Bug#857465: Postfix-3.1.4 reintroduces bug 214741

2017-05-21 Thread LaMont Jones
tags 857465 + wontfix -- I believe that the postinst does the best it can at getting the FQDN into main.cf -- this doesn't do much for the upgrade path though. I agree with upstream that postfix should not be calling gethostbyname at runtime -- if this is happening in a fresh install, then I'm

Bug#820974: bind9 crypto issue

2017-01-20 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:35:16PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > I believe this is a serious bug, since it affects the most common way > to deploy bind9 server which is in a chroot. > In my opinion, we should probably not release stable stretch with > bind9 in this state. > > This is

Bug#851489: Updated Russian debconf translation

2017-01-15 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 06:09:35PM +0300, Sergey Alyoshin wrote: > Package: postfix > Version: 3.1.3-6 > Priority: wishlist > Tags: l10n patch This file is unchanged from one that landed in the source tree on the 9th.. Was that intentional? lamont

Bug#850430: postfix 3.1.4-1 breaks on lmtp interface

2017-01-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Leuxner wrote: > $ grep lmtp /etc/postfix/master.cf > lmtp unix - - y - - lmtp Is there by any chance any trailing whitespace on that line? lamont

Bug#845750: postfix: Cleanup does not see the postfix-pcre.so.1.0.1 file (and probably others libraries)

2016-11-29 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 01:06:26PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Saturday, November 26, 2016 06:42:13 PM Bartosz Rudnicki wrote: > > Yes, there is a tab character after pcre. > > > > I set "chroot" option to "n" for all services in the master.cf and > > restarted postfix. > > > > Now,

Bug#837164: ipmitool lan print does not report ipv6 addresses

2016-09-09 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: ipmitool Version: 1.8.16-3 # sudo ipmitool lan print Set in Progress : Set Complete Auth Type Support : Auth Type Enable: Callback : : User : : Operator : : Admin:

Bug#824077: liblwres90: lwres_context_recv ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused)

2016-05-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 03:43:26PM -0700, Erik Ziegenbalg wrote: > There seems to be a bug with the lwres_context_recv function, when trying to > recvfrom, it always returns back ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused) eventhough > it is > a UDP packet. This causes lwres_context_recv to return

Bug#820912: Bad command startup

2016-04-14 Thread LaMont Jones
retitle 820912 Bad command startup when daemon_directory is invalid close 820912 -- On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 05:09:47PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote: > # Fix problem caused by package maintainer. > daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix This would be your problem right here... Nothing in the

Bug#820912: Bad command startup

2016-04-13 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:58:39PM +1000, Nikolai Lusan wrote: > After upgrade to 3.1.0 the mail.log file fills with the following alert: > Apr 11 23:42:23 lutsk postfix/master[8473]: warning: process > /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 9583 exit status 127 > Apr 11 23:42:23 lutsk

Bug#815694: postfix init scripts think it started even though it did not

2016-04-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:28:07PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Package: postfix > Version: 3.0.3-1 > Severity: important > > Hey. > Well there are already bugs open that postfix is broken since 3.0,... > But another thing that apparently doesn't work: > When doing something like >

Bug#781739: bind9: please package new upstream version 9.10.2

2016-03-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:30:45PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > bind9 9.10.2 is available on https://www.isc.org/downloads/ - it would be nice > if you could package this. (eg because latest freeipa versions need it.) 9.10.3-P4 is in NEW on its way to experimental. I'm expecting to land it in

Bug#815707: postfix: fails to start after upgrade: fails to copy CA certificates

2016-02-23 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:27:51PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > This is presumably because my Postfix configuration has > smtp_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt > but the init script seems to assume that the smtp_tls_CAfile will be a > directory? It looks to be a "almost

Bug#666950: postfix-sqlite is missing, and main postfix package now links with libpq5

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:22:17PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 12.04.2012 18:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > [LaMont Jones] > >* Link with and use sqlite when building dict_sqlite. add sqlite > > dictionary to dynamicmaps.cf. Closes: #666950 >

Bug#815094: postfix-mysql: fails to link dict_mysql.so

2016-02-20 Thread LaMont Jones
fixed 3.0.3-2 -- 3.0.3-2 has the migration code to properly rewrite dynamicmaps.cf to reflect upstream changes when incorporating shared libraries and dynamicmaps. lamont

Bug#815047: postfix: Postfix fails to start after upgrade

2016-02-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:43:16PM -0500, James Cloos wrote: > shlib_directory=/usr/lib/postfix/lib > daemon_directory=/usr/lib/postfix/daemons I've been kicking this around with Scott K, and we're going to go with shlib_directory=/usr/lib/postfix

Bug#814372: overly agressive URLField validation causes failures

2016-02-10 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: python3-django Version: 1.8.7-1 If the django site lives somewhere that the admins have declared a bogus top-level domain, and chosen to use an rfc1035-conforming name (with a hyphen in the middle of it), then django URLField validation considers the domain to be invalid. (I suspect

Bug#800697: ITP: django-piston3: a django mini-framework for creating apis.

2015-10-02 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist -- lamont

Bug#785754: please include apparmor profile

2015-05-21 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:31:43PM +0200, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:19:26PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:24:55PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: # we need libraries, and we need to be able to restart /usr/lib{,32,64}/** mr, /usr

Bug#785754: please include apparmor profile

2015-05-19 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: anope Severity: wishlist -- Please include the attached apparmor profile as part of the packge. It should be delivered as /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.anope. See also https://wiki.debian.org/AppArmor thanks, lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#783183: init.d reload should fail if the daemon is not running

2015-04-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: anope Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: serious If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It currently passes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#783185: documentation and reality disagree on logging file naming

2015-04-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: anope Version: 2.0.2-1 DAEMON_ARGS has --logdir=/var/log/$NAME and that means that when I say 'log { name = /var/log/anope/services.log.', it decides that I clearly want the log file to be named /var/log/anope/var/log/anope/services.log, which is not very intuitive, and takes some time

Bug#783184: please include regex_posix, regex_pcre and sql modules (from extra)

2015-04-23 Thread LaMont Jones
don't care either way on that part. patch attached lamont From ce09340e7c51f23c3e2b08b5e069355aa8eecdad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: LaMont Jones lam...@canonical.com Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:16:06 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] add m_sql and m_regex_{posix,pcre} modules --- debian/control | 2

Bug#783183: init.d reload should fail if the daemon is not running

2015-04-23 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:34:43PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 08:29:14AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: Package: anope Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: serious If the daemon is not running, reload should fail. It currently passes. Really? A quick review of init

Bug#780288: postfix: mydestination parameter contains 2 commas when main.cf is generated at installation

2015-03-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:02:56PM +0100, Grégoire Bellon-Gervais wrote: Subject: postfix: mydestination parameter contains 2 commas when main.cf is generated at installation Package: postfix Version: 2.9.6-2 Severity: minor Known bug that is not a functional bug, since commas are treated

Bug#773170: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#773170: insserv: refuses to start postfix at boot because dnsmasq is disabled

2015-01-10 Thread LaMont Jones
severity 773170 important -- On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 09:33:16AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:58:09 +0100 Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: Well, postfix uses Required-start: $named because it needs name resolution. And I guess dnsmasq provides $named by

Bug#769583: unblock: bind9/ 9.9.5 with patch or 9.9.6?

2014-11-17 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 07:28:02PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: testing currently has bind9 version 1:9.9.5.dfsg-5 Upstream released 9.9.6 fixing some bugs with an impact on compatibility and at least one appears to be security related Corrected bugs in the handling of wildcard records by the

Bug#769583: unblock: bind9/ 9.9.5 with patch or 9.9.6?

2014-11-17 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: In the particular case, it has been suggested that the final changes compared to testing will be 87 000 (or more) lines. Unless 97+% of this is pure documentational/auto-generated changes, which can be filtered out and turn this

Bug#750485: postfix: Upstream version 2.11.1 available, fixes serious bug

2014-06-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 07:39:03PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but I note that Jessie and wheezy-backports haven't been fixed yet. Is it the practice to close the bug report before the package has propagated from sid? The bug is marked as found in 2.11.0-1, and fixed in

Bug#741285: bind9: FTBFS on kfreebsd: linking errors

2014-03-24 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 741285 + moreinfo -- I'll need someone with kfreebsd to provide a patch. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#740225: libbind-dev: please include dns/forward.h, dns/update.h and isc/errno2result.h

2014-02-27 Thread LaMont Jones
+++ bind9-9.9.5.dfsg/debian/rules + install -m644 lib/isc/unix/errno2result.h debian/bind9/usr/include/isc This feels wrong to me, and makes be believe that errno2result.h is not intended to be delivered. Lets discuss this one a bit more, first. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#724844: bind9: Missing dns/rrl.h

2014-01-27 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 08:52:42PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:42:29PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: I'd like to echo this; 9.9.x has useful and important functionality for DNSSEC deployment. The bug in question seems to be a repeat of #720813 which was

Bug#734401: postfix: debconf settings don't reflect main.cf if altered manually (e.g. relay_host)

2014-01-16 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:37:15PM -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote: Setting relay_host in /etc/postfix/main.cf manual and the doing dpkg-reconfigured results in debconf setting (unless you set it back) the relay_host previously configured in debconf, not the one from main.cf through manual

Bug#729562: bind9: named silently dies at boot

2013-11-14 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:24:51AM +0100, Olaf Zaplinski wrote: Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u1 Severity: normal Tags: ipv6 Dear Maintainer, named silently fails at boot, perhaps because of these two IPv6 addresses that this host has: 2a00:12c0:1015:100:1::2 and

Bug#689607: arm64 support for util-linux

2013-11-09 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 08:42:08PM +, Wookey wrote: Updated patch attached. As the Debian arm64 port is now properly underway and this was filed over a year ago, I propose to NMU this as otherwise it'll be an FTBFS soon. Do it. I'm hoping that we'll have an upload before the month is

Bug#708420: postfix: With multiple instances, the init script does not start all instances

2013-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 708420 + moreinfo -- On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:57:04PM +0200, Vincent Rischmann wrote: I have multiple instances of postfix, each in /etc/postfix/ms/{01,02,...} Postfix is correctly configured (postmulti lists my instances as enabled). What is multi_instance_name set to in the various

Bug#719719: ITP: bind10 -- ISC's Internet Domain Name Server

2013-08-14 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:47:14AM -0430, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote: * Package name: bind10 Version : 1.1.0 Upstream Author : ISC Software Distribution pack...@isc.org * URL : http://bind10.isc.org * License : BSD Programming Lang: C++, Python

Bug#717069: bind9: Please allow alternative dnsutils and host packages

2013-07-16 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: the Knot DNS 1.3.0 introduced knot-dnsutils and knot-host package(s), so it would be nice if the two can coexist nicely in the system. knot-dnsutils and knot-host provide kdig, knsupdate and khost binaries that aim to be 1:1

Bug#246680: ldap-support for bind9

2013-06-17 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 07:21:39PM +0200, InuSasha wrote: i want to reopen the wish-entry. the bind 9.8.4 supports the ldap back-end out of the box. only --with-dlz-ldap=yes have to add to configure. I believe that doing that forces ldap to be installed on every machine that has bind9

Bug#710997: iptables calls setsockopt incorrectly

2013-06-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: iptables Version: 1.4.18-1 Tags: patch -- Since time immemorial, iptables has called setsockopt() and treated any -1 return value as fatal. Any system call can return EAGAIN or EINPROGRESS (depending on the origins of the API), and good coding practice requires checking for that and

Bug#705762: Uploaded new upstream version

2013-05-30 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:28:31AM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: I have just uploaded nmap 6.25-0.1 to DELAYED/5: Please go ahead and upload it to non-delayed. I'll get the source tree caught up with the archive in the next week or 3. lamont nmap (6.25-0.1) unstable; urgency=low *

Bug#703805: postfix: insserv cannot enable postfix if dnsmasq is disabled

2013-03-23 Thread LaMont Jones
found 2.4.6-4 -- On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:40:51PM +0100, Dominik George wrote: Package: postfix Version: 2.10.0-3 Severity: normal The postinst script cannot successfully run update-rc.d when dnsmasq is installed but disabled at boot time. This was introduced in the original insserv

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:59:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably have been more useful, fwiw. Noted for the future. The source and amd64 binaries are

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Jones lam...@debian.org +Maintainer: LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org Standards-Version: 3.9.1.0 Homepage: http://www.postfix.org Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), po-debconf (= 0.5.0), groff-base, patch, lsb-release, libdb-dev (=4.6.19), libldap2-dev (=2.1), libpcre3-dev, libmysqlclient-dev

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message in the bug log for details. wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given

Bug#702374: postfix: get message Relay Access Denied, when using SASL

2013-03-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:19:49PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Doti wrote: I've been able to solve the problem by adding this line to the conf (main.cf) : smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination but I'm not sure there will be no side

Bug#699145: bind9: CVE-2012-5689

2013-02-25 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Given these, I am not convinced that this should be RC for wheezy. How about a NEWS item drawing attention to the issue and workaround, and a downgrade to

Bug#698658: bind9 with fix for 698641

2013-02-14 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:44:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Debian admin has deployed the patch at [2] to the bind running the debian.org nameservers - else debian.org's nameservers would not have any resources left to answer legitimate queries. We think it important that the bind

Bug#699934: bind9: on upgrading bind, it never tells me that a new /etc/default/bind9 is going to be installed

2013-02-07 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:50:22AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: I have a modified /etc/default/bind9. Everytime bind packages are upgraded, I end up having a /etc/default/bind9.dpkg-dist, which by itself is fine, but dpkg never queries me with the usual dialog on whether I want to

Bug#698641: Please apply the rate limiting patches

2013-01-21 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 06:08:58PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: With the grown deployment of DNSSEC and more information being put into the domain name system, DNS servers have become and are becoming a useful tool for denial of service attacks by providing amplification: a single UDP packet

Bug#692416: Wheezy with dlopen enabled

2013-01-15 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:11:42PM +0100, Peter Beck wrote: Having the same issue on a wheezy machine with Samba4. I'm also curious if this will be fixed for wheezy too. The current plan is to have 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-3 migrate to wheezy. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#690361: dpkg: postfix doesn't get the correct SE Linux labels

2013-01-14 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 690361 + moreinfo -- It is not clear what exactly the change should be here, nor do I have a machine to test it on. If someone would like to propose a patch, I'd be happy to include it. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#697798: pu: package bind9/1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze8

2013-01-09 Thread LaMont Jones
13f278e..2ef9801 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +bind9 (1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze9) squeeze-proposed-updates; urgency=low + + * Update db.root with new IP for D.root-servers.net. Closes: #697352 + + -- LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:07:02 -0700

Bug#697352: fixed 697352 in 1:9.9.2.dfsg.P1-2

2013-01-07 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 05:42:58PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:06:51AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: fixed 697352 1:9.9.2.dfsg.P1-2 thanks I can't find this version. Has it been uploaded to unstable yet? It'll be uploaded this week sometime - I'm waiting for one more

Bug#695192: bind9: CVE-2012-5688

2012-12-05 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:31:00AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: bind9 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Please see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00828 Stable is not affected. This needs to be fixed through testing-proposed-updates, since the

Bug#669213: bind9: new upstream release: 9.9

2012-10-29 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:10:55PM +0100, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: a bind 9.9 package would be great as the new upstream version contains many improvements regarding DNSSEC. Is there any progress on this or does anyone have a working debian source for bind 9.9? It's not in the git repository

Bug#669213: bind9: new upstream release: 9.9

2012-10-29 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Indeed. In any case, were the new version to be accepted in to the release then the appropriate route would be via unstable, not direct to t-p-u. Works for me. I'll toss 9.8.4 into sid. As for getting it into wheezy, it'll make

Bug#675247: upgrading postfix fails to add sqlite to dynamicmaps.cf

2012-05-30 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: postfix Version: 2.9.1-5 -- When the package is upgraded, dynamicmaps_upgrade is queried, but never created, so we skip adding sqlite to the maps list. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#672882: FTBFS: inconsistent operand constraints in 'asm'

2012-05-14 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i128 Version: 1:1.3.5-1+b1 -- Fails to build with the following error: config.status: executing libtool commands dh_auto_build -a -O--builddirectory=build/ make[1]: Entering directory

Bug#672883: FTBFS: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'

2012-05-14 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: xserver-xorg-video-qxl Version: 0.0.17-2+b1 -- CCLD libuxa.la make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.17-2+b1-ia64-5fbY_J/xserver-xorg-video-qxl-0.0.17/build/src/uxa' make[4]: Entering directory

Bug#672952: FTBFS: compile errors

2012-05-14 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: dolfin Version: 1.0.0-5 -- cd /build/buildd-dolfin_1.0.0-5-ia64-LDjTpK/dolfin-1.0.0/obj-ia64-linux-gnu/dolfin/swig /usr/bin/g++ -D_cpp_EXPORTS -DBOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG -DHAS_SLEPC -DHAS_PETSC -DHAS_UMFPACK -DHAS_CHOLMOD -DHAS_SCOTCH -DHAS_ZLIB -DHAS_MPI -DMPICH_IGNORE_CXX_SEEK

Bug#652511: postfix: Postfix fails to start after upgrade due failed `Running newaliases postalias …'

2012-04-12 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:48:44AM +0100, Pascal Volk wrote: No idea why the Postfix package creates /etc/aliases if the file doesn't exist. The postinst script probably should check `postconf -h alias_database` output. And it will hopefully do nothing if the output looks like

Bug#626648: installation lacks RELEASE_NOTES-2.7 documentation file

2012-04-12 Thread LaMont Jones
tags 626648 + wontfix -- It also lacks RELEASE_NOTES-1.0 RELEASE_NOTES-1.1 RELEASE_NOTES-2.0 RELEASE_NOTES-2.1 RELEASE_NOTES-2.2 RELEASE_NOTES-2.3 RELEASE_NOTES-2.4 RELEASE_NOTES-2.5 RELEASE_NOTES-2.6 (which are found in the source, and not delivered by Debian, nor the upstream install

Bug#620543: upgrade from lenny to squeeze: mailbox_command changed

2012-04-12 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 04:29:52PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: On my lenny system, I had this setting in main.cf: mailbox_command = procmail -a $EXTENSION DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir After doing `apt-get dist-upgrade' to squeeze, I found it had changed to this:

Bug#630144: nmap: New upstream release

2012-03-23 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 01:18:36AM -0700, Fyodor wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: We're 9 months later and we're still at 5.21 in Debian unstable. I don't want to get embroiled in any Debian politics, but I will say, on behalf of the Nmap Project,

Bug#630144: nmap: New upstream release

2012-03-23 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:38:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, LaMont Jones wrote: Sounds great. Nmap hasn't been getting the attention it deserves from me. I'll get some time to focus on this next week while I'm on a plane. FWIW, I updated a local package of nmap

Bug#648982: sample config is broken

2011-11-16 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: cricket Version: 1.0.5-11 Tags: patch The sample config defines bgcolor=white, but does not define white, resulting in cpu graphs not displaying. lamont --- /tmp/Defaults 2011-11-16 12:32:57.0 + +++ sample-config/Defaults 2011-11-16 12:23:47.0 + @@

Bug#625988: BIND 9.8

2011-11-03 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:13:29PM +0100, Norman Rasmussen wrote: Friendly ping? Uploaded 1:9.8.1.dfsg-1 to sid yesterday. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#625988: BIND 9.8

2011-08-21 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 05:10:58PM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote: What is the status of bringing BIND 9.8 to Debian? Status of this bugreport was changed to pending, but I donot see why. It was changed to pending because the upload is pending. I'm expecting to upload it sometime this week, once

Bug#630144: nmap: New upstream release

2011-06-12 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:58:42PM +0200, Maximilian Gass wrote: nmap 5.50 is out since January 28th. Please upgrade the package. Yeah, it's in progress these 5 months now. Judging by the PTS, you are missing a debian/watch file ;) It wouldn't have changed anything, other than getting me even

Bug#620710: util-linux: New upstream release available

2011-05-11 Thread LaMont Jones
2.19.1 was just uploaded to experimental so people can play with it before I actually upload it to sid. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#619694: bind9: wrong owner/permission for /etc/bind

2011-03-26 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:08:02PM +0900, MIZUHARA Bun wrote: While named runs as user bind by default, the configuration file directory, /etc/bind, is owned by root and not writable by anyone other than root. This effectively prevents named from creating any files in the directory, for

Bug#610052: unblock: util-linux/2.17.2-6

2011-01-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:48:28AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hmm, LaMont, would it be possible for you to reupload with fixed PO files (I think you just need to dig them out from the BTSthey have probably been broken by the infamous mutt encoding bug)? This, assuming the release

Bug#610052: unblock: util-linux/2.17.2-6

2011-01-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:36:19PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org): Or grab the PO file from the BTS web interface Yeah - files grabbed, I need to build the debs and I'll get them uploaded. that should happen within the next 12-14 hours. (sleep

Bug#609415: Critical issue with mount not working at boot (with last new mount version!)

2011-01-09 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:57:52AM +0100, yellow wrote: then the client NFS has into /etc/fstab mount the NFS IP:/home /home nfs with here regullar parameters What specifically does the line say (ignoring the IP address). regular parameters has many posible meanings lamont -- To

Bug#510130: Error calculing volhdr partition boundaries on SGI disklabel

2010-12-21 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:05:06PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:42:11PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: That should be fine, thanks! What's the status? fix-committed, one more bug to decide how

Bug#602839: unblock: bind9/1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1

2010-12-09 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:10:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1 unblocked. Thanks - the specific patch for the first CVE was not forthcoming. And the others just combined to make it more sensible to just unblock it, IMO. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#566072: proposed patch

2010-11-30 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:33:27PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:48:30AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote [edited]: I'll ponder this an get back with you on Monday (US time). and? what about my earlier proposal of using debconf only if it happens to be installed? Well

Bug#510130: Error calculing volhdr partition boundaries on SGI disklabel

2010-11-30 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:38:41PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Lamont, are you fine with an NMU? This bug has been open for a long time and needs to be fixed for Squeeze soon. I have another upload for util-linux that I'm planning doing late this week or monday. (566072) Is that soon

Bug#602839: unblock: bind9/1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1

2010-11-30 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Lamont, would it be possible to prepare an upload fixing just the security bug for squeeze (so based on 1:9.7.1.dfsg.P2-2)? I looked into it a bit, but couldn't pinpoint the exact changes for CVE-2010-3752 (not with a

Bug#566072: proposed patch

2010-11-28 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:41:37PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Please consider the attached patch that displays a warning using debconf. Note that I've added the warning in the postinst script (as opposed to preinst, as suggested in msg #54 of this bug report) so that it suffices to Depend

Bug#156489: Processed: severity of 156489 is serious

2010-11-20 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:39:31PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: How could that possibly work given that mountall.sh runs after hwclockfirst.sh and hwclock.sh, i.e. when /var is on a separate file system. In fact, /etc/adjtime MUST live on the root filesystem, since it must be accessed before

Bug#566072: util-linux: fsck goes into maintenance shell on every boot

2010-11-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 06:58:21PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: Clint Adams wrote: Is there a legitimate reason to set a pass number if you actually do not want the filesystem to be checked? I would say probably not. But in the past, I (and others) would often cut-and-paste fstab lines, then

Bug#600548: Tab completion for mount has extra escape characters when spaces are present

2010-10-18 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:25:13PM -0700, Aaron Barany wrote: After a little more experimentation, it appears that it only adds extra escape characters if mount (and unmount) are preceded by sudo. The only reason why umount worked for my test in my original message is because I didn't specify

Bug#214741: postfix: myhostname (if not set explicitly) is assigned the hostname with localdomain by default

2010-10-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:03:16PM +0200, Hristo Erinin wrote: Oct 6 12:27:27 fury postfix/postqueue[19564]: dict_eval: expand $myhostname - fury.localdomain What is the output from these commands? hostname --fqdn grep ^127 /etc/hosts lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#598912: bind9: bind 9.6-ESV-R2 available; fixes DNSSEC issues

2010-10-07 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Julien BLACHE: Bind9 9.6-ESV-R2 is available, with fixes for DNSSEC that can be considered security patches [1]. I would like to push that out to stable, either via security or proposed-updates. Lamont, what do you think?

Bug#599081: watch file for bind9

2010-10-04 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 599081 + wontfix -- On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:56:21PM +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote: It seems that bind9 package doesn't have watch file. I've written it, so please include this if appreciated. That is correct. Can't stand the things myself. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#597934: postfix reconfigure does not re-set current hostname to myhostname

2010-09-24 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: When doing a postfix reconfigure/debconf... (at least when choosing the local host only templates), the current hostname is not set to myhostname (but the previous value is retained). This is in most cases ok, but the

Bug#551307: CVE-2009-2939 is still affecting postfix in lenny.

2010-07-19 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:32:03PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote: what about applying this patch? Given how postfix does things internally, the exposure from this bug is minimal to nonexistant: I doubt that it warrants a security release for lenny. Which would be why I haven't bothered to do

Bug#588055: regression of 572606

2010-07-05 Thread LaMont Jones
Good point. OTOH, an actual bit of content in the bug would have helped simplify the work of understanding what your issue was. lamont On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 04:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: Severity: serious Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.7.1.dfsg-1 User:

Bug#588055: regression of 572606

2010-07-05 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:05:10PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: retitle 588055 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D The issue is identical to the issue in the last bug report? But right, I have retitled this bug report now so at least it has the same subject. In which case,

Bug#575916: bind9: assertion fails in name.c:1699 INSIST(offset = length)

2010-07-02 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:54:44PM +0200, Michael Braun wrote: Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1+lenny1 Today, named crashed suddenly after a few hours of operation with the failed assertion mentioned above. This in turn broke DHCP, as DNS was no longer resolvable, which in turn made

Bug#586335: bind9: 9.6-ESV-R1 fails to resolve

2010-06-30 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:46:31PM +0200, o...@cisko.se wrote: 9.6-ESV-R1 fails or is terribly slow to resolve for example dannychoo.com dns01:~# host dannychoo.com dannychoo.com has address 174.143.211.39 ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached If you do the same on an older

Bug#584254: dpkg should support a --force-unsafe-io option or such

2010-06-02 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: dpkg Version: 1.15.6 Severity: normal With the introduction of fsync() calls to protect data, applications that do potentially large apt-get install invocations may not want to incur the penalty of fsync() calls from dpkg. In the case of building a livecd, this can be the difference

Bug#581857: order random_1 brokeness

2010-05-16 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 07:19:23PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: order random_1 is applied to DO queries and consequently returns data which fails DNSSEC validation. It's also not restricted to types A and , so there's a risk of service degradation/DoS (for example, assume that a

Bug#574490: postfix: out of debootstrap: mail_queue_enter: create file maildrop/390620.22755: Permission denied

2010-03-18 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 574490 + moreinfo -- What exactly are you reporting, and what were you doing to get there? On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:57:56PM +0100, julien wrote: Package: postfix Version: 2.5.5-1.1 Severity: important -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.4 APT prefers stable APT

Bug#572606: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D

2010-03-05 Thread LaMont Jones
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:24:18AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: This source package contains the following files from the IETF under non-free license terms: Nice boilierpate bug. I thought I had gotten all of these, I'll deal with the rest shortly. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#566356: mount ntfs external hard disk on usb port for read only

2010-01-25 Thread LaMont Jones
reassign 566356 linux-2.6 -- On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:03:14PM +0530, gnath wrote: using external hard disk formatted with ntfs on usb port gives read only mode. Can use or play with files on EHD without write/create. use additional flashdisk/pendrive with vfat on another usb port with rw

Bug#561251: mount: Bluebirds shows as /media/dvd when no disk is in reader!

2009-12-26 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:21:33AM -0500, Gary Dale wrote: Weird! When I remove a disk from my dvd rewriter, I get a phantom volume labelled Bluebirds in /media/dvd. I can even open at least one of the file - autorun.inf - and read it. There are also 3 .exe files (bluebirds.exe, dragburn.exe

Bug#554585: nbtk_1.2.0-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: segv

2009-11-24 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:35:58AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: tags 554585 + help Most likely, it's related to these errors, or something similar: ../nbtk/nbtk-widget.c: In function 'nbtk_widget_get_pseudo_classes': ../nbtk/nbtk-widget.c:853: warning: return from incompatible pointer

Bug#556404: Avahi has a problem with bind9 db.local-file and the localzone in named.conf

2009-11-16 Thread LaMont Jones
reasign 556404 avahi-daemon -- avahi needs to actually parse the zone info, not rely on filenames, as wildly vary. lamont On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 08:47:59PM +0100, Erik Grootjans wrote: Package: Bind9 Version: 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1 I have made a default installation of bind and are using it

  1   2   3   4   5   >