Bug#671981: [Pkg-ganeti-devel] Bug#671981: ganeti: FTBFS: configure: error: ip command not found

2012-05-08 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:13:09PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: ganeti Version: 2.5.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120508 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your

Bug#672114: ganeti-instance-debootstrap: outdated distros mentioned

2012-05-08 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:57:22AM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote: Package: ganeti-instance-debootstrap Version: 0.9-3 Severity: minor The EXTRA_PKGS section in the default file talk about etch and lenny: # EXTRA_PKGS: depending on the suite and architecture you are using, different # extra

Bug#672114: ganeti-instance-debootstrap: outdated distros mentioned

2012-05-08 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:37:02PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:57:22AM -0400, Micah Anderson wrote: Package: ganeti-instance-debootstrap Version: 0.9-3 Severity: minor The EXTRA_PKGS section in the default file talk about etch and lenny: # EXTRA_PKGS

Bug#672203: RM: ganeti-htools [alpha armel armhf kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel sparc hppa hurd-i386] -- ROM; NBS; migrated to a different source package

2012-05-08 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, I've recently moved the ganeti-htools binary package from the source pkg with the same name to the ganeti source package (upstream change). However, this also implied a Build-Depends change, and as such the binary package cannot be built on all

Bug#672203: retitle 672203 to RM: ganeti-htools [alpha armel armhf kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel hppa hurd-i386] -- ROM; NBS; migrated to a different source package

2012-05-08 Thread Iustin Pop
retitle 672203 RM: ganeti-htools [alpha armel armhf kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel hppa hurd-i386] -- ROM; NBS; migrated to a different source package thanks Package already built on sparc, changing bug title to drop removal request on sparc. thanks, iustin signature.asc

Bug#671750: Configuration of domain save/restore broken

2012-05-06 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.1.2-5 Severity: grave Hi, Between 4.1.2-3 and 4.1.2-5, the sanity checks on the variables defined in /etc/default/xendomains (XENDOMAINS_SAVE, XENDOMAINS_RESTORE, etc.) was lost. I can't check exactly when because there's no Vcs defined for this package.

Bug#665911: status

2012-04-01 Thread Iustin Pop
Just a short status update: the upstream .tar.gz contains some embedded libraries; I've emailed Johan to check the actual license/source of those. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#665911: ITP: haskell-ekg -- remote monitoring of Haskell processes over HTTP

2012-03-26 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org * Package name: haskell-ekg Version : 0.3.0.3 Upstream Author : Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/tibbe/ekg * License : BSD Programming Lang: Haskell

Bug#664744: libprotobuf7: Please raise priority of libprotobuf7-package to optional.

2012-03-20 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:57:57PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: Package: libprotobuf7 Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, Please adjust the package priority of the package libprotobuf7 to optional. Rationale: - It depends only on packages which are in priority optional or

Bug#664744: libprotobuf7: Please raise priority of libprotobuf7-package to optional.

2012-03-20 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:57:57PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: Package: libprotobuf7 Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, Please adjust the package priority of the package libprotobuf7 to optional. Rationale: - It depends only on packages which are in priority optional or

Bug#664471: false positive for hyphen-used-as-minus-sign

2012-03-18 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 06:07:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org writes: It seems to me that lintian falsely reports hyphen-used-as-minus-sign for the following line in the file: Use \f[C]--\ --help\f[] for a list. If the space ('\ ') is removed

Bug#240596: doc-rfc-std: The documents should use IETF NNNN notation

2012-03-18 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 10:04:23AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: Package: doc-rfc-std Version: 20030621-1 Severity: wishlist Socuments in the package use various numbering shemes rfcNNN.txt* rfc.txt* It would be good idea to unify it to use same as http://www.ietf.org/rfc uses,

Bug#664524: override: doc-rfc:non-free/metapackages optional

2012-03-18 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Based on policy 3.9.3 (2.4: new archive sections … metapackages added), I've changed the sectiof doc-rfc from non-free/doc to non-free/metapackages. Unless I misunderstood what the new policy says, could you please update the override for this

Bug#664471: false positive for hyphen-used-as-minus-sign

2012-03-18 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:07:43AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org writes: On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 06:07:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: That's because Debian applies a local override to the *roff macros to force all hyphens to be US-ASCII. But we would really

Bug#464631: RFC 2616 crazy paragraph

2012-03-18 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:58:55AM -0400, Iustin Pop wrote: On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:00:56AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: Package: doc-rfc-std Version: 20030621-1 File: /usr/share/doc/RFC/links/rfc2616.txt.gz ? What is up with this crazy paragraph? 4.If the message uses

Bug#240597: gzip vs. xz

2012-03-18 Thread Iustin Pop
Hi, I've checked the difference between gzip and xz (in its default -6 mode, not in -9, which the man page discourages). The tests were done on all the files in the orig.tar.gz archive. original: 417M gzip: 46s to compress down to 152M, 3.2s to decompress xz:

Bug#664466: ITP: shelltestrunner -- test command-line programs or arbitrary shell commands

2012-03-17 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org * Package name: shelltestrunner Version : 1.2.1 Upstream Author : Simon Michael si...@joyful.com * URL : http://joyful.com/shelltestrunner * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: Haskell

Bug#664471: false positive for hyphen-used-as-minus-sign

2012-03-17 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.6 Severity: minor Hi, It seems to me that lintian falsely reports hyphen-used-as-minus-sign for the following line in the file: Use \f[C]--\ --help\f[] for a list. If the space ('\ ') is removed, the warning is no longer generated. I'm not familiar with the groff

Bug#661590: doc-rfc-misc: tries to overwrite /usr/share/doc/RFC/links/rfc1145.txt.gz in doc-rfc-others 20100731-1

2012-02-29 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:16:20AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Package: doc-rfc-misc Version: 20120225-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.6.1 When upgrading: Preparing to replace doc-rfc-misc 20100731-1 (using .../doc-rfc-misc_20120225-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement

Bug#648850: libprotobuf-java: protobuf.jar missing on amd64 in sid 2.4.1-1

2011-11-15 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Package: libprotobuf-java Version: 2.4.0a-2 Severity: normal Hi, missing protobuf.jar file for amd64 architecture makes osmosis program unusable. Hi, The java file is there: $ dpkg-deb -c libprotobuf-java_2.4.1-1_all.deb

Bug#648850: libprotobuf-java: protobuf.jar missing on amd64 in sid 2.4.1-1

2011-11-15 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:17:29PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Od: Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org Hi Iustin, The java file is there: $ dpkg-deb -c libprotobuf-java_2.4.1-1_all.deb |grep jar -rw-r--r-- root/root349404 2011-11-08 00:13 ./usr/share/java/protobuf-java-2.4.1.jar

Bug#648222: Significant 2D performance regression with ColorTiling

2011-11-13 Thread Iustin Pop
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 06:15:43PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Don, 2011-11-10 at 18:01 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 10 November 2011 17:46, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org wrote: The recent upgrade

Bug#648672: libprotobuf-java: Maven repo POMs should be installed without reference to parent POM

2011-11-13 Thread Iustin Pop
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:23:04AM +0100, Jakub Adam wrote: Hi, when I try to compile JGit library that depends on libprotobuf-java, Maven fails with following error: [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). Project ID: com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java:jar:debian

Bug#543714: closing 543714

2011-11-08 Thread Iustin Pop
close 543714 thanks Hi, Since Lenny is old-stable now, I'm closing this bug. Sorry for not having it actually fixed when it was requested. (feel free to reopen/retitle if you still need a backport) thanks, iustin signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#624260: kvm: kernel inside guest support

2011-07-24 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:22:22PM -0400, micah anderson wrote: Package: ganeti2 Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: wishlist It seems like ganeti requires that you use a kernel external to the guest, probably because that is the default mode of operation with xen. However, on a kvm system, you can

Bug#624257: [Pkg-ganeti-devel] Bug#624257: xen holdovers when using kvm

2011-07-24 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:14:44PM -0400, micah anderson wrote: Package: ganeti2 Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: normal It seems that even when you do not specify xen as a possible hypervisor in the cluster setup (--enabled-hypervisors=kvm), you still get xen-br0 as the default link name:

Bug#619996: nfs-common: idmapd.conf(5) manual page missing

2011-03-29 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 03:01:52PM +1100, Jason White wrote: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: It is not included in the upstream source - even though idmapd(8) refers to it! That's weird. Fedora have it, howver. Perhaps this is a forward upstream bug. Hi all, Please see

Bug#619726: cron.dail/man-db does unnecessary writes

2011-03-26 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: man-db Version: 2.5.9-4 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, /etc/cron.daily/man-db has this snippet: # expunge old catman pages which have not been read in a week if [ -d /var/cache/man ]; then cd / if ! dpkg-statoverride --list /var/cache/man /dev/null 21; then chown -R man

Bug#613648: [Pkg-ganeti-devel] Bug#613648: ganeti2: Wrong permissions for /var/lock after gnt-node add

2011-02-16 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:29:16PM +0100, Ronny Lindner wrote: Package: ganeti2 Version: 2.1.6-1 Severity: critical Tags: patch upstream Justification: breaks unrelated software The command gnt-node add changes the permissions of /var/lock to d-wxrwS--t (3661 octal, 1777 decimal!).

Bug#611724: [Pkg-ganeti-devel] Bug#611724: ganeti2: Ganeti service don't start

2011-02-01 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:20:53AM -0200, Diego Silva wrote: Package: ganeti2 Version: 2.1.6-1 Severity: normal After install ganeti2 on squezze and follow the official 2.1 install documentation, I can't start the service due the missing of configuration files: /etc/init.d/ganeti

Bug#611724: [Pkg-ganeti-devel] Bug#611724: ganeti2: Ganeti service don't start

2011-02-01 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:11:26PM -0200, Diego Morato wrote: I was unable to initialise the cluster: /var/log/ganeti/commands.log: 2011-01-31 21:42:10,076: gnt-cluster init pid=2965 INFO run with arguments 'cluster00.example.com.br' 2011-01-31 21:42:13,391: gnt-cluster init pid=2965

Bug#607679: [Pkg-ganeti-devel] Bug#607679: ganeti2: new version available

2010-12-20 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:22:54AM +0100, Holger Fischer wrote: Package: ganeti2 Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: wishlist -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2

Bug#607679: [Pkg-ganeti-devel] Bug#607679: ganeti2: new version available

2010-12-20 Thread Iustin Pop
reopen 607679 thanks On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 01:03:57AM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: Ganeti 2.3.0 is already available in experimental. I will close this bug as invalid. Oops, I was mistaken. 2.3.0 has not been packaged, reopening bug. On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:22:54AM +0100, Holger Fischer

Bug#597957: [Pkg-ganeti-devel] Bug#597957: ganeti2: unclear how to convert plain to drbd

2010-09-24 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:54:25PM +, Clint Adams wrote: Package: ganeti2 Version: 2.1.6-1 admin.txt gives gnt-instance modify -t drbd INSTANCE as the command to run to convert a plain instance to drbd. This does not work; an attempt results in Changing the disk template to a

Bug#596546: Extra/unneeded dependency on python-dev

2010-09-12 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: kodos Version: 2.4.9-6.3 Severity: normal Hi, kodos depends on python-dev, which in turn brings in lots of other dependencies (e.g. 70MB on an otherwise clean install). I've tested and kodos itself seems to work fine, at least the basic features, without python-dev installed, just with

Bug#582786: munin: munin-cgi-graph fails on multigraphs

2010-09-12 Thread Iustin Pop
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:55:23PM +0200, Daniel Reichelt wrote: Hi again, I totally missed the fact that with the previous patch on multigraph-pages within every device-specific graph *all* devices were drawn. The attached patch (incorporates the previous one) fixes that: - first of

Bug#596009: ganeti-instance-debootstrap: does not produce a vm suitable for use with xen in squeeze

2010-09-09 Thread Iustin Pop
severity 596009 important thanks On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:38:17AM +, Clint Adams wrote: On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:10:28PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: Thanks for the report. Just to make sure I understand correctly: the instance is working fine, but the console (gnt-instance console

Bug#596009: ganeti-instance-debootstrap: does not produce a vm suitable for use with xen in squeeze

2010-09-08 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:35:59PM +, Clint Adams wrote: Package: ganeti-instance-debootstrap Version: 0.9-1 When using debootstrap+default with Xen, the new instance is unusable unless one forces init to run a getty on hvc0. Hi, Thanks for the report. Just to make sure I understand

Bug#594933: Manpage idmapd.conf.5 not shipped

2010-08-30 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.2.2-4 Severity: normal Hi, It seems the manpage for /etc/idmapd.conf is not shipped (anymore?) by any package. I'm reporting this against nfs-common as this package is the one shipping the daemon. I've seen though that the man page is present in the sources for

Bug#520258: This is a very old version

2010-08-25 Thread Iustin Pop
I just took a quick look at this bug, but it's against version 4.0b7, and current upstream version is 6.1, so the easiest way out would be to first test a new upstream version. regards, iustin signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#563683: localepurge: diff for NMU version 0.6.2+nmu1

2010-08-19 Thread Iustin Pop
(no changes needed) + * Add dependency on debhelper + * Fix syntax errors in NEWS.Debian + * Register the configuration file via ucfr, so that ucf knows about it + + -- Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:45:19 +0200 + localepurge (0.6.2) unstable; urgency=low * Corrected entry

Bug#593269: downloads code from the internet during build

2010-08-18 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Iustin Pop wrote: First, thanks for reporting this. But I cannot reproduce this on unstable (in a clean pbuilder chroot), since the python-setuptools is new enough (for sid). While the behaviour

Bug#593268: source is not re-buildable

2010-08-18 Thread Iustin Pop
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:01:21PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: Source: protobuf Version: 2.3.0-3 Severity: important The protbuf source package is not rebuildable, i.e. I cannot build from the same source tree more than once. It really should be. This is probably due to a bad

Bug#593269: downloads code from the internet during build

2010-08-18 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:12:24PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: It might not be something we can fix for this release, but I think this is a significant security bug in the source package. Unfortunately, my first investigation

Bug#593269: downloads code from the internet during build

2010-08-17 Thread Iustin Pop
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: Source: protobuf Version: 2.3.0-3 Severity: serious During building your package on stable: | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/weasel/.temp/2010-08-16/protobuf-2.3.0' | # python bindings | cd python python setup.py build

Bug#592165: doc-rfc: depend on doc-rfc-experimental

2010-08-07 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:18:45AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: Package: doc-rfc Version: 20100731-1 Severity: wishlist Hi. I guess doc-rfc should also depend on doc-rfc-experimental. Or even better, as doc-rfc is just kind of a meta-package, as far as I can see, replace

Bug#591886: doc-rfc: lost RFCs in changed packaging scheme

2010-08-06 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:26:44AM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: Package: doc-rfc Version: 20100731-1 Hello, after purging the old numeric doc-rfc packages and upgrading (and installing) the new ones I noticed there are some RFCs from the old packages not shipped anymore with the

Bug#591886: doc-rfc: lost RFCs in changed packaging scheme

2010-08-06 Thread Iustin Pop
severity 591886 minor retitle 591886 RFC 17a lost in changed packaging scheme thanks On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 07:39:23PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:03:47AM -0400, Iustin Pop wrote: I've dropped intentionally the non-issues RFCs from the packaging, as rfc

Bug#464631: RFC 2616 crazy paragraph

2010-08-04 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:00:56AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: Package: doc-rfc-std Version: 20030621-1 File: /usr/share/doc/RFC/links/rfc2616.txt.gz ? What is up with this crazy paragraph? 4.If the message uses the media type multipart/byteranges, and the ransfer-length is

Bug#591367: python-pylibacl: build a dbg package and support python 2.6

2010-08-02 Thread Iustin Pop
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:19:45PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: Package: python-pylibacl User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Hello dear maintainer The attached patch applied in ubuntu adds a debug package and support for python 2.6

Bug#591300: Inconsistency between empty-binary-package and corrections-case

2010-08-01 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: lintian Version: 2.4.3 Severity: normal Hi, The empty-binary-package tag contains this in the description: If the package is deliberately empty, please mention in the package long description one of the phrases meta-package, […] However, meta-package is considered a wrong spelling

Bug#590112: Epydoc fails to parse comment-based docstrings with Python 2.6

2010-07-25 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:15:06PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: Ok, I uploaded 3.0.1-8 including the patch. If you have a few minutes, please confirm that the new patched package is working for you. Thanks for the fast response! Did a test, the warnings are gone and the documentation is

Bug#590112: Epydoc fails to parse comment-based docstrings with Python 2.6

2010-07-23 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: python-epydoc Version: 3.0.1-7 Severity: normal Hi, There's a known bug with epydoc and python 2.6 (the tokenizer has changed in 2.6, and epydoc hasn't been updated to account for it). While upstream seems dormant, a patch is available on the sourceforce tracker, see

Bug#590112: Epydoc fails to parse comment-based docstrings with Python 2.6

2010-07-23 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 02:44:15PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote: There's a known bug with epydoc and python 2.6 (the tokenizer has changed in 2.6, and epydoc hasn't been updated to account for it). While upstream seems

Bug#589636: Dependency on 'ed' of texconfig is not declared

2010-07-19 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: texlive-binaries Version: 2009-6 Severity: normal Hi, texconfig uses ed, without declaring this as a dependency (and ed is only optional). Furthermore, it doesn't check the exit code of 'ed' calls, so it fails silently in case ed is missing. Adding a dependency on ed in the binary

Bug#587732: protobuf: diff for NMU version 2.3.0-2.1

2010-07-11 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:46:18PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: On 07/11/2010 12:27 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: Because there's no requirement anywhere that says arch:all packages need to be buildable on all architectures. The binary target must be all that is necessary for the user to

Bug#587732: protobuf: diff for NMU version 2.3.0-2.1

2010-07-10 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 07:52:38PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: tags 587732 + patch tags 587732 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for protobuf (versioned as 2.3.0-2.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. I was

Bug#587732: protobuf: diff for NMU version 2.3.0-2.1

2010-07-10 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Hi Iustin, On 07/10/2010 08:39 PM, Iustin Pop wrote: I was planning to revert the move of the openjdk-6 from b-d-i to b-d, as an alternative to depend on default-jdk. The move was done simply to have 'jar' available

Bug#587732: protobuf should B-D on default-jdk

2010-07-01 Thread Iustin Pop
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:17:46AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Package: protobuf Version: 2.3.0-2 Severity: serious Hello, the current version of protobuf could not be build on some architectures (namely hppa, hurd and kfreebsd-*) because you build depend on openjdk-6-jdk, instead you

Bug#572923: marked as done (protobuf: FTBFS on armel (test-suite failure))

2010-05-25 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:25:37AM +0200, sean finney wrote: reopen 572923 severity 572923 important thanks hi iustin, Unfortunately I don't think that change is sufficient to fix the bug. With signed overflows the app slides into undefinedbehaviorland as soon as it occurs so while the

Bug#572923: marked as done (protobuf: FTBFS on armel (test-suite failure))

2010-05-25 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:05:11PM +0200, sean finney wrote: hi, On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:44:57AM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: I understand your point, and I'm fine with the bug being reopened. But personally, I do not believe anymore this is a software bug, but simply a compiler bug. I

Bug#572923: marked as done (protobuf: FTBFS on armel (test-suite failure))

2010-05-25 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:14:05PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:05:11PM +0200, sean finney wrote: hi, On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:44:57AM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: I understand your point, and I'm fine with the bug being reopened. But personally, I do not believe

Bug#572923: marked as done (protobuf: FTBFS on armel (test-suite failure))

2010-05-25 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:05:11PM +0200, sean finney wrote: i would hazard a guess that the problems are still there but that you don't see them because the tests are passing and thus the package builds. istr that running with -O0 -ftrapv still produces an abort(), which would definitively

Bug#572923: Disabling optimizations on the ZigZagDecode64 function fixes the unittests

2010-05-24 Thread Iustin Pop
While searching for more information on GCC on armel, I came across #580334, which sounds very much like our case: gcc 4.3 is fine, gcc 4.4 breaks on armel. Following their approach, I've disabled optimizations on the ZigZagDecode64 function, and suprise! unittests pass without any error. Until

Bug#572923: signed integer overflow, maybe?

2010-05-22 Thread Iustin Pop
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:24:47PM +0200, sean finney wrote: hiya, Hi there, On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:14:16PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: Since I honestly don't know that much here, I think it would be best that you forward this to upstream, to get it integrated. In the meantime, I'll

Bug#546397: pwsafe: Complains about not being setuid despite availability of mlock() to unprivileged processes

2010-04-23 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:52:28AM +1000, Jason White wrote: Package: pwsafe Version: 0.2.0-3 Severity: normal Pwsafe issues warnings about its not being a setuid binary. However, since kernel 2.6.8, according to the mlock(2) manual page, the mlock() function is available to unprivileged

Bug#572923: signed integer overflow, maybe?

2010-04-15 Thread Iustin Pop
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 07:34:05PM +0200, sean finney wrote: On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 09:47:36PM +0200, sean finney wrote: fixing both of these doesn't fix the problem, though the protoc program does get a tiny bit further before abort()ing. also, ConsumeSignedInteger (text_format.cc),

Bug#572923: New GCC version

2010-03-23 Thread Iustin Pop
I just saw gcc-4.4 4.4.3-5 is available, will do a test run with it once I'm back from the current vacation - it does have some ARM mentions in the changelog, who knows. iustin signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#572923: signed integer overflow, maybe?

2010-03-15 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:17:14PM +0100, sean finney wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:07:13AM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: So again, sorry if I'm talking stupid things. But here the compiler does exactly what you required it to do. 0x8000 as a positive constant doesn't work already

Bug#572923: signed integer overflow, maybe?

2010-03-13 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:33:41PM +0100, sean finney wrote: hi, On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:47:50PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: (without the negation). adding a negation operator to this is what was raising my eyebrows. it could be that as long as everything is a constant that stuff

Bug#572923: signed integer overflow, maybe?

2010-03-13 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:07:13AM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:33:41PM +0100, sean finney wrote: i'm not saying it *isn't* a compiler error, but inserting a few printfs and the problem disappearing is also pretty common in other situations of undefined behavior

Bug#572923: signed integer overflow, maybe?

2010-03-12 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:22:31PM +0100, sean finney wrote: On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:38:23PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: actually, from /usr/lib/limits.h, -0x8000 is indeed the minimum value for signed int32. a brief look at the tests failing show that this is exactly what upstream

Bug#567546: Some more investigation

2010-03-11 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:35:31AM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: Hi, I can confirm this is not a configuration issue, but a regression. I keep nfs-kernel-server version 1.2.0-4.1 pinned on my server, since that's a known working version. The current version in unstable (1.2.1-3) is broken

Bug#572923: signed integer overflow, maybe?

2010-03-09 Thread Iustin Pop
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 06:47:46PM +0100, sean finney wrote: hey folks, just to throw something out there, the last time i ran into a bug like this was a few weeks back with php, also with gcc 4.4 and also on arm. turns out it was a case of signed integer overflow, which has undefined

Bug#572923: protobuf: FTBFS on armel (test-suite failure)

2010-03-07 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 06:45:16PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Package: protobuf Version: 2.3.0-1 Severity: serious the protobuf testsuite fails on armel, leading to ftbfs. See https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=protobufarch=armelver=2.3.0-1stamp=1264814475file=logas=raw Cheers,

Bug#572923: protobuf: FTBFS on armel (test-suite failure)

2010-03-07 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 08:03:48PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 19:19:25 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: Now, I'm not sure how to proceed here. I see that gcc-4.4 on armel is still the same (4.4.3-1) as when the build was attempted, so just re-attempting the build

Bug#567546: Some more investigation

2010-02-28 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:35:31AM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: Hi, I can confirm this is not a configuration issue, but a regression. I keep nfs-kernel-server version 1.2.0-4.1 pinned on my server, since that's a known working version. The current version in unstable (1.2.1-3) is broken. I

Bug#515754: nfs-common: Mounting with sec=krb5p fails with access denied by server while mounting

2010-02-28 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 01:30:22PM +, Ben Harris wrote: Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.1.4-1 Severity: important When attempting to mount an NFS filesystem using Kerberos 5 security, I get an error: wraith:/tmp# mount -osec=krb5p ghast.csi.cam.ac.uk:/export/home/bjh21 /mnt

Bug#567546: Some more investigation

2010-02-27 Thread Iustin Pop
Hi, I can confirm this is not a configuration issue, but a regression. I keep nfs-kernel-server version 1.2.0-4.1 pinned on my server, since that's a known working version. The current version in unstable (1.2.1-3) is broken. The behaviour seems to be very strange; at first mount from the

Bug#571173: [Pkg-ganeti-devel] Bug#571173: FTBFS: The import of `Data.Ord' is redundant

2010-02-24 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:55:01AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Source: ganeti-htools Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 (and apparently on alpha for the same reason) this way: | ghc

Bug#564143: tomoyo-ccstools: doesn't work with separate /usr

2010-01-07 Thread Iustin Pop
, since I had to boot with an older kernel to be able to boot at all, which is bad behaviour. Thank you, Iustin Pop -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel

Bug#562658: Package ready, just waiting for sponsoring

2009-12-29 Thread Iustin Pop
For the record, the package is ready (or almost) at http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ganeti/htools.git (just in case anyone wonders what's the delay on the ITP), waiting for the DD in the team to be online to upload it. iustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#562658: ITP: ganeti-htools -- Cluster tools for Ganeti

2009-12-26 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org * Package name: ganeti-htools Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Iustin Pop ius...@google.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/ * License : GPL2 Programming Lang: Haskell Description

Bug#562665: Wrong depends on libcurl3-gnutls (and not -dev)

2009-12-26 Thread Iustin Pop
Package: libghc6-curl-dev Version: 1.3.5-2+b1 Severity: important As the subject says, the dependency on libcurl3-gnutls instead of libcurl4-gnutls-dev (I'm not sure why there isn't a libcurl3-gnutls-dev) means that one cannot actually build a package that depends only on libghc6-curl-dev:

Bug#523114: memtest86: diff for NMU version 3.5-2.1

2009-12-06 Thread Iustin Pop
a lintian override for statically-linked-binary (which is expected) + + -- Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:17:12 +0100 + memtest86 (3.5-2) unstable; urgency=low * Sync'd packaging with memtest86+ 2.11-3. diff -u memtest86-3.5/debian/control memtest86-3.5/debian/control --- memtest86

Bug#550096: memtest86+: diff for NMU version 4.00-2.1

2009-12-06 Thread Iustin Pop
/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib by checking +both grub files and also changing the linux/linux16 grub command based +on which version we find (Closes: #550096) + * Update suggests to a recent version of grub2 + * Add a lintian override for statically-linked-binary (which is expected) + + -- Iustin

Bug#550096: .: 4: Can't open /usr/lib/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib

2009-12-05 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 11:13:52AM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote: 04.12.2009 в 22:07:56 +0100 Iustin Pop написал(а): On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:09:02PM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote: 04.12.2009 в 16:27:03 +0100 Iustin Pop написал(а): On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:44:39PM +0500, Stepan

Bug#550096: .: 4: Can't open /usr/lib/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib

2009-12-05 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 07:15:55PM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote: 05.12.2009 в 13:33:13 +0100 Iustin Pop написал(а): Yes, but you're tying here together the grub-mkconfig_lib change and the linux/linux16 change, and these were not done together. These two should be split, and the linux16

Bug#553291: memtest86: read-in-maintainer-script postinst:12

2009-12-04 Thread Iustin Pop
patch as in #522345) +(Closes: #523114) + * Due to the above changes, conflict with old version of grub-pc and +grub-common that don't support these. + + -- Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:07:31 +0100 + memtest86 (3.5-2) unstable; urgency=low * Sync'd packaging

Bug#550096: .: 4: Can't open /usr/lib/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib

2009-12-04 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:44:39PM +0500, Stepan Golosunov wrote: Package: memtest86+ Version: 4.00-2 Severity: serious Upgrade to memtest86+ 4.00-2 fails: Preparing to replace memtest86+ 2.11-3 (using .../memtest86+_4.00-2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement memtest86+ ... Updating

Bug#550096: .: 4: Can't open /usr/lib/grub/grub-mkconfig_lib

2009-12-04 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:09:02PM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote: 04.12.2009 в 16:27:03 +0100 Iustin Pop написал(а): On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:44:39PM +0500, Stepan Golosunov wrote: Package: memtest86+ Version: 4.00-2 Severity: serious Upgrade to memtest86+ 4.00-2 fails

Bug#499516: drbd8-utils: Do not 'invoke-rc.d drbd stop' in prerm script for action 'upgrade'

2009-12-02 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 04:26:49PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote: Attached to this email is patch against the current SVN tree that simply disables the stop of the prerm for upgrades. If by any chance, an upgrade absolutely requires the stop, IMHO this should be done conditionally in the new

Bug#524458: nfs-common: Can't read large files

2009-12-02 Thread Iustin Pop
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:34:07AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote: Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.1.2-6lenny1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Large remote files can't be read: packard:/mnt/gateway/tmp$ mount | fgrep gateway gateway:/ on /mnt/gateway type nfs

Bug#522926: client cannot write to new files on server, only edit/delete/create

2009-12-02 Thread Iustin Pop
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:31:30PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.1.4-1 Severity: grave […] Hi, However, they could not write to new files. They could create them, but trying to write to them causes: open(testfile, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = -1

Bug#556922: Console resize freezes mc causing system crash/hang

2009-12-02 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 08:26:54PM +0100, Benny Baumann wrote: Am 01.12.2009 22:18, schrieb Iustin Pop: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Benny Baumann wrote: Package: mc Version: 2:4.6.2~git20080311-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system When

Bug#553292: memtest86+: read-in-maintainer-script postinst:12

2009-12-02 Thread Iustin Pop
) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Replace manual propt with debconf (Closes: #553292). + + -- Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:58:36 +0100 + memtest86+ (4.00-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix wrong integration of grub2 patch (Closes: #549125). diff -urN /tmp

Bug#556922: Console resize freezes mc causing system crash/hang

2009-12-01 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:54:31AM +0100, Benny Baumann wrote: Package: mc Version: 2:4.6.2~git20080311-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system When running mc inside a screen session via SSH mc crashes as soon as you resize the window in which mc is displayed. When

Bug#551821: [nfs-common] directory not mounted at boot-time

2009-12-01 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:25:34AM +0200, Marco Righi wrote: Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.2.0-4 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, I have some lines in fstab as the following one (the server is the same, the pointed directory are different)

Bug#551931: libprotobuf-dev: Version 2.2 released on August 11

2009-11-13 Thread Iustin Pop
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:24:59AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 31 October 2009 at 04:49, Iustin Pop wrote: | On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 22 October 2009 at 10:09, Iustin Pop wrote: | | On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk

Bug#499516: drbd8-utils: Do not 'invoke-rc.d drbd stop' in prerm script for action 'upgrade'

2009-11-07 Thread Iustin Pop
this is not needed and shutdowns must be done by the +administrator + + -- Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:17:41 +0100 + drbd8 (2:8.3.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. Property changes on: debian/rules

<    1   2   3   >