language names? They are either ll or ll_LL.
As everything will be UTF-8 encoded, there is no need to add encoding.
There is probably a need to add a UTF-8 encoding something,
but there probably isn't really a need.
Why does it have to be char something[] when
char *
I was thinking more of
if (locale == C)
question user;
else
get country from locale.
It doesn't work, you can't get country from locale, you must always ask
user to tell where he lives.
Huh?
They are in
language_country.codeset format.
ja_JP is
They are in
language_country.codeset format.
ja_JP is Japan,
pt_BR is Brazil.
What is the problem?
[...]
Do you really think that there are no Japanese people outside of Japan?
Then they should use
ja_CA or whatever they want.
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Why does it have to be char something[] when
char * something will perfectly work ?
I did not say it has to be a char[6], I do not care if someone wants to
malloc it.
Please use strdup and friends, or asprintf, or other kind of
things that are less prone to break.
--
To
Do you really think that there are no Japanese people outside of Japan?
Then they should use ja_CA or whatever they want.
No, this locale does not exist.
That doesn't really matter if it doesn't currently exist on
your system. You can always make one.
regards,
junichi
--
Please use strdup and friends, or asprintf, or other kind of
things that are less prone to break.
Ok, I will use strdup. While we are on it, why are return values of
allocation routines never checked?
You could add checks, or use/define xstrdup to give some
useful error message.
They
There are two points I am unconfortable with this patch:
Why not use locale information ? (it is needed for some frontend and
other things)
and why is the country information 6-chars long?
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
we don't need to bump soversion at all, unless we make
backward-incompatible changes. just bump minor (and don't change the
packaging name). Also, fix shlibs to depend on that version or
later.
But surely adding stuff to a data structure is a backward-incompatible
change?
It
and some playing with /etc/passwd.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
,
although it is not currently implemented,
it should be doable.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:16:58 +0200
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Putting the driver on the floppy costs space, so two languages would
have to go (they will be available when the CDROM is accessible), ja and
es. The language catalogs on the floppy image would be: en pt de fr.
I
/changelog16 Sep 2002 23:40:53 - 1.28
+++ debian/changelog19 Sep 2002 17:10:01 -
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+cdebconf (0.24) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NOT YET RELEASED
+ * Junichi Uekawa:
+- debconf, debconf-copydb, debconf-loadtemplate, dpkg-reconfigure: call setlocale
+- link
On 20 Sep 2002 03:32:37 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Debian Boot CVS Master
| add setlocale call to each main(), and switch slang to slang-utf8
Have you tested that slang-utf8 works properly with cdebconf?
No. But enabling setlocale requires slang-utf8.
regards,
On 20 Sep 2002 03:32:37 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Debian Boot CVS Master
| add setlocale call to each main(), and switch slang to slang-utf8
Have you tested that slang-utf8 works properly with cdebconf?
I've checked now, it seems to be working fine.
regards,
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:10:34 +0200
Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moshe tells me that I need to commit my Catalan templates in UTF-8
No
The templates files should not be in UTF-8.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
--
To
sure, still valid UTF-8, but it's UTF-8 for what the UTF-8 is if
interpreted according to Latin1. I thought dpkg didn't assume anything
at all about the encoding in control files? That it expected us-ascii
and damn everyone who didn't follow that. Can I fix this somehow, or are
we doomed
On 13 Sep 2002 10:29:55 +0200
Could we move that out of Description-xx: lines to
generate some kind of po file?
Believe me, nobody would be happier than me if we used po files instead
;)
I was only working with it like this because this was the current
concept of translating the
)
We already have many templates files that are in the legacy encoding,
and it's not impossible to maintain a lang-charset mapping table.
There already is one in the BTS.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E
of gettext
to include on boot floppies.
Are you mentioning pointerize ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:45:54 -0600
Debian Boot CVS Master [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Repository: debian-installer/doc
who:porridge
time: Wed Sep 11 09:45:54 MDT 2002
Log Message:
Tidied up. Comments are very welcome.
Files:
changed:i18n.txt
* cdebconf (and
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:50:26 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:36:58PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
[...]
- for debs (base system), we:
* make the templates.ll files in whatever encoding
* either recode them or not when concatening
[...]
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:36:58 +0200
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Am I right that cdebconf handles the templates in debian-installer?
2. Is this possible on all architectures? I mean: do all architectures
use framebuffer?
That also means that bterm will be Essential in
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:36:58 +0200
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
- for udebs, we:
* make the templates.ll files in whatever encoding we like
* recode (say using iconv) the templates.ll to UTF-8 when creating
the combined templates file
* simply copy the strings
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:55:29 -0400
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My plan was to add support to debconf to use iconv to convert to
nl_langinfo(CODESET), from the template encoding (which is legacy
ISO-8859-whatever, or EUC-whatever).
That way, no transition (breakage) in terms of debconf
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:41:35 -0400
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ja.po files are in EUC-JP.
Well, they *can* be UTF-8.
They usually aren't.
Wouldn't just having Description-ll_LL.ENCODING: fields work fine ?
I've got a feeling that it's doable.
I can think of ways to
On 09 Sep 2002 09:07:47 +0200
Also, a pretty standard policy when translating things is to try not to
change the meaning of the text.
Huh? I only want to change the default value, how does it have an impact
on the meaning of the text?
Changing the default value changes the
ISO-8859-? for most european countries, EUC-JP in Japan,
and so on.
Not what your environment variable holds.
Hmm. I meant to ask whether or am I cursed with Latin1 because I happen
to live in western Europe? (but I must've forgotten it somehow) which
it seems I am. So my conversion
] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-floppies in
respect to i18n.
boot-floppies worked around the size constraints by loading
locale information from file on CD-Rom, if it was available.
(xlp.tgz).
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832
not 100% up to speed on what the single floppy is supposed to
be able to do (bootstrap for systems that can't boot from CDs and
netinstall I suppose, but what else?)
El-torito bootable CD image ?
Are we still using 2.88MB image is used for booting from the CD-Rom?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 16:51:49 -0700
Chris Tillman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| For floppy installs, why not plan on having a floppy version available
| in each language rather than trying to do a multilingual floppy?
Because we will then have a zillion different floppies to choose from?
Hi,
I don't know if it's really a feasible solution, or what people had in mind, but
I had a quick-hack into what might be udebootstrap, IMO.
This application takes in a predetermined directory filled with udebs and debs,
and extract them using tar, ar, and zcat.
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:44:03 -0700
Chris Tillman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was no response to this request on the debian-powerpc list, I
guess it really belongs to debian-boot (cc'd).
Since the consensus is that the current prep and chrp kernels which
we supply as part of
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:30:32 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) wrote:
But where must PO files go?
There are at least 2 ways:
* all messages in a central place (debian-installer/po/ or
debian-installer/libdebian-installer/po/ so that PO catalogs may
be shipped with
On 02 Sep 2002 16:48:05 +0200
I've added the build-dep, but I don't get a versioned binary depend.
Hmm. Come to think of it, why doesn't libd-i have the SONAME in the
package name?
Yes, this is a very badly packaged shared library.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02 Sep 2002 09:56:11 +0200
I'm getting ready to commit my changes that make anna and main-menu
share Packages-file parsing code. They do so by a function in libd-i.
This means that if you want to build anna or main-menu after I've
committed, you first have to build and install the new
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 02:36:33 +1000
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's going to go on the rootfs? Presumably something like:
libc6, busybox-udeb, ash-udeb
udpkg, cdebconf, anna
*-retriever and any dependencies they have
/lib/modules/kernel/**
It could be
On 26 Aug 2002 00:39:06 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It is difficult to reduce a library if you don't know what functions
in it will be used. Since additional modules could be dropped onto
install media at any time, it is very difficult to guarantee that a
On 19 Aug 2002 13:05:37 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| UTF-8.
|
| I think they need to be written in latin-1, and then converted to UTF-8
| possibly in the build scripts.
uhm, why?
Aren't there already packages which are producing debs and udebs at
the same time ?
If
On 18 Aug 2002 16:51:42 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Come to think of it. Which character set should be used? I usually use
| UTF-8 for everything these days, but I think that Swedish translations
| of debconf templates have been in Latin1 before...
UTF-8.
I think they
On 15 Aug 2002 15:34:30 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| you need to coordinate with joey hess before you upload the new
| cdebconf. we need debconf to move to the new debconf-api dependency
| as well.
uhm, can't just cdebconf provide it for now and debconf provide it at
.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
shared library matching their soname
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
people working on at least maintaining the
code.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide
In Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:24:19 +0200 (CEST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
One line of advise:
Please use diff -u. It's much easier to read.
With the attached patch below, I would have spent only 2 seconds.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
, so I need a fix for this.
What do you need to do ?
Wouldn't it be possible to just create your own
apt archive with only minimal packages to fool
debootstrap into thinking that it is the real archive?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint
, I already uploaded one.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 12:56:38PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I've pondered with the code a bit, and I think this is an overkill to
require aptitude in base.
By having base-config Depend: on it, or download it in the normal course
reassign 149971 debootstrap
thanks
I think this is a bug in base-config or debootstrap.
Are we adding aptitude to base ?
Today, trying to pbuilder create --distribution sid, creation failed.
The reported exit message is:
W: Failure while configuring base packages. This will be
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 13:20:33 +1000
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 04:02:11PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
The new base-config package in sid depends on aptitude, so debootstrap
should download it.
Bleh. Guys, please file the bug on debootstrap *before*
?
tweak slang/newt for languages support.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 01:59, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
For Japanese, we at least need some kind of debconf fix for
utf-8 character conversion support, or a working japanese character
terminal (jfbterm for all arches?).
Couldn't debconf
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:37:24 -0400
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, this is just not going to happen for woody, r0 at least. I have
never gotten a well-tested patch to base-config that is obviously
correct. I did get a great deal of off-the-cuff, untested, large,
nonobvious,
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.10-7.1
Tags: patch
Two things:
build against slang-utf8, and set UTF8.
diff -ru cdebconf-0.10-orig/debian/control cdebconf-0.10/debian/control
--- cdebconf-0.10-orig/debian/control Tue Jan 1 03:44:16 2002
+++ cdebconf-0.10/debian/controlWed May 29
] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 27 May 2002 13:29:35 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The charset in the templates are undefined, but if we decide that we
want it to be UTF-8 then that won't be a problem. (Just a small
policy decision.) The frontend would have to know how to convert it
into something
be handled when the
time is due.
Last time I looked, there is no charset signifier in
debconf templates, how does one know if the template is in
utf-8 or euc-jp?
Or am I misunderstanding what you mean by debconf templates
completely?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi
obvious which character code they are in).
Does cdebconf inherit the same problem? Does it convert to utf-8 on the
fly?
What is a bogl frontend ? Is it very different from newt-utf8 that
boot-floppies uses?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
