On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:28:10PM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
So is there a straightforward way to do this?
Yeah, I'd like to have a fiddle with getting this support into d-i in time
for Sarge if possible. I'm not currently aware of a mainstream Linux
installer that does this, so we might score
Sorry, for the current crosspost. Reply-to set to both listswhile
we try a solution for communicating among d-i translators.
This is the last one I will do. Further Debian Installer l10n-related
announcements and communication will be done with a crosspost to -boot
and -i18n. Please susbcribe
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 06:40:39PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Yeah, I'd like to have a fiddle with getting this support into d-i in time
for Sarge if possible. I'm not currently aware of a mainstream Linux
installer that does this, so we might score some points come review time...
Some nice
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:04:27AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:44:20PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
I've dropped powerpc entirely from beta3. Of the images we produced, the
netinst CD images do not work for any powerpc subarch, because they
don't have usable kernels on
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:44:33AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
I recommend all translators a daily check of this status page.
The page address is:
http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/translation-status.html --
The linked page http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/udebs/ is weird. It
shows
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:18:13 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line close old bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Christian Perrier wrote:
The release cycle will probably be short, so please try to keep your
translations updated as quick as possible.
How much short?
Regards,
ogi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maitland Bottoms wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta3 netboot
uname -a: Linux indigo2 2.4.22-r4k-ip22 #1 Mon Feb 9 21:48:42 CET 2004 mips unknown
Date: Mon Mar 15 23:26:48 EST 2004
Method: netboot from Woody i386 box
Machine: SGI Indigo2
Processor:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 11:26:31PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il dom, 2004-03-14 alle 21:00, Joey Hess ha scritto:
[...]
powerpc: autobuilding. kdb-chooser, airport wifi (#237894)
What is the problem with autobuilding? I don't know if that port still
uses the kernel I compile,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:53:15PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:38:29PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On 15.III.2004 at 19:17 Sven Luther wrote:
Well, the problem is as follows :
1) the -powerpc kernel used in most 32 bit powerpc installs has the ext3
fs
On 16.III.2004 at 00:09 Maitland Bottoms wrote:
- partitions -
Pt# Device Info Start End Sectors Id
System
1: /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 0 3 32769 0
SGI volhdr
11:
Il mar, 2004-03-16 alle 10:05, Sven Luther ha scritto:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 11:26:31PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il dom, 2004-03-14 alle 21:00, Joey Hess ha scritto:
[...]
powerpc: autobuilding. kdb-chooser, airport wifi (#237894)
What is the problem with autobuilding?
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 03:00:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Assuming we release tomorrow, the deadline is now past for changes to
udebs that go in the initrds. All translations are uploaded. The string
freeze is over. Please limit changes to important fixes. If there are
any final fixes to
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:44:20PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
As soon as the web site rebuilds I'll send out the official release
announcement.
There turned out to be a lot of arch-specific errata, but hey, we added
4 architectures this release! Whee! Plans from here will
On 15.III.2004 at 22:34 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
The following comes from an installation report that I just closed:
#236069 The current dialogs, especially in the beginning, give the
#236069 suggestion that the only function of partman is
#236069 _partitioning_ and not also the selection
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 236241 partconf
Bug#236241: UNMOUNTED ide drive on a SCSI system creates a installation (sarge
installer) problem
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partconf'.
retitle Can not use SCSI drives if there is unmounted IDE
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:26:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:44:20PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Rather than say that beta3 supports only netboot and businesscard
installs for prep and chrp, I've dropped the whole thing. If the powerpc
people would like to release in
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:55:46 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Thanks for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 236351 -1
Bug#236351: installation-reports bug
Bug 236351 cloned as bug 238292.
reassign -1 partconf
Bug#238292: installation-reports bug
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partconf'.
retitle -1 The user had to umount the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 236387 debian-installer
Bug#236387: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer'.
retitle 236387 hw-detect-full hungs due to mussing modules
Bug#236387: Package: installation-reports
Hello,
I found the following problems when trying to install from
sarge-i386-netinst.iso
dated 20040314:
- in network configuration leaving the gateway address empty results in an
error
message malformed IP address instead of just disabling teh default route
- /lib/libevms-2.3.so.0 is linked
| | | |
| | | | #1 primary root
| | | | #5 logical swap
| | | | #6 logical /home
| | |
| | | Do everybody agree about this?
| |
| | What are the reasons for primary and against logical partitions?
|
| The reason for logical against primary is that the partition table is
| easier to be
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:37:29 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Thanks for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:40:59 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#236359: installation-reports: Install hangs on partitioner
scanning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: debian-installer
Version: As of 20040412
Severity: normal
During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
This means that when the packages get upgraded they prompt for
configuration.
While
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:19:59AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:26:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:44:20PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Rather than say that beta3 supports only netboot and businesscard
installs for prep and chrp, I've dropped
[Gaudenz Steinlin]
As I and David are going to take over the maintainership of discover
1.5 we are interested in fixing the transition plan now.
If I understood you and David correctly, you wanted to go ahead with
the transition, but did not have time to do it yourself. I'm looking
into doing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 236395 -1
Bug#236395: installation-reports: debian-installer beta2 (daily) - xfs broken
Bug 236395 cloned as bug 238305.
reassign -1 debian-installer
Bug#238305: installation-reports: debian-installer beta2 (daily) - xfs broken
Bug reassigned
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 236399 -1
Bug#236399: Debian installer fails on Thinkpad 560x
Bug 236399 cloned as bug 238306.
reassign -1 debian-installer
Bug#238306: Debian installer fails on Thinkpad 560x
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:26:20 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#236395: installation-reports: debian-installer beta2 (daily) -
xfs broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Gaudenz Steinlin]
As I and David are going to take over the maintainership of discover
1.5 we are interested in fixing the transition plan now.
If I understood you and David correctly, you wanted to go ahead with
the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 236241 Can not use SCSI drives if there is unmounted IDE drive
Bug#236241: UNMOUNTED ide drive on a SCSI system creates a installation (sarge
installer) problem
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
[Gaudenz Steinlin]
This is Ok with me. I will be busy with real life until 4/15. I
really hope I find more time to work on d-i and discover afterwards.
I look forward to your return. :)
IIRC Branden agreed to an NMU by the debian-boot Team of discover2
if Progeny does not upload it. Ian
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:42:17 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#236399: Debian installer fails on Thinkpad 560x
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:19:59AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Incidentally, do we offer 2.6 on any architecture at the moment? My
laptop needs that to be able to run X. (Not a showstopper as such, since
I think it still also needs Michel Dänzer's xserver-xfree86-dri-trunk
package anyway ...)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 02:05:46PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Gaudenz Steinlin]
Looking at the subversion repository, I suspect there are some patches
missing compared to the packages in the debian archive. Do you known
if this is true?
I'm not sure if Ian merged everything. You can
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:50:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing duplicate installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 236566 -1
Bug#236566: INSTALL REPORT
Bug 236566 cloned as bug 238316.
reassign -1 base-config
Bug#238316: INSTALL REPORT
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'.
retitle -1 Uses an US mirror for Australian residents
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 236581 debian-installer
Bug#236581: Package: installation-reports - powerpc iseries - as400
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer'.
severity 236581 wishlist
Bug#236581: Package: installation-reports - powerpc
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
Good. I am executing it then. I'll start by updating the alioth CVS,
and ask for people to review the changes. When this is done, I'll
upload a new version and wait for the ftp-masters to do their thing.
When the new discover1 package is in the archive, it should be
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 02:40:07PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The alioth CVS for discover1 is updated with my changes. Please
review. If the changes are ok, I'll upload today.
Please hold off. I may not have time today to review them. Please wait
until I've done so before uploading.
[David Nusinow]
Why the conflicts at all? If the discover2 package is providing the
discover package (=2) then it should simply replace the old discover
package. Same for discover-data. discover-data and discover versions
would matter of course, but I don't understand why this couldn't be
[David Nusinow]
Please hold off. I may not have time today to review them. Please
wait until I've done so before uploading.
I'll try. :)
There's certaintly no rush now that beta3 is out. Thanks!
There is definitely a rush now. If the discover2 packages should have
any chance of making it
All Popluar Phar.macy
We Have It
Vico.din/Hydro.codone/Xan.ax/Vali.um/Via.gra
New Site, New Product, New Price, New Things, More ...
Come To
http://toogoodtoopass.com/shebyt/p/index.php?KBID=1074
R k degree m mayonnaise putative stumpage elmer hom mcgregor befog somber mutiny faery
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
The alioth CVS for discover1 is updated with my changes. Please
review. If the changes are ok, I'll upload today.
The packages are available from
URL:http://www.skolelinux.no/~pere/discover1/.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:42:20 GMT
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing old bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:43:19 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#236566: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 08:21, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Looking at the subversion repository, I suspect there are some patches
missing compared to the packages in the debian archive. Do you known
if this is true?
I'm not sure if Ian merged everything. You can find my latest packages on
[Jeff Bailey]
I'm curious, though. The new hotplug seems to have the goal of
replacing discover. It may make sense to use that instead of
discover2 on 2.6 based systems (since it's likely that everyone will
want it anyway)
I've experienced some problems with hotplug earlier, as it is using
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 236803 -1
Bug#236803: beta2
Bug 236803 cloned as bug 238322.
reassign -1 debian-installer
Bug#238322: beta2
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer'.
retitle -1 Reboot hungs. After poweroff and poweron boots
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 05:12:15PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
As soon as the web site rebuilds I'll send out the official release
announcement.
snip/
The rebuild is done.
At the web site ( http://www.de.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/News/2004/7 )
there is a link to
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: March 16, 2004. sarge-i386-netinst.iso (Beta 3)
downloaded from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux v8pc461 2.4.25-1-i386 #1 Tue Feb 24 8:11:13 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux Date:
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:10:00 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#236803: Debian installer report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
[Ian Murdock]
That's correct. We can upload Discover 2 whenever you are ready to
do the transition. I actually don't have an up to date key in the
keyring, so Jeff Licquia will be uploading Discover 2 for us for
now.
Sounds good. I'll leave the uploading to Jeff, assuming it happens
fairly
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 08:05, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
IIRC Branden agreed to an NMU by the debian-boot Team of discover2
if Progeny does not upload it. Ian Murduck then replied that he will
upload soon, but this has not happend since then. According to him
the maintainer of discover2
[David Nusinow]
Please hold off. I may not have time today to review them. Please
wait until I've done so before uploading. There's certaintly no rush
now that beta3 is out. Thanks!
I just realized that I could upload them to experimental instead of
unstable. This will put them in the NEW
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004.03.16 local mirror (beta3)
uname -a: Linux bus 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004.03.16
Method: images on hard disk partition; grub on a floppy. Then network
from my local mirror, which mirrors
What about uploading both discover1 and the new discover (2) to
experimental today, to get it into the NEW queue and on the todo list
for the ftp-masters? This way we know the packages are cleared by the
ftp-masters when we upload the packages into unstable.
These are the package names
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:37:50PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jeff Bailey]
I'm curious, though. The new hotplug seems to have the goal of
replacing discover. It may make sense to use that instead of
discover2 on 2.6 based systems (since it's likely that everyone will
want it
I made some symbolic links
# cd /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0
# ln -s part2 part11
# ln -s part3 part12
# ln -s part4 part13
and that got me a little further in the process.
The arcboot installation didn't seem to go well,
so I am not left with a disk-bootable indigo2.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20040315
Tags: d-i, sarge
When discover tryies to add the qlogicisp module to the installer kernel,
lsmod reports that qlogicisp is initilazing, and the installer hangs
awaiting for the module install to finish.
I'm working with a Digital Personal Workstation
Did you know That the normal cost for Super Vkiagra is $20, per dose?
We are running a hot special!! T0DAY Its only an amazing $2.00
Shipped world wide!
DISC0UNT 0RDER:
http://coachmen.xptheworld.biz/PH009/?affiliate_id=233648campaign_id=407
ddetect_0.76_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.76.dsc
ddetect_0.76.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.76_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.76_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.76_all.udeb
archdetect_0.76_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
Accepted:
archdetect_0.76_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.76_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.76.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.76.dsc
ddetect_0.76.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.76.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.76_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.76_all.udeb
Sven Luther wrote:
netinst CD images do not work for any powerpc subarch, because they
don't have usable kernels on them. Also, the kernel images have a broken
postinst that does not set up the /vmlinux symlink for yaboot. And
This is because kernel-package is utterly broken, and i had to
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The point with the changes it to replace the 'discover' debs in sid
with discover version 2. The udebs stay the same, so debian-installer
should not be affected by the move.
Except of course that it will need to be modified to apt-install an
appropriate version of
[Joey Hess]
Except of course that it will need to be modified to apt-install an
appropriate version of discover..
Perhaps, but probably not. I think we should keep discover version 2
out of testing until it is as good as discover 1. That mean the
version of discover in sarge can be used with
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 06:37, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Of course hotplug have a huge advantage using these maps directly, as
the kernel module maintainers in effect is maintaining their HW
database. :)
Note that the next version of discover-data will have this advantage
as well: We're
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Perhaps, but probably not. I think we should keep discover version 2
out of testing until it is as good as discover 1. That mean the
version of discover in sarge can be used with d-i, right?
Hmm, this will make it harder to install unstable with d-i though.
--
[Marco d'Itri]
Petter, this is not a problem but a feature.
Oh. I didn't realise. Thanks for clearing that up.
Actually I consider discover broken by design because it needs a
proprietary database which must be updated for each driver added to
the kernel and for each new device supported
we have an excellent reputation.
Any field of your choice is accepted. MBA, and Doctorate (PhD)
call and receive your diploma within days.
1 212 629 1971
linux-kernel-di_0.50_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+s390+sparc.changes
uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di_0.50.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.50.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.50_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.50_i386.udeb
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:37:50PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jeff Bailey]
I'm curious, though. The new hotplug seems to have the goal of
replacing discover. It may make sense to use that instead of
discover2 on 2.6 based systems (since it's likely that everyone will
want
[Joey Hess]
Hmm, this will make it harder to install unstable with d-i though.
Why?
'discover' in unstable will be discover version 2, and it work about
the same as discover version 1.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Mark Brown wrote:
During the installer run many packages (for example, setserial) appear
to get installed without their debconf configuration scripts being run.
This means that when the packages get upgraded they prompt for
configuration.
Incorrect, they are installed in the normal way but
eochu wrote:
There is no probleme with the network : all packages have been obtained.
The problem comes when I try to partition the hard disk drive. The
installer can not access to the hard disk.
We've just released beta 3 of the debian installer. Please try it and
see if it fixed your
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 06:59:01PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
I've experienced some problems with hotplug earlier, as it is
using the info in /lib/modules/version/modules.*map directly.
If more than one module claim to support a given PCI id, it seem
to pick any one of them. The
floppy-retriever_0.23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
floppy-retriever_0.23.dsc
floppy-retriever_0.23.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_0.23_all.udeb
load-floppy_0.23_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
On Mar 16, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I consider discover broken by design because it needs a
proprietary database which must be updated for each driver added to
the kernel and for each new device supported by each driver.
What do you mean by proprietary database
Accepted:
floppy-retriever_0.23.dsc
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.23.dsc
floppy-retriever_0.23.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.23.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_0.23_all.udeb
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.23_all.udeb
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Two modifications happened recently to d-i strings:
-one new string in arcboot-installer
-in fuzzy string in silo-installer
Indeed this was a complete rewrite of silo-installer templates. So,
you get 5 untranslated strings.
I've been puzzled
Quoting Ognyan Kulev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Christian Perrier wrote:
The release cycle will probably be short, so please try to keep your
translations updated as quick as possible.
How much short?
Well, no idea. But this now also depends on sarge release deadlines,
so you need to be prepared
Quoting Eddy Petrisor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
When is the deadline (release) for d-i?
This highly depends on sarge release deadlineswhich, afaik is not
yet exactly known
Hopefuly, today the Romanian team will double it's
size...
Great. As I already wrote elsewhere, think about asking for a
[Marco d'Itri]
Belonging, or pertaining, to a proprietor (Webster)
I meant something that is specific to a single program, feel free to
choose a more suitable word.
Right. Here it is mostly used as another word for non-free, and I did
not see how the discover database was non-free.
BTW, I'd
On Mar 16, Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How difficult is this blacklisting to do? Is filing bugs against the
hotplug package sufficient?
Yes, the name of the module has to be added to /etc/hotplug/blacklist.
Please provide a detailed explanation of why the blacklisting is needed
in the
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta-3, 16march2004
uname -a: Linux debpes 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 16march2004, 12:54PM EST
Method: Used 100MB CD, booted from standard IDE ATAPI CD-ROM
Machine: Compaq Deskpro EN 733
Processor:
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.25-power3-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.25-power4-di_0.50_powerpc.udeb
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Petter, this is not a problem but a feature. Actually I consider
discover broken by design because it needs a proprietary database which
must be updated for each driver added to the kernel and for each new
device supported by each driver.
I'm finding it a little difficult to
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:47:51 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Thanks for your installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 236914 -1
Bug#236914: Installation report (images from 7 March, i386)
Bug 236914 cloned as bug 238357.
reassign -1 partman-auto
Bug#238357: Installation report (images from 7 March, i386)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to
Package: discover
Severity: minor
Tags: patch l10n
Please use the attached updated Danish debconf translation.
The old one somehow doesnt seem to be active. Maybe this is because the po file
header was not filled in correctly.
# translation of da.po to Danish
# translation of Discover1 Debian
discover1_1.5-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.5-4.dsc
discover1_1.5-4.diff.gz
discover-udeb_1.5-4_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.5-4_i386.deb
On Mar 16, Jeff Licquia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Which XFree86 driver works with my video card?
- How do I format PostScript to talk to my printer?
- What software do I need to install for my new scanner to work?
- What package contains the special tweak utilities for my laptop?
-
Rejected: discover1_1.5-4.dsc refers to discover1_1.5.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it
in the queue or in the pool.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 237075 bogl-bterm-udeb
Bug#237075: Debian installer segfaults on Sun Ultra 1 Creator 3d (sparc64)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `bogl-bterm-udeb'.
retitle bterm exits with segmentation fault on Sun Ultra 1 Creator 3d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 237185 grub-installer
Bug#237185: Rather good install
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.
retitle 237185 Doesn't include the other operating systems in the boot menu
Bug#237185: Rather good install
Changed
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:46:20 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#236973: Successful but troubled installation on mips (Indy R4k)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 237291 +fixed
Bug#237291: d-i m68k mac nativehd success
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
discover1_1.5-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.5-4.dsc
discover1_1.5-4.tar.gz
discover-udeb_1.5-4_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.5-4_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.5-4_i386.deb
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
