that was added in the upload of protobuf
2.3.0-2.
If this does cause problems to reoccur on arm I'm going to track down
the root cause and get the fixes into protobuf upstream.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 13/08/14 01:15, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 12/08/14 03:11, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Hi,
I think the transition is not quite over; there is still #756422, which
blocks #755212. We need a sourceful upload of collectd in order
Hi,
Here is a patch addressing the protobuf-c transition.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
From 83a2ca9fa67968905d01bcd3a232eaa2f6ed6d19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert S. Edmonds edmo...@debian.org
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:38:40 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] control: Update protobuf-c
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 12/08/14 03:11, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Hi,
I think the transition is not quite over; there is still #756422, which
blocks #755212. We need a sourceful upload of collectd in order to
rebuild (or possibly remove) the .pb-c.[ch] files in the collectd-dev
(X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
Icedove/31.0
On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I am requesting an upload slot to upload protobuf-c 1.0.0-1
it with
the upload of the new upstream release when it's out?
Yes, please.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
by Robert Edmonds. This looks like the cause of the problem.
Hi,
I'd be happy to take a look and try to debug the issue to see if it's
caused by the protobuf-c changes.
However, I'm entirely unfamiliar with osm2pgsql. Is there any chance
you could walk me through setting up a test case, or provide
Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 08/04/2014 05:59 PM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I'd be happy to take a look and try to debug the issue to see if it's
caused by the protobuf-c changes.
Thanks, that's much appreciated.
However, I'm entirely unfamiliar with osm2pgsql. Is there any chance
the only thing left for this transition is
to get an updated collectd with re-generated .pb-c.h files into the
archive.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I have binNMUed collectd and criu. Let me know if there's anything else that
needs binNMUs.
Hi, Emilio:
I don't see binNMUs for collectd or criu. I see collectd at version
5.4.1-3. But a recent criu upload transitioned the package
.)
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
* The header file (protobuf-c.h) which compiled .pb-c.h files must
include. This is shipped in the libprotobuf-c0-dev package
(protobuf-c 1.0.0), or the libprotobuf-c-dev package (protobuf-c
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Fix uploaded to experimental. It's not clear whether it's OK to proceed
with upload to sid ASAP, or wait for some coordinated action?
Will upload protobuf-c 1.0.0 sometime today, then the fixed libgadu can
be uploaded to unstable.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo
used mismatched versions of the library and compiler.
I have a fix pending for protobuf-c 1.0.0-1 that should prevent
libprtoobuf-c-dev from being installed with an older
protobuf-c-compiler.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
structures get de-referenced. I am fairly sure that the layout of those
structures has not changed in protobuf-c 1.0.0, but I will verify with
abi-compliance-checker.
The ProtobufCMessageDescriptor structures *have* changed, but I don't
think you export those anywhere.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo
Hi, Emilio:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I am requesting an upload slot to upload protobuf-c 1.0.0-1 to unstable.
I am hoping to accomplish a transition to protobuf-c 1.0.0 in time for
the jessie release. (Disclaimer: I am also one
libgadu that we might want to rebase and
apply to upstream libprotobuf-c, but it doesn't look like anything will
break if libgadu is built against the system's protobuf-c.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi, Gergely:
Gergely Nagy wrote:
Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org writes:
riemann-c-client
Rebuilt by hand successfully against protobuf-c 1.0.0~rc2-1 from
experimental.
Has an unversioned build dependency on libprotobuf-c0-dev. This
needs
protobuf-c = 1.0.0 is
uploaded to unstable, you can drop the old 'c0' -dev package name:
Build-Depends: libprotobuf-c-dev
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
to this transition is here:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/issues/129
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -Npru osm2pgsql-0.84.0.orig/debian/control osm2pgsql-0.84.0/debian/control
--- osm2pgsql-0.84.0.orig/debian/control 2014-07-10 03:22:12.0 -0400
+++ osm2pgsql
utilize this file. I would recommend that the upstream developers
ship a .proto file instead.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -Npru libgadu-1.12.0.orig/debian/control libgadu-1.12.0/debian/control
--- libgadu-1.12.0.orig/debian/control 2014-06-15 11:39:00.0 +
Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014, at 00:32, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Ondřej Surý wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org
* Package name: dnssec-root-key
Hm, I would maybe call this dnssec-root-anchors. Technically
!
Just keep me as an Uploader.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
don't need the Red Hat spec files or init
scripts or that kind of stuff.)
Patches welcome :-)
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
semantics?
Anyway, consider this email an offer to co-maintain :-)
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
need to figure out
how to get the key material into the format that the various programs
expect. (I haven't looked to see what format getdns and hash-slinger
expect.)
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:21:03PM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I've built test binaries from tag debian/1.4.17-3+deb7u1 and they are
available here:
http://people.debian.org/~edmonds/build/unbound/1.4.17-3+deb7u1/
If this looks good to the release team, I
!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Robert Edmonds:
[0] https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01167
Do you have more details, perhaps actual code excerpts which trigger
this? I want to make sure it's not a compiler bug.
I don't have any further details, sorry.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
and they are
available here:
http://people.debian.org/~edmonds/build/unbound/1.4.17-3+deb7u1/
If this looks good to the release team, I will be happy to upload to
-pu, no NMU required.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
command name like ping, so it would be nice if these packages could be
co-installable somehow, even if kdig implemented exactly the same
command-line interface as src:bind9's dig.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Chris Knadle wrote:
On Monday, February 03, 2014 22:25:23 Robert Edmonds wrote:
I've uploaded protobuf 2.5.0-8 to experimental, which has the exact same
ABI/API as protobuf 2.5.0-5. Can you tell me if the current version of
mumble in the archive works with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-8, once it's
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I don't have any current need for python-pefile myself and I don't have
time to maintain it, so I'm requesting that someone adopt it. Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Chris Knadle wrote:
On Friday, January 31, 2014 15:18:18 Robert Edmonds wrote:
[...]
Chris Knadle's input in #737246 makes me believe that the changes in
2.5.0-6 / -7 just aren't correct. I'm thinking we should probably go
back to the approach in 2.5.0-5 (though with a fallback atomic
/clone.S:131
(gdb)
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:00:35 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:00:35 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I
.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable shortly. Is there anything I
need to do to schedule binNMUs of the reverse deps
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable shortly. Is there anything I
need to do to schedule binNMUs of the reverse deps
/protobuf/issues/detail?id=488
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I now have protobuf 2.5.0 building on all architectures in experimental.
(Upstream did some... interesting... things to cause FTBFSes on all but
a few supported architectures.)
Please let me know when I may begin this transition by uploading to
unstable.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo
Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 15:02:53 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Please let me know when I may begin this transition by uploading to
unstable.
If you're confident binNMUs of the reverse deps will be enough (ie there
were no API changes
}}
CmdL = {ArgList = 0x7fffe020, Conf = 0x659010, FileList = 0x65e780}
Errors = false
(gdb)
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
uninitialised values come from
==4547== ERROR SUMMARY: 9 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 4 from 4)
Segmentation fault
root@bst:~#
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
Thank you,
tony
hello, tony:
can you please send a pointer to your updated source package?
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
returning a slightly different
errno value than bup was expecting). i believe this original issue was
fixed in upstream commit a373ac2333c6d0f4253136598ac0b3aeb5adac4e. i
will tentatively re-enable the python-pylibacl build-dependency on
kfreebsd in the next bup upload.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo
|libprotobuf-lite8|libprotoc8/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libprotobuf7|libprotobuf-lite7|libprotoc7/;
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
daemons.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/duplicate-ipv6-address-detection-in.html
[4] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2113822
[5] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4429
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it in debian, so i'd be
happy to co-maintain it with you in collab-maint. btw, if your alioth
account is not on the collab-maint team i can advocate for you. but,
yes, in my opinion the initial packaging work is done now and the
package is ready for inclusion in the debian archive.
--
Robert
nicely with
gitolite.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this package is ready for the debian archive now, so i've just uploaded
it to DELAYED/7.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
) by providing alternatives for
/usr/bin/dig? and are you really aiming to make kdig an exact, 1:1,
bug-for-bug clone of dig? e.g., #712747 is quite annoying. i'm still
not quite convinced that an alternative is the right thing to do here.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
}:~$ khost -t txt debian.org
Host debian.org. has no TXT record
edmonds@chase{0}:~$
btw, there's also dnsget (in the udns-utils package) which does both
'dig' and 'host' style output :)
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
machine
that has bind9 installed. Or are you saying that is not the case?
how is this any different from forcing kerberos to be installed on every
machine that has bind9 installed?
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/unbound.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
From 0416ce7d49513dbe6492cc0669a89ad61106b0b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert S. Edmonds edmo...@debian.org
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 15:03:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] debian/unbound.init: automatically set up the chroot
directory if enabled (#579622
-backports to wheezy is release critical, so this bug will
probably have to wait for a stable [wheezy] update, if it gets fixed at
all. maybe a release note is in order, though?
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, and fails. it should also try an -record DNS lookup and
connecting over IPv6 before failing.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
= http://vault.centos.org/centos/4.9/os/x86_64/CentOS/RPMS/
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
whoops, apparently those URLs shouldn't have a leading centos
component.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
will need to go via tpu.
debdiff is attached.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -Nru unbound-1.4.17/debian/changelog unbound-1.4.17/debian/changelog
--- unbound-1.4.17/debian/changelog 2012-05-28 14:36:18.0 -0400
+++ unbound-1.4.17/debian/changelog 2013-02-17 12:35
retitle 699163 ITA: bup -- highly efficient file backup system based on git
thanks
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
believe there is precedent for
an updated package in stable to update DNS root server hints in [0].)
the debdiff is attached.
[0]
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/b/bind9/current/changelog#version1:9.3.4-2etch2
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -u unbound-1.4.6/debian/changelog
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Roger Lynn wrote:
Every query returns SERVFAIL even after internet access appears and even for
queries which are forwarded to a local server. Unbound has to be restarted
after internet access appears before it will work.
This is a significant problem
and see if it behaves any better?
i believe the dependencies are all the same, so you ought to be able to
just pin the unbound packages from unstable.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: libldns-dev
Version: 1.6.13-4
Severity: wishlist
hi,
it looks like ldns builds a pkgconfig file (packaging/libldns.pc) but
doesn't actually install it. it would be nice if the debian packaging
could install this file to $(libdir)/pkgconfig and ship it in the -dev
package.
--
Robert
debian version (squeeze, squeeze-backports, testing, unstable), and
what version of the package are you running?
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 82.8 kB of archives.
After this operation, 557 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? ^C
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Philipp Kern wrote:
Did you preseed the nameservers value?
no, i typed it in when doing manual network configuration in d-i.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Robert Edmonds wrote:
(when i did the install i put in 8.8.8.8 for the DNS server and that
setting was written correctly to /etc/resolv.conf.)
i guess i should also mention that i did static IPv4 network
configuration (no DHCP), and that there was an IPv6 router on the
network interface sending
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:34:06AM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
(when i did the install i put in 8.8.8.8 for the DNS server and that
setting was written correctly to /etc/resolv.conf.)
i guess i should also mention that i did static IPv4 network
manager screen where you can toggle sources.list entries for the
security and volatile repositories. i've attached a screen shot
of my terminal to show what this looks like.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
attachment: configure_the_package_manager.png
signature.asc
Description
Robert Edmonds wrote:
* normally on a long menu screen you can scroll down by pressing the
down arrow key. this doesn't seem to work, and i couldn't manage
to reach the (hidden) options on the configure the package
manager screen where you can toggle sources.list entries
[ sorry, this should have gone to the BTS. ]
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Robert Edmonds, le Wed 03 Oct 2012 18:04:50 -0400, a écrit :
virt-install \
Do you know what kind of terminal virt-install emulates? (if it emulates
anything, instead of just passing chars
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Robert Edmonds, le Wed 03 Oct 2012 18:04:50 -0400, a écrit :
virt-install \
Do you know what kind of terminal virt-install emulates? (if it emulates
anything, instead of just passing chars by).
virt-install actually just invokes virsh console. looking at virsh's
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Robert Edmonds, le Wed 03 Oct 2012 18:33:13 -0400, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Robert Edmonds, le Wed 03 Oct 2012 18:04:50 -0400, a écrit :
virt-install \
Do you know what kind of terminal virt-install emulates? (if it emulates
anything, instead
|. S|
0037
root@pao1ks1:~#
(when i did the install i put in 8.8.8.8 for the DNS server and that
setting was written correctly to /etc/resolv.conf.)
i'd guess there's a buffer somewhere in netcfg that's not getting
properly filled.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
of ldns. Package libldns or download
source http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/ldns
i assume we can wait for ondrej to upload the new ldns rather than build
unbound without ECDSA support...
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: ldns
Severity: wishlist
hi, ondrej:
can you upload the new ldns released today so that i can upload the new
unbound with ECDSA support enabled?
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in individual distributions.
http://groups.crossroads.io/groups/crossroads-dev/messages/topic/2PAVRyQVwFozRDYmypdpUN
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Package: ldns
Version: 1.6.12-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
hi,
please provide a debugging symbols package for ldns. (patch attached.)
TIA.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
From 0d06b91739690a115787f3b08ecc90f5e87da9b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert S. Edmonds edmo
, and more.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(~800K vs ~70K on amd64).
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
From 1fbe5e2b18284ae1157a344e11e1cf18008feba6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert S. Edmonds edmo...@debian.org
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:56:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Create debug symbols package
---
debian/control | 10
to 8 or explicitly passing
--libexecdir=/usr/lib/rssh to configure should fix this. (or,
alternately, installing the chroot helper into the multi-arch library
directory, i guess.)
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
databases which use
the SSTable data structure internally as part of their data store,
management of SSTable files -- creation, merging, deletion, combining
of search results from multiple SSTables -- is left to the discretion
of the mtbl library user.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
Description : immutable sorted string table library (Python bindings)
mtbl is a C library implementation of the Sorted String Table (SSTable)
data structure.
.
This package contains a Python extension module for libmtbl.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital
the case, you might consider lowering the infra-host-ttl
setting in unbound.conf or using the unbound-control dump_infra
command.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Toni Müller wrote:
On 01/27/2012 04:40 PM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
is it possible you temporarily lost internet connectivity immediately
before resolving stopped?
thanks for the pointer idea, but I'm unconvinced. That would mean that
losing Internet connectivity on the order of seconds
#457875 from 2002:
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-depend on libsnappy-dev, or the reference to snappy compression
in the package description should be amended to note that the debian
package has been compiled without compression support.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: ipset
Version: 2.5.0-1
i haven't used or maintained this package in several years, could
someone please adopt it? i suspect that it can be simplified
considerably now that the kernel component has been merged to the
mainline kernel.
thanks.
[resend with pseudoheader.]
--
Robert
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert S. Edmonds edmo...@debian.org
* Package name: nss-ubdns
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Robert Edmonds
* URL : https://github.com/edmonds/nss-ubdns
* License : ISC, BSD, LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: C
Description
behaviour in 1.4.10-1~bpo60+1. Any chance of
having this fixed?
this patch should fix it.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
From 3ad03eba5eb6c1346fb6301e09a1d7811a331f45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert S. Edmonds edmo...@debian.org
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 15:28:36 -0400
Subject: [PATCH
Simon Kelley wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
i disagree. the existence of an option that pre-empts queries for
one-label qnames (and the comment at the top of the example config file
encouraging one to turn it on) harms interoperability.
There should be a warning, certainly. What do you
-edns utility in the ldnsutils
package which checks if a recursive server is EDNS/DNSSEC transparent.
but a more comprehensive, stand-alone test utility/library would be a
useful thing to have, and it could hopefully be integrated into
resolvconf or the system's network interface manager.
--
Robert
Maik Zumstrull wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 20:05, Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org wrote:
it would be useful if you could get a packet trace of the failure.
run something like:
# tcpdump -s1518 -pni any -w dnsmasq-failure.pcap 'tcp port 53 or udp port
53'
Sure, no problem
clone 629290 -1
reassign -1 dnsmasq
retitle -1 dnsmasq: not DNSSEC transparent
severity -1 important
thanks
Maik Zumstrull wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 21:16, Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org wrote:
you're most likely running unbound in the default debian config which
enables DNSSEC
Robert Edmonds wrote:
so unbound forwarding to 4.2.2.1 works, but unbound forwarding to
dnsmasq which forwards to 4.2.2.1 does not work. so dnsmasq is not
fully transparent when forwarding between a validating forwarder and a
validating recursive nameserver.
ugh, i meant DNSSEC-conformant
201 - 300 of 570 matches
Mail list logo
