Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: charlescur...@charlescurley.com
Dear Maintainer,
I took delivery of two Ace Magic T8+ computers recently.
https://www.acemagic.com/products/t8plus I am bringing one up as a router
running Debian 12.2 (Bookworm).
A full hardware probe of
On 25/11/2023 at 22:29, David Hillman wrote:
On 11/25/23 01:37, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Extracting /var/log/syslog would be useful to understand what's going on
there. (...)
Thanks Cyril. This system is running Debian 12, so there is no
/var/log/syslog.
Cyril meant the installer syslog,
David Hillman (2023-11-25):
> Thanks Cyril. This system is running Debian 12, so there is no
> /var/log/syslog. As I mentioned in the original report, I found nothing
> apparently related in the Journal.
I'm confused. You filed an installation report regarding a failure to
recogniz
On 11/25/23 01:37, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Extracting /var/log/syslog would be useful to understand what's going on
there. A very quick search suggests this card might be supported by the
tg3 module (drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c), which is definitely
shipped in the installer. So maybe it's
Lennart Sorensen (2023-11-25):
> I suspect you are missing the firmware file for the network port. I think
> this one:
>
> firmware-misc-nonfree: /lib/firmware/tigon/tg3.bin
>
> The installer probably does not include that.
The netinst *definitely* does ship that package:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:34:50PM -0600, David Hillman wrote:
>
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Boot method: USB stick
> Image version:
> https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.2.0-amd64-netinst.iso
> Date: 2023-November-23 11PM GMT
>
> Machine: Dell R720
>
On Saturday, 25 November 2023 08:37:09 CET Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hard to tell without any logs.
The output of `lsmod` and `dmesg` from both Ubuntu and Debian may also help to
figure out why it's working in one but not the other.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Hi,
Am 24. November 2023 23:54:49 MEZ schrieb David Hillman
:
>On 11/24/23 12:59, Holger Wansing wrote:
>Thanks Holger. I could do that, but that would completely defeat the purpose.
> I installed Debian 12 on this machine as a test, to confirm that everything
>necessary works, before
Hi David,
David Hillman (2023-11-24):
> Thanks Holger. I could do that, but that would completely defeat the
> purpose. I installed Debian 12 on this machine as a test, to confirm that
> everything necessary works, before installing it on a dozen or so other
> similar machines.
>
> And
On 11/24/23 12:59, Holger Wansing wrote:
Hi,
David Hillman wrote (Fri, 24 Nov 2023 12:34:50 -0600):
Ubuntu 20 and 22 installers work just fine on the same hardware, so this
is a Debian-specific issue. All four interfaces work just fine under
both Ubuntu 20 and 22, but are totally
Hi,
David Hillman wrote (Fri, 24 Nov 2023 12:34:50 -0600):
> Ubuntu 20 and 22 installers work just fine on the same hardware, so this
> is a Debian-specific issue. All four interfaces work just fine under
> both Ubuntu 20 and 22, but are totally dysfunctional with Debian 12.
Maybe you could
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB stick
Image version:
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.2.0-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2023-November-23 11PM GMT
Machine: Dell R720
Processor: 2 x Xeon E5-2650
Memory: 192GB
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O]
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #1035392 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Installation Report:
Bookworm RC2: Raspberry Pi 400 (netboot)
Marked Bug as done
--
1035392: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035392
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Followup-For: Bug #1035392
Control: close -1
(closing; I'll likely re-attempt an install on the same hardware with a more
recent release of Debian in future, for comparison purposes)
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 18:28:51 +0100 Abhinav Praveen
wrote:
> This issue persists in the current Debain 12 installer:
debian-12.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso
> --
> Abhinav Praveen
>
>
The issue is also in the latest installer, debian-12.1.0-amd64-netinst.iso
This issue persists in the current Debain 12 installer:
debian-12.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso
--
Abhinav Praveen
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@hands.com
Boot method: CD in openQA
Image version:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bookworm_di_rc3/amd64/iso-cd/debian-
bookworm-DI-rc3-amd64-netinst.iso
Date:
Machine: openQA x86_64 qemu video: qxl memory: 2GB. SeaBIOS and
On May 4, 2023 3:35:40 PM Pascal Hambourg wrote:
On 04/05/2023 at 16:21, Peter Ehlert wrote:
"Install the GRUB boot loader" menu ... 6 items
Enter device manually
/dev/sda (usb-SanDisk ...
/dev/sdb (ata-WL4000G ...
/dev/sdc (ata-WDC_WD300...
/dev/sdd (ata-WDC_WD300...
/dev/sde
On 04/05/2023 at 16:21, Peter Ehlert wrote:
"Install the GRUB boot loader" menu ... 6 items
Enter device manually
/dev/sda (usb-SanDisk ...
/dev/sdb (ata-WL4000G ...
/dev/sdc (ata-WDC_WD300...
/dev/sdd (ata-WDC_WD300...
/dev/sde (ata-SanDisk_SDSSDA240G_162248447811)
I selected /dev/sde and
der
installation" ? If yes, what option did you select exactly ?
from my initial installation-report:
"when install was finished, a list of drives was displayed, asking where
to install GRUB.
the install drive was highlighted
I selected the drive with bios_grub
the display showed
Package: installation-reports
Followup-For: Bug #1035392
> The only customized dnsmasq setting required was:
>
> pxe-service=0, "Raspberry Pi Boot"
Oops, I lied. There was one other relevant dnsmasq setting:
dhcp-boot=bootnetaa64.efi
(telling the device what EFI filename to retrieve and
On 02/05/2023 at 15:21, Peter Ehlert wrote:
DI asks on which drive to install GRUB
User says disk X
DI attempts to install on Drive Y
result ... GRUB does not get installed at all
This is completely different from what I understood.
The statement "GRUB does not get installed at all" is
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Boot method: network
Image version: [2023-04-28] Bookworm Release Candidate 2 Installer
Date: 2023-05-02
Machine: Raspberry Pi 400
Partitions:
Filesystem Type 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on
udev devtmpfs
On 4/30/23 01:17, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
On 30/04/2023 at 01:47, Peter Ehlert wrote:
On 4/29/23 15:41, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
On 29/04/2023 at 16:02, Peter Ehlert wrote:
reboot gave me the Old GRUB menu, not including my new system.
What do you mean by "old GRUB menu" ? The GRUB which
On 30/04/2023 at 01:47, Peter Ehlert wrote:
On 4/29/23 15:41, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
On 29/04/2023 at 16:02, Peter Ehlert wrote:
reboot gave me the Old GRUB menu, not including my new system.
What do you mean by "old GRUB menu" ? The GRUB which was previously
installed on /dev/sdb ?
On 4/29/23 15:41, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Hello Peter,
On 29/04/2023 at 16:02, Peter Ehlert wrote:
Legacy aka BIOS booting
system has 4 physical disk drives, all GPT partition tables
only one drive has a partition with bios_grub
install was on a drive without bios_grub
when install was
Hello Peter,
On 29/04/2023 at 16:02, Peter Ehlert wrote:
Legacy aka BIOS booting
system has 4 physical disk drives, all GPT partition tables
only one drive has a partition with bios_grub
install was on a drive without bios_grub
when install was finished, a list of drives was displayed,
On 4/29/23 09:21, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 08:51:48AM -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
On 4/29/23 07:23, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hi Peter,
Could you please share a copy of the installer logs? You should be
able to find them in /var/log/installer on the installed system.
there
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 08:51:48AM -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>
>On 4/29/23 07:23, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Could you please share a copy of the installer logs? You should be
>> able to find them in /var/log/installer on the installed system.
>there is no file "installer" in
Hi Peter,
Could you please share a copy of the installer logs? You should be
able to find them in /var/log/installer on the installed system.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 07:02:43AM -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>Package: grub-installer
>Boot method: USB
>Image version:
Package: grub-installer
Boot method: USB
Image version: debian-bookworm-DI-rc2-amd64-netinst.iso
download from Debian
Date: 2023-04-28 ~17
Machine: HP Z820 Workstation
Processor: 2x 8-core model: Intel Xeon E5-2687W
Memory: 47.06 GiB
Partitions:
peter@RC2net:~$ df -T
Filesystem Type
Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2023 19:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1033325: fixed in installation-report 2.87
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033325,
regarding installation-report: store and report firmware information
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1033325 [installation-report] installation-report: store and report
firmware information
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1033325: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033325
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
This is still a problem to this day and the bookworm freeze is right
around the corner...
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB stick
Image version:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/11.5.0-live+nonfree/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-11.5.0-amd64-kde+nonfree.iso
Date: 02 October 2022
Machine: Dell Inspiron 5482
Processor: #
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: spenserpulleyk...@yahoo.com
(Please provide enough information to help the Debian
maintainers evaluate the report efficiently - e.g., by filling
in the sections below.)
Boot method: USB
Image version:
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1005308 [installation-reports] Installation Report: Crash of Debian
netinst iso in Xen HVM guest
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
--
1005308: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005308
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
installation-report 2.80 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183,
CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192
https://bugs.debian.org
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: DVD
Image version:Debian GNU/Linux 11.2.0 _Bullseye_ - Official amd64
NETINST 20211218-11:12
Date: 31st Mar 2022
Machine:AMD A4-4000 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
BIOS: MSI FM2-A75MA-P33
Partitions:
/dev/sda1 FAT32 - unused
sda2
(charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.5.2-1
ii reportbug 7.5.3~deb10u1
installation-repo
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:22:09 +0100
with message-id <20220116132209.f5d2130cc006cf61f4d0f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#988797: RC1 installation report
has caused the Debian Bug report #988797,
regarding RC1 installation report
to be marked as done.
This means th
Hi,
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote (Thu, 20 May 2021 18:32:00
+):
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:59:37AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > Op 19-05-2021 om 20:06 schreef Cyril Brulebois:
> > > I think deactivating cdrom entries was implemented several release
> > > cycles ago. That should be the
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2022 12:41:40 +0100
with message-id <20220116124140.628d7a55b6a1101100458...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: #989300 Bullseye installation report
has caused the Debian Bug report #989300,
regarding Bullseye installation report
to be marked as done.
This
> Initial boot: [O]
> Detect network card:[E]
> Configure network: [E]
> Detect media: [O]
> Load installer modules: [O]
> Detect hard drives: [O]
> Partition hard drives: [O]
> Install base system:[O]
> Clock/timezone setup: [O]
> User/password setup:
Your message dated Sat, 30 Oct 2021 18:30:54 +0200
with message-id <20211030183054.906cb9aac22395d0f32a6...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Mass-closing old grub-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #292513,
regarding installation-report: Unable to install grub-pc on LVM
On 2021-10-02, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-02-15, Vieno Hakkerinen wrote:
>> I created a ext2 for /boot and luks+lvm+btrfs for /. As d-i defaults
>> to use a @rootfs subvolume for btrfs the linux bootargs need to have
>> set "rootflags=subvol=@rootfs". This was not set during configuration
On 2021-02-15, Vieno Hakkerinen wrote:
> I created a ext2 for /boot and luks+lvm+btrfs for /. As d-i defaults
> to use a @rootfs subvolume for btrfs the linux bootargs need to have
> set "rootflags=subvol=@rootfs". This was not set during configuration
> of flash-kernel. Without this argument
Hi,
Gunnar Wolf wrote (Tue, 19 May 2020 00:33:32 -0500):
> The Buster installer could not find my wireless card (RTL 8821CE).
>
> I performed the install using a spare external wireless interface; after
> booting to the installed system, I found an unofficial module supporting
> this hardware
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2021 21:12:05 +0200
with message-id <20210829211205.5cf88e58c35cf70db3aa7...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Closing successful installation-reports bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #991899,
regarding RC3 installation report
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2021 21:11:06 +0200
with message-id <20210829211106.6e971be92f233e38a28ea...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Closing installation-reports bugs without further information
has caused the Debian Bug report #962802,
regarding Installation Report
to be marked a
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2021 21:11:06 +0200
with message-id <20210829211106.6e971be92f233e38a28ea...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Closing installation-reports bugs without further information
has caused the Debian Bug report #961089,
regarding installation-report bullseye
Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2021 21:09:59 +0200
with message-id <20210829210959.f3d5b403cce267ff9e69d...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Closing bugreports related to missing/not installed firmware
has caused the Debian Bug report #963755,
regarding installation-report: fails to boot with
ril Brulebois
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 06:00
To: lucas; 992...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: pkg-raspi-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Subject: Re: Bug#992774: installation-report
Hi,
lucas (2021-08-23):
> Installation was successful except for disabled usb port.
Thanks for your report. FWIW w
Hi,
lucas (2021-08-23):
> Installation was successful except for disabled usb port.
Thanks for your report. FWIW we deal with installations that were
performed using the Debian Installer; I'm putting the maintainers of the
relevant Raspberry Pi tooling in copy.
> Documentation for hardware
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Flashing eMMC
Image version:
https://raspi.debian.net/verified/20210718_raspi_4_bullseye.img.xz
Date: 20-08-2021, 15:08
Machine: Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 IO Board
Processor: Broadcom BCM2711 quad-core Cortex-A72 (ARM v8) 64-bit SoC
Memory:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Date: Tuesday Aug 3 3:30 PM
Machine: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset DRAM Controller [8086:2e20] (rev 03)
Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd GA-EP45-DS5/GA-EG45M-DS2H Motherboard
[1458:5000]
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ6700 @
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
See attached file.
Thank you for your hard work on Debian !
Filippo
Please make sure that any installation logs that you think would
be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large
files using
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.71
Severity: normal
(report done from another macn
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: DVD (Xen PV mode)
Image version:
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/bt-dvd/debian-10.10.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso.torrent
2021-06-19 19:20
Date:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Cyril,
you are welcome.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 15:23:02 +0200
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hallo Oliver,
>
> And thanks for your report.
>
> Oliver Psotta (2021-06-17):
> > [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
PS: I forgot to mention that Gnome forgets the settings of screen
brightness after restarts. Same bug with Ubuntu. I could file a bug
report. Could you point me to the package that is relevant here? Thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Hallo Oliver,
And thanks for your report.
Oliver Psotta (2021-06-17):
> [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
>
> Initial boot: [O ]
> Detect network card:[E ]
> Configure network: [O ]
> Detect media: [E ]
> Load installer modules: [E
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
(Please provide enough information to help the Debian
maintainers evaluate the report efficiently - e.g., by filling
in the sections below.)
Boot method: USB
Image version:
Hi Cyril,
thanks for the analysis.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 05:16:31PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> May 25 11:15:32 localechooser: info: System locale
> (debian-installer/locale) = 'en_US.UTF-8'
> May 25 11:15:32 localechooser: info: Set debian-installer/language =
> 'en_US:en'
>
Marc Haber (2021-06-09):
> I have attached the installer's syslog of a new installation. All
> issues that I reported were observed during this installation.
Thanks, this sticks out:
May 25 11:15:32 localechooser: info: System locale
(debian-installer/locale) = 'en_US.UTF-8'
May 25
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 12:24:33AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Repeating this:
I apologize for waiting for delivery of a new usb stick so that the
new installation would not be a complete waste of time.
> If you were to retry the installation, saving /var/log/syslog manually
> before
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:07:52 +0200):
> Marc Haber (2021-06-08):
> > Since my default domain types differently with US and DE keyboard, I
> > guess this might be an actual regression, I would have noticed this in
> > earlier versions of the installer.
>
> I guess someone
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:49:15PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> The more pressing issue IMO is the deletion of /sbin/start-stop-daemon.
>
Repeating this:
If you were to retry the installation, saving /var/log/syslog manually
before rebooting into the installed system would be useful. Without it,
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:27:57PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> I checked with rc1 and the *brandnew* rc2 netinst images on amd64 qemu
> VM machine (text installer), and I cannot reproduce such issue with wrong
> keyboard layout; German is correctly available immediately after the
> "Configure
most of the
time, and I don't know the specifics of the text version by heart.
> > Simply /var/log/syslog for the main log. Other files are mentioned
> > there:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/installation-report/-/blob/master/debian/installation-report.postinst
ies:
> - debootstrap
> - debian-installer-utils
> - apt-setup (code apparently copied from d-i-utils until some clean-up
>happens, which never did)
>
> > And, the installed system does neither have /var/log/installer nor
> > /var/log/debian-installer. This is
never did)
> And, the installed system does neither have /var/log/installer nor
> /var/log/debian-installer. This is also reproducible :-( Where would
> I find the files that get copied to /target/var/log/installer in the
> still running installer?
Simply /var/log/syslog for the main
ning installer?
Greetings
Marc
-- Package-specific info:
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.7.0-5
ii reportbug 7.10.3
installation-report suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:59:37AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Op 19-05-2021 om 20:06 schreef Cyril Brulebois:
> > Goedendag Paul,
> >
> > and thanks for your report.
> >
> > Paul van der Vlis (2021-05-19):
>
> Correction, I did use: "pci=noaer", no capitals.
>
> I guess this will
Goedendag Paul,
and thanks for your report.
Paul van der Vlis (2021-05-19):
> I did install Debian on an Acer laptop. The installation went OK, but
> I have some things to tell:
>
> 1. After the installation the 240GB SSD was after a short period full
> with PCIe AER errors in the logs. I
Package: installation-reports
I did install Debian on an Acer laptop. The installation went OK, but I
have some things to tell:
1. After the installation the 240GB SSD was after a short period full
with PCIe AER errors in the logs. I think it's good to tell about
errors in the logs, but
Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2021 23:25:23 +0200
with message-id <20210423212523.ifn6kdifh3rk3...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#985832: installation report: netboot debian-installer
kernel too old
has caused the Debian Bug report #985832,
regarding installation report: netboot
Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:19:57 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id
and subject line closing successfull installation report
has caused the Debian Bug report #986894,
regarding installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:09:26 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id
and subject line closing successfull installation report
has caused the Debian Bug report #973530,
regarding installation-report: successful installation on SD card on EEE PC,
runs on X230
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:02:00 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id
and subject line closing successfull installation report
has caused the Debian Bug report #984727,
regarding installation-reports: just an installation report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: DVD 1
Image version:
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/bullseye_di_alpha3/amd64/iso-dvd/
Date: 04/12/2021 23:00 UTC-5
Machine: Desktop
Processor: Intel Core i5-8600k
Memory: 16.0 GiB
Partitions:
S.ficheros Tipo bloques de 1KUsados
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: SSD built with Rufus using this installation guide:
https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=50=282839
Image version: Debian 11 ARM64 net install ISO
Debian-testing-arm64-netinst.iso 2021-03-15 04:03
Date:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: network
Image version:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/debian-installer/amd64/linux
Date: 2021-03-11 ++
Machine: KVM
Processor: x86_64
Memory: 2 GB
Partitions: does not matter
Output of lspci -knn
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: USB
Image version: debian-mac-10.8.0-amd64-netinst.iso
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/ 2021-02-06
Date:
Machine: MacBook3,1 (Nov 2007)
Partitions:
Base System Installation
Your message dated Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:33:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#980929: fixed in installation-report 2.78
has caused the Debian Bug report #980929,
regarding reportbug and installation-report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi,
On 18.02.2021 18.04, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Now merged.
Thanks!
> Will upload at the weekend, I think.
A new reportbug upload will follow within 24 hours after you upload.
Nis
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Sat, 6 Feb 2021 16:50:40 +0100):
> Hi,
>
> Nis Martensen wrote:
> > What do you think about including the installation-report message
> > template directly in reportbug?
> >
> > In reportbug's GTK interface, the output of bugscri
On 2/17/21 3:20 PM, Jeff Forsyth wrote:
Comments/Problems:
RPI4 with 4GiB Ram. This system is netbooted using RPI-UEFI 1.22 and
iPXE 1.2.x.
DNSMASQ send the RPI-UEFI to the RPI. The RPI-UEFI pulls the arm64
EFI/ipxe. The iPXE
shows a menu for booting into the Debian Installer. The
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
Image version:
https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/arm64/daily/netboot/debian-installer/arm64/linux
2021-02-17 02:07
Date: 2021-02-17 19:14
Machine: RPI4
Processor:
Memory: 4G
Partitions:
Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
Base System Installation
(charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
installation-report depends on no packages.
Versions of packages installation-report recommends:
ii pciutils 1:3.7.0-5
ii reportbug 7.9.0
installation-report suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Hi,
Nis Martensen wrote:
> What do you think about including the installation-report message
> template directly in reportbug?
>
> In reportbug's GTK interface, the output of bugscripts is not handed to
> the user for editing, since it is seen as additional information and
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:43:25 +0100
with message-id <20210131224324.hguvf6n4cwlts...@percival.namespace.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#971984: installation-reports: installation report
has caused the Debian Bug report #971984,
regarding installation-reports: installation
Package: installation-report
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-report...@lists.debian.org
What do you think about including the installation-report message
template directly in reportbug?
In reportbug's GTK interface, the output of bugscripts is not handed to
the user for editing
Control: reassign -1 pcmciautils
Control: tags -1 + patch
Charles Curley wrote:
> I tried a Xircom CreditCard Ethernet adapter, CE38-100BTX, which uses
> the xirc2ps_cs driver. It runs, if slowly, on an installed system. But
> on installation, the software fails to detect it also.
>
> I
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 pcmciautils
Bug #980271 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Toshiba Tecra 8000
Installation report Bullseye
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'pcmciautils'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #980271 to the s
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
X-Debbugs-Cc: charlescur...@charlescurley.com
Dear Maintainer,
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD-ROM
Image version: debian-bullseye-DI-alpha3-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 14 January 2021
Machine: Toshiba Tecra 8000
Partitions:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 10:38:07AM +0330, Sayed Hadi Rastgou Haghi wrote:
>Package: installation-reports
>
>Partitions:
>/dev/sda1 / ext4 [formated]
>/dev/sda2 swap
>/dev/sda3 /home ext4 [kept old partiotin]
>/dev/sda4 /var ext4 [kept old partiotin]
>
>Comments/Problems:
>
>We
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD, USB Stick
Image
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-10.6.0-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Wed Nov 18 16:23:27 +0330 2020
Machine:HP Proliant Gen9
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz
Memory: 48GB
eye/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_IE:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/sys
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #971984 [installation-reports] installation-reports: installation report
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
971984: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971984
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 01:42:17AM -0400, WK Burke wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Boot method: usb
> Image version: debian 10.0 iso
>
> Machine: Dell Inspiron 15-3567
>
>
> Base System Installation Checklist:
> [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate
1 - 100 of 4544 matches
Mail list logo
